Acupuncture Versus Biofeedback for Treatment of Functional Anorectal Pain.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Functional anorectal pain is one of several types of functional anorectal disorders. In this study, we compared the effectiveness of acupuncture (intervention) and biofeedback (control) as treatment for patients with functional anorectal pain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective, single-center, randomized, and comparative study examined 68 patients with functional anorectal pain who were recruited from June 2017 to January 2019 at the Nanjing Hospital of Chinese Medicine Affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine. Patients were randomly assigned to receive acupuncture or biofeedback. Patients in the acupuncture group received acupuncture at Zhongliao (BL33), Xialiao (BL34), Ganshu (BL18), Shenshu (BL23), and Dachangshu (BL25). Patients in the biofeedback group received pelvic floor biofeedback therapy, consisting of Kegel pelvic floor muscle training and electrical stimulation. Patients in both groups received 20 treatments over 4 weeks. The primary outcome was pain score on a visual analog scale, and the secondary outcomes were results from the MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36) quality of life questionnaire, the self-rating depression scale, and the self-rating anxiety scale. RESULTS: Visual analog scale pain scores significantly decreased in both of the groups with treatment (both P < .01). The final visual analog scale score was significantly lower in patients with pelvic floor dyssynergia who were treated with biofeedback (1.40 ± 0.97 vs. 5.30 ± 1.70) (P < .05). The 2 groups had similar decreases in self-rating depression scale and self-rating anxiety scale scores. Intriguingly, the acupuncture group had better mental health outcomes (P <.05). CONCLUSION: Both acupuncture and biofeedback therapy reduced the pain of patients with functional anorectal pain. Biofeedback provided more relief in patients with pelvic floor dyssynergia, and acupuncture provided greater improvements in mental health status.

[Symptom distribution of female pelvic floor dysfunction patients with constipation as chief complaint].

OBJECTIVE: To observe the multiple symptom distribution, severity and quality of life of female pelvic floor dysfunction(FPFD) patients with constipation as chief complaint. METHODS: One hundred FPFD patients with constipation as chief complaint from Speciaty Outpatient Clinic, Pelvic Floor Center of Nanjing Municipal Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine between September 2015 and February 2017 were retrospectively enrolled in this study. A comprehensive medical history questionnaire survey and systematical evaluation of severity and quality of life of these patients with constipation was conducted. Constipation scoring system scale (CSS) and patient-assessment of constipation quality of life questionnaire (PAC-QOL) were applied to evaluate the constipation. Other scales included: (1)pain visual analogue scale (VAS) and short form-36 questionnaire (SF-36): if combined with chronic functional anal rectal pain; (2) international consultation on incontinence questionnaire-short form (ICIQ-SF) and urinary incontinence quality of life questionnaires (I-QOL):if combined with urinary incontinence; (3) fecal incontinence severity score scale (Wexner-FIS) and fecal incontinence quality of life questionnaire (FI-QOL):if combined with fecal incontinence. RESULTS: The mean age of 100 FPFD patients was (57.9±13.9) (24-89) years and the mean disease course was (7.0±8.2)(0.5-40.0) years. Seventy-five cases (75%) were complicated with anal pain, 70 with urinary incontinence, 37 with rectocele, 19 with nocturia, 11 with urinary frequency, 10 with defecation incontinence. Complication with only one symptom was observed in 20 cases (20%), and with two or more symptoms was observed in 80 cases (80%). Pelvic floor relaxation syndrome patients were dominant (58 cases, 58%). The severity of constipation (CSS) was 6-22 (13.89±3.79) points and the quality of life (PAC-QOL) was 45-133 (87.13±18.57) points in FPFD patients. VAS and SF-36 of patients combined with chronic functional anal rectal pain were 1-8 (3.0±1.9) points and 14.4-137.0(71.5±31.4) points respectively. ICIQ-SF and I-QOL of patients combined with urinary incontinence were 1-17 (6.1±3.6) points and 52-110 (90.0±15.8) points respectively. Wexner-FIS and FI-QOL of patients combined with fecal incontinence were 1-11 (4.4±3.0) points and 52-116 (83.4±23.3) points respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The symptoms of FPFD patients with constipation as chief complaint are complex. They are mainly complicated with anal diseases, then urinary incontinence, and mostly with more than 2 symptoms. Their quality of life is poor.

[Efficacy analysis of acupuncture with biofeedback in the treatment of patients with functional anorectal pain].

OBJECTIVE: To observe the short- and long-term efficacy of acupuncture combined with biofeedback in the treatment of functional anorectal pain (FARP). METHODS: Clinical data of 142 patients who met the functional gastrointestinal disorders and functional anorectal pain based on criteria of Rome III( undergoing acupuncture with biofeedback therapy from August 2010 to November 2015 in Pelvic Floor Center of The Third Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine were retrospectively analyzed. Telephone and outpatient clinic recheck were used as standard follow-up. The clinical effect of short-term and long-term data collected from the disease-based database was evaluated with visual analogue pain scale (VAS) (0-10 points), short form health survey questionnaire (SF-36) (0-148 points). The overall satisfaction and effectiveness (VAS was >30%) were evaluated at the end of treatment (short-term) and during follow-up (long-term). RESULTS: The effective follow-up data were obtained from 71.1%(101/142) of patients and the median follow-up time was 28(3-67) months. The VAS of 101 cases was 6.09±1.78, 1.99±1.89 and 3.55±2.60 before treatment, at the end of treatment and during follow-up respectively. Though the VAS during follow-up was higher than that at the end of treatment, but still significantly lower than that before treatment(P<0.05). The SF-36 score of 31 patients was 82.0±16.9, 94.0±15.1 and 88.1±15.3 before treatment, at the end of treatment and during follow-up respectively. Though the SF-36 score during follow-up was lower compared to at the end of treatment, but still significantly higher compared to before treatment (P<0.05). The effective rates were 85.9%(122/142) at the end of treatment and 75.2%(76/101) during follow-up, and the satisfactory rates were 92.3%(131/142) and 84.2%(85/101), respectively. CONCLUSION: Acupuncture with biofeedback has significant short-term and long-term efficacy in treating functional anorectal pain, and its degree of satisfaction is high.

[Study on the measurement and locating of Baliao points (eight sacral foramina)].

OBJECTIVE: To seek the problems of position, measuring and locating methods of Baliao points (posterior sacral foramina) in modern researches. METHODS: Using Baliao (eight sacral foramina), Shangliao(BL 31), Ciliao(BL 32), Zhongliao(BL 33), Xialiao(BL 34), Dihoukong (posterior sacral foramina), Dikong (sacral foramina) and Digu(sacrum) as the key words, literature in the database of the CNKI from 1957 to 2012 were re trieved and analyzed. RESULTS: Problems were found in the past researches including limited numbers of relative literature, disunity of the measurement targets, complicated terms of indices, disunity of the starting and ending point of measurement, unclear weight of indices, deviation of results, lacking of combination with clinical practice and variety of locating methods. CONCLUSION: Position of Baliao points (eight sacral foramina) are clear. However, the locating methods are blurred and vary a lot. Study on living body has more significance for measurement and researches. Factors of gender, body weight, height and childbearing should also be taken into consideration. Therefore, it is necessary to find a more accurate and easier way of locating.