Structural and functional analyses of biosimilar enoxaparins available in Brazil.

Biosimilar enoxaparins have been available for clinical use in Brazil since 2009. Although their use has reduced costs of treatment expenses, their implementation still raises some concerns about efficiency, safety, regularity and reproducibility of batches. We undertook structural and functional analyses on over 90 batches of pharmaceutical-active ingredient, and 330 ones of the final products of biosimilar enoxaparins available in the Brazilian market between 2009 and 2014. Besides a nationwide-scale analysis, we have also employed methods that go beyond those recommended by the standard pharmacopeias. We have used high-resolution 2D NMR, detailed assessment of the anticoagulant and antithrombotic properties, check of side effects in experimental animals after continuous administration, and analyses of individual composing oligosaccharides. The 1D 1H NMR spectra of all batches of biosimilar enoxaparins are fairly coincident, and the resultant average spectrum is quite identical to that from the original drug. This structural equality was also assured by highly resolved 2D NMR spectra. The anticoagulant activity, determined by diverse assays and the in vivo antithrombotic and bleeding effects of the biosimilar version were confirmed as equal as of the parental enoxaparins. Structure and function of the composing oligosaccharides were identical in both enoxaparin types. No side effect was observed after continuous subcutaneous administration to rats for 30 days at the dose of 2 mg kg⁻¹ body weight. Biosimilar enoxaparins available in Brazil fulfilled the requirement of the five items defined by FDA-USA for approval of this type of drug.

Structural and functional analyses of bovine and porcine intestinal heparins confirm they are different drugs.

Anticoagulant heparins are mostly obtained from porcine intestine. Occasionally they are also obtained from bovine intestine. Structural and functional analyses of pharmaceutical-grade heparins from these two sources using multiple methods such as NMR spectroscopy, in vitro and in vivo assays of the anticoagulant, antithrombotic and bleeding effects, complemented by fractionation on anion exchange chromatography, confirm they are different drugs. Although bovine heparin is more heterogeneous and less sulfated, heparins from both sources are overall made of a similar mixture of fractions, however with different proportions. Therefore, high-anticoagulant composites from bovine origin, similar to porcine counterparts, can be properly obtained.

Heparin from bovine intestinal mucosa: glycans with multiple sulfation patterns and anticoagulant effects.

Pharmaceutical grade heparins from porcine intestine and bovine lung consist mainly of repeating tri-sulfated units, of the disaccharide →4-α-IdoA2S-1→4-α-GlcNS6S-1→. Heparin preparations from bovine intestine, in contrast, are more heterogeneous. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and disaccharide analysis after heparinase digestions show that heparin from bovine intestine contains α-glucosamine with significant substitutive variations: 64% are 6-O-sulfated and N -sulfated, as in porcine intestinal heparin while 36% are 6-desulfated. Desulfated α-iduronic acid units are contained in slightly lower proportions in bovine than in porcine heparin. NMR data also indicate N-, 3- and 6-trisulfated α-glucosamine (lower proportions) and α-GlcNS-1→4-α-GlcA and α-IdoA2S-1→4-α-GlcNAc (higher amounts) in bovine than in porcine heparin. Porcine and bovine heparins can be fractionated by anion exchange chromatography into three fractions containing different substitutions on the α-glucosamine units. Each individual fraction shows close disaccharide composition and anticoagulant activity, regardless of their origin (bovine or porcine intestine). However, these two heparins differ markedly in the proportions of the three fractions. Interestingly, fractions with the typical heparin disaccharides of porcine intestine are present in bovine intestinal heparin. These fractions contain high in vitro anticoagulant activity, reduced antithrombotic effect and high bleeding tendency. These observations indicate that the prediction of haemostatic effects of heparin preparations cannot rely exclusively on structural analysis and anticoagulant assays in vitro . Minor structural components may account for variations on in vivo effects. In conclusion, we suggest that pharmaceutical grade bovine intestinal heparin, even after purification procedures, is not an equivalent drug to porcine intestinal heparin.