Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Clin Med ; 12(14)2023 Jul 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37510890

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Adequate pain management for abdominal hysterectomy is a key factor to decrease postoperative morbidity, hospital length of stay and chronic pain. General anesthesia is still the most widely used technique for abdominal hysterectomy. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of blended anesthesia (spinal and general anesthesia) compared to balanced general anesthesia in patients undergoing hysterectomy with or without lymphadenectomy for ovarian, endometrial or cervical cancer or for fibromatosis. METHODS: We retrospectively collected data from adult ASA 1 to 3 patients scheduled for laparoscopic or mini-laparotomic hysterectomy with or without lymphadenectomy for ovarian, endometrial or cervical cancer or for fibromatosis. Exclusion criteria were age below 18 years, ASA > 3, previous chronic use of analgesics, psychiatric disorders, laparotomic surgery with an incision above the belly button and surgery extended to the upper abdomen for the presence of cancer localizations (e.g., liver, spleen or diaphragm surgery). The cohort of patients was retrospectively divided into three groups according to the anesthetic management: general anesthesia and spinal with morphine and local anesthetic (Group 1), general anesthesia and spinal with morphine (Group 2) and general anesthesia without spinal (Group 3). RESULTS: NRS was lower in the spinal anesthesia groups (Groups 1 and 2) than in the general anesthesia group (Group 3) for every time point but at 48 h. The addition of local anesthetics conferred a small but significant NRS decrease (p = 0.009). A higher percentage of patients in Group 3 received intraoperative sufentanil (52.2 ± 18 mcg in Group 3 vs. Group 1 31.8 ± 16.2 mcg, Group 2 44.1 ± 15.6, p < 0.001) and additional techniques for postoperative pain control (11.4% in Group 3 vs. 2.1% in Group 1 and 0.8% in Group 2, p < 0.001). Intraoperative hypotension (MAP < 65 mmHg) lasting more than 5 min was more frequent in patients receiving spinal anesthesia, especially with local anesthetics (Group 1 25.8%, Group 2 14.6%, Group 3 11.6%, p < 0.001), with the resulting increased need for vasopressors. Recovery-room discharge criteria were met earlier in the spinal anesthesia groups than in the general anesthesia group (Group 1 102 ± 44 min, Group 2 91.9 ± 46.5 min, Group 3 126 ± 90.7 min, p < 0.05). No differences were noted in postoperative mobilization or duration of ileus. CONCLUSIONS: Intrathecal administration of morphine with or without local anesthetic as a component of blended anesthesia is effective in improving postoperative pain control following laparoscopic or mini-laparotomic hysterectomy, in reducing intraoperative opioid consumption, in decreasing postoperative rescue analgesics consumption and the need for any additional analgesic technique. We recommend managing postoperative pain with a strategy tailored to the patient's physical status and the type of surgery, preventing and treating side effects of pain treatments.

2.
BMC Anesthesiol ; 23(1): 94, 2023 03 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36977996

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Atypical Haemolytic Uremic Syndrome is an acute life-threatening condition, characterized by the clinical triad of microangiopathic hemolytic anaemia, thrombocytopenia, kidney injury. Management of pregnants affected by Atypical Haemolytic Uremic Syndrome can be a serious concern for obstetric anesthesiologist in the delivery room and in the intensive care unit. CASE PRESENTATION: A 35-year-old primigravida with a monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancy, presented with an acute haemorrhage due to retained placenta after elective caesarean section and underwent surgical exploration. In the postoperative period, the patient progressively developed hypoxemic respiratory failure and, later on, anaemia, severe thrombocytopenia, and acute kidney injury. A timely diagnosis of Atypical Haemolytic Uremic Syndrome was made. Non-invasive ventilation and high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy sessions were initially required. Hypertensive crisis and fluid overload were aggressively treated with a combination of beta and alpha adrenergic blockers (labetalol 0,3 mg/kg/h by continuous intravenous infusion for the first 24 hours, bisoprolol 2,5 mg twice daily for the first 48 hours, doxazosin 2 mg twice daily), central sympatholytics (methyldopa 250 mg twice daily for the first 72 hours, transdermal clonidine 5 mg by the third day), diuretics (furosemide 20 mg three times daily), calcium antagonists (amlodipine 5 mg twice daily). Eculizumab 900 mg was administered via intravenous infusion once per week, attaining hematological and renal remissions. The patient also received several blood transfusion units and anti- meningococcal B, anti-pneumococcal, anti-haemophilus influenzae type B vaccination. Her clinical condition progressively improved, and she was finally discharged from intensive care unit 5 days after admission. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical course of this report underlines how crucial it is for the obstetric anaesthesiologist to promptly identify Atypical Haemolytic Uremic Syndrome, since early initiation of eculizumab, together with supportive therapy, has a direct effect on patient outcome.


Subject(s)
Acute Kidney Injury , Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome , Complement Inactivating Agents , Pregnancy Complications , Adult , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Acute Kidney Injury/etiology , Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome/therapy , Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome/drug therapy , Cesarean Section/adverse effects , Hemorrhage , Kidney , Complement Inactivating Agents/therapeutic use
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...