ABSTRACT
Communimetric screening tools help clinicians identify and communicate their patient's areas of need and the corresponding level of action. However, few tools exist to identify mental health (MH) and developmental needs in young children. We aimed to implement and evaluate a new communimetric MH and developmental screening tool for children under 6 (HEADS-ED Under 6) in a community MH agency in Ontario, Canada. Using a prospective cohort design, we explored how intake workers used the HEADS-ED Under 6 screening tool from November 2019 to March 2021. 94.5% of children (n = 535/566) were screened with the HEADS-ED at intake. Total HEADS-ED scores and domains were used to inform the intensity of recommended services. Three clinical domains (Eating & sleeping, Development, speech/language/motor, and Emotions & behaviors) also independently predicted a priority recommendation. The tool showed good concordance with the InterRAI Early Years for children under 4 years old. The HEADS-ED Under 6 was a brief, easy, and valid screening tool, and can be used to identify important MH and developmental domains early, rate level of action/impairment, communicate severity of needs, and help determine intensity of service required.
Les outils de dépistage communimétrique aident les cliniciens à identifier et à communicer les besoins et le niveau d'action correspondant de leur patient. Cependant il existe peu d'outil pour identifier les besoins en Santé Mentale (SM en français) et les besoins développentaux chez les jeunes enfants. Nous nous sommes donné pour but d'appliquer et d'évaluer un nouveal outil communimétrique de SM et développemental pour les enfants de moins de 6 ans (HEADSED de moins de 6 ans) dans une agence communautaire de SM dans l'Ontario au Canada. En utilisant une conception de cohorte prospective nous avons exploré la manière dont les préposés à l'accueil ont utilisé le HEADSED de moins de six ans de novembre 219 à mars 2021. 94,5% des enfants (n = 535566) ont été dépister avec le HEADSED à l'accueil. Tous les scores et domaines HEADSED ont été utilisé pour éclairer l'intensité des services recommandés. Trois domaines cliniques (Manger et dormir, Développement/parole/langage/moteur, et les Emotions, comportements ont aussi prédit une recommandation de priorité indépendamment. L'outil a fait preuve d'une bonne concordance avec le InterRAI Early Years pour les enfants de moins de 4 ans. Le HEADSED de moins de 6 ans s'est avéré être un outil de dépistage valide, bref et facile, et peut être utiliser pour identifier des domaines de SM et des domaines du développement importants tôt, d'évaluer un niveau d'action/de dépréciation, de communiquer la sévérité de besoins, et aider à déterminer l'intensité des services requis. Kommunimetrische ScreeningInstrumente helfen klinisch Tätigen dabei, die Bedürfnisse ihrer Patienten zu erkennen, zu kommunizieren und die entsprechenden Maßnahmen zu ergreifen. Es gibt jedoch nur wenige Instrumente welche die Bedürfnisse von Kleinkindern hinsichtlich ihrer psychischen Gesundheit und Entwicklung ermitteln. Unser Ziel war es, ein neues kommunimetrisches ScreeningInstrument für die psychische Gesundheit und Entwicklung von Kindern unter 6 Jahren (HEADSED unter 6 Jahren) in einer kommunalen Einrichtung der psychischen Gesundheitsversorgung in Ontario, Kanada, einzuführen und zu evaluieren. In einer prospektiven Kohortenstudie untersuchten wir von November 2019 bis März 2021 wie die Mitarbeitenden der Einrichtung bei Aufnahmen das HEADSEDScreeningTool für Kinder unter 6 Jahren einsetzten. 94,5 % der Kinder (n = 535/566) wurden bei Aufnahme mit dem HEADSED gescreent. Die HEADSEDGesamtergebnisse und Domänen wurden verwendet, um die Intensität der empfohlenen Gesundheitsleistungen zu bestimmen. Ebenfalls sagten drei klinische Domänen (Essen und Schlafen, Entwicklung/Sprechen/Sprache/Motorik und Emotionen/Verhaltensweisen) unabhängig voneinander eine prioritäre Empfehlung voraus. Das Instrument zeigte eine gute Übereinstimmung mit dem InterRAI Early Years für Kinder unter 4 Jahren. Das HEADSED für Kinder unter 6 Jahren erwies sich als ein kurzes, einfaches und valides ScreeningInstrument, das eingesetzt werden kann, um frühzeitig wichtige Bereiche psychischer Gesundheit und Entwicklung zu identifizieren, das Ausmaß von Interventionen/Beeinträchtigungen einzuschätzen, die Stärke dahingehender Bedürfnisse mitzuteilen und die notwendige Intensität von Gesundheitsleistungen zu bestimmen. ã³ãã¥ãã¡ããªãã¯ã¹ã¯ãªã¼ãã³ã°ãã¼ã«ã¯ãè¨åºå»ãæ£è ã®å¿ è¦ãªé åã¨ããã«å¯¾å¿ããè¡åã¬ãã«ãç¹å®ããä¼ããã®ã«å½¹ç«ã¤ãããããå¹¼å ã®ã¡ã³ã¿ã«ãã«ã¹(MH)ã¨çºéã®ãã¼ãºãç¹å®ãããã¼ã«ã¯ã»ã¨ãã©åå¨ããªããæ¬ç 究ã¯ãã«ããã»ãªã³ã¿ãªãªå·ã®å°åMHæ©é¢ã«ããã¦ã6æ³æªæºå ã対象ã¨ããæ°ããã³ãã¥ãã¡ããªãã¯MHããã³çºéã¹ã¯ãªã¼ãã³ã°ãã¼ã«(HEADSED under 6)ã®å°å ¥ããã³è©ä¾¡ãç®çã¨ãããååãã³ãã¼ããã¶ã¤ã³ãç¨ãã¦ã2019å¹´11æãã2021å¹´3æã«ãã¤ã³ãã¤ã¯æ å½è ã6æ³æªæºå ã¹ã¯ãªã¼ãã³ã°ãã¼ã«HEADSEDãã©ã®ããã«ä½¿ç¨ãããã調æ»ããã94.5ï¼ ã®åã©ã(n = 535/566)ãã¤ã³ãã¼ã¯æã«HEADSEDã§ã¹ã¯ãªã¼ãã³ã°ãåãããHEADSEDã®ç·ã¹ã³ã¢ã¨é åã¯ãæ¨å¥¨ããããµã¼ãã¹ã®ç¨åº¦ãç¥ãããã«ä½¿ç¨ããããã¾ãã3ã¤ã®è¨åºé å(é£æ¬²ã¨ç¡ç ãçºéã»çºèªã»è¨èªã»éåãææ /è¡å)ããåå¥ã®åªå é ä½ãäºæ¸¬ããããã®ãã¼ã«ã¯ã4æ³æªæºå ã対象ã¨ããInterRAI Early Yearsã¨è¯å¥½ãªä¸è´ã示ãããHEADSED Under 6ã¯ãç°¡æ½ã§ãç°¡åã§ãæå¹ãªã¹ã¯ãªã¼ãã³ã°ãã¼ã«ã§ãããæ©æã«éè¦ãªç²¾ç¥ä¿å¥ããã³çºéé åãç¹å®ããæ´»å/é害ã®ã¬ãã«ãè©ä¾¡ãããã¼ãºã®éç度ãä¼ããå¿ è¦ãªãµã¼ãã¹ã®å¼·åº¦ã決å®ããããã«ä½¿ç¨ãããã¨ãã§ããã.
ABSTRACT
Objective: To assess physician-based mental health care utilization during the COVID-19 pandemic among children and adolescents new to care and those already engaged with mental health services, and to evaluate differences by sociodemographic factors. Study design: We performed a population-based repeated cross-sectional study using linked health and administrative databases in Ontario, Canada among all children and adolescents 3-17 years. We examined outpatient visit rates per 1,000 population for mental health concerns for those new to care (no physician-based mental healthcare for ≥1 year) and those with continuing care needs (any physician-based mental healthcare <1 year) following onset of the pandemic. Results: Among ~2.5 million children and adolescents (48.7% female, mean age 10.1 ± 4.3 years), expected monthly mental health outpatient visits were 1.5/1,000 for those new to mental health care and 5.4/1,000 for those already engaged in care. Following onset of the pandemic, visit rates for both groups were above expected [adjusted rate ratio (aRR) 1.22, 95% CI 1.17, 1.27; aRR 1.10, 95% CI 1.07, 1.12] for new and continuing care, respectively. The greatest increase above expected was among females (new: aRR 1.33, 95% CI 1.25, 1.42; continuing: aRR 1.22 95% CI 1.17, 1.26) and adolescents ages 13-17 years (new: aRR 1.31, 95% CI 1.27, 1.34; continuing: aRR 1.15 95% CI 1.13, 1.17). Mood and anxiety concerns were prominent among those new to care. Conclusion: In the 18 months following onset of the pandemic, outpatient mental health care utilization increased for those with new and continuing care needs, especially among females and adolescents.
ABSTRACT
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic catalyzed major changes in how youth mental health (MH) services are delivered. Understanding youth's MH, awareness and use of services since the pandemic, and differences between youth with and without a MH diagnosis, can help us optimize MH services during the pandemic and beyond. Objectives: We investigated youth's MH and service use one year into the pandemic and explored differences between those with and without a self-reported MH diagnosis. Methods: In February 2021, we administered a web-based survey to youth, 12-25 years, in Ontario. Data from 1373 out of 1497 (91.72%) participants were analyzed. We assessed differences in MH and service use between those with (N=623, 45.38%) and without (N=750, 54.62%) a self-reported MH diagnosis. Logistic regressions were used to explore MH diagnosis as a predictor of service use while controlling for confounders. Results: 86.73% of participants reported worse MH since COVID-19, with no between-group differences. Participants with a MH diagnosis had higher rates of MH problems, service awareness and use, compared to those without a diagnosis. MH diagnosis was the strongest predictor of service use. Gender and affordability of basic needs also independently predicted use of distinct services. Conclusion: Various services are required to mitigate the negative effects of the pandemic on youth MH and meet their service needs. Whether youth have a MH diagnosis may be important to understanding what services they are aware of and use. Sustaining pandemic-related service changes require increasing youth's awareness of digital interventions and overcoming other barriers to care.
Contexte: La pandémie de la COVID-19 a catalysé des changements majeurs de la manière dont les services de santé mentale (SM) sont dispensés aux jeunes. Comprendre la SM des jeunes, la connaissance et l'utilisation des services depuis la pandémie, et les différences entre les jeunes avec et sans un diagnostic de SM peut nous aider à optimiser les services de SM durant la pandémie et au-delà. Objectifs: Nous avons investigué la SM et l'utilisation des services des jeunes un an après le début de la pandémie et exploré les différences entre ceux avec et sans un diagnostic de SM auto-rapporté. Méthodes: En février 2021, nous avons administré un sondage en ligne à des jeunes de 12 à 25 ans en Ontario. Les données de 1373 participants sur 1497 (91,72 %) participants ont été analysées. Nous avons évalué les différences de SM et d'utilisation des services entre ceux avec (N = 623, 45,38 %) et sans (N = 750, 54,62 %) un diagnostic de SM auto-rapporté. Les régressions logistiques ont servi à explorer le diagnostic de SM comme prédicteur de l'utilisation de services tout en contrôlant les confusions. Résultats: 86,73 % des participants ont rapporté une SM pire depuis la COVID-19, sans différences entre les groupes. Les participants ayant un diagnostic de SM avaient des taux plus élevés de problèmes de SM, de connaissance et d'utilisation des services comparé à ceux sans diagnostic. Le diagnostic de SM était le prédicteur le plus fort de l'utilisation de services. Le sexe et l'abordabilité des besoins de base prédisaient aussi indépendamment l'utilisation de services distincts. Conclusion: Divers services sont nécessaires pour atténuer les effets négatifs de la pandémie sur la SM des jeunes et répondre à leurs besoins de service. Savoir si les jeunes ont un diagnostic de SM peut être important pour comprendre quels services ils connaissent et utilisent. Soutenir les changements de services liés à la pandémie exige d'accroître la connaissance des jeunes des interventions numériques et de surmonter d'autres obstacles des soins.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the relationship between social determinants of health and physician-based mental healthcare utilization and virtual care use among children and adolescents in Ontario, Canada, during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: This population-based repeated cross-sectional study of children and adolescents (3-17 years; N = 2.5 million) used linked health and demographic administrative data in Ontario, Canada (2017-2021). Multivariable Poisson regressions with generalized estimating equations compared rates of outpatient physician-based mental healthcare use during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic with expected rates based on pre-COVID patterns. Analyses were conducted by socioeconomic status (material deprivation quintiles of the Ontario Marginalization index), urban/rural region of residence, and immigration status. RESULTS: Overall, pediatric physician-based mental healthcare visits were 5% lower than expected (rate ratio [RR] = 0.95, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.92 to 0.98) among those living in the most deprived areas in the first year of the pandemic, compared with the least deprived with 4% higher than expected rates (RR = 1.04, 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.06). There were no differences in overall observed and expected visit rates by region of residence. Immigrants had 14% to 26% higher visit rates compared with expected from July 2020 to February 2021, whereas refugees had similarly observed and expected rates. Virtual care use was approximately 65% among refugees, compared with 70% for all strata. CONCLUSION: During the first year of the pandemic, pediatric physician-based mental healthcare utilization was higher among immigrants and lower than expected among those with lower socioeconomic status. Refugees had the lowest use of virtual care. Further work is needed to understand whether these differences reflect issues in access to care or the need to help inform ongoing pandemic recovery planning.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Mental Health , Humans , Child , Adolescent , Ontario/epidemiology , Pandemics , Cross-Sectional StudiesABSTRACT
Over the past decade, visits to American and Canadian emergency departments (EDs) for child and youth mental health care have increased substantially.1,2 Acute mental health crises can occur as a result of a variety of concerns, including those that are life threatening (eg, suicide attempts), pose safety concerns (eg, suicidal intentions, aggressive behaviors, alcohol and other drug use), and are physically distressing to the child or youth (eg, panic attacks). ED health care providers play a vital role in assessing the safety and well-being of the child or youth and referring them to services for ongoing care.3,4 During the ED visit, assessment and care should pinpoint risks, inform treatment, and consider family needs and preferences as part of a patient-centered approach. Yet, this approach to care is not widely adopted in EDs. Most EDs do not require the use of pediatric-specific mental health tools to guide assessments or have patient-centered procedures in place to guide the care of patients with mental health emergencies.5-7 Our team believes these limitations have led to the provision of acute mental health care that can lack sufficient quality and efficiency. This study protocol describes a trial designed to evaluate if a novel mental health care bundle that was co-designed with parents and youth results in greater improvements in the well-being of children and youth 30 days after seeking ED care for mental health and/or substance misuse concerns compared with existing care protocols. We hypothesize that the bundle will positively impact child and youth well-being, while also providing cost-effective health care system benefits.
Subject(s)
Mental Health Services , Substance-Related Disorders , Adolescent , Canada , Child , Emergency Service, Hospital , Humans , Mental Health , Multicenter Studies as Topic , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Substance-Related Disorders/psychologyABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic has introduced new stressors for parents ("caregivers") that may affect their own and their child's mental health (MH). We explored self-reported levels of caregiver strain (parents' perceived ability to meet parenting demands), and the MH and sociodemographic factors of caregivers to identify predictors of strain that can be used to guide MH service delivery for families. METHODS: We administered a web-based survey to Ontario caregivers with a child between 4 and 25 years old, between April and June 2020. We analyzed information from 570 maternal caregivers on their sociodemographics, youngest (or only) child's MH, their own MH, and the degree of caregiver strain experienced since the pandemic. We used linear regressions (unadjusted and adjusted models) to explore the relationship between caregiver strain and sociodemographics, child MH and caregiver MH. RESULTS: Over 75% of participants reported "moderate-to-high" caregiver strain. More than 25% of caregivers rated their MH as "poor" and 20% reported moderate-to-severe anxiety. Forty-five percent of the variance in caregiver strain was accounted for by child age, caregiver anxiety, and multiple child and caregiver MH variables. Younger child age and higher caregiver anxiety were the greatest predictors of caregiver strain. CONCLUSION: We found a relationship between child age, child and caregiver MH variables, and caregiver strain. Given the interrelatedness of these factors, supporting caregivers' MH and lessening their role strain becomes critical for family well-being. Evidence-based individual, family, and public health strategies are needed to alleviate pandemic-related strain. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Caregivers , Adolescent , Adult , COVID-19/epidemiology , Child , Child, Preschool , Humans , Mental Health , Pandemics , Parenting , Stress, Psychological/etiology , Young AdultABSTRACT
IMPORTANCE: Public health measures to reduce the spread of COVID-19 have heightened distress among children and adolescents and contributed to a shift in delivery of mental health care services. OBJECTIVES: To measure and compare physician-based outpatient mental health care utilization before and during the COVID-19 pandemic and quantify the extent of uptake of virtual care delivery. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Population-based repeated cross-sectional study using linked health and administrative databases in Ontario, Canada. All individuals aged 3 to 17 years residing in Ontario from January 1, 2017, to February 28, 2021. EXPOSURES: Pre-COVID-19 period from January 1, 2017, to February 29, 2020, and post-COVID-19 onset from March 1, 2020, to February 28, 2021. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Physician-based outpatient weekly visit rates per 1000 population for mental health diagnoses overall and stratified by age group, sex, and mental health diagnostic grouping and proportion of virtual visits. Poisson generalized estimating equations were used to model 3-year pre-COVID-19 trends and forecast expected trends post-COVID-19 onset and estimate the change in visit rates before and after the onset of COVID-19. The weekly proportions of virtual visits were calculated. RESULTS: In a population of almost 2.5 million children and adolescents (48.7% female; mean [SD] age, 10.1 [4.3] years), the weekly rate of mental health outpatient visits was 6.9 per 1000 population. Following the pandemic onset, visit rates declined rapidly to below expected (adjusted relative rate [aRR], 0.81; 95% CI, 0.79-0.82) in April 2020 followed by a growth to above expected (aRR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.04-1.09) by July 2020 and sustained at 10% to 15% above expected as of February 2021. Adolescent female individuals had the greatest increase in visit rates relative to expected by the end of the study (aRR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.25-1.28). Virtual care accounted for 5.0 visits per 1000 population (72.5%) of mental health visits over the study period, with a peak of 5.3 visits per 1000 population (90.1%) (April 2020) and leveling off to approximately 70% in the latter months. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Physician-based outpatient mental health care in Ontario increased during the pandemic, accompanied by a large, rapid shift to virtual care. There was a disproportionate increase in use of mental health care services among adolescent female individuals. System-level planning to address the increasing capacity needs and to monitor quality of care with such large shifts is warranted.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Physicians , Adolescent , COVID-19/epidemiology , Child , Child, Preschool , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Mental Health , Ontario/epidemiology , PandemicsABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Suicidal Ideation (SI) is common in adolescents and increases the risk of completed suicide. Few brief interventions have been shown to reduce SI in adolescents. The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of a novel brief group intervention, building resilience and attachment in vulnerable adolescents (BRAVA), designed for adolescents and their caregivers to reduce adolescent SI. METHODS: The study was a pre-post, noncontrolled trial in which 46 adolescents were enrolled in the BRAVA intervention. Adolescents and caregivers completed an intake assessment, six BRAVA group sessions, and an exit assessment 1-week post-BRAVA. RESULTS: Adolescents' SI decreased significantly after completing the BRAVA treatment (pre-post difference = 18.1, 95% CI = 10.01-26.12). Significant improvements in associated symptoms of depression, anxiety, and perceived stress were also observed. Caregivers had reduced perceived stress (pre-post difference = 2.7, 95% CI = 0.30-5.16) and reduction in attachment avoidance (difference = 1.6, 95% CI = 0.29-2.91). Treatment satisfaction was high across the six modules. The rolling entry feature of the intervention allowed participants to begin treatment approximately 2 weeks sooner compared to waiting for the next group cycle. CONCLUSIONS: Study results demonstrate that the BRAVA intervention has the potential to reduce SI among adolescents who present to hospital services in crisis. Further studies are required to establish BRAVA's efficacy in a randomized controlled trial.
Subject(s)
Caregivers , Suicidal Ideation , Adolescent , Anxiety/therapy , Crisis Intervention , Depression/therapy , HumansABSTRACT
Research emphasizes the importance of asking about suicidality. Unfortunately, misperceptions of harm remain which can compromise clinical care, research, and public health surveillance efforts. Our objective was to evaluate the empirical evidence on whether and how asking about suicide related behaviors (SRB), such as suicidal ideation and suicide attempts, and non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) results in harmful outcomes. We reviewed and rated seventeen studies and conducted a systematic review and random-effects meta-analysis on eight studies comparing those asked vs. not asked on immediate and later SRB, NSSI, and psychological distress (PD). Forest plots demonstrated no statistically significant effects of asking on SRB, NSSI, or PD. Eight RCTs provided the strongest evidence and demonstrated either low or unclear risk of bias, and the remaining cohort studies were of low to moderate quality. With the current available evidence, we found no harmful outcomes of asking, however more RCTs with a low risk of bias are required to firmly conclude that asking through self-report and interview methods does not further exacerbate distress, SRB and NSSI compared to those not asked.
Subject(s)
Self-Injurious Behavior , Suicidal Ideation , Humans , Risk , Risk Factors , Self Report , Self-Injurious Behavior/psychology , Suicide, Attempted/prevention & control , Suicide, Attempted/psychologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: This effectiveness study aimed to evaluate the clinical use of the HEADS-ED tool for patients presenting to a pediatric emergency department (PED) for mental health (MH) care. METHODS: In this pragmatic trial, PED physicians used the HEADS-ED to guide their assessment and identify areas of MH need in 639 patients (mean [SD], 15.16 [1.40] years; female, 72.6%) who presented to the emergency department with MH concerns between May 2013 and March 2014. RESULTS: The HEADS-ED guided consultation to psychiatry/crisis, with 86% receiving a recommended consult. Those with a HEADS-ED score of greater than or equal to 8 and suicidality of 2 (relative risk, 2.64; confidence interval, 2.28-3.06) had a 164% increased risk of physicians requesting a consult compared with those with a score of less than 8 or greater than or equal to 8 with no suicidality of 2. The HEADS-ED mean score was significantly higher for those who received a consult (M = 6.91) than those who did not (M = 4.70; P = 0.000). Similarly, the mean score for those admitted was significantly higher (M = 7.21) than those discharged (M = 5.28; P = 0.000). Agreement on needs requiring action between PED physicians and crisis intervention workers was obtained for a subset of 140 patients and ranged from 62% to 93%. CONCLUSIONS: Results support the HEADS-ED's use by PED physicians to help guide the assessment and referral process and for discussing the clinical needs of patients among health care providers using a common action-oriented language.
Subject(s)
Emergency Service, Hospital , Mass Screening/methods , Mental Disorders/diagnosis , Adolescent , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Mental Health , Referral and Consultation/statistics & numerical data , Reproducibility of Results , Risk AssessmentABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Self-harm is increasing among adolescents, and because of changing behaviours, current data are needed on the consequences of self-harm. We sought to investigate the trends related to hospital presentation, readmission, patient outcome and medical costs in adolescents who presented with self-harm to the emergency department. METHODS: We used administrative data on 403 805 adolescents aged 13-17 years presenting to Ontario emergency departments in 2011-2013. Adolescents with self-harm visits were 1:2 propensity matched to controls with visits without self-harm, using demographic, mental health and other clinical variables. Five years after the index presentation, hospital or emergency department admission rates for self-harm, overall mortality, suicides and conservative cost estimates were compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: Of 5832 adolescents who visited Ontario emergency departments in 2011-2013 after self-harm (1.4% of visits), 5661 were matched to 10 731 adolescents who presented for reasons other than self-harm. Adolescents who presented with self-harm had a shorter time to a repeat emergency department or hospital admission for self-harm (hazard ratio [HR] 4.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.44-5.27), more suicides (HR 7.96, 95% CI 4.00-15.86), and higher overall mortality (HR 3.23, 95% CI 2.12-4.93; p < 0.001). The positive predictive value of self-harm-related emergency department visits for suicide was 0.7%. Adolescents with self-harm visits had mean 5-year estimates of health care costs of $30 388 compared with $19 055 for controls (p < 0.001). INTERPRETATION: Adolescents with emergency department visits for self-harm have higher rates of mortality, suicide and recurrent self-harm, as well as higher health care costs, than matched controls. Development of algorithms and interventions that can identify and help adolescents at highest risk of recurrent self-harm is warranted.
Subject(s)
Emergency Service, Hospital , Patient Discharge/statistics & numerical data , Self-Injurious Behavior/mortality , Suicide, Attempted/statistics & numerical data , Suicide/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Algorithms , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Health Care Costs , Health Services Needs and Demand , Humans , Male , Ontario/epidemiology , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Patient Discharge/economics , Propensity Score , Prospective Studies , Self-Injurious Behavior/psychology , Suicide, Attempted/psychologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To document the rates of intentional self-harm and mental disorders among youths aged 13 to 17 years visiting Ontario emergency departments (EDs) from 2003-2017. METHODS: This was a repeated cross-sectional observational design. Outcomes were rates of adolescents with (1) at least 1 self-harm ED visit and (2) a visit with a mental disorder code. RESULTS: Rates of youths with self-harm visits fell 32% from 2.6/1000 in 2003 to 1.8 in 2009 but rose 135% to 4.2 by 2017. The slope of the trend in self-harm visits changed from -0.18 youths/1000/year (confidence interval [CI], -0.24 to -0.13) during 2003 to 2009 to 0.31 youths/1000/year (CI, 0.27 to 0.35) during 2009 to 2017 (P < 0.001). Rates of youths with mental health visits rose from 11.7/1000 in 2003 to 13.5 in 2009 (15%) and to 24.1 (78%) by 2017. The slope of mental health visits changed from 0.22 youths/1000/year (CI, 0.02 to 0.42) during 2003 to 2009 to 1.84 youths/1000/year (CI, 1.38 to 2.30) in 2009 to 2017 (P < 0.001). Females were more likely to have self-harm (P < 0.001) and mental health visits (P < 0.001). Rates of increase after 2009 were greater for females for both self-harm (P < 0.001) and mental health (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Rates of adolescents with self-harm and mental health ED visits have increased since 2009, with greater increases among females. Research is required on the determinants of adolescents' self-harm and mental health ED visits and how they can be addressed in that setting. Sufficient treatment resources must be supplied to address increased demands for services.
Subject(s)
Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Self-Injurious Behavior/epidemiology , Adolescent , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Mental Disorders/therapy , Ontario/epidemiology , Self-Injurious Behavior/therapyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Approximately 45% of youth presenting to the emergency department (ED) for mental health (MH) concerns will have a repeat ED visit. Since youth greatly depend on their caregivers to access MH services, the objective of this study was to determine if family characteristics were associated with repeat ED visits. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of youth aged 6-18 years (62% female) treated at a tertiary pediatric ED for a discharge diagnosis related to MH was conducted. Data were gathered from medical records, telephone interviews, and questionnaires. Family factor contribution was analyzed using a multivariable logistic regression model controlling for demographic, clinical and service utilization factors. Variables associated with earlier and more frequent visits were determined using cox regression and negative binomial regression. RESULTS: Of 266 participants, 70 (26%) had a repeat visit. While caregiver history of MH treatment decreased the odds of having a repeat ED visit, family functioning and perceived family burden were not associated with repeat visits. Post-visit MH services, prior psychiatric hospitalization, higher severity of symptoms, and living closer to the hospital increased the odds of repeat visits. CONCLUSIONS: This study examined the contribution of multiple family factors in predicting repeat MH visits to the ED. Results suggest caregiver characteristics may impact the decision to return. Healthcare providers should therefore consider caregiver and youth service utilization factors to inform patient management and discharge planning.
OBJECTIFS: Environ 45 % des adolescents qui se présentent au service d'urgence (SU) pour des raisons de santé mentale (SM) auront une visite répétée au SU. Puisque les adolescents dépendent beaucoup de leurs aidants pour avoir accès aux services de SM, l'objectif de cette étude était de déterminer si les caractéristiques familiales étaient associées aux visites répétées au SU. MÉTHODES: Une étude de cohorte rétrospective a été menée sur des adolescents de 6 à 18 ans (62 % de sexe féminin) traités dans un SU pédiatrique tertiaire pour un diagnostic lié à la SM posé au moment du congé. Les données ont été recueillies d'après les dossiers médicaux, les entrevues téléphoniques et les questionnaires. La contribution des facteurs familiaux a été analysée à l'aide d'un modèle de régression logistique multivariable après contrôle des facteurs démographiques, cliniques et d'utilisation des services. Les variables associées à des visites précédentes et plus fréquentes ont été déterminées à l'aide de la régression de Cox et la régression binomiale négative. RÉSULTATS: Sur les 266 participants, 70 (26 %) avaient une visite répétée. Les antécédents de traitement de SM des aidants diminuaient les probabilités d'avoir une visite répétée au SU, et le fonctionnement familial et le fardeau familial perçu n'étaient pas associés à des visites répétées. Les services de SM ultérieurs à la visite, une hospitalisation psychiatrique précédente, une gravité plus élevée des symptômes et le fait d'habiter à proximité de l'hôpital augmentaient les probabilités de visites répétées. CONCLUSIONS: Cette étude a examiné la contribution de multiples facteurs familiaux à la prédiction de visites répétées au SU pour raisons de SM. Les résultats suggèrent que les caractéristiques des aidants puissent influer sur la décision de retourner au SU. Les prestataires de soins de santé devraient donc prendre en compte les facteurs d'utilisation des services des aidants et des adolescents afin d'éclairer la prise en charge des patients et la planification du congé.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the use of a mental health (MH) screening tool in a hospital-based centralized MH referral telephonic intake process. The tool is used to guide psychosocial screening in several domains: home; education; activities and peers; drugs and alcohol; suicidality; emotions, thoughts, and behaviors; and discharge resources (HEADS-ED). We wanted to understand the use of the tool to guide next step in care decision-making over the telephone. METHODS: Intake workers used the HEADS-ED tool to guide the assessment processes, identified areas of MH need, and made decisions about next step in care. We completed a retrospective chart review of all callers to the intake system over 4 months to gather initial decision at intake and subsequent steps in treatment. χ2 and analysis of variance tests were used to examine differences between HEADS-ED scores and next step in care. RESULTS: A total of 674 patients aged 3 to 19 years (mean age = 11.7 years, SD = 0.6; girls = 50.0%) called for services. Significant mean differences were found on total HEADS-ED scores between treatment options (F4,641 = 75.76; P < .001). Decision validity indicated that 86% (n = 506 of 587) of initial referrals matched treatments that were actually received. Uptake of the tool was 100%, and interrater reliability indicated strong agreement between raters (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.82; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: With our results, we support the use of the HEADS-ED tool in a telephone-based MH intake system to help guide the initial assessment and inform decision-making about fit of next step in care, both within the health center-based MH system and in the community.
Subject(s)
Clinical Decision-Making/methods , Mental Disorders/diagnosis , Mental Health Services , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Referral and Consultation , Telemedicine/methods , Telephone , Adolescent , Behavior, Addictive/diagnosis , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Hospitals , Humans , Male , Mental Health Services/organization & administration , Observer Variation , Prospective Studies , Referral and Consultation/organization & administration , Reproducibility of Results , Telemedicine/organization & administration , Young AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To assess the performance of the Canadian Hospitals Injury Reporting and Prevention Program's newly developed self-harm surveillance tool (CHIRPP-SI) designed to improve emergency department (ED) hospital surveillance of youth self-inflicted injury (SI). METHODS: This was a prospective, single-centre cohort study from February 2015 to September 2015. Eligible participants were aged 6-17.99 years and presented to the ED with a primary mental health complaint. The frequency of SI cases was extracted from three data sources (CHIRPP-SI, medical chart, and the National Ambulatory Care Reporting System Metadata (NACRS)). Cohen's kappa statistic was used to examine the level of agreement between data sources. RESULTS: Of the 250 participants who received a medical chart review, 70 completed the CHIRPP-SI. Of those who did not complete the CHIRPP-SI, 86% (n = 154) reported no SI related to their presentation, 12% (n = 22) declined to participate without specifying self-injury status, and 2% (n = 4) were unable to be interviewed prior to discharge. The three sources of surveillance data varied considerably; the medical chart captured the highest frequency of individuals reporting SI related to their ED visit (33.6%), followed by the CHIRPP-SI (28.0%), and the NACRS database (8.4%). The CHIRPP-SI captured the method of SI and the place of occurrence in 100% of individuals, and the bodily location harmed in 98.6% of individuals. CONCLUSIONS: Study findings highlight the disparity between different sources of data, in relation to the capture of paediatric SI, presenting to hospital EDs. If greater details of SI events are to be identified, surveillance tools such as the CHIRPP-SI should be considered.
Subject(s)
Emergency Service, Hospital , Population Surveillance/methods , Self-Injurious Behavior/epidemiology , Self-Injurious Behavior/therapy , Adolescent , Canada/epidemiology , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Prospective StudiesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to examine the mental health needs of children and youth who present to the emergency department (ED) for mental health care and to describe the type of, and satisfaction with, follow-up mental health services accessed. METHODS: A 6-month to 1.5-year prospective cohort study was conducted in three Canadian pediatric EDs and one general ED, with a 1-month follow-up post-ED discharge. Measures included 1) clinician rating of mental health needs, 2) patient and caregiver self-reports of follow-up services, and 3) interviews regarding follow-up satisfaction. Data analysis included descriptive statistics and the Fisher's exact test to compare sites. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 373 children and youth (61.1% female; mean age 15.1 years, 1.5 standard deviation). The main reason for ED presentations was a mental health crisis. The three most frequent areas of need requiring action were mood (43.8%), suicide risk (37.4%), and parent-child relational problems (34.6%). During the ED visit, 21.6% of patients received medical clearance, 40.9% received a psychiatric consult, and 19.4% were admitted to inpatient psychiatric care. At the 1-month post-ED visit, 84.3% of patients/caregivers received mental health follow-up. Ratings of service recommendations were generally positive, as 60.9% of patients obtained the recommended follow-up care and 13.9% were wait-listed. CONCLUSIONS: Children and youth and their families presenting to the ED with mental health needs had substantial clinical morbidity, were connected with services, were satisfied with their ED visit, and accessed follow-up care within 1-month with some variability.
Subject(s)
Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Mental Disorders/therapy , Mental Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Mental Health , Patient Admission , Patient Discharge , Adolescent , Canada/epidemiology , Child , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Incidence , Male , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Prospective StudiesABSTRACT
Children and youth presenting to the emergency department with mental health concerns present a challenge for clinicians and system capacity. Addressing a significant system gap and sparse strategies in the literature, representative leaders from hospital and community agencies developed a novel pathway to guide efficient and doable risk assessment and ensure timely transition to appropriate community mental health services. This article describes and reflects on our innovative Emergency Department Clinical Pathway for Children and Youth with Mental Health Conditions that bridges traditional barriers between hospital and community settings to address mental health needs for this population.
Subject(s)
Critical Pathways , Emergency Service, Hospital , Mental Disorders/therapy , Mental Health Services , Adolescent , Child , HumansABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Repeat visits represent up to 45% of mental health (MH) presentations to emergency departments (EDs) and are associated with higher health care costs. We aimed to synthesize available literature on predictors of pediatric MH repeat ED visits and differences between repeat visitors and nonrepeat visitors. METHODS: A systematic review was performed using PsycINFO, PubMed, and CINAHL databases. Reporting followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement checklist. Methodologic quality was assessed using the following 8 criteria: design, generalizability, breadth of predictors, reporting of effect sizes, additional outcomes, interaction terms, confounding variables, and clear definition of repeat visits. RESULTS: A total of 178 articles were retrieved; 11 articles met inclusion criteria. Quality assessment revealed that all studies used chart review or administrative data. Predictors were grouped into 3 categories: demographic, clinical, and MH care access and utilization factors. Common predictors associated with repeat ED MH visits included socioeconomic status, involvement with child protective services, and previous and current MH service use. For studies using a 6-month repeat window, the most common factors were previous psychiatric hospitalization and currently receiving MH services. Heterogeneity in statistical analyses and determinants explored precluded the use of meta-analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Findings revealed that repeat visits to the ED for MH concerns is a complex phenomenon that can be attributed to various demographic, clinical, and MH care access and utilization factors. To further elucidate the strongest predictors, future prospective research should consider prospective designs and include family factors. Investigating recency and frequency outcomes can also inform clinical practice.
Subject(s)
Emergency Service, Hospital , Mental Health Services , Adolescent , Child , Child Protective Services , Humans , Social ClassABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Children with mental health crises require access to specialised resources and services which are not yet standard in general and paediatric EDs. In 2010, we published a systematic review that provided some evidence to support the use of specialised care models to reduce hospitalisation, return ED visits and length of ED stay. We perform a systematic review to update the evidence base and inform current policy statements. METHODS: Twelve databases and the grey literature were searched up to January 2015. Seven studies were included in the review (four newly identified studies). These studies compared ED-based strategies designed to assess, treat and/or therapeutically support or manage a mental health presentation. The methodological quality of six studies was assessed using the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care Risk of Bias tool (one interrupted time series study) and a modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (three retrospective cohort and two before-after studies). The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system was applied to rate overall evidence quality (high, moderate, low or very low) for individual outcomes from these six studies. An additional study evaluated the psychometric properties of a clinical instrument and was assessed using criteria developed by the Society of Pediatric Psychology Assessment Task Force (well-established, approaching well-established or promising assessment). RESULTS: There is low to very low overall evidence quality that: (1) use of screening laboratory tests to medically clear mental health patients increases length of ED stay and costs, but does not increase the risk of clinical management or disposition change if not conducted; and (2) specialised models of ED care reduce lengths of ED stay, security man-hours and restraint orders. One mental health assessment tool of promising quality, the home, education, activities and peers, drugs and alcohol, suicidality, emotions and behaviour, discharge resources (HEADS-ED), has had good accuracy in predicting admission to inpatient psychiatry. CONCLUSIONS: Lower-quality data suggest benefits to the use of specialised resources and services for paediatric mental health care in general and paediatric EDs. Experimental evaluation of strategies and the inclusion of patient-reported outcomes will improve confidence in these findings. Additional psychometric studies are needed for the HEADS-ED tool to be considered well established.
Subject(s)
Disease Management , Mental Health Services/standards , Pediatrics/standards , Adolescent , Child , Child Restraint Systems/statistics & numerical data , Child, Preschool , Emergency Service, Hospital/economics , Emergency Service, Hospital/organization & administration , Evidence-Based Medicine/methods , Humans , Pediatrics/methodsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to identify barriers and facilitators to the implementation of the HEADS-ED, a screening tool appropriate for use in the emergency department (ED) that facilitates standardized assessments, discharge planning, charting, and linking pediatric mental health patients to appropriate community resources. METHODS: A qualitative theory-based design was used to identify barriers and facilitators to implementing the HEADS-ED tool. Focus groups were conducted with participants recruited from 6 different ED settings across 2 provinces (Ontario and Nova Scotia). The Theoretical Domains Framework was used as a conceptual framework to guide data collection and to identify themes from focus group discussions. RESULTS: The following themes spanning 12 domains were identified as reflective of participants' beliefs about the barriers and facilitators to implementing the HEADS-ED tool: knowledge, skills, beliefs about capabilities, social professional role and identity, optimism, beliefs about consequences, reinforcement, environmental context and resources, social influences, emotion, behavioral regulation and memory, and attention and decision process. CONCLUSIONS: The HEADS-ED has the potential to address the need for better discharge planning, complete charting, and standardized assessments for the increasing population of pediatric mental health patients who present to EDs. This study has identified potential barriers and facilitators, which should be considered when developing an implementation plan for adopting the HEADS-ED tool into practice within EDs.