Large volume "mammotome" biopsy may reduce the need for diagnostic surgery in papillary lesions of the breast.

BACKGROUND: There is currently debate as to whether all papillary lesions diagnosed on breast needle core biopsy (BNCB) require surgical excision. The development of large volume "mammotome" biopsy now permits non-operative removal. Few studies have assessed the usefulness of this approach. AIM: To review the pathological and radiological findings in a series of B3 and B4 papillary lesions identified on conventional BNCB with a view to assessing the usefulness of mammotome biopsy as a means of avoiding diagnostic surgery. METHODS: All BNCBs from 23 June 2005 to 14 August 2007 that contained a B3 or B4 papillary lesion were identified by searching the pathology department records. Follow-up histology and radiological details were obtained. RESULTS: 34 papillary BNCBs were included in this study: 21 from screen-detected lesions and 13 from patients presenting symptomatically. 31 were classified B3 and three were B4. Four cases included an atypical ductal epithelial proliferation (three B4, one B3). 14 patients had undergone open surgical biopsy, 15 had undergone mammotome excision, and five had had no subsequent procedure. All cases that had undergone mammotome biopsy had not shown atypia on the core, and 13 (87%) proved benign. In two cases the mammotome biopsy was either atypical or malignant, prompting surgery; the biopsy changes deriving from areas of ductal carcinoma in situ arising in the context of multiple intraduct papillomas and both were distinctive mammographically in presenting with large areas of segmental calcification. 11/14 cases that had undergone surgical excision had not shown atypia on the core, and proved benign. All three cases with atypia on the core proved malignant. CONCLUSION: In selected cases, mammotome biopsy may improve sampling of papillary lesions such that malignancy may be excluded without recourse to diagnostic surgery. Mammotome in such cases effectively acts as a therapeutic procedure. This has important implications for symptomatic and breast screening services.

Examination of breast needle core biopsy specimens performed for screen-detected microcalcification.

AIMS: To establish the number of histological levels necessary for the evaluation of breast needle core biopsy (NCB) specimens taken from areas of mammographic calcification in patients presenting via the UK National Health Service Breast Screening Programme. METHODS: Retrospective review of a series of breast NCB specimens initially examined routinely at nine levels. The presence of calcification within the histological sections in each of three sets of levels (levels 1-3, 4-6 and 7-9) and the (cumulative) diagnostic B category that would have pertained after each were assessed. RESULTS: Accurate diagnostic classification was possible after examination of three levels in 89% cases. Examination of a further three levels permitted accurate diagnosis in a further eight cases (total 97% cases). In only three cases were nine levels necessary for accurate classification. In only a single case (1%) was it likely that routine examination of six levels could have led to significant misclassification. In a significant group of patients (18%), nine levels were considered to provide additional useful information, although this information did not alter the diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: NCBs for screen-detected mammographic calcification should be routinely examined at six levels. Further levels may be needed in occasional cases to identify more conclusively the associated pathological abnormality. Further levels may be of particular value when assessing atypical intraductal proliferative epithelial lesions.

Steroid hormone receptor expression in male breast cancer.

AIMS: To investigate expression of the steroid hormone receptors estrogen receptor (ER)-alpha and -beta, progesterone receptor (PR) and androgen receptor (AR) in male breast cancer. METHODS: Specimens from 16 male breast cancers were immunostained for ERalpha, ERbeta, PR and AR. FINDINGS: Eighty-seven percent of tumours expressed ERalpha, 93% PR, 87% ERbeta and 87% AR. Staining for ERalpha and PR was confined exclusively to the nuclei of epithelial cells with some heterogeneity. Nuclear immunoreactivity was also observed with AR. Again this was restricted to epithelial cells but tended to be more uniform. ERbeta was seen in the nuclei of epithelial cells and also in stromal fibroblasts and lymphocytes. Analysis of serial sections revealed a similar pattern of staining with ERbeta and AR in epithelial cells. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to expression of the better known steroid receptors, ERalpha, PR and AR, we have demonstrated a high rate of expression of ERbeta in male breast cancer. This is in keeping with the generally high steroid receptor expression seen in males. However, the abundance of ERbeta expressed in this small series of male breast cancer is in contrast to female breast cancer where ERbeta expression is often reduced.

Needle core biopsy can reliably distinguish between benign and malignant papillary lesions of the breast.

AIMS: To review 21 screen-detected papillary lesions in which the core biopsy findings suggested a papillary lesion and to correlate pathological and radiological findings in order to assess the risks of associated malignancy and the need for surgical intervention. The appropriate management of non-malignant papillary breast lesions detected on needle core biopsy (NCB) is currently uncertain. METHODS AND RESULTS: Forty-seven papillary breast lesions with a histological diagnosis of papilloma, papilloma with atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), multiple papillomas, 'papillomatosis' or papillary carcinoma (invasive or in situ) were identified from records at the Leeds Breast Screening and Assessment Unit. The cases were diagnosed between between May 1995 and May 2002. In 21 cases the previous NCB contained a papillary proliferation which had been categorized as either 'B2', benign, 'B3', of uncertain malignant potential, or 'B4', suspicious of malignancy. All of the 19 'B3' or 'B4' cases and one of the two 'B2' lesions had undergone open surgical biopsy. All cases with a previous 'B4' were malignant on subsequent excision. All excised cases with a previous 'B3' or 'B2' were found benign, although four of the 'B3's derived from papillomata associated with an atypical proliferation amounting to ADH. In three of these four (75%) the papillary proliferation had been associated with epithelial hyperplasia of usual type (HUT) on the core and the radiological features were of a mass lesion detected on incident round screen which had increased in size. CONCLUSION: Our results confirm the accuracy of NCB in the diagnosis of screen-detected papillary lesions of the breast. Surgical excision may not always be necessary following a 'B3' core biopsy.

Expression of prostate specific antigen in male breast cancer.

Male breast cancer is uncommon, accounting for less than 1% of all breast cancers. Carcinoma metastatic to the male breast is also unusual, with metastatic prostatic carcinoma being among the most common primary sites from which such tumours derive. Metastatic prostatic cancer and primary breast cancer may be histologically indistinguishable without immunohistochemistry because both often infiltrate with a cribriform architecture. Distinguishing between primary and metastatic disease within the breast is important because the treatment options for each are radically different. Following a case in which metastatic prostatic disease was initially wrongly diagnosed as primary breast cancer, a small series of male breast cancers was examined for expression of prostate specific antigen (PSA) and prostatic acid phosphatase to assess the usefulness of these markers in making this distinction. Focal expression of PSA was found in one of 11 cases of male breast cancer. These results indicate that PSA should be used with caution in this context.

Surgical excision is warranted following a core biopsy diagnosis of mucocoele-like lesion of the breast.

AIMS: Mucocoele-like lesions (MLLs) of the breast are unusual lesions in which mucin-filled ducts or cysts are accompanied by extrusion of mucin into surrounding stroma. A possible diagnosis of MLL may be suggested by the finding of mucin-filled ducts or cysts and/or stromal mucin in a core biopsy sample. Whether such findings should prompt immediate open diagnostic biopsy to exclude malignancy is currently uncertain, although this represents current practice in our institution. In this study we have reviewed 11 cases of possible MLL on core biopsy correlating both pathological and radiological findings in order to determine the risks of associated malignancy and whether excision is the most appropriate management option. METHODS AND RESULTS: Eleven cases of possible MLL presenting via the Breast Screening and Assessment Unit in Leeds since April 1999 were identified by review of pathological records. Histological slides, mammograms and ultrasound images were reviewed. Ten of the 11 had undergone open surgical biopsy for diagnosis. Three of the 10 (30%) proved to derive from malignant lesions. Two were ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and one was an invasive mucinous carcinoma. All three cases had an associated atypical epithelial proliferation which, in a surgical excision, would be classified as atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) at least, as well as mucin in the core biopsy sample. The majority of possible MLLs presented radiologically as coarse calcification, but two of four (50%) which had a radiological mass subsequently proved malignant. Seven cases were without atypia on the core and all subsequently proved benign. Three of these, however, were associated with ADH on the excision biopsy. CONCLUSION: Surgical excision is warranted following a core biopsy suggestion of possible MLL when mucin-filled ducts or cysts and stromal mucin have been seen. The risk of malignancy is high when the core biopsy also contains an atypical epithelial proliferation (100% in our series) and also when there is an associated radiological mass lesion. In cases without atypia on the core a significant proportion of cases (43%) are associated with ADH on excision.

Will the spectrum of lesions prompting a "B3" breast core biopsy increase the benign biopsy rate?

AIM: To audit the benign surgical biopsies in women screened, assessed, and referred by the Leeds/Wakefield Breast Screening Unit for the year 1999-2000 with a view to determining any association with a preoperative B3 core biopsy categorisation. METHODS: The results of all preoperative diagnostic procedures in all patients who underwent surgical excision for a lesion proving benign in the year 1999-2000 were reviewed. Cases were categorised according to whether the preoperative fine needle aspirate cytology (FNAC) or core biopsy had been equivocal or of uncertain malignant potential (C3/B3), inadequate or unrepresentative (C1/B1), or benign (C2/B2). In those cases with a C3/B3 FNAC or core biopsy result, reasons for the uncertainty were determined by examination of the report and, where necessary, slides. In cases with C1/B1 or C2/B2 investigations and in those without a preoperative procedure, the reasons for surgical referral were determined from the screening records. Case records of all patients with a B3 core biopsy categorisation who subsequently proved to have malignancy were also reviewed. RESULTS: Thirty six women had benign surgical biopsies in the 1999-2000 screening year. In 13 of the 36 patients, referral for diagnostic biopsy rested on radiological and/or pathological suspicion of radial scar. The core biopsy category was B3 in all but one, which was in the B1 category. In a further 10 patients, referral was based primarily on a pathological B3 categorisation. The reasons for this were as follows: papillary lesion (two), fibroepithelial lesion (two), atypical intraductal epithelial proliferation (two), stromal mucin (two), atypical lobular hyperplasia (one), and an unusual vascular lesion (one). Two cases with a C3 on FNAC also derived from papillary lesions. In the remaining nine patients, the radiological features were sufficiently suspicious to prompt referral in the presence of either inadequate/unrepresentative (C1/B1) or benign (B2) preoperative pathological findings. Two women had no preoperative needle biopsy. CONCLUSIONS: In 22 of 36 benign biopsies, the initial core biopsy categorisation was B3. According to the current system of core biopsy categorisation, a diversity of lesions must be designated as of "uncertain malignant potential" (B3) because the technique provides insufficient tissue for full histological assessment. The use of this category may increase the number of benign biopsies if all such cases are referred for surgery. An increase in the benign biopsy rate may be averted if larger amounts of tissue can be obtained using newer vacuum assisted techniques such as the Mammotome.

Evaluation of seven oestrogen receptor beta antibodies for immunohistochemistry, western blotting, and flow cytometry in human breast tissue.

Two oestrogen receptors, ER alpha and ER beta, exist. While much is known about ER alpha, the role of ER beta is still undefined, especially at the protein level. The aim of this study was to determine the utility of seven ER beta antibodies (14C8, 8D5, PAI313, PPG5/10, N19, 9.88, and D7N) raised against different domains of ER beta in three commonly used laboratory applications, namely immunohistochemistry, western blot, and flow cytometry, using human breast material. For immunohistochemical analysis of frozen material, PAI313 and D7N gave stronger and more specific signals than 14C8, 8D5, and PPG5/10. In paraffin sections, 14C8, closely followed by PPG5/10, gave by far the most superior nuclear immunoreactivity, compared with the other antibodies tested. In general, flow cytometry results mirrored the immunohistochemistry data for paraffin sections, with antibodies ranked 14C8 > 8D5> or = PAI-313 > PPG5/10 >D7N. For western blotting, 8D5 and D7N yielded the strongest and most consistent bands, with weaker bands seen with the others. It is concluded that ER beta protein can be detected using specific antibodies. However, there is considerable variation between the specificity and application of these antibodies, highlighting the fact that careful optimization is required when selecting an antibody for use in a particular laboratory technique.

Distinct expression patterns of ER alpha and ER beta in normal human mammary gland.

AIM: Two oestrogen receptors (ERs) have been identified to date-the "classic" ER alpha and the more recently described ER beta. Although much is known about ER alpha at the mRNA and protein levels, our knowledge of the expression and distribution of ER beta protein is much more limited. The aim of this study was to compare the cellular distribution of ER alpha and ER beta in normal human mammary gland. METHODS: Formalin fixed, paraffin wax embedded material was obtained from reduction mammoplasty specimens, normal tissue adjacent to breast tumour, or fibroadenoma. Sections were immunohistochemically stained for ER alpha, ER beta, and the progesterone receptor. The staining pattern for each antibody was evaluated and compared. RESULTS: ER alpha was restricted to the cell nuclei of epithelial cells lining ducts and lobules. Although ER beta was also seen in these cells, additional strong staining was detected specifically in the cell nuclei of myoepithelial cells. Occasional staining was seen in surrounding stromal and endothelial cell nuclei and in lymphocytes. CONCLUSIONS: ER subtypes have distinct distribution patterns in the normal mammary gland. The widespread distribution of ER beta suggests that it may be the dominant ER in the mammary gland where it may be acting as a natural suppressor.

Immunohistochemical detection of ERbeta in breast cancer: towards more detailed receptor profiling?

Oestrogen receptor (ER) is used routinely to predict endocrine responsiveness in patients with breast cancer. A second ER, ERbeta has been described but its significance remains undefined; most studies have described mRNA levels rather than protein expression. Here, we demonstrate for the first time, immunohistochemical detection of ERbeta in archival breast tumours.

New mammographic stromal deformity: what is the significance of this finding on screening mammograms?

Current practice within the NHS Breast Screening Programme recommends surgical excision of screen detected areas of stromal deformity as differentiating carcinomas from radial scars and excluding in situ malignancy in association with radial scars is unreliable. We retrospectively reviewed all cases recalled for assessment over a 4 year period, identified to have an area of persistent stromal deformity not associated with surgical scarring and without an associated mammographic mass. Thirty women were prevalent (first) round screens--17 cases proved to be malignant and 13 benign. The latter group included three cases of atypical ductal hyperplasia. Nineteen women were incident (subsequent) round screens--all 19 cases proved to be malignant. This study supports the practice of surgically removing all areas of stromal deformity, particularly new areas of stromal deformity detected in the incident round, as in this group the likelihood of malignancy is extremely high.

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in breast cancer: comparison of plasma, serum, and tissue VEGF and microvessel density and effects of tamoxifen.

The assessment of angiogenesis in breast cancer is of importance as a key indicator of survival and response to therapy. Circulating vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) measurements may provide a less subjective analysis than microvessel density (MVD) or immunohistochemical analysis of VEGF expression; however, most studies have used serum, which is now known to largely reflect platelet-derived VEGF concentrations. This study examined for the first time both plasma (VEGFp) and serum (VEGFs) VEGF concentrations in 201 blood samples from pre- and postmenopausal healthy controls and from patients with benign breast disease, localized breast cancer, breast cancer in remission, or metastatic breast cancer and related these to other clinicopathological markers. VEGFp but not VEGFs concentrations of patients with localized disease were significantly elevated compared with normal controls (P = 0.016). Patients with metastatic disease had higher VEGFp and VEGFs levels than normal controls (P < 0.001, P = 0.044 respectively), and higher VEGFp, but not VEGFs, than patients with benign disease (P = 0.009) and patients with localized disease (P = 0.004). However, the highest VEGFp and VEGFs concentrations were seen in patients in remission compared with normal controls (P < 0.001 and P = 0.008, respectively). VEGFp concentrations in patients in remission were also higher than in patients with benign disease (P = 0.01) or patients with localized disease (P = 0.005). Tamoxifen treatment was significantly associated with higher circulating and platelet-derived VEGF levels. Circulating VEGF did not correlate with any clinicopathological factor, including MVD or VEGF expression. VEGF expression was significantly correlated with estrogen receptor status and inversely correlated with tumor grade. MVD correlated with tumor size. Tamoxifen-induced increases in VEGF may be important in clinical prognosis or associated pathologies.