ABSTRACT
The linear excess relative risk (ERR) is the most commonly reported measure of association in radiation epidemiological studies, when individual dose estimates are available. While the asymptotic properties of the ERR estimator are well understood, there is evidence of small sample bias in case-control studies of treatment-related radiation exposure and second cancer risk. Cohort studies of cancer risk after exposure to low doses of radiation from diagnostic procedures, e.g., computed tomography (CT) examinations, typically have small numbers of cases and risks are small. Therefore, understanding the properties of the estimated ERR is essential for interpretation and analysis of such studies. We present results of a simulation study that evaluates the finite-sample bias of the ERR estimated by time-to-event analyses and its confidence interval using simulated data, resembling a retrospective cohort study of radiation-related leukemia risk after CT examinations in childhood and adolescence. Furthermore, we evaluate how the Firth-corrected estimator reduces the finite-sample bias of the classical estimator. We show that the ERR is overestimated by about 30% for a cohort of about 150,000 individuals, with 42 leukemia cases observed on average. The bias is reduced for higher baseline incidence rates and for higher values of the true ERR. As the number of cases increases, the ERR is approximately unbiased. The Firth correction reduces the bias for all cohort sizes to generally around or under 5%. Epidemiological studies showing an association between radiation exposure from pediatric CT and cancer risk, unless very large, may overestimate the magnitude of the relationship, while there is no evidence of an increased chance for false-positive results. Conducting large studies, perhaps by pooling individual studies to increase the number of cases, should be a priority. If this is not possible, Firth correction should be applied to reduce small-sample bias.
Subject(s)
Leukemia, Radiation-Induced , Leukemia , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced , Neoplasms , Radiation Exposure , Adolescent , Humans , Child , Risk , Retrospective Studies , Cohort Studies , Leukemia, Radiation-Induced/epidemiology , Leukemia/epidemiology , Radiation Exposure/adverse effects , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/adverse effects , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/epidemiology , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/etiologyABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Mental health conditions may affect outcome of COVID-19 disease, while exposure to stressors during the pandemic may impact mental health. The purpose of this study was to examine these factors in relation to ocurrence of depression and anxiety after the first outbreak in Spain. METHODS: We contacted 9515 participants from a population-based cohort study in Catalonia between May and October 2020. We drew blood samples to establish infection to the virus. Pre-pandemic mental health conditions were confirmed through Electronic Health Registries. We used the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale to assess severe depression and anxiety post-pandemic. Exposure to proximal, financial and wider environment stressors during the lockdown were collected. We calculated Relative Risks (RR), adjusting for individual- and contextual covariates. RESULTS: Pre-pandemic mental health disorders were not associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection , but were associated with severity of COVID-19 disease. People with pre-existing mental health disorders showed higher prevalence of severe depression (25.4%) and anxiety (37.8%) than those without prior mental disorders (4.9% and 10.1%). Living alone was a strong predictor of severe depression among mental health patients (RR = 1.6, 95% CI 1.2-2.2). Among those without prior mental health disorders, post-lockdown depression and anxiety were associated with household interpersonal conflicts (RR = 2.6, 95% CI 2.1-3.1; RR = 2.1, 95% CI 1.9-2.4) and financial instability (RR = 2.2, 95% CI 1.8-2.9; 1.9, 95% CI 1.6-2.2). CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic and the lockdown were associated with increased post-lockdown depression and anxiety. Patients with pre-existing mental health conditions are a vulnerable group for severe COVID-19 disease.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , Pandemics , Mental Health , Spain/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2 , Cohort Studies , Depression/epidemiology , Depression/psychology , Stress, Psychological/epidemiology , Stress, Psychological/psychology , Communicable Disease Control , Anxiety/epidemiology , Anxiety/psychologyABSTRACT
The purpose of this study is to support retrospective dose estimation for epidemiological studies by providing estimates of historical absorbed organ doses to the brain, lens of the eye, salivary glands, and thyroid from intraoral dental radiographic examinations performed from 1940 to 2009. We simulated organ doses to an adult over 10 y time periods from 1940 to 2009, based on commonly used sets of x-ray machine settings collected from the literature. Simulations to estimate organ dose were performed using personal computer x-ray Monte Carlo software. Overall, organ doses were less than 1 mGy for a single intraoral radiograph for all decades. From 1940 to 2009, doses to the brain, eye lens, salivary glands, and thyroid decreased by 86, 96, 95, and 89%, respectively. Of these four organs, the salivary glands received the highest doses, with values decreasing from about 0.23 mGy in the 1940s to 0.025 mGy in the 2000s for a single intraoral radiograph. Based on simulations using collected historical data on x-ray technical parameters, improvements in technology and optimization of the technical settings used to perform intraoral dental radiography have resulted in a decrease in absorbed dose to the brain, eye lens, salivary glands, and thyroid over the period from 1940 to 2009.
Subject(s)
Brain/radiation effects , Lens, Crystalline/radiation effects , Radiography, Dental , Salivary Glands/radiation effects , Thyroid Gland/radiation effects , Adult , Humans , Monte Carlo Method , Radiation Dosage , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
Corrigendum: This work was also funded by the European Commission grant 603794 (GERoNiMO project).
ABSTRACT
The use of computed tomography (CT) imaging is clearly beneficial for millions of patients. However, the potential adverse health effects, particularly cancer, of ionising radiation exposure from CT early in life are an issue of growing concern in the radiological protection, medical, and public health communities. Although efforts to quantify these effects have been conducted, the precision and accuracy of reported risks needs confirmation. EPI-CT, a European collaborative epidemiological study, was set up to quantify risks from paediatric CT to optimise paediatric diagnostic protocol. The study, coordinated by the International Agency for Research on Cancer, was designed as a multi-national cohort study of children and young adults who underwent CT scanning for long-term follow-up. It combined data from existing and extended cohorts in France, the UK, and Germany, and from new cohorts assembled in Belgium, Denmark, the Netherlands, Norway, Spain, and Sweden using a common protocol. A flexible dose reconstruction approach that can accommodate collection of data from historical sources (prior to 2000) and automatically extract data from the Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine headers of recorded images available in the Picture Archiving Communication System was developed. Individual organ dose estimates for each child were derived from Monte-Carlo-based radiation transport calculations using hybrid phantoms of different sexes and ages. To account for uncertainties due to missing input data, a simulation method that maintains correlations of doses for persons within subgroups with similar exposure attributes and simulates uncertain dose-model parameter values was used. Simulation studies to evaluate the potential impact of a range of potential confounders (e.g. underlying medical conditions, socio-economic status, missing medical procedures performed outside of participating hospitals) on risk estimates were conducted based on data from some EPI-CT countries and/or reasonable scenarios. In total, 1,170,186 patients (before censorship) were enrolled in the national cohorts. Most patients (75%) had only undergone one CT scan and 29% of all patients were aged <5 years at the time of their first CT examination. The median duration of follow-up was 8 years for the entire cohort, although this varied between countries. Overall, the follow-up accounted for nearly 10 million person-years. This study received partial funding from the European Commission 7th Framework Programme under Grant Agreement No. 269912.
Subject(s)
Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/epidemiology , Radiation Dosage , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/adverse effects , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Cohort Studies , Europe , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/etiology , Radiation Protection , Risk , Young AdultABSTRACT
MELODI (Multidisciplinary European Low Dose Initiative) is a European radiation protection research platform with focus on research on health risks after exposure to low-dose ionising radiation. It was founded in 2010 and currently includes 44 members from 18 countries. A major activity of MELODI is the continuous development of a long-term European Strategic Research Agenda (SRA) on low-dose risk for radiation protection. The SRA is intended to identify priorities for national and European radiation protection research programs as a basis for the preparation of competitive calls at the European level. Among those key priorities is the improvement of health risk estimates for exposures close to the dose limits for workers and to reference levels for the population in emergency situations. Another activity of MELODI is to ensure the availability of European key infrastructures for research activities, and the long-term maintenance of competences in radiation research via an integrated European approach for training and education. The MELODI SRA identifies three key research topics in low dose or low dose-rate radiation risk research: (1) dose and dose rate dependence of cancer risk, (2) radiation-induced non-cancer effects and (3) individual radiation sensitivity. The research required to improve the evidence base for each of the three key topics relates to three research lines: (1) research to improve understanding of the mechanisms contributing to radiogenic diseases, (2) epidemiological research to improve health risk evaluation of radiation exposure and (3) research to address the effects and risks associated with internal exposures, differing radiation qualities and inhomogeneous exposures. The full SRA and associated documents can be downloaded from the MELODI website ( http://www.melodi-online.eu/sra.html ).
Subject(s)
Interdisciplinary Communication , Radiation Dosage , Radiobiology/methods , Humans , Radiation Exposure , Radiation Tolerance , Risk AssessmentABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To study the relations between maternal cumulative exposure to extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields (ELF EMF) and the risk of moderate prematurity and small for gestational age within the Elfe cohort. METHODS: The Elfe study included 18,329 infants born at 33weeks of gestation or more in France in 2011 and was designed to follow the children until 20years of age. Gestational age and anthropometric data at birth were collected in medical records and small for gestational age was defined according to a French customized growth standard. During interviews, mothers were asked to report their job status during pregnancy. If employed, their occupation was coded according to the International Standard Classification of Occupations 1988 and the date on which they stopped their work was recorded. Cumulative exposure to ELF EMF during pregnancy was assessed, for both mothers who worked and those who did not during pregnancy, using a recently-updated job-exposure matrix (JEM). Cumulative exposure was considered as a categorical variable (<17.5, 17.5-23.8, 23.8-36.2, 36.2-61.6 or ≥61.6µT-days), a binary variable (<44.1 and ≥44.1µT-days) and a continuous variable. Associations were analyzed by logistic regression, adjusting for the mother's lifestyle factors, sociodemographic characteristics and some mother's medical history during and before pregnancy. Analyses were restricted to single births and to complete values for the pregnancy outcomes (n=16,733). RESULTS: Cumulative exposure was obtained for 96.0% of the mothers. Among them, 37.5% were classified in the 23.8-36.2µT-days category, but high exposures were rare: 1.3% in the ≥61.6µT-days category and 5.5% in the ≥44.1µT-days category. No significant association was observed between maternal cumulative exposure and moderate prematurity and small for gestational age in this exposure range. CONCLUSION: This large population-based study does not suggest that maternal exposure to ELF EMF during pregnancy is highly associated with risks of moderate prematurity or small for gestational age.
Subject(s)
Electromagnetic Fields/adverse effects , Maternal Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Pregnancy Outcome/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , France/epidemiology , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Pregnancy , Young AdultABSTRACT
We undertook a re-analysis of the Canadian data from the 13-country case-control Interphone Study (2001-2004), in which researchers evaluated the associations of mobile phone use with the risks of brain, acoustic neuroma, and parotid gland tumors. In the main publication of the multinational Interphone Study, investigators concluded that biases and errors prevented a causal interpretation. We applied a probabilistic multiple-bias model to address possible biases simultaneously, using validation data from billing records and nonparticipant questionnaires as information on recall error and selective participation. In our modeling, we sought to adjust for these sources of uncertainty and to facilitate interpretation. For glioma, when comparing those in the highest quartile of use (>558 lifetime hours) to those who were not regular users, the odds ratio was 2.0 (95% confidence interval: 1.2, 3.4). After adjustment for selection and recall biases, the odds ratio was 2.2 (95% limits: 1.3, 4.1). There was little evidence of an increase in the risk of meningioma, acoustic neuroma, or parotid gland tumors in relation to mobile phone use. Adjustments for selection and recall biases did not materially affect interpretation in our results from Canadian data.
Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms/etiology , Cell Phone , Glioma/etiology , Meningioma/etiology , Neuroma, Acoustic/etiology , Parotid Neoplasms/etiology , Adult , Bias , Brain Neoplasms/epidemiology , Canada , Case-Control Studies , Electromagnetic Fields/adverse effects , Female , Glioma/epidemiology , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Meningeal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Meningeal Neoplasms/etiology , Middle Aged , Neuroma, Acoustic/epidemiology , Parotid Neoplasms/epidemiology , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
To investigate the role of cancer predisposing factors (PFs) on the associations between paediatric computed tomography (CT) scan exposures and subsequent risk of central nervous system (CNS) tumours and leukaemia. A cohort of children who underwent a CT scan in 2000-2010 in 23 French radiology departments was linked with the national childhood cancers registry and national vital status registry; information on PFs was retrieved through hospital discharge databases. In children without PF, hazard ratios of 1.07 (95% CI 0.99-1.10) for CNS tumours (15 cases) and 1.16 (95% CI 0.77-1.27) for leukaemia (12 cases) were estimated for each 10 mGy increment in CT x-rays organ doses. These estimates were similar to those obtained in the whole cohort. In children with PFs, no positive dose-risk association was observed, possibly related to earlier non-cancer mortality in this group. Our results suggest a modifying effect of PFs on CT-related cancer risks, but need to be confirmed by longer follow-up and other studies.
Subject(s)
Central Nervous System Neoplasms/etiology , Leukemia, Radiation-Induced/etiology , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/etiology , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/adverse effects , Central Nervous System Neoplasms/mortality , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Leukemia, Radiation-Induced/mortality , Male , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/mortality , RiskSubject(s)
Neoplasms/epidemiology , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , MaleABSTRACT
In the framework of the International Nuclear Workers Study conducted in France, the UK and the U.S. (INWORKS), updated and expanded methods were developed to convert recorded doses of ionizing radiation to estimates of organ doses or individual personal dose equivalent [H(p)(10)] for a total number of 308,297 workers, including 40,035 women. This approach accounts for differences in dosimeter response to predominant workplace energy and geometry of exposure and for the recently published ICRP report on dose coefficients for men and women separately. The overall mean annual individual personal dose equivalent, including zero doses, is 1.73 mSv [median = 0.42; interquartile range (IQR): 0.07, 1.59]. Associated individual organ doses were estimated. INWORKS includes workers who had potential for exposure to neutrons. Therefore, we analyzed neutron dosimetry data to identify workers potentially exposed to neutrons. We created a time-varying indicator for each worker, classifying them according to whether they had a positive recorded neutron dose and if so, whether their neutron dose ever exceeded 10% of their total external penetrating radiation dose. The number of workers flagged as being exposed to neutrons was 13% for the full cohort, with 15% of the cohort in France, 12% of the cohort in the UK and 14% in the U.S. We also used available information on in vivo and bioassay monitoring to identify workers with known depositions or suspected internal contaminations. As a result of this work, information is now available that will allow various types of sensitivity analyses.
Subject(s)
Nuclear Reactors , Occupational Exposure/analysis , Radiometry/methods , Female , France , Humans , Male , Neutrons , Photons , United Kingdom , United StatesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To study the cancer risk related to protracted, low-dose exposure to different industrial uranium compounds, paying attention to their isotopic composition and solubility. METHODS: Two thousand and ninety-seven workers employed at the AREVA NC uranium processing plant (France) were followed up for mortality from 1960 to 2006. Historical exposure to uranium and other carcinogenic chemical and physical pollutants was assessed on the basis of the plant-specific job-exposure matrix. For each type of uranium, Cox regression models stratified on sex and calendar period, and adjusted for socioeconomic status and potentially confounding co-exposures were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for mortality from lung cancer (53 deaths) and lymphatic and hematopoietic tissue malignancies (21 deaths). RESULTS: We observed that exposure to reprocessed uranium entails increasing risks of mortality from lung cancer and lymphatic and hematopoietic malignancies (the most significant HR being respectively 1.14 (95% CI: 1.00-1.31) and 1.20 (95% CI: 1.01-1.43) per unit of a time-lagged log-transformed continuous exposure scores), and that the HRs tend to increase with decreasing solubility of the compounds. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that uranium carcinogenicity may depend on isotopic composition and solubility of uranium compounds. This study is the first to show the carcinogenic effect of slowly soluble reprocessed uranium on two uranium target organs. This finding is consistent with data from epidemiological and experimental studies on similar compounds but need to be confirmed in the more powerful dose-response analysis.
Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/epidemiology , Lung Neoplasms/epidemiology , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/epidemiology , Occupational Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Uranium Compounds/poisoning , Adenocarcinoma/mortality , Adenocarcinoma of Lung , Adult , Cohort Studies , Female , France/epidemiology , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/mortality , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/mortality , Occupational Exposure/adverse effectsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to develop an estimate of a radio frequency (RF) dose as the amount of mobile phone RF energy absorbed at the location of a brain tumour, for use in the Interphone Epidemiological Study. METHODS: We systematically evaluated and quantified all the main parameters thought to influence the amount of specific RF energy absorbed in the brain from mobile telephone use. For this, we identified the likely important determinants of RF specific energy absorption rate during protocol and questionnaire design, we collected information from study subjects, network operators and laboratories involved in specific energy absorption rate measurements and we studied potential modifiers of phone output through the use of software-modified phones. Data collected were analysed to assess the relative importance of the different factors, leading to the development of an algorithm to evaluate the total cumulative specific RF energy (in joules per kilogram), or dose, absorbed at a particular location in the brain. This algorithm was applied to Interphone Study subjects in five countries. RESULTS: The main determinants of total cumulative specific RF energy from mobile phones were communication system and frequency band, location in the brain and amount and duration of mobile phone use. Though there was substantial agreement between categorisation of subjects by cumulative specific RF energy and cumulative call time, misclassification was non-negligible, particularly at higher frequency bands. Factors such as adaptive power control (except in Code Division Multiple Access networks), discontinuous transmission and conditions of phone use were found to have a relatively minor influence on total cumulative specific RF energy. CONCLUSIONS: While amount and duration of use are important determinants of RF dose in the brain, their impact can be substantially modified by communication system, frequency band and location in the brain. It is important to take these into account in analyses of risk of brain tumours from RF exposure from mobile phones.
Subject(s)
Algorithms , Brain/radiation effects , Cell Phone , Radiation Dosage , Radio Waves , Australia , Canada , Environmental Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Epidemiologic Studies , France , Humans , Israel , New Zealand , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to examine the associations of brain tumours with radio frequency (RF) fields from mobile phones. METHODS: Patients with brain tumour from the Australian, Canadian, French, Israeli and New Zealand components of the Interphone Study, whose tumours were localised by neuroradiologists, were analysed. Controls were matched on age, sex and region and allocated the 'tumour location' of their matched case. Analyses included 553 glioma and 676 meningioma cases and 1762 and 1911 controls, respectively. RF dose was estimated as total cumulative specific energy (TCSE; J/kg) absorbed at the tumour's estimated centre taking into account multiple RF exposure determinants. RESULTS: ORs with ever having been a regular mobile phone user were 0.93 (95% CI 0.73 to 1.18) for glioma and 0.80 (95% CI 0.66 to 0.96) for meningioma. ORs for glioma were below 1 in the first four quintiles of TCSE but above 1 in the highest quintile, 1.35 (95% CI 0.96 to 1.90). The OR increased with increasing TCSE 7+ years before diagnosis (p-trend 0.01; OR 1.91, 95% CI 1.05 to 3.47 in the highest quintile). A complementary analysis in which 44 glioma and 135 meningioma cases in the most exposed area of the brain were compared with gliomas and meningiomas located elsewhere in the brain showed increased ORs for tumours in the most exposed part of the brain in those with 10+ years of mobile phone use (OR 2.80, 95% CI 1.13 to 6.94 for glioma). Patterns for meningioma were similar, but ORs were lower, many below 1.0. CONCLUSIONS: There were suggestions of an increased risk of glioma in long-term mobile phone users with high RF exposure and of similar, but apparently much smaller, increases in meningioma risk. The uncertainty of these results requires that they be replicated before a causal interpretation can be made.
Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms/epidemiology , Cell Phone , Electromagnetic Fields/adverse effects , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/epidemiology , Radiation Dosage , Radio Waves/adverse effects , Adult , Algorithms , Australia/epidemiology , Canada/epidemiology , Case-Control Studies , Female , France/epidemiology , Glioma/epidemiology , Humans , Israel/epidemiology , Logistic Models , Male , Meningeal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Meningioma/epidemiology , Middle Aged , New Zealand/epidemiology , Odds Ratio , Risk Factors , Time FactorsABSTRACT
Although measurement of the radiofrequency (RF) exposure can today be performed with personal exposure meters, this approach would be very expensive and time-consuming for large studies, and long term measurements would require considerable commitment of the study participants. Thus, there is a need for validated exposure assessment methods that do not require individual measurements for each study participant. Among the potential predictors, one of the most amenable to being recorded adequately is the day of the week. Drawing upon an existing population-based study, our goal was therefore to assess variability of individual RF exposure across days of the week. The random sample consisted of 34 people who were supplied with a personal exposure meter for seven consecutive days, and kept a time-location-activity diary. A total of 225,414 electric field strength measurements were recorded in 12 different RF bands. Summary statistics were calculated with the robust regression on order statistics method. We found evidence for statistically significant variability of individual RF exposure across days of the week, though the relative magnitude of the differences observed was small. Larger studies are needed to validate these results and determine whether day of the week is an important determinant for inclusion in individual RF exposure prediction models that remain urgently needed to conduct epidemiological studies on potential health effects.
Subject(s)
Environmental Exposure/analysis , Radio Waves , Cell Phone/statistics & numerical data , Environmental Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Radiation Dosage , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
Twenty-five years have passed since radioactive releases from the Chernobyl nuclear accident led to the exposure of millions of people in Europe. Studies of affected populations have provided important new data on the links between radiation and cancer-particularly the risk of thyroid tumours from exposure to iodine isotopes-that are important not only for a fuller scientific understanding of radiation effects, but also for radiation protection. It is now well documented that children and adolescents exposed to radioiodines from Chernobyl fallout have a sizeable dose-related increase in thyroid cancer, with the risk greatest in those youngest at exposure and with a suggestion that deficiency in stable iodine may increase the risk. Data on thyroid cancer risks to other age groups are somewhat less definitive. In addition, there have been reported increases in incidence and mortality from non-thyroid cancers and non-cancer end points. Although some studies are difficult to interpret because of methodological limitations, recent investigations of Chernobyl clean-up workers ('liquidators') have provided evidence of increased risks of leukaemia and other haematological malignancies and of cataracts, and suggestions of an increase in the risk of cardiovascular diseases, following low doses and low dose rates of radiation. Further careful follow-up of these populations, including the establishment and long-term support of life-span study cohorts, could provide additional important information for the quantification of radiation risks and the protection of persons exposed to low doses of radiation.
Subject(s)
Chernobyl Nuclear Accident , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/epidemiology , Radiation Injuries/epidemiology , Thyroid Neoplasms/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Cataract/epidemiology , Child , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Radioactive Fallout , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Ukraine/epidemiology , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Between 1966 and 1974, France conducted 41 atmospheric nuclear tests in Polynesia, but their potential health effects have not previously been investigated. METHODS: In a case-control study, we compared the radiation exposure of almost all the French Polynesians diagnosed with differentiated thyroid carcinoma between 1981 and 2003 (n=229) to the exposure of 373 French Polynesian control individuals without cancer from the general population. Radiation exposures were estimated using measurements after the nuclear tests, age at time of each test, residential and dietary information. RESULTS: The average thyroid dose before 15 years of age was about 1.8 mGy, and 5% of the cases and 3% of the controls received a dose above 10 mGy. Despite this low level of dose, and after adjusting for ethnic group, level of education, body surface area, family history of thyroid cancer and number of pregnancies for women, we observed an increasing risk (P=0.04) of thyroid cancer with increasing thyroid dose received before age of 15 years, which remained after excluding non-aggressive differentiated thyroid micro-carcinomas. This increase of risk per unit of thyroid radiation dose was higher (P=0.03) in women who later experienced four or more pregnancies than among other women. CONCLUSION: The risk estimate is low, but is based on limited exposure data. The release of information on exposure, currently classified, would greatly improve the reliability of the risk estimation.
Subject(s)
Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/epidemiology , Nuclear Weapons , Radioactive Fallout/adverse effects , Thyroid Neoplasms/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Case-Control Studies , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Parity , Polynesia/epidemiology , Pregnancy , Radiation Dosage , Risk , Young AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The output power of a mobile phone is directly related to its radiofrequency (RF) electromagnetic field strength, and may theoretically vary substantially in different networks and phone use circumstances due to power control technologies. To improve indices of RF exposure for epidemiological studies, we assessed determinants of mobile phone output power in a multinational study. METHODS: More than 500 volunteers in 12 countries used Global System for Mobile communications software-modified phones (GSM SMPs) for approximately 1 month each. The SMPs recorded date, time, and duration of each call, and the frequency band and output power at fixed sampling intervals throughout each call. Questionnaires provided information on the typical circumstances of an individual's phone use. Linear regression models were used to analyse the influence of possible explanatory variables on the average output power and the percentage call time at maximum power for each call. RESULTS: Measurements of over 60,000 phone calls showed that the average output power was approximately 50% of the maximum, and that output power varied by a factor of up to 2 to 3 between study centres and network operators. Maximum power was used during a considerable proportion of call time (39% on average). Output power decreased with increasing call duration, but showed little variation in relation to reported frequency of use while in a moving vehicle or inside buildings. Higher output powers for rural compared with urban use of the SMP were observed principally in Sweden where the study covered very sparsely populated areas. CONCLUSIONS: Average power levels are substantially higher than the minimum levels theoretically achievable in GSM networks. Exposure indices could be improved by accounting for average power levels of different telecommunications systems. There appears to be little value in gathering information on circumstances of phone use other than use in very sparsely populated regions.
Subject(s)
Cell Phone/statistics & numerical data , Environmental Exposure/analysis , Radio Waves , Adult , Case-Control Studies , Environmental Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Monitoring/methods , Rural Health/statistics & numerical data , Time Factors , Urban Health/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Both the public perceptions, and most published epidemiologic studies, rely on the assumption that the distance of a particular residence from a base station or a broadcast transmitter is an appropriate surrogate for exposure to radiofrequency fields, although complex propagation characteristics affect the beams from antennas. The main goal of this study was to characterise the distribution of residential exposure from antennas using personal exposure meters. METHODS: A total of 200 randomly selected people were enrolled. Each participant was supplied with a personal exposure meter for 24 h measurements, and kept a time-location-activity diary. Two exposure metrics for each radiofrequency were then calculated: the proportion of measurements above the detection limit (0.05 V/m), and the maximum electric field strength. Residential address was geocoded, and distance from each antenna was calculated. RESULTS: Much of the time, the recorded field strength was below the detection level (0.05 V/m), the FM band standing apart with a proportion above the detection threshold of 12.3%. The maximum electric field strength was always lower than 1.5 V/m. Exposure to GSM and DCS waves peaked around 280 m and 1000 m from the antennas. A downward trend was found within a 10 km range for FM. Conversely, UMTS, TV 3, and TV 4&5 signals did not vary with distance. CONCLUSIONS: Despite numerous limiting factors entailing a high variability in radiofrequency exposure assessment, but owing to a sound statistical technique, we found that exposures from GSM and DCS base stations increase with distance in the near source zone, to a maximum where the main beam intersects the ground. We believe these results will contribute to the ongoing public debate over the location of base stations and their associated emissions.