Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 17 de 17
Filter
1.
PLoS One ; 18(1): e0279873, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36602973

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Conflicting results are reported about daytime variation on mortality and cardiac outcomes after non-cardiac surgeries. In this cohort study, we evaluate whether the period of the day in which surgeries are performed may influence all-cause mortality and cardiovascular outcomes in patients undergoing non-cardiac arterial vascular procedures. METHODS: 1,267 patients who underwent non-cardiac arterial vascular surgeries between 2012 and 2018 were prospectively included in our cohort and categorized into two groups: morning (7 a.m. to 12 a.m., 79%) and afternoon/night (12:01 p.m. to 6:59 a.m. in the next day, 21%) surgeries. Primary endpoint was all-cause mortality within 30 days and one year. Secondary endpoints were the incidence of perioperative myocardial injury/infarction (PMI), and the incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE, including acute myocardial infarction, acute heart failure, arrhythmias, cardiovascular death) at hospital discharge. RESULTS: After adjusting for confounders in the multivariable Cox proportional regression, all-cause mortality rates at 30 days and one year were higher among those who underwent surgery in the afternoon/night (aHR 1.6 [95%CI 1.1-2.3], P = 0.015 and aHR 1.7 [95%CI 1.3-2.2], P < 0.001, respectively). Afternoon/night patients had higher incidence of PMI (aHR 1.4 [95%CI 1.1-1.7], P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the incidence of MACE (aHR 1.3 [95%CI 0.9-1.7], P = 0.074). CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing arterial vascular surgery, being operated in the afternoon/night was independently associated with increased all-cause mortality rates and incidence of perioperative myocardial injury/infarction.


Subject(s)
Heart Diseases , Myocardial Infarction , Humans , Cohort Studies , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Myocardial Infarction/etiology , Vascular Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Risk Factors
2.
Arq Neuropsiquiatr ; 80(5 Suppl 1): 88-93, 2022 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35976292

ABSTRACT

Stroke is the second leading cause of death worldwide and the vast majority can be attributed to modifiable risk factors, mainly behavioral and metabolic. The top six risk factors responsible for cardiovascular mortality in Brazil in 2019 were high systolic blood pressure, inadequate dietary exposure, high body mass index, high LDL cholesterol, high fasting blood glucose levels, and tobacco. We intend to discuss in this paper the evidence and recommendations in the approach of three essential risk factors for patients with a history of stroke: dyslipidemia, hypertension and diabetes.


Subject(s)
Atherosclerosis , Hypertension , Stroke , Atherosclerosis/etiology , Humans , Hypertension/complications , Neurologists , Risk Factors , Stroke/etiology
3.
Arq. neuropsiquiatr ; 80(5,supl.1): 88-93, May 2022. graf
Article in English | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1393928

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Stroke is the second leading cause of death worldwide and the vast majority can be attributed to modifiable risk factors, mainly behavioral and metabolic. The top six risk factors responsible for cardiovascular mortality in Brazil in 2019 were high systolic blood pressure, inadequate dietary exposure, high body mass index, high LDL cholesterol, high fasting blood glucose levels, and tobacco. We intend to discuss in this paper the evidence and recommendations in the approach of three essential risk factors for patients with a history of stroke: dyslipidemia, hypertension and diabetes.


RESUMO O acidente vascular cerebral (AVC) é a segunda causa de morte no mundo e, em grande parte, pode ser atribuído a fatores de risco modificáveis, principalmente comportamentais e metabólicos. Os seis principais fatores de risco responsáveis pela mortalidade cardiovascular no Brasil em 2019 foram pressão arterial sistólica elevada, exposição alimentar inadequada, índice de massa corporal elevado, LDL -colesterol elevado, níveis alterados de glicemia e tabagismo. Pretendemos discutir neste artigo as evidências e recomendações na abordagem de três fatores de risco essenciais para pacientes com histórico de AVC: dislipidemia, hipertensão e diabetes.

7.
Clinics (Sao Paulo) ; 76: e3538, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34878033

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study presents the cardiology referral model adopted at the University of São Paulo-Hospital das Clínicas complex during the initial period of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, main reasons for requesting a cardiologic evaluation, and clinical profile of and prognostic predictors in patients with COVID-19. METHODS: In this observational study, data of all cardiology referral requests between March 30, 2020 and July 6, 2020 were collected prospectively. A descriptive analysis of the reasons for cardiologic evaluation requests and the most common cardiologic diagnoses was performed. A multivariable model was used to identify independent predictors of in-hospital mortality among patients with COVID-19. RESULTS: Cardiologic evaluation was requested for 206 patients admitted to the ICHC-COVID. A diagnosis of COVID-19 was confirmed for 180 patients. Cardiologic complications occurred in 77.7% of the patients. Among these, decompensated heart failure was the most common complication (38.8%), followed by myocardial injury (35%), and arrhythmias, especially high ventricular response atrial fibrillation (17.7%). Advanced age, greater need of ventilatory support on admission, and pre-existing heart failure were independently associated with in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSIONS: A hybrid model combining in-person referral with remote discussion and teaching is a viable alternative to overcome COVID-19 limitations. Cardiologic evaluation remains important during the pandemic, as patients with COVID-19 frequently develop cardiovascular complications or decompensation of the underlying heart disease.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cardiology , Humans , Pandemics , Referral and Consultation , SARS-CoV-2
10.
Clinics ; 76: e3538, 2021. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1350609

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study presents the cardiology referral model adopted at the University of São Paulo-Hospital das Clínicas complex during the initial period of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, main reasons for requesting a cardiologic evaluation, and clinical profile of and prognostic predictors in patients with COVID-19. METHODS: In this observational study, data of all cardiology referral requests between March 30, 2020 and July 6, 2020 were collected prospectively. A descriptive analysis of the reasons for cardiologic evaluation requests and the most common cardiologic diagnoses was performed. A multivariable model was used to identify independent predictors of in-hospital mortality among patients with COVID-19. RESULTS: Cardiologic evaluation was requested for 206 patients admitted to the ICHC-COVID. A diagnosis of COVID-19 was confirmed for 180 patients. Cardiologic complications occurred in 77.7% of the patients. Among these, decompensated heart failure was the most common complication (38.8%), followed by myocardial injury (35%), and arrhythmias, especially high ventricular response atrial fibrillation (17.7%). Advanced age, greater need of ventilatory support on admission, and pre-existing heart failure were independently associated with in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSIONS: A hybrid model combining in-person referral with remote discussion and teaching is a viable alternative to overcome COVID-19 limitations. Cardiologic evaluation remains important during the pandemic, as patients with COVID-19 frequently develop cardiovascular complications or decompensation of the underlying heart disease.


Subject(s)
Humans , Cardiology , COVID-19 , Referral and Consultation , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2
17.
Autops Case Rep ; 4(4): 63-69, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28573131

ABSTRACT

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease that can affect any organ or system. Neuropsychiatric and pulmonary involvement can occur in 40 and 50% of patients respectively, and may occur in several different clinical forms. While the main neuropsychiatric manifestations are represented by cognitive impairment, organic cerebral syndromes, delirium, psychosis, seizures, and peripheral neuropathies, the main forms of pulmonary involvement are pleurisy with or without pleural effusion, pneumonitis, interstitial disease, pulmonary hypertension, and alveolar hemorrhage. The authors report the case of a 49-year-old woman whose first manifestation of SLE was represented by two rare manifestations: rapidly progressive cognitive impairment, which was associated with respiratory failure caused by the shrinking lung syndrome. The authors call attention to the under-diagnosis of lupus pulmonary complications and its association with severe cognitive impairment that often necessitates aggressive treatment.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...