Influence of Cooling duration on Efficacy in Cardiac Arrest Patients (ICECAP): study protocol for a multicenter, randomized, adaptive allocation clinical trial to identify the optimal duration of induced hypothermia for neuroprotection in comatose, adult survivors of after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac arrest is a common and devastating emergency of both the heart and brain. More than 380,000 patients suffer out-of-hospital cardiac arrest annually in the USA. Induced cooling of comatose patients markedly improved neurological and functional outcomes in pivotal randomized clinical trials, but the optimal duration of therapeutic hypothermia has not yet been established. METHODS: This study is a multi-center randomized, response-adaptive, duration (dose) finding, comparative effectiveness clinical trial with blinded outcome assessment. We investigate two populations of adult comatose survivors of cardiac arrest to ascertain the shortest duration of cooling that provides the maximum treatment effect. The design is based on a statistical model of response as defined by the primary endpoint, a weighted 90-day mRS (modified Rankin Scale, a measure of neurologic disability), across the treatment arms. Subjects will initially be equally randomized between 12, 24, and 48 h of therapeutic cooling. After the first 200 subjects have been randomized, additional treatment arms between 12 and 48 h will be opened and patients will be allocated, within each initial cardiac rhythm type (shockable or non-shockable), by response adaptive randomization. As the trial continues, shorter and longer duration arms may be opened. A maximum sample size of 1800 subjects is proposed. Secondary objectives are to characterize: the overall safety and adverse events associated with duration of cooling, the effect on neuropsychological outcomes, and the effect on patient-reported quality of life measures. DISCUSSION: In vitro and in vivo studies have shown the neuroprotective effects of therapeutic hypothermia for cardiac arrest. We hypothesize that longer durations of cooling may improve either the proportion of patients that attain a good neurological recovery or may result in better recovery among the proportion already categorized as having a good outcome. If the treatment effect of cooling is increasing across duration, for at least some set of durations, then this provides evidence of the efficacy of cooling itself versus normothermia, even in the absence of a normothermia control arm, confirming previous RCTs for OHCA survivors of shockable rhythms and provides the first prospective controlled evidence of efficacy in those without initial shockable rhythms. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04217551. Registered on 30 December 2019.

Influence of Cooling duration on Efficacy in Cardiac Arrest Patients (ICECAP): study protocol for a multicenter, randomized, adaptive allocation clinical trial to identify the optimal duration of induced hypothermia for neuroprotection in comatose, adult survivors of after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

Background: Cardiac arrest is a common and devastating emergency of both the heart and brain. More than 380,000 patients suffer out-of-hospital cardiac arrest annually in the United States. Induced cooling of comatose patients markedly improved neurological and functional outcomes in pivotal randomized clinical trials, but the optimal duration of therapeutic hypothermia has not yet been established. Methods: This study is a multi-center randomized, response-adaptive, duration (dose) finding, comparative effectiveness clinical trial with blinded outcome assessment. We investigate two populations of adult comatose survivors of cardiac arrest to ascertain the shortest duration of cooling that provides the maximum treatment effect. The design is based on a statistical model of response as defined by the primary endpoint, a weighted 90-day mRS (modified Rankin Scale, a measure of neurologic disability), across the treatment arms. Subjects will initially be equally randomized between 12, 24, and 48 hours of therapeutic cooling. After the first 200 subjects have been randomized, additional treatment arms between 12 and 48 hours will be opened and patients will be allocated, within each initial cardiac rhythm type (shockable or non-shockable), by response adaptive randomization. As the trial continues, shorter and longer duration arms may be opened. A maximum sample size of 1800 subjects is proposed. Secondary objectives are to characterize: the overall safety and adverse events associated with duration of cooling, the effect on neuropsychological outcomes, and the effect on patient reported quality of life measures. Discussion: In-vitro and in-vivo studies have shown the neuroprotective effects of therapeutic hypothermia for cardiac arrest. We hypothesize that longer durations of cooling may improve either the proportion of patients that attain a good neurological recovery or may result in better recovery among the proportion already categorized as having a good outcome. If the treatment effect of cooling is increasing across duration, for at least some set of durations, then this provides evidence of the efficacy of cooling itself versus normothermia, even in the absence of a normothermia control arm, confirming previous RCTs for OHCA survivors of shockable rhythms and provides the first prospective controlled evidence of efficacy in those without initial shockable rhythms. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04217551, 2019-12-30).

What Huntington's Disease Patients Say About Their Illness: An Online Direct-to-Participant Pilot Study.

Background: Direct-to-participant online reporting facilitates the conduct of clinical research by increasing access and clinically meaningful patient engagement. Objective: We assessed feasibility of online data collection from adults with diagnosed Huntington's disease (HD) who directly reported their problems and impact in their own words. Methods: Data were collected online from consenting United States residents who self-identified as 1) having been diagnosed with Huntington's disease, 2) able to ambulate independently, and 3) self-sufficient for most daily needs. Data for this pilot study were collected using the Huntington Study Group myHDstory online research platform. The Huntington Disease Patient Report of Problems (HD-PROP), an open-ended questionnaire, was used to capture verbatim bothersome problems and functional impact. Natural language processing, human-in-the-loop curation of verbatim reports involving clinical and experience experts, and machine learning classified verbatim-reports into clinically meaningful symptoms. Results: All 8 questionnaires in the online pilot study were completed by 345 participants who were 60.9% men, 34.5±9.9 (mean±SD) years old, and 9.5±8.4 years since HD diagnosis. Racial self-identification was 46.4% Caucasian, 28.7% African American, 15.4% American Indian/Alaska Native, and 9.5% other. Accuracy of verbatim classification was 99%. Non-motor problems were the most frequently reported symptoms; depression and cognitive impairment were the most common. Conclusions: Online research participation was feasible for a diverse cohort of adults who self-reported an HD diagnosis and predominantly non-motor symptoms related to mood and cognition. Online research tools can help inform what bothers HD patients, identify clinically meaningful outcomes, and facilitate participation by diverse and under-represented populations.

Developing an Edema Clinician-Reported Outcome Measure for Nephrotic Syndrome.

Introduction: Edema is a common manifestation of proteinuric kidney diseases, but there is no consensus approach for reliably evaluating edema. The objective of this study was to develop an edema clinician-reported outcome measure for use in patients with nephrotic syndrome. Methods: A literature review was conducted to assess existing clinician-rated measures of edema. Clinical experts were recruited from internal medicine, nephrology, and pediatric nephrology practices to participate in concept elicitation using semi-structured interviews and cognitive debriefing. Qualitative analysis methods were used to collate expert input and inform measurement development. In addition, training and assessment modules were developed using an iterative process that also utilized expert input and cognitive debriefing to ensure interrater reliability. Results: While several clinician-rated measures of edema have been proposed, our literature review did not identify any studies to support the reliability or validity of these measures. Fourteen clinician experts participated in the concept elicitation interviews, and twelve participated in cognitive debriefing. A clinician-reported outcome measure for edema was developed. The measure assesses edema severity in multiple individual body parts. An online training module and assessment tool were generated and refined using additional clinician input and investigative team expertise. Conclusion: The Edema ClinRO (V1) measure is developed specifically to measure edema in nephrotic syndrome. The tool assesses edema across multiple body parts, and it includes a training module to ensure standardized administration across raters. Future examination of this measure is ongoing to establish its reliability and validity.

Identifying Design Opportunities for Adaptive mHealth Interventions That Target General Well-Being: Interview Study With Informal Care Partners.

BACKGROUND: Mobile health (mHealth) interventions can deliver personalized behavioral support to users in daily contexts. These interventions have been increasingly adopted to support individuals who require low-cost and low-burden support. Prior research has demonstrated the feasibility and acceptability of an mHealth intervention app (CareQOL) designed for use with informal care partners. To further optimize the intervention delivery, we need to investigate how care partners, many of whom lack the time for self-care, react and act in response to different behavioral messages. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to understand the factors that impact care partners' decision-making and actions in response to different behavioral messages. Insights from this study will help optimize future tailored and personalized behavioral interventions. METHODS: We conducted semistructured interviews with participants who had recently completed a 3-month randomized controlled feasibility trial of the CareQOL mHealth intervention app. Of the 36 participants from the treatment group of the randomized controlled trial, 23 (64%) participated in these interviews. To prepare for each interview, the team first selected representative behavioral messages (eg, targeting different health dimensions) and presented them to participants during the interview to probe their influence on participants' thoughts and actions. The time of delivery, self-reported perceptions of the day, and user ratings of a message were presented to the participants during the interviews to assist with recall. RESULTS: The interview data showed that after receiving a message, participants took various actions in response to different messages. Participants performed suggested behaviors or adjusted them either immediately or in a delayed manner (eg, sometimes up to a month later). We identified 4 factors that shape the variations in user actions in response to different behavioral messages: uncertainties about the workload required to perform suggested behaviors, concerns about one's ability to routinize suggested behaviors, in-the-moment willingness and ability to plan for suggested behaviors, and overall capability to engage with the intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that care partners use mHealth behavioral messages differently regarding the immediacy of actions and the adaptation to suggested behaviors. Multiple factors influence people's perceptions and decisions regarding when and how to take actions. Future systems should consider these factors to tailor behavioral support for individuals and design system features to support the delay or adaptation of the suggested behaviors. The findings also suggest extending the assessment of user adherence by considering the variations in user actions on behavioral support (ie, performing suggested or adjusted behaviors immediately or in a delayed manner). INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.2196/32842.

The Dosing of Mobile-Based Just-in-Time Adaptive Self-Management Prompts for Caregivers: Preliminary Findings From a Pilot Microrandomized Study.

BACKGROUND: Caregivers of people with chronic illnesses often face negative stress-related health outcomes and are unavailable for traditional face-to-face interventions due to the intensity and constraints of their caregiver role. Just-in-time adaptive interventions (JITAIs) have emerged as a design framework that is particularly suited for interventional mobile health studies that deliver in-the-moment prompts that aim to promote healthy behavioral and psychological changes while minimizing user burden and expense. While JITAIs have the potential to improve caregivers' health-related quality of life (HRQOL), their effectiveness for caregivers remains poorly understood. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the dose-response relationship of a fully automated JITAI-based self-management intervention involving personalized mobile app notifications targeted at decreasing the level of caregiver strain, anxiety, and depression. The secondary objective is to investigate whether the effectiveness of this mobile health intervention was moderated by the caregiver group. We also explored whether the effectiveness of this intervention was moderated by (1) previous HRQOL measures, (2) the number of weeks in the study, (3) step count, and (4) minutes of sleep. METHODS: We examined 36 caregivers from 3 disease groups (10 from spinal cord injury, 11 from Huntington disease, and 25 from allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation) in the intervention arm of a larger randomized controlled trial (subjects in the other arm received no prompts from the mobile app) designed to examine the acceptability and feasibility of this intensive type of trial design. A series of multivariate linear models implementing a weighted and centered least squares estimator were used to assess the JITAI efficacy and effect. RESULTS: We found preliminary support for a positive dose-response relationship between the number of administered JITAI messages and JITAI efficacy in improving caregiver strain, anxiety, and depression; while most of these associations did not meet conventional levels of significance, there was a significant association between high-frequency JITAI and caregiver strain. Specifically, administering 5-6 messages per week as opposed to no messages resulted in a significant decrease in the HRQOL score of caregiver strain with an estimate of -6.31 (95% CI -11.76 to -0.12; P=.046). In addition, we found that the caregiver groups and the participants' levels of depression in the previous week moderated JITAI efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides preliminary evidence to support the effectiveness of the self-management JITAI and offers practical guidance for designing future personalized JITAI strategies for diverse caregiver groups. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04556591; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04556591.

Development and Validation of the Low Vision Severely Constricted Peripheral Eyesight (LV-SCOPE) Questionnaire.

PURPOSE: To develop and validate a novel patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure to assess vision-related functioning in individuals with severe peripheral field loss (PFL). DESIGN: Prospective outcome measure development/validation study. METHODS: A 127-item questionnaire was developed based on a prior qualitative interview study. A total of 116 participants with severe PFL due to retinitis pigmentosa (RP) or glaucoma were recruited at the Kellogg Eye Center and completed the Likert-scaled telephone-administered questionnaire. Included participants had a horizontal extent of their visual field <20 degrees (RP) or a mixed or generalized stage 4 to 5 defect using the Enhanced Glaucoma Staging System (glaucoma) in the better seeing eye (or in 1 eye if the fellow eye visual acuity was <20/200). Response data were analyzed using exploratory factor analysis and Rasch modeling. Poorly functioning items were eliminated, confirmatory factor analysis was used to ensure scale unidimensionality, and the model was refit to produce the final instrument. RESULTS: The final Low Vision Severely Constricted Peripheral Eyesight (LV-SCOPE) Questionnaire contains 53 items across 6 domains: mobility, object localization, object recognition, reading, social functioning, and technology. There were 74 items removed because of high missingness, poor factor loadings, low internal consistency, high local dependency, low item information, item redundancy, or differential item functioning. Using Rasch item calibrations, person ability scores could be calculated for each of the 6 unidimensional LV-SCOPE domains with good test-retest stability. CONCLUSIONS: The LV-SCOPE Questionnaire provides a valid and reliable measure of vision-related functioning across 6 key domains relevant to individuals with severe PFL. Findings support the clinical utility of this psychometrically valid instrument.

The reliability and validity of the TBI-CareQOL system in four diverse caregiver groups.

PURPOSE: Establishing the psychometric reliability and validity of new measures is an ongoing process. More work is needed in to confirm the clinical utility of the TBI-CareQOL measurement development system in both an independent cohort of caregivers of traumatic brain injury (TBI), as well as in additional caregiver groups. METHODS: An independent cohort of caregivers of people with TBI (n = 139), as well as three new diverse caregiver cohorts (n = 19 caregivers of persons with spinal cord injury, n = 21 caregivers for persons with Huntington disease, and n = 30 caregivers for persons with cancer), completed 11 TBI-CareQOL measures (caregiver strain; caregiver-specific anxiety; anxiety; depression; anger; self-efficacy; positive affect and well-being; perceived stress; satisfaction with social roles and activities; fatigue; sleep-related impairment), as well as two additional measures to examine convergent and discriminant validity (PROMIS Global Health; the Caregiver Appraisal Scale). RESULTS: Findings support the internal consistency reliability (all alphas > 0.70 with the vast majority being > 0.80 across the different cohorts) of the TBI-CareQOL measures. All measures were free of ceiling effects, and the vast majority were also free of floor effects. Convergent validity was supported by moderate to high correlations between the TBI-CareQOL and related measures, while discriminant validity was supported by low correlations between the TBI-CareQOL measures and unrelated constructs. CONCLUSION: Findings indicate that the TBI-CareQOL measures have clinical utility in caregivers of people with TBI, as well as in other caregiver groups. As such, these measures should be considered as important outcome measures for clinical trials aiming to improve caregiver outcomes.

Item Banks for Measuring the Effect of Blood Pressure Dysregulation on Health-Related Quality of Life in Persons With Spinal Cord Injury.

OBJECTIVE: To report on the development and calibration of the new Blood Pressure Dysregulation Measurement System (BPD-MS) item banks that assess the effect of BPD on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and the daily activities of Veterans and non-Veterans with spinal cord injury (SCI). DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey study. SETTING: Two Veteran Affairs medical centers and a SCI model system site. PARTICIPANTS: 454 respondents with SCI (n=262 American Veterans and n=192 non-Veterans; N=454). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The BPD-MS item banks. RESULTS: BPD item pools were developed and refined using literature reviews, qualitative data from focus groups, and cognitive debriefing of persons with SCI and professional caregivers. The item banks then underwent expert review, reading level assessment, and translatability review prior to field testing. The items pools consisted of 180 unique questions (items). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, item response theory modeling, and differential item function investigations resulted in item banks that included a total of 150 items: 75 describing the effect of autonomic dysreflexia on HRQOL, 55 describing the effect of low blood pressure (LBP) on HRQOL, and 20 describing the effect of LBP on daily activities. In addition, 10-item short forms were constructed based on item response theory-derived item information values and the clinical relevance of item content. CONCLUSIONS: The new BPD-MS item banks and corresponding 10-item short forms were developed using established rigorous measurement development standards, which represents the first BPD-specific patient-reported outcomes measurement system unique for use in the SCI population.

Advance Care Planning and Health-Related Quality of Life in Huntington Disease: Results from a Multicenter National Study.

Objective: With Huntington disease (HD), a fatal neurodegenerative disease where the prevalence of suicidal thoughts and behavior (STB) remains elevated as compared to other neurological disorders, it is unknown whether STB and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) affect plans for the end of life or more broadly, advance care planning (ACP). Conversely, it is unknown whether ACP would provoke future changes to STB and HRQoL. Therefore, we sought to evaluate whether STB and HRQoL patient-reported outcomes (PROs) contribute to ACP and whether ACP relates to changes in STB and HRQoL at 24 months. Methods: HD-validated clinician- and patient-assessments (i.e., HRQoL PROs) were obtained at baseline enrollment, 12 and 24 months through our multi-center study (HDQLIFE™) throughout the United States among people with premanifest, early-stage, and late-stage manifest HD. We used linear mixed-effects models to determine the relationships between STB and HRQoL at baseline and HDQLIFE End of Life Planning at follow-up. Separate linear mixed-effects models were used to assess the relationship between HDQLIFE End of Life Planning at baseline, and HRQoL and STB at 12 and 24 months. False discovery rate adjustments were used to account for multiple comparisons. Results: At baseline enrollment, STB and HRQoL were not related to HDQLIFE End of Life Planning at 12 or 24 months. Similarly, at baseline, HDQLIFE End of Life Planning demonstrated no association with STB or HRQoL at 12 or 24 months. Interpretation: STB and HRQoL PROs do not significantly affect patient engagement with ACP. Most importantly, engaging in ACP does not cause untoward effects on HRQoL or STB for this rare neurodegenerative disease where the lifetime prevalence of STB approaches 30%.

Development of a New Measure of Housing Security: The REDD-CAT Housing Security Measure.

BACKGROUND: Housing security is a key social determinant of behavior related to health outcomes. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to develop a new patient-reported outcome measure that evaluates aspects of housing security for use in the Re-Engineered Discharge for Diabetes-Computer Adaptive Test (REDD-CAT) measurement system. DESIGN: Qualitative data, literature reviews, and cross-sectional survey study. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 225 people with T2DM provided responses to the items in this item pool. MAIN MEASURES: A new item pool that evaluates important aspects of housing security was developed using stakeholder data from focus groups of persons with T2DM. KEY RESULTS: For the Housing Affordability scale, factor analysis (both exploratory and confirmatory) supported the retention of six items. Of these items, none exhibited sparse cells or problems with monotonicity; no items were deleted due to low item-adjusted total score correlations. For the six affordability items, a constrained graded response model indicated no items exhibited misfit; thus, all were retained. No items indicated differential item functioning (examined for age, sex, education, race, and socioeconomic status). Thus, the final Affordability item bank comprised six items. A Housing Safety index (three items) and a Home Features index (eight items) were also developed. Reliability (i.e., internal consistency and test-retest reliability) and validity (i.e., convergent, discriminant, and known-groups) of the new measures were also supported. CONCLUSIONS: The REDD-CAT Housing Security Measure provides a reliable and valid assessment of housing affordability, safety, and home features in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Future work is needed to establish the clinical utility of this measure in other clinical populations.

A pilot intervention of using a mobile health app (ONC Roadmap) to enhance health-related quality of life in family caregivers of pediatric patients with cancer.

Background: The Roadmap mobile health (mHealth) app was developed to provide health-related quality of life (HRQOL) support for family caregivers of patients with cancer. Methods: Eligibility included: family caregivers (age ≥18 years) who self-reported as the primary caregiver of their pediatric patient with cancer; patients (age ≥5 years) who were receiving cancer care at the University of Michigan. Feasibility was calculated as the percentage of caregivers who logged into ONC Roadmap and engaged with it at least twice weekly for at least 50% of the 120-day study duration. Feasibility and acceptability was also assessed through a Feasibility and Acceptability questionnaire and the Mobile App Rating Scale to specifically assess app-quality. Exploratory analyses were also conducted to assess HRQOL self- or parent proxy assessments and physiological data capture. Results: Between September 2020-September 2021, 100 participants (or 50 caregiver-patient dyads) consented and enrolled in the ONC Roadmap study for 120-days. Feasibility of the study was met, wherein the majority of caregivers (N=32; 65%) logged into ONC Roadmap and engaged with it at least twice weekly for at least 50% of the study duration (defined a priori in the Protocol). The Feasibility and Acceptability questionnaire responses indicated that the study was feasible and acceptable with the majority (>50%) reporting Agree or Strongly Agree with positive Net Favorability [(Agree + Strongly Agree) - (Disagree + Totally Disagree)] in each of the domains (e.g., Fitbit use, ONC Roadmap use, completing longitudinal assessments, engaging in similar future study, study expectations). Improvements were seen across the majority of the mental HRQOL domains across all groups; even though underpowered, there were significant improvements in caregiver-specific aspects of HRQOL and anxiety and in depression and fatigue for children (ages 8-17 years), and a trend toward improvement in depression for children ages 8-17 years and in fatigue for adult patients. Conclusions: This study supports that mHealth technology may be a promising platform to provide HRQOL support for caregivers of pediatric patients with cancer. Importantly, the findings suggest that the study protocol was feasible, and participants were favorable to participate in future studies of this intervention alongside routine cancer care delivery.

Death Anxiety in Huntington Disease: Longitudinal Heath-Related Quality-of-Life Outcomes.

Objective: Death anxiety, represented by the HDQLIFE™ Concern with Death and Dying (CwDD) patient-reported outcome (PRO) questionnaire, captures a person's worry about the death and dying process. Previous work suggests that death anxiety remains an unremitting burden throughout all stages of Huntington disease (HD). Although palliative interventions have lessened death anxiety among people with advanced cancer, none has yet to undergo testing in the HD population. An account of how death anxiety is associated with longitudinal changes to aspects of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) would help optimize neuropalliative interventions for people with HD. Methods: HDQLIFE collected PROs concerning physical, mental, social, and cognitive HRQoL domains and clinician-rated assessments from people with HD at baseline and 12 and 24 months. Linear mixed-effects models were created to determine how baseline death anxiety was associated with follow-up changes in HRQoL PROs after controlling for baseline death anxiety and other disease and sociodemographic covariates. Results: Higher baseline HDQLIFE CwDD is associated with 12- and 24-month declines in HDQLIFE Speech Difficulties, neurology quality of life (NeuroQoL) Depression, Suicidality, HDQLIFE Meaning and Purpose, and NeuroQoL Positive Affect and Well-being. Interpretation: Death anxiety may be a risk factor for worsening mental health and speech difficulty. A further prospective study is required to evaluate whether interventions on death anxiety or mental health generally can reduce declines in HRQoL for people with HD over time.

Barriers and Facilitators to Accessing Rehabilitation Health Care: A Veterans Affairs Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems Qualitative Study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare barriers and facilitators to accessing health care services among service members and veterans (SMVs) by traumatic brain injury (TBI) severity groups. DESIGN: Qualitative descriptive study guided by an access to health care services conceptual framework. SETTING: Five Veterans Affairs (VA) polytrauma rehabilitation centers. PARTICIPANTS: SMVs (N=55, including 10 caregivers as proxies) ≥2 years post-TBI recruited from the VA TBI Model Systems and grouped by TBI severity (mild/moderate, severe). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Barriers and facilitators accessing care. RESULTS: The main facilitators included ease of communicating with providers to help SMVs identify and utilize appropriate health care, family advocates who promoted engagement in health care, ability to use government and community facilities, and online resources or equipment. Distance to services was uniformly identified as a main barrier for both patient groups. However, facilitators and barriers to health care access differed by TBI severity. SMVs with severe TBI highlighted the role of nonprofit organizations in promoting health care engagement and the availability of VA specialty residential programs in meeting health care needs. Having unrecognized health care needs in chronic stages and communication difficulties with providers were more commonplace for those with greater TBI severity and affected quality of care. Those with mild/moderate TBI highlighted challenges associated with paying for services in the community and scheduling of services. CONCLUSIONS: Barriers and facilitators exist across multiple dimensions of a health care access framework and vary by TBI severity. Results suggest possible mechanistic links between health care access and SMV health outcomes. Findings support current policy and practice efforts to facilitate health care access for SMVs with TBI but highlight the need for tailored approaches for those with greater disability.

Development and calibration data for the Medication Adherence Item Bank: a new computer adaptive test for persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

PURPOSE: To develop a new computer adaptive test that evaluates important aspects of medication adherence for persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus. METHODS: Two hundred and twenty-five people with type 2 diabetes mellitus completed 41 items related to medication adherence. RESULTS: Exploratory analysis supported the essential unidimensionality of the initial item pool. Five items were deleted due to low item-adjusted total score correlations (resulting in 36 items). Confirmatory factor analysis supported the retention of 27 items. A graded response model identified no items for exclusion, based on misfit. No items were flagged for meaningful differential item functioning (DIF). The final item bank is comprised of 27 items; an associated 6-item short form was constructed that balanced both psychometric factors (e.g., item information values) and clinical input. Initial analysis of the simulated CAT and static short form supported both the reliability (i.e., internal consistency and test-retest reliability) and validity (i.e., convergent, discriminant, and known groups) of both administration formats. CONCLUSIONS: The new medication adherence item bank provides a reliable and valid assessment of the ability to take medications accurately among people with T2DM; it will be available in early 2023 through healthmeasures.net.

Development and calibration data for the Illness Burden item bank: a new computer adaptive test for persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to develop a new measure, the Re-Engineered Discharge for Diabetes Computer Adaptive Test (REDD-CAT) Illness Burden item bank, to evaluate the impact that a chronic condition has on independent living, the ability to work (including working at home), social activities, and relationships. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were used to inform the development of an item pool (47 items) that captured patients' beliefs about how a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes interferes with different aspects of their lives. The Illness Burden item bank was developed and tested in 225 people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. RESULTS: No items had sparse response option cells or problems with monotonicity; two items were deleted due to low item-rest correlations. Factor analyses supported the retention of 29 items. With those 29 remaining items, a constrained (common slope) graded response model fit assessment indicated that two items had misfit; they were excluded. No items displayed differential item functioning by age, sex, education, or socio-economic status. The final item bank is comprised of 27 items. Preliminary data supported the reliability (internal consistency and test-retest reliability) and validity (convergent, discriminant, and known-groups) of the new bank. CONCLUSION: The Illness Burden item bank can be administered as a computer adaptive test or a 6-item short form. This new measure captures patients' perceptions of the impact that having type 2 diabetes has on their daily lives; it can be used in conjunction with the REDD-CAT measurement system to evaluate important social determinants of health in persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Development and calibration data for the Healthcare Access Item Bank: a new computer adaptive test for persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to develop a new measure to evaluate the ability to receive medical services when needed among persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus. METHODS: The Healthcare Access measure was developed using data from 225 persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus who completed an item pool comprised of 54 questions pertaining to their experience accessing healthcare services. RESULTS: Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses supported the retention of 45 items. In addition, a constrained graded response model (GRM), as well as analyses that examined item misfit and differential item functioning (investigated for age, sex, education, race, and socioeconomic status), supported the retention of 44 items in the final item bank. Expert review and GRM item calibration products were used to inform the selection of a 6-item static short form and to program the Healthcare Access computer adaptive test (CAT). Preliminary data supported the reliability (i.e., internal consistency and test-retest reliability) and validity (i.e., convergent, discriminant, and known-groups) of the new measure. CONCLUSIONS: The new Healthcare Access item bank can be used to examine the experiences that persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus have with healthcare access, to better target treatment improvements and mitigate disparities; it will be available as a part of the Neuro-Qol measurement system through healthmeasures.net and the PROMIS Application Programmable Interface (API) in early 2023.

Initial Evidence for Reliable and Valid Use of Scores on the 8-Item Econ-QOL Short Form to Measure Economic Quality of Life in Caregivers of Persons With Traumatic Brain Injury.

OBJECTIVE: To provide reliability and validity data to support the clinical utility of Economic Quality of Life Measure (Econ-QOL) scores in caregivers of civilians and service members/veterans with traumatic brain injury (TBI). DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey study. SETTING: Three academic medical centers and a Veterans Affairs treatment facility. PARTICIPANTS: 376 caregivers of civilians (n=213) and service members/veterans (n=163) with TBI (N=376). INTERVENTIONS: N/A. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Econ-QOL and several patient-reported outcome measures (Traumatic Brain Injury Caregiver Quality of Life Caregiver-Specific Anxiety and Caregiver Strain, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System sleep-related impairment, Neurological Quality of Life Measurement System positive affect and well-being) and measures of financial status (self-reported income). RESULTS: Internal consistency reliability of the Econ-QOL Short Form scores were excellent (all Cronbach's alphas ≥.92). There were no floor or ceiling effects for scores. There was evidence of convergent and discriminant validity, with the Econ-QOL scores having the strongest relationships with self-reported income (convergent validity evidence) and weak relationships with the other measures (discriminant validity evidence). Individuals with scores that were "below or possibly below" the poverty line (according to 2016 federal government poverty level thresholds) reported worse economic quality of life relative to those individuals who were definitely above the poverty line, supporting known-groups validity. CONCLUSIONS: This article establishes the clinical utility of scores on the Econ-QOL Short Form in caregivers of persons with TBI and provides evidence that it is valid and appropriate to use such scores not only in a variety of different disability populations (eg, spinal cord injury, stroke) but also in caregivers.

An app-based just-in-time-adaptive self-management intervention for care partners: The CareQOL feasibility pilot study.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study was to establish the feasibility and acceptability of an intensive data collection protocol that involves the delivery of a personalized just-in-time adaptive intervention (JITAI) in three distinct groups of care partners (care partners of persons with spinal cord injury [SCI], Huntington's disease [HD], or hematopoietic cell transplantation [HCT]). RESEARCH METHOD/DESIGN: Seventy care partners were enrolled in this study (n = 19 SCI; n = 21 HD, n = 30 HCT). This three-month (90 day) randomized control trial involved wearing a Fitbit to track sleep and steps, providing daily reports of health-related quality of life (HRQOL), and completing end of month HRQOL surveys. Care partners in the JITAI group also received personalized pushes (i.e., text-based phone notifications that include brief tips or suggestions for improving self-care). At the end of three-months, care partners in both groups completed a feasibility and acceptability questionnaire. RESULTS: Most (98.6%) care partners completed the study, average compliance was 88% for daily HRQOL surveys, 96% for daily steps, and 85% for daily sleep (from wearing the Fitbit), and all monthly surveys were completed with the exception of one missed 3-month assessment. The acceptability of the protocol was high; ratings exceeded 80% agreement for the different elements of the study. Improvements were seen for the majority of the HRQOL measures. There was no evidence of measurement reactivity. CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS: Findings provide strong support for the acceptability and feasibility of an intensive data collection protocol that involved the administration of a JITAI. Although this trial was not powered to establish efficacy, findings indicated improvements across a variety of different HRQOL measures (~1/3 of which were statistically significant). (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Impact-Tardive Dyskinesia (Impact-TD) Scale: A Clinical Tool to Assess the Impact of Tardive Dyskinesia.

Objective: Tardive dyskinesia (TD) is a movement disorder that can negatively affect health-related quality of life. However, the impact of TD is not necessarily dependent solely on the objective severity of TD movements. There is currently no easy-to-use, standardized, clinician-rated assessment of the impact of TD on functioning. The aim of this consensus panel was to develop a scale (Impact-TD scale) to assess the impact of TD on patients' daily functioning in practice settings.Participants: Nine health care professionals with expertise in TD and clinical scale development met to discuss how TD negatively impacts the functional activities of patients.Evidence: This panel comprised 7 individuals from a previous panel that developed recommendations on the importance of optimally assessing the functional impact of TD. The previous panel published a narrative literature review that summarized the existing approaches to assess the impact of TD in clinical research and practice.Consensus Process: A modified Delphi process was used to assess agreement on the format and content of the Impact-TD scale. The panel discussed key features of the Impact-TD scale (ie, simplicity, usability, assessment of frequency of impact versus interference/distress). The scale aimed to describe specific consequences of TD symptoms with which patients may have difficulty.Conclusions: Consensus was reached on a list of consequences of TD symptoms that have a functional impact and were categorized in 4 functional domains: social, psychological/psychiatric, physical, and vocational/educational/recreational. The Impact-TD scale offers an easy-to-use clinical scale to measure the functional impact of TD in practice settings.