Reimagining Education in Global Radiotherapy: The Experiences and Contribution of Rayos Contra Cancer.

PURPOSE: Technology advancements ushered in a new era of how we reimagine our human interaction, with videoconferencing becoming commonplace in educational, professional, and social settings. These tools became the new paradigm in online/virtual education for all institutions around the world. Particularly in global health, where the traditional norm for support relied on traveling and onsite visits, we face a ripe opportunity for innovation. METHODS: From 2019 to present, Rayos Contra Cancer has conducted remote operations by organizing the efforts of volunteer educators and moderators who are radiotherapy professionals or trainees from across the United States and other parts of the world. On average, each program consists of 17 virtual sessions. The hour-long sessions are conducted over Zoom and include didactics, question-and-answer dialogue with participants, and sample cases. The educators are seasoned and accomplished radiation oncologists, physicists, dosimetrists, and radiation therapists who teach single or multiple topics in a program. Participants are radiotherapy professionals or trainees affiliated with a radiotherapy clinic in a low- and middle-income country. RESULTS: The number of participant clinics ranged from 2 to 120 per program. Our combined programs have resulted in over 2,000 unique participants spanning approximately 500 unique centers in 54 countries with the support of over 200 unique educators and moderators from centers in 18 countries. CONCLUSION: When the world shut down, we were forced to reimagine how we approached global health education. Our data show tremendous growth year to year and from one curriculum to another. The feedback from our participants demonstrates that our approach is an effective way to engage practitioners in radiotherapy centers with fewer resources.

Targeting Education as a Barrier to Implement Hypofractionation: Results of a Country-Wide Training Program.

Introduction: Access to radiation therapy in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) could be improved with modern hypofractionated radiation therapy schedules, although their adoption remains limited. We aimed to evaluate perceptions regarding hypofractionation and the effect of a dedicated curriculum in an LMIC. Methods and Materials: We developed a pilot e-learning hypofractionation curriculum focused on breast, prostate, rectal cancer, and high-grade glioma in Colombia. International educators taught 13 weekly, 90-minute sessions. Participants completed pre- and postcurriculum questionnaires regarding hypofractionation attitudes, 1 to 5 Likert-scale self-confidence, and practices for 12 clinical scenarios. Physicians' responses were categorically scored "1" (for hypofractionation or ultrahypofractionation) or "0" (for conventional fractionation). We used the paired t test to measure pre- versus postcurriculum differences in self-confidence and the McNemar test to detect differences in hypofractionation selection. Results: Across 19 cities in Colombia, 147 clinicians enrolled: 61 radiation oncologists, 6 radiation oncology residents, 59 medical physicists, 18 physics residents, and 3 other staff. Among physicians, education was the greatest barrier to select hypofractionation, common in ultrahypofractionation for prostate (77.6%) and breast cancer (74.6%) and less common for moderate hypofractionation of prostate (61.2%) and breast cancer (52.2%). Additional perceived barriers included unfamiliarity with clinic protocols (7%-22%), clinical experience (5%-15%), personal preference (3%-16%), and lack of technology (3%-20%), with variation across different clinical settings. After the curriculum, paired (n = 38) physicians' selection of hypofractionation increased across all disease sites (mean aggregate score 6.2/12 vs 8.2/12, P <.001). Self-confidence among paired clinicians (n = 87) increased for prostate ultrahypofractionation (+0.45), rectal ultrahypofractionation (+0.43), breast hypofractionation (+0.38), and prostate hypofractionation (+0.23) (P ≤ .03). Conclusions: In an LMIC with a bundled payment system, lack of education and training was a perceived barrier for implementation of hypofractionation and ultrahypofractionation. A targeted e-learning hypofractionation curriculum increased participant confidence and selection of hypofractionated schedules.

Weakly migratory metastatic breast cancer cells activate fibroblasts via microvesicle-Tg2 to facilitate dissemination and metastasis.

Cancer cell migration is highly heterogeneous, and the migratory capability of cancer cells is thought to be an indicator of metastatic potential. It is becoming clear that a cancer cell does not have to be inherently migratory to metastasize, with weakly migratory cancer cells often found to be highly metastatic. However, the mechanism through which weakly migratory cells escape from the primary tumor remains unclear. Here, utilizing phenotypically sorted highly and weakly migratory human breast cancer cells, we demonstrate that weakly migratory metastatic cells disseminate from the primary tumor via communication with stromal cells. While highly migratory cells are capable of single cell migration, weakly migratory cells rely on cell-cell signaling with fibroblasts to escape the primary tumor. Weakly migratory cells release microvesicles rich in tissue transglutaminase 2 (Tg2) which activate murine fibroblasts and lead weakly migratory cancer cell migration in vitro. These microvesicles also induce tumor stiffening and fibroblast activation in vivo and enhance the metastasis of weakly migratory cells. Our results identify microvesicles and Tg2 as potential therapeutic targets for metastasis and reveal a novel aspect of the metastatic cascade in which weakly migratory cells release microvesicles which activate fibroblasts to enhance cancer cell dissemination.

What are the association patterns between handgrip strength and adverse health conditions? A topical review.

Measures of handgrip strength can be used to conveniently assess overall muscle strength capacity. Although stand-alone measures of handgrip strength provide robust health information, the clinical meaningfulness to determine prevention and treatment options for weakness remains limited because the etiology of muscle weakness remains unclear. Moreover, clinical outcomes associated with handgrip strength are wide-ranging. Therefore, disentangling how handgrip strength is associated with health conditions that are metabolically or neurologically driven may improve our understanding of the factors linked to handgrip strength. The purpose of this topical review was to highlight and summarize evidence examining the associations of handgrip strength with certain health outcomes that are metabolically and neurologically driven. From this perusal of the literature, we posit that stand-alone handgrip strength be considered an umbrella assessment of the body systems that contribute to strength capacity, and a panoptic measurement of muscle strength that is representative of overall health status, not a specific health condition. Recommendations for future strength capacity-related research are also provided.