Modelos para el análisis de políticas públicas en salud reportados en publicaciones científicas / Models for public health policy analysis reported in scientific publications

Objetivo: Sintetizar los modelos para el análisis de políticas públicas en salud reportados en investigaciones publicadas en el periodo 2002-2017. Método: Utilizando términos MesH se realizó una búsqueda sistemática de artículos en inglés, portugués y español en las bases de datos PubMed, Scielo, Jstor, ProQuest y Google Académico publicados en el periodo de estudio. La evaluación de la calidad se realizó mediante la herramienta para entender un estudio cualitativo desarrollada por CASPe. Resultados: La mayor proporción de investigaciones se realizaron en países del continente africano. Las políticas relacionadas con la atención en salud fueron objeto de investigación con mayor frecuencia. El modelo de análisis de políticas de Walt y Gilson, seguido del marco de corrientes múltiples de Kingdon, fueron los modelos que con mayor regularidad se reportaron. Conclusiones: En los artículos se enuncia el modelo de análisis de política pública, pero no el enfoque que la orienta. Se requiere construir un corpus teórico más robusto que permita la discusión sobre los enfoques y modelos para el análisis de políticas públicas. Su distinción es relevante, ya que puede ordenar las propuestas metodológicas para el estudio de las políticas. (AU)

Objective: To summarize public health policy models reported in studies published between 2002-2017. Method: Using MesH vocabulary, we systematically searched articles in English, Spanish and Portuguese in the PubMed, Scielo, Jstor, ProQuest and Google Scholar data-bases. The quality of the articles was assessed using the tool for understanding a qualitative study by CASPe. Results: A higher proportion of scientific studies were conducted in the African continent. The policies relating to health care were most frequently investigated. Walt and Gilson's model and Kingdon's multiple streams framework were more frequently reported. Conclusions: The articles set out the public policy analysis model, but not the approach to guide it. A more robust theoretical body needs to be built to enable discussion about the approaches and models for the analysis of public policies. Its distinction is relevant, since it can order methodological proposals for the study of policies. (AI)

[Models for public health policy analysis reported in scientific publications]. / Modelos para el análisis de políticas públicas en salud reportados en publicaciones científicas.

OBJECTIVE: To summarize public health policy models reported in studies published between 2002-2017. METHOD: Using MesH vocabulary, we systematically searched articles in English, Spanish and Portuguese in the PubMed, Scielo, Jstor, ProQuest and Google Scholar data-bases. The quality of the articles was assessed using the tool for understanding a qualitative study by CASPe. RESULTS: A higher proportion of scientific studies were conducted in the African continent. The policies relating to health care were most frequently investigated. Walt and Gilson's model and Kingdon's multiple streams framework were more frequently reported. CONCLUSIONS: The articles set out the public policy analysis model, but not the approach to guide it. A more robust theoretical body needs to be built to enable discussion about the approaches and models for the analysis of public policies. Its distinction is relevant, since it can order methodological proposals for the study of policies.