ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Telemedicine (TM) has had a powerful impact in recent years, particularly on managing chronic diseases such as inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Knowing patients' expectations and concerns is essential to increase their confidence in this mode of medical care. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We interviewed a large cohort of IBD patients enrolled at two Italian tertiary referral centers to investigate their trust in TM. RESULTS: A total of 376 patients completed the survey and were included in the study: 293 (77.9%) considered TM valuable for managing their disease, and 307 (85%) wanted to have TM service at their center. However, only 99 patients (26.3%) believed that TM guarantees the same level of care as the in-person visit. Among the socio-demographic variables, those independently associated with trust in TM were the higher education qualification (p=0.02) and the level of competence in information and communication technologies (ICT) (p=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlighted the importance of equipping IBD patients with basic ICT skills to utilize TM services and increase their confidence in ICT with the help of caregivers. Additionally, to improve the perceived value of TM, it will be helpful to use additional tools such as telemonitoring of disease activity using patients' reported outcomes or remote measurement of fecal calprotectin.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases , Telemedicine , Humans , Pandemics , Cross-Sectional Studies , Trust , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/diagnosis , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/therapy , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/epidemiology , Chronic Disease , Leukocyte L1 Antigen ComplexABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: From September 2020, a second wave of COVID-19 pandemic started. We aimed at exploring the impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection in IBD patients during the two waves. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All IBD patients with a confirmed diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection were enrolled. They were sorted into two groups (those infected before September 2020, and those from September 2020 to January 2021) and compared by demographic and clinical data. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients (out of about 600 with a follow-up visit) were infected with SARS-CoV-2 (4.1%). Sixteen were male and the mean age was 46.5 ± 14.3 years (range 24-74). Six were smokers and 11 had comorbidities; 2 were on steroids and 17 on immunosuppressants or biologics. Three patients (12%) needed hospitalization and other three patients were treated with azithromycin, steroids and LMWH, all of them during the second wave. No patient died or developed any sequelae. Two subjects were infected during the first wave (0.3 vs. 3.83, p<0.0001). Non-significant differences were found between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: A higher number of IBD patients were infected during the second wave. No patient developed a severe form of pneumonia, even those treated with immunosuppressants or biologics. No risk factor for hospitalization was found.
Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , COVID-19/transmission , COVID-19/virology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/virology , Italy/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: De novo non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in liver-transplanted patients for cirrhosis not due to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is becoming a growing phenomenon. AIMS: We performed a systematic review and evaluated the prevalence of this event and possible associated factors. METHODS: A literature search in medical databases (PubMed, MEDLINE/OVIDSP, Science Direct and EMBASE) was performed in March 2017. Relevant publications were identified in most important databases. We estimated the pooled prevalence of NAFLD and NASH in patients with liver transplant. The data have been expressed as proportions/percentages, and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated, using the inverse variance method. Odd ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were estimated. RESULTS: Twelve studies were selected, enrolling 2166 subjects overall undergoing post-liver transplant biopsy. The pooled weighted prevalence of de novo NAFLD was 26% (95% CI 20%-31%). The pooled weighted prevalence of NASH was 2% (95% CI 0%-3%). The highest prevalences of de novo NAFLD were found for patients transplanted for alcoholic cirrhosis (37%) and cryptogenic cirrhosis (35%) and for patients taking tacrolimus (26%). Tacrolimus showed a risk of NAFLD similar to ciclosporin (OR = 1.02, 95% CI 0.3-3.51). CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing liver transplant are more prone to experience diabetes, hypertension or dyslipidaemia, and NAFLD may be an important element in this context. In this study, we show how the prevalence of NASH tends to remain significant and similar to the general population. Moreover, this study suggests a possible association with specific transplant indications. Further studies are required to confirm these findings.
Subject(s)
Liver Transplantation/adverse effects , Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease/etiology , Biopsy , Humans , Liver Cirrhosis/congenital , Liver Cirrhosis/epidemiology , Liver Cirrhosis/etiology , Liver Transplantation/statistics & numerical data , Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease/epidemiology , Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease/pathology , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Transplant Recipients/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
In follow-up of a screening program for prostate cancer, 192 men from the urban Denver area and 244 men from rural northeastern Colorado completed a mailed questionnaire addressing their health and medical care, insurance coverage, lifestyles, and desire for health education and screening programs. Rural respondents were older and more were self-insured. Twice as many urban men were prompted to participate in the prostate screening program by media announcements (51.0% vs 23.4%), while spouses (21.3% vs 9.4%) and physicians (13.1% vs 6.8%) played greater roles in motivating rural participants. The primary topics for health information and education needs perceived by the rural men were cancer-related, while those for urban men concentrated on cardiac risk factors. Both preferred that this information be provided in the form of written materials or through their personal physicians. This pilot study suggests certain differences in the present health practices, motivational factors, and health information and education needs in urban versus rural men. These differences should be explored further and be considered in the design of cancer prevention and screening programs for these populations.