ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The management of upper aerodigestive tract cancers is a complex specialty. It is essential to provide an update to establish optimal care. At the initiative of the INCa and under the auspices of the SFORL, the scientific committee, led by Professor Béatrix Barry, Dr. Gilles Dolivet, and Dr. Dominique De Raucourt, decided to develop a reference framework aimed at defining, in a scientific and consensus-based manner, the general principles of treatment for upper aerodigestive tract cancers applicable to all sub-locations. METHODOLOGY: To develop this framework, a multidisciplinary team of practitioners was formed. A systematic analysis of the literature was conducted to produce recommendations classified by grades, in accordance with the standards of the French National Authority for Health (HAS). RESULTS: The grading of recommendations according to HAS standards has allowed the establishment of a reference for patient care based on several criteria. In this framework, patients benefit from differentiated care based on prognostic factors they present (age, comorbidities, TNM status, HPV status, etc.), conditions of implementation, and quality criteria for indicated surgery (operability, resectability, margin quality, mutilation, salvage surgery), as well as quality criteria for radiotherapy (target volume, implementation time, etc.). The role of medical and postoperative treatments was also evaluated based on specific criteria. Finally, supportive care must be organized from the beginning and throughout the patients' care journey. CONCLUSION: All collected data have led to the development of a comprehensive framework aimed at harmonizing practices nationally, facilitating decision-making in multidisciplinary consultation meetings, promoting equality in practices, and providing a state-of-the-art and reference practices for assessing the quality of care. This new framework is intended to be updated every 5 years to best reflect the latest advances in the field.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell , Humans , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/therapy , Gastrointestinal TractABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Prophylactic central neck dissection in clinically low-risk cT1bT2N0 papillary thyroid carcinoma is controversial, due to a large number of conflicting retrospective studies, some showing an advantage in terms of locoregional recurrence, others showing no advantage. These previous studies all show high rates of excellent response. We aim to demonstrate the non-inferiority of thyroidectomy alone as compared to total thyroidectomy with prophylactic central neck dissection in conjunction with adjuvant RAI 30 mCi with rTSH stimulation in terms of excellent response at 1 year. TRIAL DESIGN AND METHODS: Prospective randomized open multicenter phase III trial including patients with 11-40-mm papillary thyroid carcinoma (Bethesda VI) or suspicious cytology (Bethesda V) confirmed malignant on intra-operative frozen section analysis, with no suspicious lymph nodes on a specialized preoperative ultrasound examination. Patients will be randomized 1:1 into two groups: the reference group total thyroidectomy with bilateral prophylactic central neck dissection, and the comparator group total thyroidectomy alone. All patients will receive an ablative dose of 30mCi of radioactive iodine (RAI) within 4 months of surgery. The primary outcome is to compare the rate of excellent response at 1 year after surgery between the groups, as defined by an unstimulated serum thyroglobulin (Tg) level ≤ 0.2 ng/mL with no anti-Tg antibodies, an normal neck ultrasound and no ectopic uptake on the post-RAI scintiscan. Non-inferiority will be demonstrated if the rate of patients with excellent response at 1 year after randomization does not differ by more than 5%. Setting the significance level at 0.025 (one-sided) and a power of 80% requires a sample size of 598 patients (299 per group). Secondary outcomes are to compare Tg levels at 8 +/- 2 postoperative weeks, before RAI ablation, the rate of excellent response at 3 and 5 years, the rate of other responses at 1, 3, and 5 years (biochemical incomplete, indeterminate, and structurally incomplete responses), complications, quality of life, and cost-utility. DISCUSSION (POTENTIAL IMPLICATIONS): If non-inferiority is demonstrated with this high-level evidence, prophylactic neck dissection will have been shown to not be necessary in clinically low-risk papillary thyroid carcinoma. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03570021. June 26,2018.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Papillary , Thyroid Neoplasms , Humans , Thyroid Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Thyroid Neoplasms/surgery , Neck Dissection/adverse effects , Thyroid Cancer, Papillary/surgery , Iodine Radioisotopes , Retrospective Studies , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life , Carcinoma, Papillary/pathology , Carcinoma, Papillary/surgery , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Thyroidectomy/adverse effectsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Brain metastases (BM) from differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC) are uncommon, and many questions about their management remain unsolved. The objective of this retrospective study was to analyze the characteristics, treatments, and outcomes of patients with BM from DTC. METHODS: Among the 1523 patients with a DTC prospectively recorded in institutional databases between 1989 and 2012, 21 patients (1.4%) with BM were retrospectively retrieved. Patient characteristics, histological findings on initial thyroidectomy specimen, treatments, and time to death were reviewed. Overall survival (OS) was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Survival curves for various subgroups of patients according to baseline characteristics and treatment received were compared. RESULTS: The mean age at initial and BM diagnosis was, respectively, 52.7 and 63.2 years. World Health Organization performance status (PS) at BM diagnosis was good (<2) for 12 patients and poor (≥2) for 9. The initial carcinoma was papillary for 12 patients, follicular for 5, and poorly differentiated for 4. Eighteen patients had other previous and/or synchronous distant metastases: lung (11), bone (10), and others (2 peritoneum, 1 liver, 1 adrenal gland, and 1 uterine cervix). The average interval between the first metastasis and the BM was 3 years (range 0-35.6 years). The mean number and the mean size of BM were, respectively, 2.8 (range 1-10) and 22.5 mm (range 3-44 mm). Surgery was performed for 10 patients and radiotherapy (RT) for 18, with 2 stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), 2 conformal RT limited to the metastasis, and 15 whole-brain RT. The median OS after BM was 7.1 months. OS at 1 and 2 years were 41.6% and 35.6%. PS and realization of surgery or SRS had an impact on survival, with OS of 27 months when PS <2 versus 3 months when PS ≥2 (p=0.0009), and OS of 11.9 months after surgery or SRS versus 3.6 months in their absence (p=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: BM from thyroid cancer may have an indolent evolution with survival of one to two years or longer for specific groups of patients. Therefore, aggressive treatment options such as neurosurgery and RT should be strongly considered in patients with good PS.
Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms/secondary , Thyroid Neoplasms/pathology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Brain Neoplasms/mortality , Brain Neoplasms/pathology , Brain Neoplasms/therapy , Carcinoma/pathology , Carcinoma/surgery , Carcinoma, Papillary , Female , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Radiosurgery , Retrospective Studies , Thyroid Cancer, Papillary , Thyroid Neoplasms/surgeryABSTRACT
Objectives. Thyroid carcinomas incidence, in particular papillary variants, is increasing. These cancers are generally considered to have excellent prognosis, and papillary microcarcinomas are usually noninvasive. Many prognostic histopathology factors have been described to guide therapeutic decisions. Most patients are treated with total thyroidectomy without radioiodine treatment or partial surgery. Case Summary. A 65-year-old man with no significant medical history presented with pain in the left chest wall that had been present for several months. A computed tomography (CT) found a large tissue mass of 4 cm responsible for lysis of the middle arch of the 4th rib on the left. It was a single lesion, highly hypermetabolic on the 18-FDG PET/CT. The histology analysis of the biopsy and surgical specimen favored an adenocarcinoma with immunostaining positive for TTF1 and thyroglobulin (Tg). The total thyroidectomy carried out subsequently revealed a 4 mm papillary microcarcinoma with vesicular architecture of the right lobe, well delimited and distant from the capsule without vascular embolisms. After two radioiodine treatments, the patient is in complete clinical, biological, and radiological remission. Conclusion. This extremely rare case of a singular bone metastasis revealing a papillary thyroid microcarcinoma illustrates the necessity of further research to better characterize the forms of papillary thyroid microcarcinomas with potentially poor prognosis.