Does on-site computed tomography matter? A cross-sectional study of stroke patients' door-to-scan-time in rural hospitals.

PURPOSE: Many rural Australian hospitals lack on-site computed tomography (CT). These hospitals often refer patients to local off-site private radiology clinics or to central hospitals, challenging the achievement of time-sensitive scans. For stroke patients, timely access to CT affects treatment options. This study questions whether on-site CT matters in rural hospitals by investigating stroke patients' door-to-scan-time (DTST) and CT scan sequence referrals. METHOD: A retrospective chart audit was completed across four rural hospitals; two with on-site CT and two without. Adult emergency stroke presentations were randomly sampled. Comparisons between on-site and off-site CT hospitals were made for DTST and CT sequence referrals using Mann-Whitney U-tests and Fisher's exact tests. RESULTS: A total of 120 charts were audited (on-site CT, n = 60; off-site CT, n = 60). DTST was longer for off-site vs. on-site CT hospitals (median = 4.30 h vs. median = 0.70 h; U = 338, p < 0.001) regardless of whether presentations occurred in business hours or out of hours (p < 0.001). Off-site CT hospitals ordered less CT angiography or perfusion scanning (32% vs. 85%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Off-site CT hospital patients had longer DTST and received less angiography or perfusion scanning. These findings suggest that on-site CT matters to rural stroke patients by improving equitable access to CT and appropriate scan referrals.

Connectivity is the key to longer rural placement: Retaining students on rural longitudinal integrated clerkships.

PURPOSE: Recruitment and retention of medical practitioners to rural practice is an ongoing global issue. Rural longitudinal integrated clerkships (LIC) are an innovative solution to this problem, which are known to increase rural workforce. Crucially this association increases with time on rural placement. This study examines factors that promote retention in a Rural LIC. METHODS: A two-phased, sequential design qualitative study in a cohort of students enrolled in a rural LIC at Griffith University, Queensland, Australia. Phase I consisted of an open-ended questionnaire and phase II follow-up focus groups from the same cohort. Data was transcribed and analysed using an iterative, six-step thematic analysis process to identify salient themes. RESULTS: Twenty-four students were invited to participate, of which eight respond in phase I and thirteen participated in phase II. Participants described retention being driven by connectivity within three broad themes: current practice, future practice (immediate internship and career intention), and social networks. Participant proposals to increase connectivity were also suggested including peer-led solutions and short rotations in metropolitan hospitals. CONCLUSION: Connectivity is key to retention on rural longitudinal integrated clerkships. Programs which enhance connectivity with current practice, future practice, and social networks will increase retention on rural medical programs.

Recruiting students to rural longitudinal integrated clerkships: a qualitative study of medical educationists' experiences across continents.

INTRODUCTION: Many health systems struggle in the provision of a sustainable and an efficient rural health workforce. There is evidence to suggest that Longitudinal Integrated Clerkships (LIC) placing student learners in rural community settings have positively impacted the provision of rural health care services The recruitment and engagement of students in rural LIC have significant challenges. This study explored best practice methods of recruiting and supporting the transition of medical students into rural LIC. METHODS: The study took place during the 2021 Consortium of Longitudinal Integrated Clerkships Conference, a virtual event hosted by Stellenbosch University, South Africa. Participants consisted of delegates attending the Personally Arranged Learning Session (PeArLS) themed 'Secrets to success'. The session was recorded with the participants' consent and the recordings were transcribed verbatim. Data was uploaded to NVivo software and coded and analyzed using constant comparative analysis. Salient themes and patterns were identified. RESULTS: Thirteen attendees participated in the PeArLS representing a range of countries and institutions. Strategically marketing the LIC brand, improving the LIC program profile within institutions by bridging logistics, and the need to scaffold the transition to the rural LIC learning environment emerged as key themes for success. The attendees highlighted their experiences of using peer groups, early exposure to rural LIC sites, and student allocation strategies for promotion. Unique learning styles adopted in LIC models, student anxiety and the importance of fostering supportive relationships with stakeholders to support students in their transition to the LIC environment were discussed. DISCUSSION: This PeArLS highlighted successful systems and processes implemented in rural settings across different countries to recruit and manage the transition of medical students to rural LIC. The process proved to be a quick and efficient way to elicit rich information and may be of benefit to educationists seeking to establish similar programs or improve existing rural LIC.