Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters











Language
Publication year range
1.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med ; 36(1): 2183755, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36860097

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Compare the neonatal outcomes of two protocols of diagnosis and surveillance of pregnancies complicated by early-onset FGR in a tertiary hospital. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of pregnant women diagnosed with early-onset FGR between 2017 and 2020. We compared the obstetric and perinatal outcomes between two different management protocols (before and after 2019). RESULTS: Seventy-two cases of early-onset FGR were diagnosed in the forementioned period: 45 (62.5%) were managed according to protocol 1 and 27 (37.5%) according to protocol 2. Mean gestational age at delivery was significantly different between groups: 34.9 ± 3.1 weeks (95% CI 34.0-35.9) in group 1 and 32.3 ± 4.4 weeks (95% CI 30.4-33.9) in group 2. 74.1% (20) of newborns in group 2 were admitted in de NICU, a significant difference when compared with 46.7% of group 1. There were no statistically significant differences in the remaining serious neonatal adverse outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study published comparing two different protocols of management of FGR. The implementation of the new protocol seems to have led to a decrease in the number of fetuses labeled as growth restricted and to a decrease in the gestational age of delivery of such fetuses, but without increasing the rate of serious neonatal adverse outcomes. SYNOPSIS: The implementation of the 2016 ISUOG guidelines for the diagnosis of fetal growth restriction seems to have led to a decrease in the number of fetuses labeled as growth restricted and to a decrease in the gestational age of delivery of such fetuses, but without increasing the rate of serious neonatal adverse outcomes.


Subject(s)
Fetal Growth Retardation , Fetus , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy , Humans , Female , Infant , Retrospective Studies , Gestational Age , Hospitalization
4.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med ; 28(16): 1996-2000, 2015 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25394612

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Fetal body tumors are rare, but the ability to diagnose them has improved over recent years. Most masses discovered in the chest results from fetal bronchopulmonary malformations, such as congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation and bronchopulmonary sequestration. Congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation and bronchopulmonary sequestration have a reported incidence of 50% and 33% of all prenatally diagnosed lung lesions, respectively. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of the congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation and bronchopulmonary sequestration cases diagnosed or surveilled at our department, between January 2003 and March 2013. Prenatal examination, evolution, management and patient outcome were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 918 fetal malformations were diagnosed at our hospital, 17 of them representing fetal bronchopulmonary malformations. The majority were diagnosed during the second trimester and stabilized or regressed during the third trimester of pregnancy. The pregnancies and deliveries had no other relevant findings or complications, except in three cases. Nine children required surgery. All of the children are healthy and have a normal development, with regular surveillance by the pediatricians. DISCUSSION: The majority of these fetal lung masses are isolated findings that partially regress during intrauterine life. With adequate postnatal surveillance and eventual surgery the prognosis is good.


Subject(s)
Bronchopulmonary Sequestration/diagnosis , Cystic Adenomatoid Malformation of Lung, Congenital/diagnosis , Prenatal Diagnosis , Bronchopulmonary Sequestration/therapy , Cystic Adenomatoid Malformation of Lung, Congenital/therapy , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Male , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Trimester, Second , Pregnancy Trimester, Third , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL