ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to investigate and address the question surrounding the determination of the optimal endograft length of coverage during TEVAR for type B aortic dissection (TBAD), with a particular emphasis on the distal landing zone (DLZ). DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were used. METHODS: The PRISMA-ScR statement was followed. RESULTS: Several variables can contribute to the length of coverage during TEVAR in TBAD patient. Baseline patient's characteristics, TBAD-related features, the type of endoprosthesis, and postoperative graft behaviour may contribute to the choice of coverage. CONCLUSIONS: No robust data have been published regarding the optimal length of TEVAR. Therefore, reporting the percentage of covered aorta and improving computational studies should be valorised to improve postoperative outcomes.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Arterial stiffness, particularly aortic stiffness (AoS), is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Endovascular repair for abdominal (EVAR) and thoracic (TEVAR) aortic disease may increase AoS. This study protocol aims to assess changes in AoS before and after interventions for aortic disease. METHODS: Patients scheduled for EVAR or TEVAR during a three-year period will be enrolled. An indirect AoS indicator, carotid-to-femoral pulse wave velocity (cf-PWV) will be measured non-invasively using applanation tonometry and reported with others perioperative data before and after the endovascular treatment. Moreover, cardiological data will be collected through echocardiography. RESULTS: Fifty EVAR and 50 TEVAR will be enrolled. We will primarily analyze changes in cf-PWV. To ensure the reliability of our findings, we will also include supplementary data such as clinical information, morphological data, and functional echocardiographic data. CONCLUSIONS: By examining AoS modifications before and after endovascular aortic repair, this study aims to enhance our understanding of how arterial stiffness changes following endoprosthesis deployment. The findings from the applied protocol are expected to be informative for innovative graft designs with minimized mechanical mismatch with the aortic wall and with improved vascular hemodynamic, aligning with the current trend in improving patient outcomes. Moreover, understanding these modifications is important for predicting and improving long-term cardiovascular outcomes in patients undergoing such interventions.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Meta-analyses and emerging randomized data indicate that second-generation ('mesh') carotid stents (SGS) may improve outcomes versus conventional (single-layer) stents but clinically-relevant differences in individual SGS-type performance have been identified. No comparisons exist for SGS versus carotid endarterectomy (CEA). EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Thirty-day death (D), stroke (S), myocardial infarction (M), and 12-month ipsilateral stroke and restenosis in SGS studies were meta-analyzed (random effect model) against CEA outcomes. Eligible studies were identified through PubMed/EMBASE/COCHRANE. Forest plots were formed for absolute adverse evet risk in individual studies and for relative outcomes with each SGS deign versus contemporary CEA outcomes as reference. Meta-regression was performed to identify potential modifiers of treatment modality effect. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Data were extracted from 103,642 patients in 25 studies (14 SGS-treated, 41% symptomatic; nine randomized controlled trial (RCT)-CEA-treated, 37% symptomatic; and two Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI)-CEA-treated, 23% symptomatic). Casper/Roadsaver and CGuard significantly reduced DSM versus RCT-CEA (-2.70% and -2.95%, P<0.001 for both) and versus VQI-CEA (-1.11% and -1.36%, P<0.001 for both). Gore stent 30-day DSM was similar to RCT-CEA (P=0.581) but increased against VQI-CEA (+2.38%, P=0.033). At 12 months, Casper/Roadsaver ipsilateral stroke rate was lower than RCT-CEA (-0.75%, P=0.026) and similar to VQI-CEA (P=0.584). Restenosis with Casper/Roadsaver was +4.18% vs. RCT-CEA and +4.83% vs. VQI-CEA (P=0.005, P<0.001). CGuard 12-month ipsilateral stroke rate was similar to VQI-CEA (P=0.850) and reduced versus RCT-CEA (-0.63%, P=0.030); restenosis was reduced respectively by -0.26% and -0.63% (P=0.033, P<0.001). Twelve-month Gore stent outcomes were overall inferior to surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Meta-analytic integration of available clinical data indicates: 1) reduction in stroke but increased restenosis rate with Casper/Roadsaver, and 2) reduction in both stroke and restenosis with CGuard MicroNET-covered stent against contemporary CEA outcomes at 30 days and 12 months used as a reference. This may inform clinical practice in anticipation of large-scale randomized trials powered for low clinical event rates (PROSPERO-CRD42022339789).