ABSTRACT
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1333183.].
ABSTRACT
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a neuromodulatory therapy that has been FDA approved for the treatment of various disorders, including but not limited to, movement disorders (e.g., Parkinson's disease and essential tremor), epilepsy, and obsessive-compulsive disorder. Computational methods for estimating the volume of tissue activated (VTA), coupled with brain imaging techniques, form the basis of models that are being generated from retrospective clinical studies for predicting DBS patient outcomes. For instance, VTA models are used to generate target-and network-based probabilistic stimulation maps that play a crucial role in predicting DBS treatment outcomes. This review defines the methods for calculation of tissue activation (or modulation) including ones that use heuristic and clinically derived estimates and more computationally involved ones that rely on finite-element methods and biophysical axon models. We define model parameters and provide a comparison of commercial, open-source, and academic simulation platforms available for integrated neuroimaging and neural activation prediction. In addition, we review clinical studies that use these modeling methods as a function of disease. By describing the tissue-activation modeling methods and highlighting their application in clinical studies, we provide the neural engineering and clinical neuromodulation communities with perspectives that may influence the adoption of modeling methods for future DBS studies.
ABSTRACT
Spinal neurostimulation is a promising approach for treating spinal lesions and has implications in various neurological disorders. It promotes axonal regeneration and neuronal plasticity to reestablish disrupted signal transduction pathways following spinal injuries or degeneration. This paper reviews the current technology and its differing utilities in various types of neurostimulation, including invasive and noninvasive methods. The paper also explores the efficacy of spinal compression and decompression therapy, with a primary focus on degenerative spinal disorders. Moreover, the potential of spinal neurostimulation in therapies for motor disorders, such as Parkinson's disease and demyelinating disorders, is discussed. Finally, the paper examines the changing guidelines of use for spinal neurostimulation following surgical tumor resection. The review suggests that spinal neurostimulation is a promising therapy for axonal regeneration in spinal lesions. This paper concludes that future research should focus on the long-term effects and safety of these existing technologies, optimizing the use of spinal neurostimulation to enhance recovery and exploring its potential for other neurological disorders.
ABSTRACT
Anesthesia in neurosurgery embodies a vital element in the development of neurosurgical intervention. This undisputed interest has offered surgeons and anesthesiologists an array of anesthetic selections to utilize, though with this allowance comes the equally essential requirement of implementing a maximally appropriate agent. To date, there remains a lack of consensus and official guidance on optimizing anesthetic choice based on operating priorities including hemodynamic parameters (e.g., CPP, ICP, MAP) in addition to the route of procedure and pathology. In this review, the authors detail the development of neuroanesthesia, summarize the advantages and drawbacks of various anesthetic classes and agents, while lastly cohesively organizing the current literature of randomized trials on neuroanesthesia across various procedures.
ABSTRACT
Neurologic injury often influences various bodily functions associated with digestion. It is imperative for an individual to obtain proper nutrients to maintain a healthy lifestyle and recover from injury. In this review, we explore variables and methods of enteral tube placement in neurologic injury patients influencing recovery, specifically G- and J-tubes. We will first review the patient population by identifying leading causes for enteral tube placement among both pediatric and adult neurologic patients. We will then discuss the general procedures for placement and safety considerations for specified patient populations. We will explore interventions limiting placement of the G- and J-tubes by focusing on two interventions: ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) and intrathecal baclofen (ITB). Then, we will highlight nutritional enhancers that may influence general treatment. Finally, we discuss proper weaning procedures and eJective methods fitting patient needs.
