NO-IL-6/10-IL-1ß axis: a new pathway in steatotic and non-steatotic liver grafts from brain-dead donor rats.

Introduction: Brain death (BD) and steatosis are both risk factors for organ dysfunction or failure in liver transplantation (LT). Material and methods: Here, we examine the role of interleukin 6 (IL- 6) and IL-10 in LT of both non-steatotic and steatotic liver recovered from donors after brain death (DBDs), as well as the molecular signaling pathways underlying the effects of such cytokines. Results: BD reduced IL-6 levels only in nonsteatotic grafts, and diminished IL-10 levels only in steatotic ones. In both graft types, BD increased IL-1ß, which was associated with hepatic inflammation and damage. IL-6 administration reduced IL-1ß only in non-steatotic grafts and protected them against damage and inflammation. Concordantly, IL-1ß inhibition via treatment with an IL-1 receptor antagonist caused the same benefits in non-steatotic grafts. Treatment with IL-10 decreased IL-1ß only in steatotic grafts and reduced injury and inflammation specifically in this graft type. Blockading the IL-1ß effects also reduced damage and inflammation in steatotic grafts. Also, blockade of IL-1ß action diminished hepatic cAMP in both types of livers, and this was associated with a reduction in liver injury and inflammation, then pointing to IL-1ß regulating cAMP generation under LT and BD conditions. Additionally, the involvement of nitric oxide (NO) in the effects of interleukins was evaluated. Pharmacological inhibition of NO in LT from DBDs prompted even more evident reductions of IL-6 or IL-10 in non-steatotic and steatotic grafts, respectively. This exacerbated the already high levels of IL-1ß seen in LT from DBDs, causing worse damage and inflammation in both graft types. The administration of NO donors to non-steatotic grafts potentiated the beneficial effects of endogenous NO, since it increased IL-6 levels, and reduced IL-1ß, inflammation, and damage. However, treatment with NO donors in steatotic grafts did not modify IL-10 or IL-1ß levels, but induced more injurious effects tan the induction of BD alone, characterized by increased nitrotyrosine, lipid peroxidation, inflammation, and hepatic damage. Conclusion: Our study thus highlights the specificity of new signaling pathways in LT from DBDs: NO-IL-6-IL-1ß in non-steatotic livers and NO-IL-10-IL-1ß in steatotic ones. This opens up new therapeutic targets that could be useful in clinical LT.

The Role of Neuregulin-1 in Steatotic and Non-Steatotic Liver Transplantation from Brain-Dead Donors.

BACKGROUND: Brain death (BD) and steatosis are key risk factors to predict adverse post-transplant outcomes. We investigated the role of Neuregulin-1 (NRG1) in rat steatotic and non-steatotic liver transplantation (LT) from brain death donors (DBD). METHODS: NRG1 pathways were characterized after surgery. RESULTS: NRG1 and p21-activated kinase 1 (PAK1) levels increased in steatotic and non-steatotic grafts from DBDs. The abolishment of NRG1 effects reduced PAK1. When the effect of either NRG1 nor PAK1 was inhibited, injury and regenerative failure were exacerbated. The benefits of the NRG-1-PAK1 axis in liver grafts from DBDs were associated with increased vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGFA) and insulin growth factor-1 (IGF1) levels, respectively. Indeed, VEGFA administration in non-steatotic livers and IGF1 treatment in steatotic grafts prevented damage and regenerative failure resulting from the inhibition of either NRG1 or PAK-1 activity in each type of liver. Exogenous NRG1 induced greater injury than BD induction. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates the benefits of endogenous NRG1 in liver grafts from DBDs and underscores the specificity of the NRG1 signaling pathway depending on the type of liver: NRG1-PAK1-VEGFA in non-steatotic livers and NRG1-PAK1-IGF1 in steatotic livers. Exogenous NRG1 is not an appropriate strategy to apply to liver grafts from DBD.

Insights into Growth Factors in Liver Carcinogenesis and Regeneration: An Ongoing Debate on Minimizing Cancer Recurrence after Liver Resection.

Hepatocellular carcinoma has become a leading cause of cancer-associated mortality throughout the world, and is of great concern. Currently used chemotherapeutic drugs in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma lead to severe side effects, thus underscoring the need for further research to develop novel and safer therapies. Liver resection in cancer patients is routinely performed. After partial resection, liver regeneration is a perfectly calibrated response apparently sensed by the body's required liver function. This process hinges on the effect of several growth factors, among other molecules. However, dysregulation of growth factor signals also leads to growth signaling autonomy and tumor progression, so control of growth factor expression may prevent tumor progression. This review describes the role of some of the main growth factors whose dysregulation promotes liver tumor progression, and are also key in regenerating the remaining liver following resection. We herein summarize and discuss studies focused on partial hepatectomy and liver carcinogenesis, referring to hepatocyte growth factor, insulin-like growth factor, and epidermal growth factor, as well as their suitability as targets in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Finally, and given that drugs remain one of the mainstay treatment options in liver carcinogenesis, we have reviewed the current pharmacological approaches approved for clinical use or research targeting these factors.

Role of Dietary Nutritional Treatment on Hepatic and Intestinal Damage in Transplantation with Steatotic and Non-Steatotic Liver Grafts from Brain Dead Donors.

Herein, we investigate whether: (1) the administration of glucose or a lipid emulsion is useful in liver transplantation (LT) using steatotic (induced genetically or nutritionally) or non-steatotic livers from donors after brain death (DBDs); and (2) any such benefits are due to reductions in intestinal damage and consequently to gut microbiota preservation. In recipients from DBDs, we show increased hepatic damage and failure in the maintenance of ATP, glycogen, phospholipid and growth factor (HGF, IGF1 and VEGFA) levels, compared to recipients from non-DBDs. In recipients of non-steatotic grafts from DBDs, the administration of glucose or lipids did not protect against hepatic damage. This was associated with unchanged ATP, glycogen, phospholipid and growth factor levels. However, the administration of lipids in steatotic grafts from DBDs protected against damage and ATP and glycogen drop and increased phospholipid levels. This was associated with increases in growth factors. In all recipients from DBDs, intestinal inflammation and damage (evaluated by LPS, vascular permeability, mucosal damage, TLR4, TNF, IL1, IL-10, MPO, MDA and edema formation) was not shown. In such cases, potential changes in gut microbiota would not be relevant since neither inflammation nor damage was evidenced in the intestine following LT in any of the groups evaluated. In conclusion, lipid treatment is the preferable nutritional support to protect against hepatic damage in steatotic LT from DBDs; the benefits were independent of alterations in the recipient intestine.

Role of FGF15 in Hepatic Surgery in the Presence of Tumorigenesis: Dr. Jekyll or Mr. Hyde?

The pro-tumorigenic activity of fibroblast growth factor (FGF) 19 (FGF15 in its rodent orthologue) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), as well as the unsolved problem that ischemia-reperfusion (IR) injury supposes in liver surgeries, are well known. However, it has been shown that FGF15 administration protects against liver damage and regenerative failure in liver transplantation (LT) from brain-dead donors without tumor signals, providing a benefit in avoiding IR injury. The protection provided by FGF15/19 is due to its anti-apoptotic and pro-regenerative properties, which make this molecule a potentially beneficial or harmful factor, depending on the disease. In the present review, we describe the preclinical models currently available to understand the signaling pathways responsible for the apparent controversial effects of FGF15/19 in the liver (to repair a damaged liver or to promote tumorigenesis). As well, we study the potential pharmacological use that has the activation or inhibition of FGF15/19 pathways depending on the disease to be treated. We also discuss whether FGF15/19 non-pro-tumorigenic variants, which have been developed for the treatment of liver diseases, might be promising approaches in the surgery of hepatic resections and LT using healthy livers and livers from extended-criteria donors.

New Insights Into the Role of Autophagy in Liver Surgery in the Setting of Metabolic Syndrome and Related Diseases.

Visceral obesity is an important component of metabolic syndrome, a cluster of diseases that also includes diabetes and insulin resistance. A combination of these metabolic disorders damages liver function, which manifests as non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). NAFLD is a common cause of abnormal liver function, and numerous studies have established the enormously deleterious role of hepatic steatosis in ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury that inevitably occurs in both liver resection and transplantation. Thus, steatotic livers exhibit a higher frequency of post-surgical complications after hepatectomy, and using liver grafts from donors with NAFLD is associated with an increased risk of post-surgical morbidity and mortality in the recipient. Diabetes, another MetS-related metabolic disorder, also worsens hepatic I/R injury, and similar to NAFLD, diabetes is associated with a poor prognosis after liver surgery. Due to the large increase in the prevalence of MetS, NAFLD, and diabetes, their association is frequent in the population and therefore, in patients requiring liver resection and in potential liver graft donors. This scenario requires advancement in therapies to improve postoperative results in patients suffering from metabolic diseases and undergoing liver surgery; and in this sense, the bases for designing therapeutic strategies are in-depth knowledge about the molecular signaling pathways underlying the effects of MetS-related diseases and I/R injury on liver tissue. A common denominator in all these diseases is autophagy. In fact, in the context of obesity, autophagy is profoundly diminished in hepatocytes and alters mitochondrial functions in the liver. In insulin resistance conditions, there is a suppression of autophagy in the liver, which is associated with the accumulation of lipids, being this is a risk factor for NAFLD. Also, oxidative stress occurring in hepatic I/R injury promotes autophagy. The present review aims to shed some light on the role of autophagy in livers undergoing surgery and also suffering from metabolic diseases, which may lead to the discovery of effective therapeutic targets that could be translated from laboratory to clinical practice, to improve postoperative results of liver surgeries when performed in the presence of one or more metabolic diseases.

Effects of Gut Metabolites and Microbiota in Healthy and Marginal Livers Submitted to Surgery.

Microbiota is defined as the collection of microorganisms within the gastrointestinal ecosystem. These microbes are strongly implicated in the stimulation of immune responses. An unbalanced microbiota, termed dysbiosis, is related to the development of several liver diseases. The bidirectional relationship between the gut, its microbiota and the liver is referred to as the gut-liver axis. The translocation of bacterial products from the intestine to the liver induces inflammation in different cell types such as Kupffer cells, and a fibrotic response in hepatic stellate cells, resulting in deleterious effects on hepatocytes. Moreover, ischemia-reperfusion injury, a consequence of liver surgery, alters the microbiota profile, affecting inflammation, the immune response and even liver regeneration. Microbiota also seems to play an important role in post-operative outcomes (i.e., liver transplantation or liver resection). Nonetheless, studies to determine changes in the gut microbial populations produced during and after surgery, and affecting liver function and regeneration are scarce. In the present review we analyze and discuss the preclinical and clinical studies reported in the literature focused on the evaluation of alterations in microbiota and its products as well as their effects on post-operative outcomes in hepatic surgery.

The Role of GLP1 in Rat Steatotic and Non-Steatotic Liver Transplantation from Cardiocirculatory Death Donors.

In liver transplantation (LT), organ shortage has led to the use of steatotic and non-steatotic grafts from donors after cardiocirculatory death (DCD). However, these grafts, especially those with steatosis, exhibit poor post-operative outcomes. To address this problem, we investigated the roles of gut-derived glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP1) and dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4), the serine protease that cleaves it, in steatotic and non-steatotic LT from DCDs. Using Zucker rats, liver grafts from DCDs were cold stored and transplanted to recipients. GLP1 was administered to donors. The levels of GLP1 in intestine and of both GLP1 and DDP4 in circulation were unaltered following cardiocirculatory death (CD). In steatotic livers from DCD, increased GLP1 and decreased DPP4 were recorded, and administration of GLP1 caused a rise in hepatic GLP1 and a reduction in DDP4. This protected against inflammation, damage, and proliferation failure. Conversely, low GLP1 and high DDP4 were observed in non-steatotic livers from DCD. The exogenous GLP1 did not modify hepatic DDP4, and the accumulated GLP1 exerted harmful effects, increasing damage, inflammation, and regeneration failure. Herein, we show that there are differences in GLP1/DDP4 regulation depending on the type of liver implanted, suggesting that GLP1 can be used as a novel and effective therapy in steatotic grafts from DCDs but that it is not appropriate for non-steatotic DCDs.

The Effect of Fibroblast Growth Factor 15 Signaling in Non-Steatotic and Steatotic Liver Transplantation from Cardiocirculatory Death.

We elucidate the relevance of fibroblast growth factor 15 (FGF15) in liver transplantation (LT) using rats with both steatotic and non-steatotic organs from donors after cardiocirculatory death (DCD). Compared to LT from non-DCDs, the induction of cardiocirculatory death (CD) increases hepatic damage, proliferation, and intestinal and circulatory FGF15. This is associated with high levels of FGF15, bilirubin and bile acids (BAs), and overexpression of the enzyme involved in the alternative BA synthesis pathway, CYP27A1, in non-steatotic livers. Furthermore, CD activates the proliferative pathway, Hippo/YAP, in these types of liver. Blocking FGF15 action in LT from DCDs does not affect CYP27A1 but causes an overexpression of CYP7A, an enzyme from the classic BA synthesis pathway, and this is related to further accumulation of BAs and exacerbated damage. FGF15 inhibition also impairs proliferation without changing Hippo/YAP. In spite of worse damage, steatosis prevents a proliferative response in livers from DCDs. In steatotic grafts, CD does not modify CYP7A1, CYP27A1, BA, or the Hippo/YAP pathway, and FGF15 is not involved in damage or proliferation. Thus, endogenous FGF15 protects against BA accumulation and damage and promotes regeneration independently of the Hippo/YAP pathway, in non-steatotic LT from DCDs. Herein we show a minor role of FGF15 in steatotic LT from DCDs.

EGF-GH Axis in Rat Steatotic and Non-steatotic Liver Transplantation From Brain-dead Donors.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the potential dysfunction caused by changes in growth hormone (GH) levels after brain death (BD), and the effects of modulating GH through exogenous epidermal growth factor (EGF) in steatotic and nonsteatotic grafts. METHODS: Steatotic and nonsteatotic grafts from non-BD and BD rat donors were cold stored for 6 hours and transplanted to live rats. Administration of GH and EGF and their underlying mechanisms were characterized in recipients of steatotic and nonsteatotic grafts from BD donors maintained normotensive during the 6 hours before donation. Circulating and hepatic GH and EGF levels, hepatic damage, and regeneration parameters were evaluated. Recipient survival was monitored for 14 days. Somatostatin, ghrelin, and GH-releasing hormones that regulate GH secretion from the anterior pituitary were determined. The survival signaling pathway phosphoinositide-3-kinase/protein kinase B that regulates inflammation (suppressors of cytokine signaling, high-mobility group protein B1, oxidative stress, and neutrophil accumulation) was evaluated. RESULTS: BD reduced circulating GH and increased GH levels only in steatotic livers. GH administration exacerbated adverse BD-associated effects in both types of graft. Exogenous EGF reduced GH in steatotic livers, thus activating cell proliferation and survival signaling pathways, ultimately reducing injury and inflammation. However, EGF increased GH in nonsteatotic grafts, which exacerbated damage. The benefits of EGF for steatotic grafts were associated with increased levels of somatostatin, a GH inhibitor, whereas the deleterious effect on nonsteatotic grafts was exerted through increased amounts of ghrelin, a GH stimulator. CONCLUSIONS: GH treatment is not appropriate in rat liver transplant from BD donors, whereas EGF (throughout GH inhibition) protects only in steatotic grafts.

Mitogen Activated Protein Kinases in Steatotic and Non-Steatotic Livers Submitted to Ischemia-Reperfusion.

: We analyzed the participation of mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs), namely p38, JNK and ERK 1/2 in steatotic and non-steatotic livers undergoing ischemia-reperfusion (I-R), an unresolved problem in clinical practice. Hepatic steatosis is a major risk factor in liver surgery because these types of liver tolerate poorly to I-R injury. Also, a further increase in the prevalence of steatosis in liver surgery is to be expected. The possible therapies based on MAPK regulation aimed at reducing hepatic I-R injury will be discussed. Moreover, we reviewed the relevance of MAPK in ischemic preconditioning (PC) and evaluated whether MAPK regulators could mimic its benefits. Clinical studies indicated that this surgical strategy could be appropriate for liver surgery in both steatotic and non-steatotic livers undergoing I-R. The data presented herein suggest that further investigations are required to elucidate more extensively the mechanisms by which these kinases work in hepatic I-R. Also, further researchers based in the development of drugs that regulate MAPKs selectively are required before such approaches can be translated into clinical liver surgery.

Adipocytokines in Steatotic Liver Surgery/Transplantation.

Because of the shortage of liver grafts available for transplantation, the restrictions on graft quality have been relaxed, and marginal grafts, such as steatotic livers, are now accepted. However, this policy change has not solved the problem, because steatotic liver grafts tolerate ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury poorly. Adipocytokines differentially modulate steatosis, inflammation, and fibrosis and are broadly present in hepatic resections and transplants. The potential use of adipocytokines as biomarkers of the severity of steatosis and liver damage to aid the identification of high-risk steatotic liver donors and to evaluate hepatic injury in the postoperative period are discussed. The hope of finding new therapeutic strategies aimed specifically at protecting steatotic livers undergoing surgery is a strong impetus for identifying the mechanisms responsible for hepatic failure after major surgical intervention. Hence, the most recently described roles of adipocytokines in steatotic livers subject to I/R injury are discussed, the conflicting results in the literature are summarized, and reasons are offered as to why strategic pharmacologic control of adipocytokines has yet to yield clinical benefits. After this, the next steps needed to transfer basic knowledge about adipocytokines into clinical practice to protect marginal livers subject to I/R injury are presented. Recent strategies based on adipocytokine regulation, which have shown efficacy in various pathologies, and hold promise for hepatic resection and transplantation are also outlined.

The effect of cortisol in rat steatotic and non-steatotic liver transplantation from brain-dead donors.

In the present study, we examined the effects of cortisol on steatotic and non-steatotic liver grafts from brain-dead donors and characterized the underlying mechanisms involved. Non-steatotic liver grafts showed reduced cortisol and increased cortisone levels in association with up-regulation of enzymes that inactivate cortisol. Conversely, steatotic liver grafts exhibited increased cortisol and reduced cortisone levels. The enzymes involved in cortisol generation were overexpressed, and those involved in cortisol inactivation or clearance were down-regulated in steatotic liver grafts. Exogenous administration of cortisol negatively affected hepatic damage and survival rate in non-steatotic liver transplantation (LT); however, cortisol treatment up-regulated the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)-protein kinase C (PKC) pathway, resulting in protection against the deleterious effects of brain-dead donors on damage and inflammatory response in steatotic LT as well as in increased survival of recipients. The present study highlights the differences in the role of cortisol and hepatic mechanisms that regulate cortisol levels based on the type of liver. Our findings suggest that cortisol treatment is a feasible and highly protective strategy to reduce the adverse effects of brain-dead donor livers in order to ultimately improve liver graft quality in the presence of steatosis, whereas cortisol treatment would not be recommended for non-steatotic liver grafts.

Is Ischemic Preconditioning a Useful Therapeutic Strategy in Liver Transplantation? Results from the First Pilot Study in Mexico.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The protective effect of ischemic preconditioning (IP) in liver transplantation (LT) has been studied with controversial results. We undertook this study to investigate whether IP of cadaveric donor livers is protective to allografts. METHODS: IP (LT + IP, n = 6) was induced by 10-min hilar clamping. These were compared to cadaver donors with no IP (LT, n = 7). Clinical data and blood were obtained in donors and recipients for biochemical and inflammatory mediator (IM) measurements (P-selectin, leukotriene B4, myeloperoxidase, ICAM-1, IL-1, IL-6, and TNF-α). Liver tissue samples were obtained from donors and recipients (90 min after reperfusion). RESULTS: No significant differences were found in demographic characteristics between donors and recipients. When comparing both groups (LT + IP vs. LT only), ICU stay was longer in LT + IP group. For biochemical parameters, a significant difference was found only with a higher total bilirubin at postoperative day 3 in LT + IP group. There was no statistical difference in IM between LT and LT + IP groups at different stages of the study. Histological analysis of donor grafts indicated the presence of steatosis (50%) in one graft from the LT + IP group. However, in post-reperfusion biopsies neither neutrophil infiltration nor grade of necrosis showed significant difference between groups. No incidence of primary graft nonfunction (PGNF) was observed and graft and patient survival was similar in the two groups at 24 months. CONCLUSION: IP does not seem to protect against I/R injury in cadaveric LT, and no PGNF was seen.

Molecular pathways in protecting the liver from ischaemia/reperfusion injury: a 2015 update.

Ischaemia/reperfusion injury is an important cause of liver damage during surgical procedures such as hepatic resection and liver transplantation, and represents the main cause of graft dysfunction post-transplantation. Molecular processes occurring during hepatic ischaemia/reperfusion are diverse, and continuously include new and complex mechanisms. The present review aims to summarize the newest concepts and hypotheses regarding the pathophysiology of liver ischaemia/reperfusion, making clear distinction between situations of cold and warm ischaemia. Moreover, the most updated therapeutic strategies including pharmacological, genetic and surgical interventions, as well as some of the scientific controversies in the field are described.

The effect of brain death in rat steatotic and non-steatotic liver transplantation with previous ischemic preconditioning.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Most liver grafts undergoing transplantation derive from brain dead donors, which may also show hepatic steatosis, being both characteristic risk factors in liver transplantation. Ischemic preconditioning shows benefits when applied in non-brain dead clinical situations like hepatectomies, whereas it has been less promising in the transplantation from brain dead patients. This study examined how brain death affects preconditioned steatotic and non-steatotic liver grafts undergoing transplantation. METHODS: Steatotic and non-steatotic grafts from non-brain dead and brain dead-donors were cold stored for 6h and then transplanted. After 2, 4, and 16 h of reperfusion, hepatic damage was analysed. In addition, two therapeutic strategies, ischemic preconditioning and/or acetylcholine pre-treatment, and their underlying mechanisms were characterized. RESULTS: Preconditioning benefits in non-brain dead donors were associated with nitric oxide and acetylcholine generation. In brain dead donors, preconditioning generated nitric oxide but did not promote acetylcholine upregulation, and this resulted in inflammation and damage. Acetylcholine treatment in brain dead donors, through PKC, increased antioxidants and reduced lipid peroxidation, nitrotyrosines and neutrophil accumulation, altogether protecting against damage. The combination of acetylcholine and preconditioning conferred stronger protection against damage, oxidative stress and neutrophil accumulation than acetylcholine treatment alone. These superior beneficial effects were due to a selective preconditioning-mediated generation of nitric oxide and regulation of PPAR and TLR4 pathways, which were not observed when acetylcholine was administered alone. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings propose the combination of acetylcholine+preconditioning as a feasible and highly protective strategy to reduce the adverse effects of brain death and to ultimately improve liver graft quality.

Adiponectin and resistin protect steatotic livers undergoing transplantation.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Numerous steatotic livers are discarded for transplantation because of their poor tolerance to ischemia-reperfusion. Controversial roles for adiponectin and related adipocytokines visfatin and resistin have been described in different liver pathologies, nevertheless it is unknown their possible implication in ischemia-reperfusion injury associated with liver transplantation. Our study aimed at characterizing the role of the adiponectin-derived molecular pathway in transplantation with steatotic and non-steatotic liver grafts. METHODS: Steatotic and non-steatotic liver transplantation was carried out and the hepatic levels of adiponectin, visfatin and resistin were measured and modulated either pharmacologically or surgically. RESULTS: Steatotic liver grafts exhibited downregulation of both adiponectin and resistin when subjected to transplantation. Adiponectin pre-treatment only protected steatotic grafts and did it so through a visfatin-independent and resistin-dependent mechanism. Adiponectin-derived resistin accumulation activated the PI3K/Akt pathway, unravelling AMPK as an upstream mediator of adiponectin's actions in steatotic grafts. Strategies aimed at increasing adiponectin including either AMPK activators or the induction of ischemic preconditioning (which activates AMPK) increased resistin accumulation, prevented the downregulation of PI3K/Akt pathway and protected steatotic liver grafts. Conversely, PI3K/Akt pathway upregulation and hepatic protection induced by adiponectin were abolished when resistin action was inhibited. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings reveal a new protective pathway in steatotic liver transplantation, namely AMPK-adiponectin-resistin-PI3K/Akt, which may help develop new strategies aimed at increasing either adiponectin or resistin in the steatotic liver undergoing transplant to ultimately increase organ donor pool and reduce waiting list.

Retinol binding protein 4 and retinol in steatotic and nonsteatotic rat livers in the setting of partial hepatectomy under ischemia/reperfusion.

Steatotic livers show increased hepatic damage and impaired regeneration after partial hepatectomy (PH) under ischemia/reperfusion (I/R), which is commonly applied in clinical practice to reduce bleeding. The known function of retinol-binding protein 4 (RBP4) is to transport retinol in the circulation. We examined whether modulating RBP4 and/or retinol could protect steatotic and nonsteatotic livers in the setting of PH under I/R. Steatotic and nonsteatotic livers from Zucker rats were subjected to PH (70%) with 60 minutes of ischemia. RBP4 and retinol levels were measured and altered pharmacologically, and their effects on hepatic damage and regeneration were studied after reperfusion. Decreased RBP4 levels were observed in both liver types, whereas retinol levels were reduced only in steatotic livers. RBP4 administration exacerbated the negative consequences of liver surgery with respect to damage and liver regeneration in both liver types. RBP4 affected the mobilization of retinol from steatotic livers, and this revealed actions of RBP4 independent of simple retinol transport. The injurious effects of RBP4 were not due to changes in retinol levels. Treatment with retinol was effective only for steatotic livers. Indeed, retinol increased hepatic injury and impaired liver regeneration in nonsteatotic livers. In steatotic livers, retinol reduced damage and improved regeneration after surgery. These benefits of retinol were associated with a reduced accumulation of hepatocellular fat. Thus, strategies based on modulating RBP4 could be ineffective and possibly even harmful in both liver types in the setting of PH under I/R. In terms of clinical applications, a retinol pretreatment might open new avenues for liver surgery that specifically benefit the steatotic liver.

Cyclic adenosine 3',5'-monophosphate in rat steatotic liver transplantation.

Numerous steatotic livers are discarded as unsuitable for transplantation (TR) because of their poor tolerance of ischemia/reperfusion (I/R). Cyclic adenosine 3',5'-monophosphate (cAMP)-elevating agents protect against I/R injury both in nonsteatotic livers that have been removed from non-heart-beating donors and subjected to warm ischemia or cold ischemia (CIS) and in perfused, isolated livers. Ischemic preconditioning (PC), which is based on brief periods of I/R, protects steatotic liver grafts, but the mechanism that is responsible is poorly understood. This study examines the role of cAMP in the vulnerability shown by steatotic livers to TR-associated I/R injury and the benefits of PC in this situation. Steatotic livers with or without PC were transplanted into Zucker rats. The hepatic levels of cAMP were measured and altered pharmacologically. Our results indicate that the cAMP levels in the nonsteatotic liver grafts were similar to those found in a sham group. However, high cAMP levels were observed in steatotic liver grafts. The blockage of cAMP generation by adenylate cyclase inhibitor pre-treatment or PC had the following results: reduced hepatic injury and increased survival of steatotic graft recipients; greater preservation of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) and reduced lactate accumulation throughout CI. This blockade of cAMP by a nitric oxide-dependent mechanism protected steatotic liver grafts against oxidative stress and microvascular disorders after reperfusion. In conclusion, cAMP blocking-based strategies could protect patients against the inherent risk of steatotic liver failure after TR.