ABSTRACT
Background: Although COVID-19 vaccination decreases the risk of severe illness, it is unclear whether vaccine administration may impact the prevalence of long-COVID. The aim of this systematic review is to investigate the association between COVID-19 vaccination and long-COVID symptomatology. Methods: MEDLINE, CINAHL, PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases, as well as medRxiv and bioRxiv preprint servers were searched up to June 20, 2022. Peer-reviewed studies or preprints monitoring multiple symptoms appearing after acute SARS-CoV-2 infection either before or after COVID-19 vaccination collected by personal, telephone or electronic interviews were included. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Findings: From 2584 studies identified, 11 peer-reviewed studies and six preprints were included. The methodological quality of 82% (n=14/17) studies was high. Six studies (n=17,256,654 individuals) investigated the impact of vaccines before acute SARS-CoV-2 infection (vaccine-infection-long-COVID design). Overall, vaccination was associated with reduced risks or odds of long-COVID, with preliminary evidence suggesting that two doses are more effective than one dose. Eleven studies (n=36,736 COVID-19 survivors) investigated changes in long-COVID symptoms after vaccination (infection-long-COVID-vaccine design). Seven articles showed an improvement in long-COVID symptoms at least one dose post-vaccination, while four studies reported no change or worsening in long-COVID symptoms after vaccination. Interpretation: Low level of evidence (grade III, case-controls, cohort studies) suggests that vaccination before SARS-CoV-2 infection could reduce the risk of subsequent long-COVID. The impact of vaccination in people with existing long-COVID symptoms is still controversial, with some data showing changes in symptoms and others did not. These assumptions are limited to those vaccines used in the studies. Funding: The LONG-COVID-EXP-CM study supported by a grant of Comunidad de Madrid.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Current guidelines suggest the use of isotonic saline (IS) infusion as the preferred resuscitation fluid in the management of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA). However, balanced electrolyte solutions (BES) have been proposed as an alternative due to a lower propensity to cause hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis. Evidence regarding the use of BES in DKA remains limited. OBJECTIVES: To determine if the use of BES in fluid resuscitation leads to faster resolution of DKA compared to IS. METHODS: The study involves a comprehensive search of literature from PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, Google Scholar, and Science Direct of clinical trials addressing the use of BES vs IS in fluid resuscitation in DKA. The time to resolution of DKA was examined as the primary endpoint. Pooled hazard ratios (HR) and Mean Difference (MD) in hours with their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using a random-effects model. RESULTS: The literature search included 464 studies that were screened individually. A total of 9 studies were identified but 6 studies were excluded due to irrelevance in the outcome of interest and target population. The pooled hazard ratio HR significantly revealed 1.46 [1.10 to 1.94] (p = 0.009) with 12% heterogeneity while MD was -3.02 (95% CI -6.78-0.74; p = 0.12) with heterogeneity of 85%. CONCLUSION: Considering the evidence from pooled small randomized trials with moderate overall certainty of evidence, the use of BES in DKA was associated with faster rates of DKA resolution compared to IS.