Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Psychiatr Res ; 172: 1-8, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38340413

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a prevalent and disabling condition characterized by a wide variety of phenotypic expressions. Several studies have reinforced the hypothesis of OCD heterogeneity by proposing subtypes based on predominant symptomatology, course, and comorbidities. Early-onset OCD (EO) could be considered a neurodevelopmental subtype of OCD, with evidence of distinct neurocircuits supporting disease progression. To deepen the heterogeneous nature of the disorder, we analyzed sociodemographic and clinical differences between the EO and late-onset (LO) subtypes in a large outpatient cohort. METHODS: Two hundred and eighty-four patients diagnosed with OCD were consecutively recruited from the OCD Tertiary Clinic at Luigi Sacco University Hospital in Milan. Sociodemographic and clinical variables were analyzed for the entire sample and compared between the two subgroups (EO, age <18 years [n = 117,41.2 %]; LO: late-onset, age ≥18 years [n = 167, 58.8 %]). RESULTS: The EO group showed a higher frequency of male gender (65 % vs 42.5 %, p < .001), and a higher prevalence of Tic and Tourette disorders (9.4 % vs 0 %, p < .001) compared to the LO group. Additionally, in the EO subgroup, a longer duration of untreated illness was observed (9.01 ± 9.88 vs 4.81 ± 7.12; p < .001), along with a lower presence of insight (13.8 % vs. 7.5 %, p < .05). CONCLUSIONS: The early-onset OCD subtype highlights a more severe clinical profile compared to the LO group. Exploring distinct manifestations and developmental trajectories of OCD can contribute to a better definition of homogeneous subtypes, useful for defining targeted therapeutic strategies for treatment.


Subject(s)
Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder , Tourette Syndrome , Humans , Male , Adolescent , Outpatients , Age of Onset , Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder/diagnosis , Tourette Syndrome/epidemiology , Comorbidity
2.
Hum Psychopharmacol ; 39(3): e2893, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38340275

ABSTRACT

Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a chronic disease with a prevalence in the general population of around 2%-3%, generally accompanied by a severe impairment of functioning and quality of life. A consistent subgroup of patients may not achieve adequate symptom remission with first-line treatments (i.e., cognitive behavioral therapy, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors [SSRIs]). The most validated option for treatment-resistant cases relies on the augmentative use of antipsychotics to SSRIs, preferably of the 'second generation'. Indeed, dopamine appears to be crucially involved in OCD neuropathology due to its implication in systems relating to goal-directed behaviour and maladaptive habits. Nevertheless, the mechanism of action of antipsychotics in OCD symptom improvement is still unclear. Risperidone, aripiprazole, and haloperidol seem to be the most useful medications, whereas 'first generation' antipsychotics may be indicated in case of comorbidity with tics and/or Tourette Syndrome. Antipsychotic augmentation may be also related to side-effects, particularly in the long term (e.g., alteration in metabolic profile, sedation, extrapyramidal symptoms). The present mini-review sought to provide the most updated evidence on augmentative antipsychotic use in treatment-resistant patients with OCD, providing a road map for clinicians in daily practice and shedding light on avenues for further research.


Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents , Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder , Humans , Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder/drug therapy , Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Antipsychotic Agents/adverse effects , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/adverse effects , Drug Therapy, Combination
3.
Clin Neuropsychiatry ; 20(3): 183-192, 2023 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37522109

ABSTRACT

Objective: Depression represents one of the most severe psychiatric disorders, characterized by low mood episodes, as well as loss of interest. Major Depressive Episodes (MDE) treatment relies primarily on monoaminergic prescriptions. However, although the presence of many antidepressant medications, their efficacy is still partial. A promising intervention to improve antidepressant treatment may be the use of adjunctive nutraceuticals. Aim of the present study was to assess the efficacy of a N-Acetyl-cysteine, S-Adenosyl-L-Methionine and Folic acid's combination for the treatment of depressive symptoms in a sample of MDE patients. Method: Fifty outpatients with a MDE diagnosis in the context of different psychiatric disorders such as Major Depression, Bipolar Disorder, Anxiety disorders, and Personality disorders were recruited. The sample was divided into different groups based on the nutraceutical administration: a) concurrently with an AD (starter group); b) add-on to an already prescribed treatment; c) single treatment. Results: A significant reduction of CGI-Severity and Improvement scores from baseline to the end of treatment was found. Moreover, the starter group showed a significantly greater CGI-Improvement score compared to the other groups. Ninety-four percent of patients did not show any side effects. Conclusions: The present study showed promising results for the use of nutraceuticals in the add-on treatment of MDE. Those compounds may be considered a versatile, tolerable, and effective add-on treatment for the reduction of depressive symptoms impact and for improving the functioning of patients affected by MDE.

4.
Int Clin Psychopharmacol ; 38(3): 160-168, 2023 05 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36729532

ABSTRACT

The present cross-sectional, retrospective study aimed to assess the prevalence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors and metabolic syndrome in a sample of psychiatric patients treated with long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs). The clinical charts of 120 patients, mainly diagnosed with schizophrenia (30.0%), schizoaffective disorder (15.0%), and bipolar disorder (13.3%) on LAIs therapy - initiated in the period from 2013 to 2019 and lasting at least one year - were retrospectively reviewed and related socio-demographic, clinical and laboratory variables were collected. The 70.8% of patients were treated with first-generation LAIs, and the remaining 29.2% with second-generation LAIs. The overall sample showed low compliance in performing the required exams and evaluations related to CVD risk factors. The prevalence of metabolic syndrome was 30.8%, and, considering specific CVD risk factors, 55% of the total sample reported abdominal obesity, 43.3% arterial hypertension, 41.7% low HDL-cholesterol, 25.8% hypertriglyceridemia, and 20.8% fasting hyperglycemia. Lastly, 6.7% showed prolonged corrected QT (QTc) interval at the ECG. Patients treated with LAIs should be regularly monitored for metabolic changes and CVD risk factors. Metabolic changes rapidly develop after initiating an antipsychotic therapy and these often involve parameters, that can be easily recorded in an outpatient setting (e.g. abdominal obesity and hypertension).


Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents , Cardiovascular Diseases , Hypertension , Metabolic Syndrome , Humans , Antipsychotic Agents/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Cardiovascular Diseases/chemically induced , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Cardiovascular Diseases/drug therapy , Metabolic Syndrome/chemically induced , Metabolic Syndrome/epidemiology , Metabolic Syndrome/drug therapy , Cross-Sectional Studies , Obesity, Abdominal/drug therapy , Risk Factors , Delayed-Action Preparations/therapeutic use , Heart Disease Risk Factors , Hypertension/drug therapy
5.
Eur J Cancer Prev ; 29(4): 306-314, 2020 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31609808

ABSTRACT

The recent interest in beta-blockers as possible agents for drug repurposing in oncology arises from many pre-clinical and epidemiologic studies suggesting a possible clinically relevant antitumour effect. In lung cancer, given the contradictory results obtained, it is crucial to further study its effects. A systematic review of the literature was planned to evaluate a possible beneficial effect of beta-blocker on overall survival in lung cancer patients. Medline and Embase databases were searched from inception until 1 May 2018 to identify published studies that assessed the effect beta-blocker use on overall survival in lung cancer patients. Risk of bias was evaluated by Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals for overall survival were estimated using a random-effects model. Of 920 studies, seven (all retrospective and observational, six cohort and one case-control), including 7448 patients, met the inclusion criteria. Beta-blocker users with lung cancer had no increased overall survival compared to non-users (hazard ratio = 1.00; 95% confidence interval = 0.91-1.10; I = 45%). Similarly, beta-blocker users with non-small cell lung cancer had no increased overall survival compared to beta-blocker non-users (hazard ratio = 0.96; 95% confidence interval = 0.80-1.17; I = 56%). Our findings do not suggest an overall survival advantage in patients with lung cancer using beta-blocker therapy when compared to non-users. Further prospective cohort studies, designed to overcome the intrinsic limitations of retrospective observational studies are warranted to definitively clarify any possible beneficial effect of beta-blockers on lung cancer overall survival.


Subject(s)
Adrenergic beta-Antagonists/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/mortality , Cardiovascular Diseases/drug therapy , Lung Neoplasms/mortality , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/prevention & control , Case-Control Studies , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/prevention & control , Observational Studies as Topic , Proportional Hazards Models , Prospective Studies , Protective Factors , Retrospective Studies
6.
Front Neurol ; 10: 13, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30733703

ABSTRACT

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disease characterized by progressive loss of dopaminergic neurons, appearance of Lewy bodies and presence of neuroinflammation. No treatments currently exist to prevent PD or delay its progression, and dopaminergic substitution treatments just relieve the consequences of dopaminergic neuron loss. Increasing evidence points to peripheral T lymphocytes as key players in PD, and recently there has been growing interest into the specific role of T helper (Th) 17 lymphocytes. Th17 are a proinflammatory CD4+ T cell lineage named after interleukin (IL)-17, the main cytokine produced by these cells. Th17 are involved in immune-related disease such as psoriasis, rheumatoid arthritis and inflammatory bowel disease, and drugs targeting Th17/IL-17 are currently approved for clinical use in such disease. In the present paper, we first summarized current knowledge about contribution of the peripheral immune system in PD, as well as about the physiopharmacology of Th17 and IL-17 together with its therapeutic relevance. Thereafter, we systematically retrieved and evaluated published evidence about Th17 and IL-17 in PD, to help assessing Th17/IL-17-targeting drugs as potentially novel antiparkinson agents. Critical appraisal of the evidence did not allow to reach definite conclusions: both animal as well as clinical studies are limited, just a few provide mechanistic evidence and none of them investigates the eventual relationship between Th17/IL-17 and clinically relevant endpoints such as disease progression, disability scores, intensity of dopaminergic substitution treatment. Careful assessment of Th17 in PD is anyway a priority, as Th17/IL-17-targeting therapeutics might represent a straightforward opportunity for the unmet needs of PD patients.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL