A randomized trial of prolonged high dose of interferon plus ribavirin for hepatitis C patients nonresponders to interferon alone.

Retreatment of chronic hepatitis C patients nonresponders to interferon (IFN) alone with the standard dose of IFN [3 million units (MU) thrice weekly (TIW)] plus ribavirin for 24 weeks has yielded low sustained virological response (SVR), averaging 8%. The aim of the present, open-labelled, randomized study was to evaluate the efficacy of IFN induction therapy followed by prolonged high dose of IFN plus ribavirin in nonresponders. One hundred and fifty-one patients were randomized to receive 5 MU daily of IFN alfa-2b (group 1, n = 73) or 5 MU TIW of IFN alfa 2b (group 2, n = 78) for 4 weeks followed by IFN (5 MU TIW) plus ribavirin (1000/1200 mg/daily) for 48 weeks in both groups. In an intention-to-treat analysis, the sustained virological response (SVR) at 24-week follow-up was 33 and 23% for group 1 and 2, respectively (P = 0.17). The overall SVR was 52 and 18% in patients with genotype 2/3 and 1/4, respectively. Among genotype 1/4 patients the SVR was 29 and 11% for age younger or older than 40 years. Compared with genotype 2/3 patients, the risk (95% confidence interval) of nonresponse to retreatment was 3.0-fold (1.17-8.0) in younger genotype 1/4 patients and 8.4-fold (3.0-23.29) in older genotype 1/4 patients. In conclusion these results suggest that retreatment with a reinforced regimen should be focused in nonresponder genotype 2/3 patients and younger genotype 1/4 patients, who are most likely to benefit. Induction therapy does not improve SVR.

Efficacy of prolonged 5 million units of interferon in combination with ribavirin for relapser patients with chronic hepatitis C.

summary. Retreatment of relapser patients with chronic hepatitis C with the standard dose of interferon (IFN) of 3 million units (MU) thrice weekly (tiw) plus ribavirin for 24 weeks achieves a sustained response in 30 and 73% of patients with genotype 1 and 2 or 3, respectively. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of IFN alpha-2b induction therapy, followed by prolonged treatment with a high dose of IFN alpha-2b plus ribavirin in relapser patients. A total of 119 patients were randomized to receive IFN alpha-2b 5 MU daily (Group A: 59 patients) or IFN alpha-2b 5 MU tiw (Group B: 60 patients) for 4 weeks followed by IFN (5 MU tiw) and ribavirin (1000-1200 mg/day) for 48 weeks in both groups. The primary end point was hepatitis C virus (HCV)-RNA clearance at week 24 after the end of treatment. A sustained virological response (SVR) was achieved in 68 and 60% of Group A and B patients, respectively (P = 0.37). Logistic regression analysis identified genotype 2 or 3 as the only independent factor associated with response, whereas induction regimen and baseline viraemia levels did not affect the response. The overall SVR was 53 and 72% in patients with genotype 1 or 4 and 2 or 3, respectively. In conclusion, induction IFN therapy does not enhance the SVR to a 48-week combination therapy. Our study suggests that relapsed patients with genotype 1 or 4 may achieve significant response rates of approximately 50%, if retreated with 5 MU tiw IFN plus ribavirin for 48 weeks.

[Value of some biological variables for the diagnosis of alcoholism in a hospital population]. / Valore di alcune variabili biologiche per la diagnosi di alcoolismo in una popolazione ospedaliera.

279 male patients consecutively admitted to a medical ward were interviewed about their drinking habits using a CAGE-like questionnaire and were subdivided into teetotallers, normal-, borderline-, heavy-drinkers. The mean values of the following laboratory tests resulted significantly different in heavy drinkers compared with the others: mean cell volume, gamma-glutamyl-transpeptidase, serum urea (BUN), SGOT, SGPT, total bilirubin. No significant difference was found for triglycerides, uric acid, albumin and gamma-globulins. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values of positive test and negative test, "goodness" were calculated for each of the 6 above-mentioned tests. Each of them had a linear correlation (inverse for BUN, direct for the others) between amount of alcohol intake and level of the test.