Long-term safety and tolerability of the lamivudine/abacavir combination as components of highly active antiretroviral therapy.

BACKGROUND: Numerous large, long-term clinical trials have assessed the safety and efficacy of the two antiretroviral nucleoside analogs lamivudine and abacavir as components of highly active antiretroviral therapy for the treatment of patients with HIV-1 infection. This analysis pools the safety data on multi-drug regimens containing lamivudine/abacavir in combination with a protease inhibitor, non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, or nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor. METHODS: Data are presented from 2279 treatment-naive HIV-1-infected patients who were enrolled in one of five clinical trials that assessed the safety and tolerability of lamivudine/abacavir in combination with a third antiretroviral agent. The well characterised combination of lamivudine/zidovudine plus efavirenz was used as the comparator arm. All available safety data (including data beyond 48 weeks) were used in all analyses, which included calculation of treatment emergent laboratory values, adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, fatalities, drug discontinuations and any summaries by study week of safety data. RESULTS: In the total lamivudine/abacavir group, 1585 of 2229 (71%) patients experienced at least one drug-related AE during the study compared with 247 of 325 (76%) patients in the lamivudine/zidovudine/efavirenz treatment group. The most common drug-related AEs reported during the study were diarrhoea (19%), nausea (18%) and dizziness (12%) in patients treated with lamivudine/abacavir plus a third agent, and nausea (31%), dizziness (27%) and headache (16%) in the comparator group. Overall, in the total lamivudine/abacavir group there were only three severe (Division of AIDS 1992 toxicity table grade 3 or 4) AEs that were reported in >1% of subjects: drug hypersensitivity, elevated ALT levels and elevated AST levels. In the lamivudine/zidovudine/efavirenz group, six severe AEs that occurred in >1% of the safety population were reported. The abacavir hypersensitivity reaction rate reported in these five studies was comparable with the previously reported rate. In addition, there were no patient fatalities attributed by investigators to the study drugs. CONCLUSION: This analysis indicates that the combination of lamivudine/abacavir is generally safe for the majority of patients when used as part of combination therapy.

Abacavir once or twice daily combined with once-daily lamivudine and efavirenz for the treatment of antiretroviral-naive HIV-infected adults: results of the Ziagen Once Daily in Antiretroviral Combination Study.

The long intracellular half-life of abacavir (ABC) supports its once-daily use, and this would be expected to simplify treatment if ABC could be given as part of a complete once-daily regimen. A randomized double-blind clinical trial compared the efficacy and safety of 600 mg of ABC administered once daily (n = 384) versus 300 mg of ABC administered twice daily (n = 386) in combination with 300 mg of lamivudine (3TC) and 600 mg of efavirenz (EFV) administered once daily in antiretroviral-naive patients over 48 weeks. The baseline median plasma HIV-1 RNA level was 4.89 log10 copies/mL (44% with viral load >100,000 copies/mL), and the median CD4 cell count was 262 cells/mm. ABC administered once daily was non-inferior to the twice-daily regimen, with 66% and 68% of patients in these respective treatment arms achieving a confirmed plasma HIV-1 RNA level <50 copies/mL (95% confidence interval: -8.4%, 4.9%). The ABC once-daily and twice-daily regimens were similar with respect to infrequency of virologic failure (10% vs. 8%), emergence of resistance mutations, CD4 cell increases from baseline (median, 188 vs. 200 cells/mm), safety profile, and incidence of ABC-related hypersensitivity reactions (9% vs. 7%). ABC administered once daily in combination with 3TC and EFV administered once daily was non-inferior to the ABC twice-daily dosing schedule when combined with 3TC and EFV over 48 weeks.

Abacavir versus zidovudine combined with lamivudine and efavirenz, for the treatment of antiretroviral-naive HIV-infected adults.

BACKGROUND: Zidovudine, lamivudine, and efavirenz comprise a highly effective and well-tolerated triple regimen for antiretroviral-naive patients. Evaluating other unique nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) combinations for long-term viral suppression is desirable. METHODS: This multicenter, randomized, double-blind noninferiority clinical trial compared the efficacy and safety of abacavir with that of zidovudine plus lamivudine and efavirenz in 649 antiretroviral-naive HIV-infected patients. The primary objective was a comparison of proportions of patients achieving plasma HIV-1 RNA levels

Once-daily versus twice-daily lamivudine, in combination with zidovudine and efavirenz, for the treatment of antiretroviral-naive adults with HIV infection: a randomized equivalence trial.

A randomized, double-blind, double-dummy controlled, multicenter trial was conducted that involved 554 antiretroviral-naive human immunodeficiency virus-infected adults (plasma HIV type 1 [HIV-1] RNA level, >or=400 copies/mL; CD4(+) cell count, >100 cells/mm(3)) and compared a 300-mg once-daily (q.d.) regimen of lamivudine (3TC) versus a 150-mg twice-daily (b.i.d.) regimen of 3TC, combined with zidovudine (300 mg b.i.d.) and efavirenz (600 mg q.d.), during a 48-week period. Treatments were considered equivalent if the 95% confidence interval (CI) for the difference in proportions of patients achieving an HIV-1 RNA level of <400 copies/mL was within the bound of -12% to 12%. At week 48 of the study, an intent-to-treat analysis in which patients with missing data were considered to have experienced treatment failure showed that the 3TC q.d. and 3TC b.i.d. regimens were equivalent (HIV-1 RNA level <400 copies/mL, 178 [64%] of 278 vs. 174 [63%] of 276; treatment difference, 1% [95% CI, -7.1% to 8.9%]; HIV-1 RNA level <50 copies/mL, 165 [59%] of 278 vs. 168 [61%] of 276; treatment difference, 1.7% [95% CI, -9.7% to 6.6%]). Median increase above baseline in CD4(+) cell count was similar (q.d. group, +144 cells/mm(3); b.i.d. group, +146 cells/mm(3)), and the incidences of adverse events, disease progression, and HIV-associated conditions were comparable.