ABSTRACT
This study aimed to compare the perceptions of smile esthetics among general practitioners, periodontists, and laypeople. Photographs of smiles were taken and digitally modified to create different gingival conditions: gingival asymmetry, unilateral gingival recession, and bilateral gingival recession. These photographs were evaluated by 150 volunteers (19-70 years old) using a 100.0-mm visual analog scale. The volunteers consisted of 50 laypeople with no knowledge of dentistry, 50 general dentists, and 50 periodontists. Analysis of variance and Student t test were performed when data presented a normal distribution. If the hypothesis of normality was rejected, the Newman-Keuls test was applied to the data. Results showed that laypeople noticed gingival asymmetry only when it reached 2.0 mm, while periodontists and general dentists noticed it at 1.0 mm. Periodontists and general dentists considered smiles with unilateral recession of ≥1.0 mm to be less attractive, while the smallest modification that was deemed unesthetic by the laypeople was 2.0 mm. In the evaluation of bilateral gingival recession, general dentists and periodontists found smiles with a 1.0-mm modification less attractive, while the changes were not noticed by laypeople until the modification reached 1.5 mm. It can be concluded that laypeople perceived changes in smile esthetics differently than did dental professionals, which suggests that laypeople may be less concerned about the esthetic effects of minor gingival alterations than are dental professionals. Therefore, it is important for the dentist to understand the individual patient's perception of what constitutes an esthetic smile before recommending a dental treatment plan.
Subject(s)
Esthetics, Dental , Gingival Recession , Smiling , Adult , Aged , Attitude of Health Personnel , Dentists , Esthetics, Dental/psychology , Female , Gingiva/anatomy & histology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Smiling/psychology , Young AdultABSTRACT
Introduction: Dentists have shown interest in learning new techniques to create more attractive smiles, but with little concern for understanding the reasons why the patient is dissatisfied. Objective: To evaluate the aesthetic perception of laypersons in dentistry in comparison with general practitioner dentists and periodontists regarding the gingival smile, and to compare this aesthetic perception between the male and female genders. Methodology: A photograph of a standard smile was taken and was digitally modified to create the periodontal conditions of a gingival smile from 0.5 mm to 2.5 mm. The photographs were judged by 150 individuals (25-65 years of age), 81 female and 69 male, divided into three groups: 50 laypersons, 50 general practitioners and 50 periodontists. The evaluation was performed using a visual analog scale. The statistical evaluation tests used were the Pearson Chi squared test, Student's t-test, ANOVA and Newman-keuls. Result: The aesthetic perceptions among the professionals are similar, and they observe more subtle changes in the aesthetics of the smile than the laypersons observe. The general practitioners and periodontists were similarly sensitive to changes generated in the gingival smile when these reached 1.5 mm, while laypersons only perceived them when these changes reached 2.5 mm. There was no significant difference in the aesthetic perception of male and female evaluators in any of the groups. Conclusion: The aesthetic perception of the gingival smile between general practitioner dentists and periodontists was similar, and dental professionals were more demanding than the layperson. There was no difference between female and male aesthetic perceptions.
Introdução: Cirurgiões-dentistas têm mostrado interesse em conhecer novos meios para a construção de sorrisos mais atraentes, porém com pouca preocupação em entender os motivos pelos quais o paciente está insatisfeito. Objetivo: Avaliar a percepção estética de pessoas leigas em odontologia em comparação com dentistas clínicos gerais e periodontistas quanto ao sorriso gengivoso, e comparar esta percepção estética do gênero masculino e feminino. Metodologia: Foi realizada fotografia de um sorriso padrão e modificada digitalmente para criar as condições periodontais de sorriso gengivoso de 0,5mm até 2,5mm. As fotografias foram avaliadas por 150 indivíduos (25-65 anos), 81 do gênero feminino e 69 do masculino, divididos em três grupos: 50 leigos, 50 clínicos gerais e 50 periodontistas. A avaliação foi realizada por escala analógica visual. Os testes de avaliação estatística utilizados foram Quiquadrado de Person, t de Student, ANOVA e Newman-keuls. Resultado: As percepções estéticas entre os profissionais são semelhantes, e percebem mudanças na estética do sorriso mais sutis que leigos. Os clínicos gerais e os periodontistas foram sensíveis de forma semelhante às mudanças geradas no sorriso gengivoso quando estas chegaram a 1,5 mm, enquanto que os leigos só perceberam quando estas modificações chegaram a 2,5 mm. Em todos os grupos não houve diferença significativa da percepção estética de avaliadores do gênero masculino e feminino. Conclusão: A percepção estética do sorriso gengivoso entre dentistas clínicos gerais e periodontistas foi semelhante, e os profissionais de odontologia foram mais exigentes do que os leigos. Não houve diferença na percepção estética feminina e masculina.
Subject(s)
Smiling , Photography, Dental , Dentists , Esthetics, Dental , General Practitioners , Gingiva , Perception , Analysis of Variance , Visual Analog ScaleABSTRACT
O objetivo deste trabalho é apresentar um caso clínico de fratura de implante osseintegrável e discutir as possíveis causas de fraturas do implante, ajudando o implantodontista a identificar os sinais que normalmente precedem as fraturas. As fraturas de implante felizmente não são acidentes freqüentes, mas quando ocorrem trazem aborrecimentos e desgastepara o paciente e grandes dificuldades para o cirurgião-dentista. No caso clínico aqui apresentado a porção fraturada do implante que se encontra no osso foi removida e uma nova prótese foi confeccionada para o paciente
The aim of this paper is to present a case report of dental implant fracture and to discuss its possible causes, helping clinicians to identify the signs that usually precede the fractures. The implant fractures happily are not frequent accidents, but when they happen they bring upset and waste for the patient and great difficulties for dentists. This case report presented the fractured portion of the implants that met in the bone was removed and a new prosthesis was made
