Polypharmacy Interactions Impacting Methacholine Challenge Testing for Asthma Assessment in Older People.

Objective To investigate potential reasons for unusually high incidence of negative Methacholine Challenge Tests (MCT), following standardized MCT medication-hold protocol, in older people with physician-diagnosed asthma. Design An analysis of a longitudinal observational parent study of asthma. Setting Community-dwelling participants were evaluated in an outpatient clinic and at home. Participants Screening inclusion criteria for the parent study included 60 years of age or older, physician diagnosis of asthma, and a positive response to at least one of six asthma screening questions. Participants were enrolled in the study if they also demonstrate either: (1) a postbronchodilator administration response showing an increase of at least 12% and 200 mL in forced expiratory volume or an increase of at least 12% and 200 mL in forced vital capacity, or (2) an MCT result of PC20 ≤ 16 mg/mL (indicating bronchial hyper-responsiveness, MCT positive). Exclusion criteria included diagnosis of cognitive impairment or dementia, residing in a long-term care facility, more than 20 pack/ year smoking history or a history of smoking within the previous five years, inability to perform pulmonary function testing maneuvers, and a Prognostic Index score of greater than 10. Interventions Analysis of participant data for non-medication- and medication-exposure factors for association with negative MCT results. Results Anticholinergic burden and statin use were positively associated with negative MCT. Conclusion Medications not accounted for in medication-hold protocols, and concurrently in use, may impact clinical tests and outcomes.

Current Bronchodilator Responsiveness Criteria Underestimate Asthma in Older Adults.

BACKGROUND: Asthma is common in older adults and is confirmed by demonstration of variable expiratory air-flow limitations, typically evaluated by spirometric assessment of bronchodilator responsiveness. However, many patients with clinically suspected asthma and documented air-flow obstruction do not exhibit a post-bronchodilator response that meets or exceeds current established guidelines. We investigated if extending the time from bronchodilator administration to assessment of bronchodilator response increases the yield of spirometry for the diagnosis of asthma in older adults. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study. The subjects were non-smokers, ≥ 60 y old, and with suspected asthma. Subjects were characterized as (1) those with a positive bronchodilator response on the 30-min post-bronchodilator spirometry, (2) those with a positive bronchodilator response on the 60-min post-bronchodilator spirometry, and (3) those without a positive bronchodilator response but with a positive methacholine challenge test. Factors associated with a late response to bronchodilator were evaluated by using bivariate analysis and by multivariate analysis by using a logistic regression model. RESULTS: This study enrolled 165 subjects. Of these, 81 (49.1%) had a positive bronchodilator response on 30-min post-bronchodilator spirometry; 25 (15.2%) had a positive bronchodilator response on the 1-h post-bronchodilator spirometry; and 59 (35.8%) had no positive bronchodilator response but had a positive methacholine challenge test. On multivariable regression analysis, those with a higher baseline percentage of predicted FEV1, higher scores on a standard asthma control test, and wheezing and/or cough after exercise were more likely to either have a late bronchodilator response or no bronchodilator response. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that a late positive response to bronchodilator use was more common than previously presumed in older subjects with suspected asthma. Pulmonary function testing laboratories should consider routinely reassessing spirometry at 1 h after bronchodilator use if the earlier assessment did not reveal a significant response.

Antibiotic Timing and Outcomes in Sepsis.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the effect of time spent in the emergency department (ED) and process of care on mortality and length of hospital stay in patients with sepsis or septic shock. METHODS: An observational cohort study was conducted on 117 patients who came through the University of Louisville Hospital ED and subsequently were directly admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). Variables of interest were time in the ED from triage to physical transport to the ICU, from triage to antibiotic(s) ordered, and from triage to antibiotic(s) administered. Expected mortality was calculated according to the University Health System Consortium Database. Primary and secondary outcomes were in-hospital death and hospital length of stay in days, respectively. RESULTS: We found no significant association between time in the ED and mortality between survivors and nonsurvivors (5.5 versus 5.7 hours, P = 0.804). After adjusting for expected mortality, a 22% increase in mortality risk was found for each hour delay from triage to antibiotic(s) ordered; a 15% increase in mortality risk was observed for each hour from triage to antibiotic(s) given. Both time from triage to antibiotic(s) ordered (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.8, P = 0.044) and time from triage to antibiotic(s) delivery (HR = 0.79, P = 0.0092) were independently associated with an increased hospital stay (HR = 0.79, P = 0.0092). CONCLUSION: Though no significant association between mortality and ED time was demonstrated, we observed a significant increase in mortality in septic patients with both delays in antibiotic(s) order and administration. Delay in care also resulted in increased hospital stays both overall and in the ICU.

Avaliação do uso da Escala Modificada de Borg na crise asmática / Evaluation of the use of the Modified Scale of Borg in the asthmatic crisis

A dispnéia é a maior causa de incapacidade e redução da qualidade de vida para pacientes com doenças respiratórias como é o caso da asma. Os objetivos deste estudo foram verificar o grau de dispnéia dos pacientes em crise asmática pela Escala Modificada de Borg e a correlação da melhora do grau de dispnéia com a melhora da função pulmonar verificada pelo Pico de Fluxo Expiratório (PFE). Foram incluídos 40 pacientes asmáticos em crise aguda, atendidos no serviço de Pronto Atendimento em Pneumologia do Hospital São Paulo, no período de setembro a dezembro de 2003. Antes e após o tratamento, os seguintes dados foram coletados: frequência cardíaca (FC), frequência respiratória (FR), PFE e saturação periférica de oxigênio (SpO2). O paciente era questionado sobre sua percepção da dispnéia pela Escala Modificada de Borg. No pré-tratamento ocorreu uma tendência dos valores altos da escala de Borg estarem relacionados aos valores baixos do PFE, invertendo esta relação no pós-tratamento. Esta escala é rápida, barata e de fácil aplicabilidade na avaliação de pacientes asmáticos. Pode ser utilizada por profissionais de saúde para a avaliação inicial dos pacientes em crise, bem como sua resposta ao tratamento.