Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Front Med (Lausanne) ; 11: 1352803, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38298814

ABSTRACT

Repurposing is one of the key opportunities to address the unmet rare diseases therapeutic need. Based on cases of drug repurposing in small population conditions, and previous work in drug repurposing, we analyzed the most important lessons learned, such as the sharing of clinical observations, reaching out to regulatory scientific advice at an early stage, and public-private collaboration. In addition, current upcoming trends in the field of drug repurposing in rare diseases were analyzed, including the role these trends could play in the rare diseases' ecosystem. Specifically, we cover the opportunities of innovation platforms, the use of real-world data, the use of artificial intelligence, regulatory initiatives in repurposing, and patient engagement throughout the repurposing project. The outcomes from these emerging activities will help progress the field of drug repurposing for the benefit of patients, public health and medicines development.

2.
Orphanet J Rare Dis ; 18(1): 144, 2023 06 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37308991

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Mechanism of Coordinated Access to Orphan Medicinal Products (MoCA) was established in 2013 with the intention of developing a coordinated mechanism between volunteering EU stakeholders and developers of Orphan Medicinal Products (OMPs) to support the exchange of information aimed at enabling informed decisions on pricing and reimbursement at Member State level and to evaluate the value of an OMP based on a Transparent Value Framework. The objective of the collaborative approach was to support more equitable access to authorised therapies for people living with rare diseases, rational prices for payers and more predictable market conditions for OMP developers. Over the past 10 years, the MoCA has conducted a series of pilot projects, examining a variety of different products and technologies at different stages of development; and with contributions from a variety of patient representatives, participation from EU payers from a range of Member States and, recently, with EUnetHTA members and the European Medicines Agency participating in the meetings as observers. RESULTS: 10 years on from the establishment of the MoCA, the European landscape has significantly evolved, not only in the field of drug development with increasingly transformative therapies based on novel technologies, but also in terms of larger numbers of approved treatments, increased budget impact and the resulting associated uncertainties; as well as in terms of stakeholder collaboration and interactions. The value of early dialogue with OMP developers, including the EU payer community via their national decision-making authorities, is a key element within this early interaction and contributes to identifying, managing and reducing uncertainties allowing a prospectively planned approach earlier in development and, consequently, to support more timely, sustainable and equitable access to new OMPs, particularly where there is a high unmet medical need. CONCLUSIONS: The voluntary, informal nature of the MoCA interactions creates a flexible framework for non-binding dialogue. A forum for such interactions is needed to achieve the aims of the MoCA and both to support healthcare systems in planning as well as to underpin timely, equitable and sustainable access to new therapies for patients with rare diseases within the EU.


Subject(s)
Budgets , Rare Diseases , Humans , Europe , Drug Development
3.
J Crohns Colitis ; 17(2): 249-258, 2023 Mar 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36130314

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Despite recent approvals for new drugs to treat adults with Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis, there are only two approved advanced treatment options [infliximab and adalimumab] for children with inflammatory bowel disease [IBD]. There are many potential new therapies being developed for adult and paediatric IBD. Moreover, regulatory agencies in both the European Union and USA have processes in place to support the early planning and initiation of paediatric studies. Nevertheless, unacceptable delays in approvals for use of drugs in children persist, with an average 7-year gap, or longer, between authorization of new IBD drugs for adults and children. METHODS: A 2-day virtual meeting was held during April 14-15, 2021 for multi-stakeholders [clinical academics, patient community, pharmaceutical companies and regulators] to discuss their perspectives on paediatric drug development for IBD. RESULTS: The multi-stakeholder group presented, discussed and proposed actions to achieve expediting the approval of new drugs in development for paediatric IBD. CONCLUSIONS: Collaborative action points for all stakeholders are required to make progress and facilitate new drug development for children with IBD.


Subject(s)
Colitis, Ulcerative , Crohn Disease , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases , Adult , Child , Humans , Adolescent , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/drug therapy , Colitis, Ulcerative/drug therapy , Crohn Disease/drug therapy , Infliximab/therapeutic use , Adalimumab/therapeutic use
4.
Ther Innov Regul Sci ; 55(5): 936-953, 2021 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33970465

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There is increased recognition that incorporating patients' perspectives and insights into the medicines development process results in better health outcomes and benefits for all involved stakeholders. Despite the increased interest and the existence of frameworks and practical recommendations, patient engagement (PE) is not yet considered standard practice. The objective of this work was to provide a roadmap to support systematic change in all stakeholder organisations involved in medicines development across Europe, patients and patient organisations, medicines developers, academia, regulatory authorities, Health Technology Assessment bodies, payers, policy-makers and public research funders, to sustain PE practices. METHODS: A mixed-methods approach was used by the EU-funded Innovative Medicines Initiative PARADIGM Consortium to co-develop the sustainability roadmap including background work to identify success factors and scenarios for sustainable PE. The roadmap development was based on the Theory of Change concept and populated with findings from (1) interviews with national/ and international institutions with the potential to increase PE uptake by other stakeholders; (2) multi-stakeholder workshops and webinars; and (3) consultations with specific stakeholder groups, Consortium members and a consultative body formed by international PE initiatives. RESULTS: This roadmap sets strategic goals for the PE community to achieve meaningful and systematic PE through changes in the culture, processes and resources of stakeholder organisations. It brings in key PARADIGM outputs to work in a coordinated fashion with existing frameworks and mechanisms to achieve system-wide sustained PE. CONCLUSIONS: The roadmap provides a framework for all stakeholders to take collective action within their organisations and across Europe to implement PE in a sustainable manner.


Subject(s)
Patient Participation , Technology Assessment, Biomedical , Europe , Humans
5.
Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol ; 13(3): 321-325, 2020 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32053756

ABSTRACT

Introduction: As part of its contribution to promoting global health, the European Medicines Agency can assess medicines for use outside the European Union (EU) and issue scientific opinions in collaboration with the World Health Organization and non-EU national regulatory authorities. Ten positive scientific opinions have been adopted by the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use of the European Medicines Agency medicines (EU-M4all, or article 58). We have investigated for the first time their impact.Method: We included all positive scientific opinions (n = 10), contacted the sponsors (n = 8) and obtained and analyzed the lists of approval granted based on these opinions.Findings: 138 regulatory approvals have been granted in 90 countries, with 75 approvals in Africa, and the remainder in Latin and South America, Middle East and South-East Asia, and non-EU Europe and Central Asia.Discussion: These scientific opinions reflect the conditions of use and rely on high standards, but the final approval decision remains with these countries. Despite the small number of EU-M4all opinions, the many approvals have had an impact and contribute to access to innovation for patients with unmet needs in target countries.


Subject(s)
Drug Approval/legislation & jurisprudence , Government Agencies/organization & administration , Health Services Accessibility/legislation & jurisprudence , Developing Countries , European Union , Global Health , Humans , Pharmaceutical Preparations/supply & distribution , World Health Organization
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL