Long-term clinical outcome after percutaneous coronary interventions in the elderly: results for 512 consecutive patients.

AIMS: Elderly patients are increasingly being referred for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), but there is a paucity of current data on the long-term outcome of elective PCI in elderly patients. We sought to define the risks facing elderly patients undergoing contemporary PCIs. METHODS AND RESULTS: Retrospectively, in a single-centre registry, we studied the mortality and the outcome of 512 consecutive patients > 75 years old who underwent PCI, between January 1st 2000 and December 31st 2001. Clinical endpoints included in-hospital mortality; major adverse cardiovascular and cerebro-vascular events (MACCE) defined by the components of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and repeat coronary revascularisation (target vessel revascularisation or not) by surgery or PCI, within the hospitalisation period and at long-term follow up. We compared 315 patients 75-79 years old (group I) with 197 patients > 80 years old (group II). In-hospital mortality and MACCE rates were not different between the two groups. Independent predictors of in-hospital major events found by multivariate analysis were: ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction or STEMI (Odds Ratio [OR]=2.58, 95% CI=1.15-5.78), left ventricular ejection fraction or LVEF <40% (OR=4.98, 95% CI=2.19-11.36) and prior coronary artery bypass grafting or CABG (OR=3.13, 95% CI=1.06-9.26). Mean long-term follow-up was 51.3 months. Death was significantly more frequent in the older group (42% vs 26%, p<0.0001). Independent predictors of long-term mortality found by multivariate analysis were: LVEF < 40% (Hazard Ratio=4.12, 95% CI=2.69-6.32), creatinine rate (HR=1.00, 95% CI=1.00-1.006) use cut-off see table and prior carotid surgery or stroke (HR=2.2, 95% CI=1.19-4.14). CONCLUSIONS: Although age is not an independent predictive factor of morbidity or mortality, co-morbidities in the elderly strongly influence long-term clinical outcomes after PCI.

[Evaluation of therapeutic strategies for myocardial infarction: the ESTIM Midi-Pyrénées survey]. / Evalualion des stratégies thérapeutiques dans l'infarctus du myocarde: le registre ESTIM Midi-Pyrénées.

UNLABELLED: The aim of the ESTIM Midi-Pyrénées survey was to monitor the management of acute coronary syndrome with ST segment elevation by cardiologists and emergency departments in the Midi-Pyrénées region. Over a period of 2 years between June 2001 and June 2003, 1287 patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome within the first 24 hours were recruited prospectively. The initial management of these patients was undertaken either by a mobile medical team in the pre-hospital phase, or in a hospital emergency department, non-interventional cardiology department or an interventional cardiology department in 51.8%, 28.8%, 9.6% et 9.9% of cases respectively. Depending on these four modes of initial management, the median time for initial management was 1h30, 2h45, 4h30 et 4h respectively. Emergency coronary reperfusion was proposed in 89.6% of cases. Of the patients in whom reperfusion was attempted within the first 12 hours, 33.7% underwent pre-hospital thrombolysis (median delay of 1h48), 35.8% underwent thrombolysis in hospital (median delay 3h), and 30.4% underwent primary angioplasty (median delay 4h40). Thrombolysis was followed by angioplasty in 80% of cases. A combined approach with thrombolysis and angioplasty was applied in 41% of patients. At one month the rate of major cardiac events, death, and/or subsequent myocardial infarction was 12%. Multivariate analysis revealed that the only significant adverse prognostic features were: not offering reperfusion [Odds ratio (OR) 4, confidence interval (CI) 2.3-3.7] and age [OR 3.8, CI 2.3-6.2]. The method of reperfusion did not influence the subsequent outcome in this regional survey. CONCLUSION: pre-hospital management allows early revascularisation. In our region there was no significant prognostic difference between pre-hospital thrombolysis and primary angioplasty. It shows that the logistic and therapeutic potentials of prehospital care are not being sufficiently exploited.

[Ablation of ventricular extra-systole in the left Valsalva sinus. A case report]. / Ablation d'une extrasystolie ventriculaire dans le sinus de Valsalva gauche. A propos d'un cas.

We report the case of a patient presenting with unrelenting isolated or repetitive monomorphic ventricular extra-systoles, with left block and right axis deviation, which appeared to arise from the right ventricular chamber, but for which ablation was finally performed in the left Valsalva sinus. The ECG and endocavity electro-physiological features which led us to suspect this atypical, although not exceptional, situation are reported, as well as the techniques for ablation available in this case.