ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Vitamin A is necessary for an adequate immune response to infections. Infection also alters vitamin A biomarkers, which interferes with assessment of vitamin A deficiency and thus impairs clinical management. Here we apply multiple strategies to adjust vitamin A biomarkers for inflammation during acute infection and evaluate associations between adjusted vitamin A status and immunologic response markers. METHODS: We measured biomarkers in pediatric patients presenting with acute febrile illness in Guayaquil, Ecuador at paired acute and convalescent visits. Four adjustment strategies were applied to retinol-binding protein (RBP) concentrations: Thurnham correction factor (TCF), BRINDA regression correction (BRC), CRP-only adjustment factor (CRP), and proof-of-concept for a proposed interleukin 6 regression model (IL-6 RM). Adjusted RBP concentrations were compared between visits using the paired Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Multivariate regression analysis was used to assess associations between adjusted vitamin A status and immunologic response markers. RESULTS: A sample of 57 participants completed the acute visit 1, and 18 of these individuals completed the convalescent visit 2. The IL-6 RM was the only strategy resulting in adjusted RBP concentrations that were not significantly different between paired visits (p = 0.20). Following RBP adjustment, 0.0% of participants were classified as vitamin A deficient (RBP ≤ 0.70 µmol/L) and 14.0% were classified as vitamin A insufficient (RBP ≤ 1.05 µmol/L). Adjusted vitamin A insufficiency was associated with an increase in macrophage inflammatory protein 1-alpha (MIP-1α, p = 0.03) and a pro-inflammatory immune response profile (p = 0.03) during the acute visit. CONCLUSIONS: We introduce a strategy for adjusting vitamin A in the context of clinical illness based on IL-6 concentrations that will need to be validated in larger studies. Assessment of vitamin A during infection allows for further understanding of how vitamin A status modulates immunopathology and enables targeted strategies for vitamin A supplementation in the context of infection among children in settings with high burdens of undernutrition and infectious diseases.
Subject(s)
Fever/blood , Inflammation/metabolism , Vitamin A Deficiency/blood , Vitamin A/blood , Adolescent , Biomarkers , C-Reactive Protein , Child , Child, Preschool , Cohort Studies , Cytokines/genetics , Cytokines/metabolism , Female , Gene Expression Regulation/drug effects , Humans , Infant , Male , Nutritional Status , Pilot Projects , Young AdultABSTRACT
We systematically searched regional and international databases and screened 1658 non-duplicate records describing women with suspected or confirmed ZIKV infection, intending to breastfeed or give breast milk to an infant to examine the potential of mother-to-child transmission of Zika virus (ZIKV) through breast milk or breastfeeding-related practices. Fourteen studies met our inclusion criteria and inform this analysis. These studies reported on 97 mother-children pairs who provided breast milk for ZIKV assessment. Seventeen breast milk samples from different women were found positive for ZIKV via RT-PCR, and ZIKV replication was found in cell cultures from five out of seven breast milk samples from different women. Only three out of six infants who had ZIKV infection were breastfed, no evidence of clinical complications was found to be associated with ZIKV RNA in breast milk. This review updates our previous report by including 12 new articles, in which we found no evidence of ZIKV mother-to-child transmission through breast milk intake or breastfeeding. As the certainty of the present evidence is low, additional studies are still warranted to determine if ZIKV can be transmitted through breastfeeding.
Subject(s)
Breast Feeding , Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical , Milk, Human/virology , Zika Virus Infection/epidemiology , Zika Virus Infection/transmission , Zika Virus , Breast Feeding/adverse effects , Humans , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Public Health Surveillance , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Zika Virus Infection/virologyABSTRACT
To help inform global guidelines on infant feeding, this systematic review synthesizes evidence related to the presence of the Ebola virus (EBOV) in breast milk and its potential risk of viral transmission to the infant when breastfeeding. We relied on a comprehensive search strategy to identify studies including women with suspected, probable, or confirmed EBOV infection, intending to breastfeed or give breast milk to an infant. Our search identified 10,454 records, and after deduplication and screening, we assessed 148 full texts. We included eight studies reporting on 10 breastfeeding mothers and their children (one mother with twins), who provided breast milk samples for assessment. EBOV was detected via RT-PCR or viral culture in seven out of ten breast milk samples. Four out of the five-breastfed infants with EBOV-positive breast milk were found positive for EBOV infection, and all of these EBOV-positive infants died. Since previous reports have detected EBOV in tears, saliva, sweat, and contaminated surfaces, with the current evidence, it is not possible to conclude with certainty that breast milk was the main route of EBOV transmission.
Subject(s)
Breast Feeding/adverse effects , Ebolavirus/isolation & purification , Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola/prevention & control , Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola/transmission , Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical/prevention & control , Milk, Human/virology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola/epidemiology , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/methods , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
The pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is caused by infection with a novel coronavirus strain, the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). At present, there is limited information on potential transmission of the infection from mother to child, particularly through breast milk and breastfeeding. Here, we provide a living systematic review to capture information that might necessitate changes in the guidance on breast milk and breastfeeding given the uncertainty in this area. Our search retrieved 19,414 total records; 605 were considered for full-text eligibility and no ongoing trials were identified. Our review includes 340 records, 37 with breast milk samples and 303 without. The 37 articles with analyzed breast milk samples reported on 77 mothers who were breastfeeding their children; among them, 19 of 77 children were confirmed COVID-19 cases based on RT-PCR assays, including 14 neonates and five older infants. Nine of the 68 analyzed breast milk samples from mothers with COVID-19 were positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA; of the exposed infants, four were positive and two were negative for COVID-19. Currently, there is no evidence of SARS-CoV-2 transmission through breast milk. Studies are needed with longer follow-up periods that collect data on infant feeding practices and on viral presence in breast milk.
Subject(s)
Breast Feeding , COVID-19 , Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical , Milk, Human/virology , SARS-CoV-2/metabolism , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/metabolism , COVID-19/transmission , Child , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, NewbornABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: When we were unable to identify an electronic data capture (EDC) package that supported our requirements for clinical research in resource-limited regions, we set out to build our own reusable EDC framework. We needed to capture data when offline, synchronize data on demand, and enforce strict eligibility requirements and complex longitudinal protocols. Based on previous experience, the geographical areas in which we conduct our research often have unreliable, slow internet access that would make web-based EDC platforms impractical. We were unwilling to fall back on paper-based data capture as we wanted other benefits of EDC. Therefore, we decided to build our own reusable software platform. In this paper, we describe our customizable EDC framework and highlight how we have used it in our ongoing surveillance programs, clinic-based cross-sectional studies, and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in various settings in India and Ecuador. OBJECTIVE: This paper describes the creation of a mobile framework to support complex clinical research protocols in a variety of settings including clinical, surveillance, and RCTs. METHODS: We developed ConnEDCt, a mobile EDC framework for iOS devices and personal computers, using Claris FileMaker software for electronic data capture and data storage. RESULTS: ConnEDCt was tested in the field in our clinical, surveillance, and clinical trial research contexts in India and Ecuador and continuously refined for ease of use and optimization, including specific user roles; simultaneous synchronization across multiple locations; complex randomization schemes and informed consent processes; and collecting diverse types of data (laboratory, growth measurements, sociodemographic, health history, dietary recall and feeding practices, environmental exposures, and biological specimen collection). CONCLUSIONS: ConnEDCt is customizable, with regulatory-compliant security, data synchronization, and other useful features for data collection in a variety of settings and study designs. Furthermore, ConnEDCt is user friendly and lowers the risks for errors in data entry because of real time error checking and protocol enforcement.
Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care/methods , Electronic Data Processing/methods , Public Health/methods , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Research DesignABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Folate is a B-vitamin required for DNA synthesis, methylation, and cellular division. Wheat and maize (corn) flour are staple crops consumed widely throughout the world and have been fortified with folic acid in over 80 countries to prevent neural tube defects. Folic acid fortification may be an effective strategy to improve folate status and other health outcomes in the overall population. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the health benefits and safety of folic acid fortification of wheat and maize flour (i.e. alone or in combination with other micronutrients) on folate status and health outcomes in the overall population, compared to wheat or maize flour without folic acid (or no intervention). SEARCH METHODS: We searched the following databases in March and May 2018: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE and MEDLINE In Process, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science (SSCI, SCI), BIOSIS, Popline, Bibliomap, TRoPHI, ASSIA, IBECS, SCIELO, Global Index Medicus-AFRO and EMRO, LILACS, PAHO, WHOLIS, WPRO, IMSEAR, IndMED, and Native Health Research Database. We searched the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and ClinicalTrials.gov for ongoing or planned studies in June 2018, and contacted authors for further information. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs), with randomisation at the individual or cluster level. We also included non-RCTs and prospective observational studies with a control group; these studies were not included in meta-analyses, although their characteristics and findings were described. Interventions included wheat or maize flour fortified with folic acid (i.e. alone or in combination with other micronutrients), compared to unfortified flour (or no intervention). Participants were individuals over two years of age (including pregnant and lactating women), from any country. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed study eligibility, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. MAIN RESULTS: We included 10 studies: four provided data for quantitative analyses (437 participants); five studies were randomised trials (1182 participants); three studies were non-RCTs (1181 participants, 8037 live births); two studies were interrupted time series (ITS) studies (1 study population of 2,242,438, 1 study unreported). Six studies were conducted in upper-middle-income countries (China, Mexico, South Africa), one study was conducted in a lower-middle-income country (Bangladesh), and three studies were conducted in a high-income country (Canada). Seven studies examined wheat flour fortified with folic acid alone or with other micronutrients. Three studies included maize flour fortified with folic acid alone or with other micronutrients. The duration of interventions ranged from two weeks to 36 months, and the ITS studies included postfortification periods of up to seven years. Most studies had unclear risk of bias for randomisation, blinding, and reporting, and low/unclear risk of bias for attrition and contamination.Neural tube defects: none of the included RCTs reported neural tube defects as an outcome. In one non-RCT, wheat flour fortified with folic acid and other micronutrients was associated with significantly lower occurrence of total neural tube defects, spina bifida, and encephalocoele, but not anencephaly, compared to unfortified flour (total neural tube defects risk ratio (RR) 0.32, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.21 to 0.48; 1 study, 8037 births; low-certainty evidence).Folate status: pregnant women who received folic acid-fortified maize porridge had significantly higher erythrocyte folate concentrations (mean difference (MD) 238.90 nmol/L, 95% CI 149.40 to 328.40); 1 study, 38 participants; very low-certainty evidence) and higher plasma folate (MD 14.98 nmol/L, 95% CI 9.63 to 20.33; 1 study, 38 participants; very low-certainty evidence), compared to no intervention. Women of reproductive age consuming maize flour fortified with folic acid and other micronutrients did not have higher erythrocyte folate (MD -61.80 nmol/L, 95% CI -152.98 to 29.38; 1 study, 35 participants; very low-certainty evidence) or plasma folate (MD 0.00 nmol/L, 95% CI -0.00 to 0.00; 1 study, 35 participants; very low-certainty evidence) concentrations, compared to women consuming unfortified maize flour. Adults consuming folic acid-fortified wheat flour bread rolls had higher erythrocyte folate (MD 0.66 nmol/L, 95% CI 0.13 to 1.19; 1 study, 30 participants; very low-certainty evidence) and plasma folate (MD 27.00 nmol/L, 95% CI 15.63 to 38.37; 1 study, 30 participants; very low-certainty evidence), versus unfortified flour. In two non-RCTs, serum folate concentrations were significantly higher among women who consumed flour fortified with folic acid and other micronutrients compared to women who consumed unfortified flour (MD 2.92 nmol/L, 95% CI 1.99 to 3.85; 2 studies, 657 participants; very low-certainty evidence).Haemoglobin or anaemia: in a cluster-randomised trial among children, there were no significant effects of fortified wheat flour flatbread on haemoglobin concentrations (MD 0.00 nmol/L, 95% CI -2.08 to 2.08; 1 study, 334 participants; low-certainty evidence) or anaemia (RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.55; 1 study, 334 participants; low-certainty evidence), compared to unfortified wheat flour flatbread. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Fortification of wheat flour with folic acid may reduce the risk of neural tube defects; however, this outcome was only reported in one non-RCT. Fortification of wheat or maize flour with folic acid (i.e. alone or with other micronutrients) may increase erythrocyte and serum/plasma folate concentrations. Evidence is limited for the effects of folic acid-fortified wheat or maize flour on haemoglobin levels or anaemia. The effects of folic acid fortification of wheat or maize flour on other primary outcomes assessed in this review is not known. No studies reported on the occurrence of adverse effects. Limitations of this review were the small number of studies and participants, limitations in study design, and low-certainty of evidence due to how included studies were designed and reported.
Subject(s)
Flour , Folic Acid/administration & dosage , Food, Fortified , Neural Tube Defects/prevention & control , Vitamin B Complex/administration & dosage , Female , Humans , Preconception Care , Pregnancy , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Triticum , Zea maysABSTRACT
In this work, we demonstrate a rapid diagnostic platform with potential to transform clinical diagnosis of acute febrile illnesses in resource-limited settings. Acute febrile illnesses such as dengue and chikungunya, which pose high burdens of disease in tropical regions, share many nonspecific symptoms and are difficult to diagnose based on clinical history alone in the absence of accessible laboratory diagnostics. Through a unique color-mixing encoding and readout strategy, our platform enabled consistent and accurate multiplexed detection of dengue and chikungunya IgM/IgG antibodies in human clinical samples within 30 min. Our multiplex assay offers several advantages over conventional rapid diagnostic tests deployed in resource-limited settings, including a low sample volume requirement and the ability to concurrently detect four analytes. Our platform is a step toward multiplexed diagnostics that will be transformative for disease management in resource-limited settings by enabling informed treatment decisions through accessible evidence-based diagnosis.
Subject(s)
Chikungunya Fever/diagnosis , Colorimetry , Dengue/diagnosis , Humans , Immunoglobulin G/analysis , Immunoglobulin M/analysis , Particle Size , Surface PropertiesSubject(s)
Clinical Medicine , Hemoglobins/metabolism , Public Health , World Health Organization , Adolescent , Anemia/blood , Anemia/diagnosis , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Pregnancy , Reference ValuesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization identified a need for evidence to inform revision of second- and third-line antiretroviral therapy (ART) options in children failing ART. We performed an in-depth scoping review of all available literature on second-line and subsequent ART regimens in children younger than 18 years. METHODS: We comprehensively searched, without language or date limitations, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, the World Health Organization's International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and ClinicalTrials.gov. RESULTS: The search retrieved 1982 records. Eighteen studies provided efficacy data: 1 randomized controlled trial, 7 phase II trials, 5 prospective and 5 retrospective cohorts. Five studies evaluated regimens in children failing first-line ART, 4 in children with multidrug resistance and 9 in children with variable treatment experience. Only 10/18 studies reported week 48 or month 12 outcomes. The overall proportion of children with virologic suppression defined by study at week 48 was 61.8%. Although the randomized controlled trial had low risk of bias, outcomes were similar between groups because of highly active optimized background regimens. All phase II and prospective studies were judged to have moderate to high risk of bias. No study compared currently recommended lopinavir-based second-line regimens for nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor failures to other non-nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor regimens head-to-head. CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence comparing current World Health Organization-recommended second- and third-line ART regimens with regimens including drugs of interest: raltegravir, darunavir, etravirine and atazanavir. Randomized controlled trials or prospective cohort studies with comparator arms, and bridging studies, ideally conducted in resource-limited settings, are required to guide future recommendations.