Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in autoimmune rheumatic diseases: a clinical consensus document by the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging.

Autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARDs) involve multiple organs including the heart and vasculature. Despite novel treatments, patients with ARDs still experience a reduced life expectancy, partly caused by the higher prevalence of cardiovascular disease (CVD). This includes CV inflammation, rhythm disturbances, perfusion abnormalities (ischaemia/infarction), dysregulation of vasoreactivity, myocardial fibrosis, coagulation abnormalities, pulmonary hypertension, valvular disease, and side-effects of immunomodulatory therapy. Currently, the evaluation of CV involvement in patients with ARDs is based on the assessment of cardiac symptoms, coupled with electrocardiography, blood testing, and echocardiography. However, CVD may not become overt until late in the course of the disease, thus potentially limiting the therapeutic window for intervention. More recently, cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) has allowed for the early identification of pathophysiologic structural/functional alterations that take place before the onset of clinically overt CVD. CMR allows for detailed evaluation of biventricular function together with tissue characterization of vessels/myocardium in the same examination, yielding a reliable assessment of disease activity that might not be mirrored by blood biomarkers and other imaging modalities. Therefore, CMR provides diagnostic information that enables timely clinical decision-making and facilitates the tailoring of treatment to individual patients. Here we review the role of CMR in the early and accurate diagnosis of CVD in patients with ARDs compared with other non-invasive imaging modalities. Furthermore, we present a consensus-based decision algorithm for when a CMR study could be considered in patients with ARDs, together with a standardized study protocol. Lastly, we discuss the clinical implications of findings from a CMR examination.

Vitamin D levels in children, adolescents, and young adults with juvenile-onset systemic lupus erythematosus: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: SS and LC contributed equally to this manuscript. Hypovitaminosis D is common in the general population. Although many studies on 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) are available on systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), few data are reported in juvenile-onset SLE (JSLE) patients. DESIGN: This study aimed to assess serum 25(OH)D levels in JSLE patients and to identify risk factors for vitamin D deficiency in this population. METHODS: Forty-five Caucasian JSLE patients (36 females, nine males; mean age 18.9±6.3 years) and 109 age- and sex-matched healthy controls entered the study. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans of the lumbar spine, serum calcium and phosphate, bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BSAP), parathyroid hormone (PTH), and 25(OH)D were assessed. The data were compared with an age- and sex-matched control group including 109 Caucasian healthy subjects. RESULTS: JSLE patients exhibited lower 25(OH)D levels than controls (p<0.005), with the lower values observed in patients with active vs. inactive disease (p<0.05). JSLE patients exhibited reduced total calcium levels (p<0.001) and higher phosphate levels (p<0.001), BSAP (p<0.001) and PTH (p<0.001) than controls. In addition, JSLE patients exhibited lower spine bone mineral apparent density (BMAD) SDS values than controls (p<0.001), with higher values in patients with 25(OH)D sufficiency and insufficiency than in those with 25(OH)D deficiency (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with JSLE have significantly lower 25(OH)D levels than controls. Therefore, vitamin D supplementation may be useful to normalize bone mass and quality in subjects with JSLE.

Finalisation and validation of the rheumatoid arthritis impact of disease score, a patient-derived composite measure of impact of rheumatoid arthritis: a EULAR initiative.

OBJECTIVE: A patient-derived composite measure of the impact of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), the rheumatoid arthritis impact of disease (RAID) score, takes into account pain, functional capacity, fatigue, physical and emotional wellbeing, quality of sleep and coping. The objectives were to finalise the RAID and examine its psychometric properties. METHODS: An international multicentre cross-sectional and longitudinal study of consecutive RA patients from 12 European countries was conducted to examine the psychometric properties of the different combinations of instruments that might be included within the RAID combinations scale (numeric rating scales (NRS) or various questionnaires). Construct validity was assessed cross-sectionally by Spearman correlation, reliability by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) in 50 stable patients, and sensitivity to change by standardised response means (SRM) in 88 patients whose treatment was intensified. RESULTS: 570 patients (79% women, mean ± SD age 56 ± 13 years, disease duration 12.5 ± 10.3 years, disease activity score (DAS28) 4.1 ± 1.6) participated in the validation study. NRS questions performed as well as longer combinations of questionnaires: the final RAID score is composed of seven NRS questions. The final RAID correlated strongly with patient global (R=0.76) and significantly also with other outcomes (DAS28 R=0.69, short form 36 physical -0.59 and mental -0.55, p<0.0001 for all). Reliability was high (ICC 0.90; 95% CI 0.84 to 0.94) and sensitivity to change was good (SRM 0.98 (0.96 to 1.00) compared with DAS28 SRM 1.06 (1.01 to 1.11)). CONCLUSION: The RAID score is a patient-derived composite score assessing the seven most important domains of impact of RA. This score is now validated; sensitivity to change should be further examined in larger studies.

NLRP1 influences the systemic sclerosis phenotype: a new clue for the contribution of innate immunity in systemic sclerosis-related fibrosing alveolitis pathogenesis.

BACKGROUND: Recent evidence has highlighted a potential role of interleukin 1ß (IL-1ß) in systemic sclerosis (SSc). NLRP1 provides a scaffold for the assembly of the inflammasome that promotes the processing and maturation of pro-IL-1ß. In addition, NLRP1 variants were found to confer susceptibility to autoimmune disorders. OBJECTIVE: /st> To study a possible association of the NLRP1 rs6502867, rs2670660 and rs8182352, rs12150220 and rs4790797 with SSc in the European Caucasian population. METHODS: NLRP1 single nucleotide polymorphisms were genotyped in 3227 individuals comprising a discovery set (870 SSc patients and 962 controls) and a replication set including individuals from Germany (532 SSc patients and 324 controls) and Italy (527 SSc patients and 301 controls), all individuals being of European Caucasian origin. RESULTS: Conditional analyses revealed a significant association for the NLRP1 rs8182352 variant with both anti-topoisomerase-positive and SSc-related fibrosing alveolitis (FA) subsets under an additive model: p=0.0042, OR 1.23 (95% CI 1.07 to 1.41) and p=0.0065 OR 1.19 (95% CI 1.05 to 1.36), respectively. Logistic regression analysis showed an additive effect of IRF5 rs2004640, STAT4 rs7574865 and NLRP1 rs8182352 risk alleles on SSc-related FA. CONCLUSIONS: Our results establish NLRP1 as a new genetic susceptibility factor for SSc-related pulmonary fibrosis and anti-topoisomerase-positive SSc phenotypes. This provides new insights into the pathogenesis of SSc, underlining the potential role of innate immunity in particular in the FA-positive SSc subphenotype, which represents a severe subset of the disease.

[Copernican revolution in the therapy of rheumatoid arthritis: the contribution of anti-TNFalpha drugs]. / La rivoluzione copernicana nella terapia dell'artrite reumatoide: il contributo degli anti-TNFalpha.

TNFalpha has a key role in cell recruitment, proliferation and death, expression of adhesion molecules and immune responses. In RA, TNFalpha is involved in matrix degradation and osteoclastogenesis. TNFalpha inhibitors are either soluble receptors (etanercept) or monoclonal antibodies (infliximab and adalimumab; golimumab and certolizumab are in development). TNFalpha antagonists, alone or in combination with methotrexate, reduce bone erosions and thinning of cartilage, but they differ as regards ligand binding, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and clinical indications. Etanercept is the only TNFalpha antagonist that also neutralises LFT-alpha. Infliximab and adalimumab are more immunogenic. Cytotoxicity and cellular lysis are also higher with infliximab and adalimumab. Etanercept slows progression of joint damage in recently diagnosed RA when given alone, but much more when given with methotrexate; anti-TNF monoclonal antibodies also were shown to slow progression alone and in combination with methotrexate. Patients with early and long-standing RA treated with etanercept have now shown improvement in ACR scores, inflammation and disability for up to 9 years. Outcomes with infliximab and adalimumab are similar to those with etanercept, but only in combination with methotrexate. As a result of neutralizing antibodies, increasing doses of anti-TNFalpha antibodies may be required to maintain clinical response. As regards side effects, opportunistic infections seem more frequent with monoclonal antibodies. TNFalpha antagonists produce more QALYs than traditional DMARDs, counteracting higher costs. The efficacy, safety, and quality of life benefits of TNFalpha antagonists suggest using them possibly earlier than today, even in clinically moderate RA. Thanks to its overall profile, etanercept might be considered as one of the first-choices in TNFalpha antagonism in RA management.

Impairment of endothelial cell differentiation from bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells: new insight into the pathogenesis of systemic sclerosis.

OBJECTIVE: Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a disorder characterized by vascular damage and fibrosis of the skin and internal organs. Despite marked tissue hypoxia, there is no evidence of compensatory angiogenesis. The ability of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) to differentiate into endothelial cells was recently demonstrated. The aim of this study was to determine whether impaired differentiation of MSCs into endothelial cells in SSc might contribute to disease pathogenesis by decreasing endothelial repair. METHODS: MSCs obtained from 7 SSc patients and 15 healthy controls were characterized. The number of colony-forming unit-fibroblastoid colonies was determined. After culture in endothelial-specific medium, the endothelial-like MSC (EL-MSC) phenotype was assessed according to the surface expression of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors (VEGFRs). Senescence, chemoinvasion, and capillary morphogenesis studies were also performed. RESULTS: MSCs from SSc patients displayed the same phenotype and clonogenic activity as those from controls. In SSc MSCs, a decreased percentage of VEGFR-2+, CXCR4+, VEGFR-2+/CXCR4+ cells and early senescence was detected. After culturing, SSc EL-MSCs showed increased expression of VEGFR-1, VEGFR-2, and CXCR4, did not express CD31 or annexin V, and showed significantly decreased migration after specific stimuli. Moreover, the addition of VEGF and stromal cell-derived factor 1 to cultured SSc EL-MSCs increased their angiogenic potential less than that in controls. CONCLUSION: Our data strongly suggest that endothelial repair may be affected in SSc. The possibility that endothelial progenitor cells could be used to increase vessel growth in chronic ischemic tissues may open up new avenues in the treatment of vascular damage caused by SSc.

Intravenous immunoglobulins improve the function and ameliorate joint involvement in systemic sclerosis: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: In systemic sclerosis (SSc), joint involvement may reduce the functional capacity of the hands. Intravenous immunoglobulins have previously been shown to benefit patients with SSc. AIM: To verify the efficacy of intravenous immunoglobulins on joint involvement and function in SSc. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 7 women with SSc, 5 with limited and 2 with diffuse SSc, with a severe and refractory joint involvement were enrolled in the study. Methotrexate and cyclophosphamide pulse therapy did not ameliorate joint symptoms. Hence, intravenous immunoglobulins therapy was prescribed at a dosage of 2 g/kg body weight during 4 days/month for six consecutive courses. The presence of joint tenderness and swelling, and articular deformities (due to primary joint involvement and not due to skin and subcutaneous changes) were evaluated. Before and after 6 months of treatment, patients were subjected to (1) Ritchie Index (RI) evaluation of joint involvement; (2) Dreiser Algo-Functional Index (IAFD) evaluation of hand joint function; (3) pain visual analogue scale (VAS) to measure joint pain; (4) Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) to evaluate the limitations in everyday living and physical disability; and (5) modified Rodnan Skin Score for skin involvement. RESULTS: After 6 months of intravenous immunoglobulins therapy, joint pain and tenderness, measured with the VAS, decreased significantly (p<0.03), and hand function (IAFD) improved significantly (p<0.02), together with the quality of life (HAQ; p<0.03). All patients significantly improved, except for one. The skin score after 6 months of intravenous immunoglobulins therapy was significantly reduced (p<0.003). CONCLUSION: This pilot study suggests that intravenous immunoglobulins may reduce joint pain and tenderness, with a significant recovery of joint function in patients with SSc with severe and refractory joint involvement. The cost of intravenous immunoglobulins might limit their use only to patients who failed disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs.

Raloxifene reduces urokinase-type plasminogen activator-dependent proliferation of synoviocytes from patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Extracellular fibrinolysis, controlled by the membrane-bound fibrinolytic system, is involved in cartilage damage and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) synovitis. Estrogen status and metabolism seem to be impaired in RA, and synoviocytes show receptors for estrogens. Our aims in this study were to evaluate in healthy and RA synoviocytes the effects of Raloxifene (RAL), a selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM), on: proliferation; the components of the fibrinolytic system; and chemoinvasion. The effects of RAL were studied in vitro on synoviocytes from four RA patients and four controls. Proliferation was evaluated as cell number increase, and synoviocytes were treated with 0.5 microM and 1 microM RAL with and without urokinase-plasminogen activator (u-PA) and anti-u-PA/anti-u-PA receptor (u-PAR) antibodies. Fibrinolytic system components (u-PA, u-PAR and plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI)-1) were assayed by ELISA with cells treated with 0.5 microM and 1 microM RAL for 48 h. u-PA activity was evaluated by zymography and a direct fibrinolytic assay. U-PAR/cell and its saturation were studied by radioiodination of u-PA and a u-PA binding assay. Chemoinvasion was measured using the Boyden chamber invasion assay. u-PA induced proliferation of RA synoviocytes was blocked by RAL (p < 0.05) and antagonized by antibodies alone. The inhibitory effect of RAL was not additive with u-PA/u-PAR antagonism. RA synoviocytes treated with RAL showed, compared to basal, higher levels of PAI-1 (10.75 +/- 0.26 versus 5.5 +/- 0.1 microg/10(6) cells, respectively; p < 0.01), lower levels of u-PA (1.04 +/- 0.05 versus 3.1 +/- 0.4 ng/10(6) cells, respectively; p < 0.001), and lower levels of u-PAR (11.28 +/- 0.22 versus 23.6 +/- 0.1 ng/10(6) cells, respectively; p < 0.001). RAL also significantly inhibited u-PA-induced migration. Similar effects were also shown, at least partially, in controls. RAL exerts anti-proliferative and anti-invasive effects on synoviocytes, mainly modulating u-PAR and, to a lesser extent, u-PA and PAI-1 levels, and inhibiting cell migration and proliferation.

Damage of cutaneous peripheral nervous system evolves differently according to the disease phase and subset of systemic sclerosis.

OBJECTIVE: Evidence shows that peripheral nervous system (PNS) is involved in systemic sclerosis (SSc), but few morphological studies have assessed the ultrastructural pathological modifications. The aim was to study ultrastructural modifications of skin PNS fibres in SSc according to subsets [limited SSc (lSSc) and diffuse SSc (dSSc)] and phases (early and advanced) of the disease. METHODS: Skin biopsies were taken from the forearms of 23 SSc patients (11 lSSc and 12 dSSc) and 10 controls. Each biopsy was processed for transmission electron microscopy (TEM). RESULTS: At TEM, observation in skin from early lSSc, signs of inflammation were evident, while PNS fibres were not damaged. The microvascular wall showed hypertrophic endothelial cells bulging into the lumen. In advanced lSSc, fibrosis prevailed on inflammation and slight ultrastructural alterations of PNS fibres were evident in the papillary derma. In early dSSc, ultrastructural alterations of PNS fibres, similar to those observed in the advanced phase of lSSc, were found together with signs of inflammation and fibrosis. In advanced dSSc, in the papillary and reticular dermis PNS fibres were reduced and showed relevant ultrastructural alterations. CONCLUSIONS: In SSc, PNS ultrastructure damage is linked to the progression and severity of skin involvement. The alterations evolve from the early to the advanced phase mainly in the diffuse subset. In particular, the severe PNS lesions found in advanced lSSc are already present and widely diffuse in early dSSc and the microvascular involvement in early lSSc seems to precede the modification of the PNS in the skin. Thus, an early therapeutic approach can be useful to reduce the progression of PNS and skin damage in SSc patients.