Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Int J Cardiol ; 387: 131098, 2023 09 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37290663

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The use of Impella support is increasingly adopted to "protect" patients with severe coronary artery disease (CAD) and left ventricle (LV) dysfunction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). AIMS: To evaluate the impact of Impella-protected (Abiomed, Danvers, Massachusetts, USA) PCIs on myocardial function recovery. METHODS: Patients with significant LV dysfunction undergoing multi-vessel PCIs with pre-intervention Impella implantation were evaluated by echocardiography before PCI and at median follow up of 6 months: global and segmental LV contractile function were assessed by LV ejection fraction (LVEF) and wall motion score index (WMSI), respectively. Extent of revascularization was graded using the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society Jeopardy score (BCIS-JS). Study endpoints were LVEF and WMSI improvement, and its correlation with revascularization. RESULTS: A total of 48 high surgical risk (mean EuroSCORE II 8) patients with median LVEF value of 30%, extensive wall motion abnormalities (median WMSI 2.16), and severe multi-vessel CAD (mean SYNTAX score 35) were included. PCIs brought a significant reduction of ischemic myocardium burden with BCIS-JS decrease from mean value of 12 to 4 (p < 0.001). At follow-up, WMSI reduced from 2.2 to 2.0 (p = 0.004) and LVEF increased from 30% to 35% (p = 0.016). WMSI improvement was proportional to the baseline impairment (R - 0.50, p < 0.001), and confined to revascularized segments (from 2.1 to 1.9, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with extensive CAD and severe LV dysfunction, multi-vessel Impella-protected PCI was associated to an appreciable contractile recovery, mainly determined by regional wall motion improvement in revascularized segments.


Subject(s)
Coronary Artery Disease , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left , Humans , Ventricular Function, Left , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Artery Disease/surgery , Heart Ventricles , Recovery of Function , Stroke Volume , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/diagnostic imaging , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/therapy
2.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv ; 13(1): 49-58, 2020 01 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31918942

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare optical coherence tomographic (OCT) guidance and fractional flow reserve (FFR) guidance in patients with angiographically intermediate coronary lesions (AICLs) in a single-center, prospective, 1:1 randomized trial. BACKGROUND: FFR and OCT imaging may help both in the assessment of AICLs and in percutaneous coronary intervention optimization. METHODS: Patients with AICLs were randomized to FFR or OCT imaging. In the FFR arm, PCI was performed if FFR was ≤0.80. In the OCT imaging arm, PCI was performed if area stenosis was ≥75% or 50% to 75% with minimal luminal area <2.5 mm2 or plaque rupture. Angina (evaluated using the Seattle Angina Questionnaire), major adverse cardiac events, and cost were assessed at the end of follow-up. The pre-defined primary endpoint was the composite of major adverse cardiac events or significant angina (defined as Seattle Angina Questionnaire frequency scale score <90) at 13 months. RESULTS: A total of 350 patients (with 446 AICLs) were enrolled (176 randomized to FFR and 174 to OCT imaging). The primary endpoint of major adverse cardiac events or significant angina at 13 months occurred in 14.8% of patients in the FFR arm and in 8.0% in the OCT imaging arm (p = 0.048). This result was driven by a statistically nonsignificant lower occurrence of all primary endpoint components. Up to 13 months, the rate of medically managed patients was significantly higher (p < 0.001) and total cost significantly lower (p < 0.001) with FFR in comparison with OCT imaging. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with AICLs, OCT guidance is associated with lower occurrence of the composite of major adverse cardiac events or significant angina. FFR guidance is associated with a higher rate of medical management and lower costs. FFR or OCT Guidance to Revascularize Intermediate Coronary Stenosis Using Angioplasty [FORZA]; NCT01824030).


Subject(s)
Cardiac Catheterization , Cardiovascular Agents/therapeutic use , Coronary Stenosis/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Stenosis/therapy , Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial/drug effects , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Tomography, Optical Coherence , Aged , Cardiac Catheterization/economics , Cardiovascular Agents/adverse effects , Cardiovascular Agents/economics , Clinical Decision-Making , Coronary Stenosis/economics , Coronary Stenosis/physiopathology , Cost Savings , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Female , Health Care Costs , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/economics , Predictive Value of Tests , Prospective Studies , Reproducibility of Results , Rome , Severity of Illness Index , Time Factors , Tomography, Optical Coherence/economics , Treatment Outcome
3.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 8(15): e012772, 2019 08 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31331219

ABSTRACT

Background Fractional flow reserve (FFR) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) may help both in assessment and in percutaneous coronary intervention optimization of angiographically intermediate coronary lesions. We designed a prospective trial comparing the clinical and economic outcomes associated with FFR or OCT in angiographically intermediate coronary lesions. Methods and Results Three hundred fifty patients with angiographically intermediate coronary lesions (n=446) were randomized to FFR or OCT guidance. In the FFR arm, percutaneous coronary intervention was performed if FFR was ≤0.80 aiming for a postprocedure FFR >0.90. In the OCT arm, percutaneous coronary intervention was performed if percentage of area stenosis was ≥75% or 50% to 75% with minimal lumen area <2.5 mm2 or plaque ulceration. Costs, angina frequency, and major adverse cardiac events were assessed at 1 month and at 13 months. We present early data at 1 month consistent with a prespecified analysis of secondary end points. Patients randomized to FFR, as compared with OCT, were significantly more commonly managed with medical therapy alone (67.7% versus 41.1%; P<0.001), required less contrast media (245±137 versus 280±129 mL; P=0.004), and exhibited a lower occurrence of contrast-induced acute kidney injury (1.7% versus 8.6%; P=0.034). At 1 month, in comparison to FFR, OCT was associated with increased total costs (2831±1288 versus 4292±3844 euros/patient; P<0.001) whereas occurrence of major adverse cardiac events or significant angina was similar. Conclusions In patients with angiographically intermediate coronary lesions, a functional guidance by FFR, as compared with OCT, increased the rate of patients treated with medical therapy alone. This translated into a significant reduction in administered contrast, contrast-induced acute kidney injury, and total costs at 1 month with FFR. Clinical Trial Registration URL: http://www.clinicaltrialsgov. Unique identifier: NCT01824030.


Subject(s)
Coronary Stenosis/surgery , Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/methods , Tomography, Optical Coherence , Aged , Coronary Angiography , Coronary Stenosis/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Stenosis/physiopathology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Severity of Illness Index , Surgery, Computer-Assisted , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...