Systematic review of surgical regenerative treatment for apicomarginal lesions in periapical surgery.

BACKGROUND: Apicomarginal lesions affect the root apex and root surface concurrently and reduce the success rate in periapical surgery. The purpose of this systematic review was to analyze the published literature on the surgical treatment of apicomarginal lesions in periapical surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A systematic review was conducted on PRISMA statement. Three data bases (PubMed-Medline, Scopus, and Embase) were searched up to March 2023. The inclusion criteria for this systematic review encompass studies pertaining to apicomarginal lesions and their surgical treatment, both preclinical and clinical in nature (including randomized trials, prospective, and retrospective observational trials), without any language or time limitations. Exclusion criteria encompass studies with duplicated population data, no description of the surgical treatment or regenerative material. Different tools for the assessment of bias were applied for each study design Results: A total of 155 articles were searched and 10 were included. Studies on teeth with apicomarginal lesions undergoing periapical surgery showed a high success rate when regenerative techniques were used, resulting in reduced probing depth, increased bone formation on the root surface, increased root cementum formation, and reduced healing by junctional epithelium. Guided tissue regeneration, platelet-rich plasma or fibrin, and enamel matrix derivatives have emerged as alternative treatments offering favorable outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The use of regenerative materials in periapical surgery could improve the prognosis of apicomarginal lesions. Future research in this field should aim to standardize classification and healing criteria to enhance comparability across studies and provide more conclusive evidence for optimal treatment approaches.

Hemostatic agents in endodontic surgery of maxillary molars: A randomized controlled pilot study of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) strips as an adjunct to epinephrine impregnated gauze versus aluminum chloride.

BACKGROUND: Hemostasis is of critical importance in endodontic surgery. Studies on bleeding control in maxillary molars are scarce. The present study compares the efficacy of two hemostatic techniques in controlling bleeding in endodontic surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A randomized two-arm pilot study involving 30 patients with peri-radicular lesions in maxillary molars (first and second molars) was carried out including the following hemostatic agents: polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) strips as an adjunct to epinephrine impregnated gauze (test group; n = 15) and aluminum chloride (Expasyl™) (control; n = 15). Bleeding control was independently assessed by the surgeon and by two blinded observers before and after application of the hemostatic agent, and was classified as either adequate (complete bleeding control) or inadequate (incomplete bleeding control). RESULTS: Bleeding control was similar in both groups. Simple binary logistic regression analysis failed to identify variables affecting bleeding control. Only the height of the keratinized mucosal band (≥ 2 mm) suggested a decreased risk of inadequate bleeding control of up to 89% (OR=0.11; p=0.06). CONCLUSIONS: No difference in the efficacy of bleeding control was observed between PTFE strips as an adjunct to epinephrine impregnated gauze and aluminum chloride in maxillary molars.

Periapical implant lesion: A systematic review.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to systematically review the evidence for periapical implant lesion, which makes a patient more susceptible to the periapical lesion, frequency, symptoms, signs (including radiological findings) and possible treatment options. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A systematic literature review and analysis of publications included in PubMed, Embase and Cochrane; articles published until March 2016; with a populations, exposures and outcomes (PEO) search strategy was performed, focused on the issue: "In patients with periapical lesion to the implant during the osseointegration, what symptoms, signs, and changes in complementary examination manifested, for according to that stage, be intervened with the appropriate approach?". The set criteria for inclusion were peer-reviewed articles. RESULTS: From a total of 212 papers identified, 36 studies were included in this systematic review, with 15461 implants evaluated and 183 periapical implant lesions. Which 8 papers included more than 5 cases and 28 included equal or less than 5 cases. Analysis of the papers revealed that periapical implant lesion is classified according to evolution stages into acute (non-suppurated and suppurated) and subacute (or suppurated-fistulized). In the acute stage and in the subacute if there is no loss of implant stability, the correct treatment approach is implant periapical surgery. In the subacute stage associated with implant mobility the implant must be removed. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence on the subject is very limited, there are few studies with small sample, without homogeneity of criteria for diagnosing the disease and without design of scientific evidence. Currently etiology lacks consensus. The early diagnosis of periapical implant periapical lesions during the osseointegration phase and early treatment, will lead to a higher survival rate of implants treated, hence preventing the need for implant extraction.

Coronectomy of impacted mandibular third molars: A meta-analysis and systematic review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Coronectomy is an alternative to complete removal of an impacted mandibular third molar. Most authors have recommended coronectomy to prevent damage to the inferior alveolar nerve during surgical extraction of lower third molars. The present study offers a systematic review and metaanalysis of the coronectomy technique. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed based on a PubMed and Cochrane databases search for articles published from 2014 and involving coronectomy of mandibular third molars located near the inferior alveolar nerve canal, with a minimum of 10 cases and a minimum follow-up period of 6 months. After application of the inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 12 articles were included in the study. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Coronectomy results in significantly lesser loss of sensitivity of the inferior alveolar nerve and prevents the occurrence of dry socket. No statistically significant differences were observed in the incidence of pain and infection between coronectomy and complete surgical extraction. After coronectomy, the remaining tooth fragment migrates an average of 2 mm within two years. CONCLUSIONS: Coronectomy is indicated when the mandibular third molar is in contact with the inferior alveolar nerve and complete removal of the tooth may cause nerve damage.

Influence of the prosthetic arm length (palatal position) of zygomatic implants upon patient satisfaction.

BACKGROUND: To assess the influence of the prosthetic arm length (palatal position) of zygomatic implants upon patient comfort and stability, speech, functionality and overall satisfaction. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective clinical study was made of patients subjected to rehabilitation of atrophic maxilla with complete maxillary implant-supported fixed prostheses involving a minimum of two zygomatic implants (one on each side) in conjunction with premaxillary implants, and with 12 months of follow-up after implant loading. Subjects used a VAS to score general satisfaction, comfort and stability, speech and functionality, and the results were analyzed in relation to the prosthetic arm length of the zygomatic implants 12 months after prosthetic delivery. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients participated in the study, receiving 22 prostheses anchored on 148 implants (44 were zygomatic and 94 were conventional implants). The mean right and left prosthetic arm length was 5.9±2.4 mm and 6.1±2.7 mm, respectively, with no statistically significant differences between them (p=0.576). The mean scores referred to comfort/retention, speech, functionality and overall satisfaction were high - no correlation being found between prosthetic arm length and patient satisfaction (p=0.815). CONCLUSIONS: No relationship could be identified between prosthetic arm length (palatal position) and patient satisfaction.