Effect of simultaneous vaccination with H1N1 and GAD-alum on GAD65-induced immune response.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: A European Phase III trial of GAD formulated with aluminium hydroxide (GAD-alum) failed to reach its primary endpoint (preservation of stimulated C-peptide secretion from baseline to 15 months in type 1 diabetes patients), but subgroup analysis showed a clinical effect when participants from Nordic countries were excluded, raising concern as to whether the mass vaccination of the Swedish and Finnish populations with the Pandemrix influenza vaccine could have influenced the study outcomes. In the current study, we aimed to assess whether Pandemrix vaccination affects the specific immune responses induced by GAD-alum and the C-peptide response. METHODS: In this secondary analysis, we analysed data acquired from the Swedish participants in the Phase III GAD-alum trial who received subcutaneous GAD-alum vaccination (two doses, n = 43; four doses, n = 46) or placebo (n = 48). GAD autoantibodies (GADA) and H1N1 autoantibodies, GAD65-induced cytokine secretion and change in fasting and stimulated C-peptide levels from baseline to 15 months were analysed with respect to the relative time between H1N1 vaccination and the first injection of GAD-alum. RESULTS: GADA levels at 15 months were associated with the relative time between GAD-alum and Pandemrix administration in participants who received two doses of the GAD-alum vaccine (p = 0.015, r = 0.4). Both in participants treated with two doses and four doses of GAD-alum, GADA levels were higher when the relative time between vaccines was ≥210 days (p < 0.05). In the group that received two doses of GAD-alum, levels of several GAD65-induced cytokines were higher in participants who received the H1N1 vaccination and the first GAD-alum injection at least 150 days apart, and the change in fasting and stimulated C-peptide at 15 months was associated with the relative time between vaccines. Neither of these effects were observed in individuals who received four doses of GAD-alum. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: In individuals who received two doses of GAD-alum, receiving the Pandemrix vaccine closer to the first GAD-alum injection, i.e. <150 days, seemed to affect both GAD65-induced immune response and C-peptide preservation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00723411.

GAD-specific T cells are induced by GAD-alum treatment in Type-1 diabetes patients.

Administration of Glutamic Acid Decarboxylase (GAD)65 formulated in aluminium hydroxide preserved insulin secretion in a phase II trial in recent onset Type 1 Diabetes. A subsequent European phase III trial was closed at 15months after failing to reach primary endpoint, but the majority of the Swedish patients completed the 21months follow-up. We studied the frequencies and phenotype of T cells, suppressive capacity of Tregs, GAD65-induced proliferation, and frequencies of T cells with a GAD65-specific TCR in Swedes participating in the trial. Stimulation with GAD65 induced activated T cells and also cells with a suppressive phenotype. Activated GAD65-specific effector T cells were detected by tetramer staining while the frequency of GAD65-specific Treg was not affected by the treatment. Additional doses of GAD-alum increased frequencies of CD25+CD127+, but had no effect on CD25hiCD127lo. Our findings indicate that GAD-alum treatment primarily induced activated T cells. GAD65-specific cells were mainly of activated phenotype.

GAD-treatment of children and adolescents with recent-onset type 1 diabetes preserves residual insulin secretion after 30 months.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to analyse data from two different studies (phase II and phase III) regarding the safety and efficacy of treatment with alum formulated glutamic acid decarboxylase GAD65 (GAD-alum) at 30 months after administration to children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. METHODS: The phase II trial was a double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled study, including 70 children and adolescents who were followed for 30 months. Participants received a subcutaneous injection of either 20 µg of GAD-alum or placebo at baseline and 1 month later. During a subsequent larger European phase III trial including three treatment arms, participants received two or four subcutaneous injections of either 20 µg of GAD-alum and/or placebo at baseline, 1, 3 and 9 months. The phase III trial was prematurely interrupted at 15 months, but of the 148 Swedish patients, a majority completed the 21 months follow-up, and 45 patients completed the trial at 30 months. Both studies included GAD65 auto-antibodies-positive patients with fasting C-peptide ≥ 0.10 nmol/l. We have now combined the results of these two trials. RESULTS: There were no treatment related adverse events. In patients treated with 2 GAD-alum doses, stimulated C-peptide area under the curve had decreased significantly less (9 m: p < 0.037; 15 m: p < 0.032; 21 m: p < 0.003 and 30 m: p < 0.004), and a larger proportion of these patients were also able to achieve a peak stimulated C-peptide > 0.2 nmol/L (p < 0.05), as compared with placebo. CONCLUSION: Treatment with two doses of GAD-alum in children and adolescents with recent-onset type 1 diabetes shows no adverse events and preserves residual insulin secretion.

Cellular and humoral immune responses in type 1 diabetic patients participating in a phase III GAD-alum intervention trial.

OBJECTIVE: GAD formulated in aluminum hydroxide (GAD-alum) has previously been shown to induce preservation of residual insulin secretion in recent-onset type 1 diabetes, but recent phase II and III GAD-alum trials failed to reach primary outcomes. The European phase III study was therefore closed after 15 months, and only a minority of patients completed the 30 months of follow-up. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This study aimed to characterize cellular and humoral responses in the Swedish patients (n = 148) participating in the phase III trial, receiving four (4D) or two (2D) GAD-alum doses or placebo. Serum GAD65 antibody (GADA) levels, GADA IgG1-4 subclass distribution, cytokine secretion, and proliferative responses in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were analyzed. RESULTS: The GAD65-induced cytokine profile tended to switch toward a predominant Th2-associated profile over time both in the 2D and 4D group. The groups also displayed increased GADA levels and PBMC proliferation compared with placebo, whereas GADA IgG subclass distribution changed in 4D patients. CONCLUSIONS: Both 2D and 4D patients displayed GAD65-specifc cellular and humoral effects after GAD-alum treatment, but at different time points and magnitudes. No specific immune markers could be associated with treatment efficacy.

GAD autoantibody epitope pattern after GAD-alum treatment in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes.

AIMS: We have previously shown that two injections of glutamic acid decarboxylase formulated in alum (GAD-alum) preserved residual insulin secretion in children and adolescents with recent onset type 1 diabetes (T1D), and was accompanied by increased GAD autoantibody (GADA) titers. The aim of this study was to investigate whether GAD-alum treatment affected the GADA epitope pattern. METHODS: Serum samples from patients treated with GAD-alum (n = 33) or placebo (n = 27), at baseline, 1, 3, 9, and 15 months after the initial injection, were tested for their binding capacity to specific GADA epitopes in an epitope-specific radioligand binding assay with six recombinant Fab (rFab) (b96.11, DPA, DPD, MICA3, b78, and N-GAD(65) mAb). RESULTS: No significant differences in variability of binding to any of the tested rFab were observed from baseline to 15 months. There was a sustained low binding of GADA to the b78- and N-GAD(65) mAb-defined epitopes, often recognized by GADA in patients with stiff person syndrome (SPS) and seldom in T1D patients. However, binding of GADA to the T1D-associated b96.11-defined epitope increased between baseline and 3 months in GAD-alum (-8.1%, min -72.4%, max 39.6%) compared to placebo patients (1.5%, min -28.3%, max 28.6%) (p = 0.02). Subsequently, the b96.11-defined epitope recognition returned to levels similar to that observed at baseline. CONCLUSIONS: GAD-alum injections did not affect binding of GADA to SPS-related epitopes, further supporting the safety of the treatment. There were no changes in GADA epitope specificity to the T1D-related epitopes, except for a temporarily increased binding to one of the tested epitopes.

Long-lasting immune responses 4 years after GAD-alum treatment in children with type 1 diabetes.

A phase II clinical trial with glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) 65 formulated with aluminium hydroxide (GAD-alum) has shown efficacy in preserving residual insulin secretion in children and adolescents with recent-onset type 1 diabetes (T1D). We have performed a 4-year follow-up study of 59 of the original 70 patients to investigate long-term cellular and humoral immune responses after GAD-alum-treatment. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were stimulated in vitro with GAD(65). Frequencies of naïve, central and effector memory CD4+ and CD8+ T cells were measured, together with cytokine secretion, proliferation, gene expression and serum GAD(65) autoantibody (GADA) levels. We here show that GAD-alum-treated patients display increased memory T-cell frequencies and prompt T-cell activation upon in vitro stimulation with GAD(65), but not with control antigens, compared with placebo subjects. GAD(65)-induced T-cell activation was accompanied by secretion of T helper (Th) 1, Th2 and T regulatory cytokines and by induction of T-cell inhibitory pathways. Moreover, post-treatment serum GADA titres remained persistently increased in the GAD-alum arm, but did not inhibit GAD(65) enzymatic activity. In conclusion, memory T- and B-cell responses persist 4 years after GAD-alum-treatment. In parallel to a GAD(65)-induced T-cell activation, our results show induction of T-cell inhibitory pathways important for regulating the GAD(65) immunity.

GAD-alum treatment in patients with type 1 diabetes and the subsequent effect on GADA IgG subclass distribution, GAD65 enzyme activity and humoral response.

We have previously shown that two injections of 20 µg GAD-alum to recent onset type 1 diabetic children induced GADA levels in parallel to preservation of insulin secretion. Here we investigated if boosted GADA induced changes in IgG1, 2, 3 and 4 subclass distributions or affected GAD(65) enzyme activity. We further studied the specific effect of GAD-alum through analyses of IA-2A, tetanus toxoid and total IgE antibodies. Serum from children receiving GAD-alum or placebo was collected pre-treatment and after 3, 9, 15 and 21 months. At 3 months a reduced percentage of IgG1 and increased IgG3/IgG4 were detected in GAD-alum treated. Further, IA-2A, IgE and tetanus toxoid antibodies, as well as GAD(65) enzyme activity, were unaffected confirming the specific effect of treatment. In the GAD-alum group, higher pre-treatment GADA were associated to more pronounced C-peptide preservation. The induced IgG3/IgG4 and reduced IgG1 suggest a Th2 deviation of the immune response.

GAD treatment and insulin secretion in recent-onset type 1 diabetes.

BACKGROUND: The 65-kD isoform of glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) is a major autoantigen in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. This trial assessed the ability of alum-formulated GAD (GAD-alum) to reverse recent-onset type 1 diabetes in patients 10 to 18 years of age. METHODS: We randomly assigned 70 patients with type 1 diabetes who had fasting C-peptide levels above 0.1 nmol per liter (0.3 ng per milliliter) and GAD autoantibodies, recruited within 18 months after receiving the diagnosis of diabetes, to receive subcutaneous injections of 20 microg of GAD-alum (35 patients) or placebo (alum alone, 35 patients) on study days 1 and 30. At day 1 and months 3, 9, 15, 21, and 30, patients underwent a mixed-meal tolerance test to stimulate residual insulin secretion (measured as the C-peptide level). The effect of GAD-alum on the immune system was also studied. RESULTS: Insulin secretion gradually decreased in both study groups. The study treatment had no significant effect on change in fasting C-peptide level after 15 months (the primary end point). Fasting C-peptide levels declined from baseline levels significantly less over 30 months in the GAD-alum group than in the placebo group (-0.21 vs. -0.27 nmol per liter [-0.62 vs. -0.81 ng per milliliter], P=0.045), as did stimulated secretion measured as the area under the curve (-0.72 vs. -1.02 nmol per liter per 2 hours [-2.20 vs. -3.08 ng per milliliter per 2 hours], P=0.04). No protective effect was seen in patients treated 6 months or more after receiving the diagnosis. Adverse events appeared to be mild and similar in frequency between the two groups. The GAD-alum treatment induced a GAD-specific immune response. CONCLUSIONS: GAD-alum may contribute to the preservation of residual insulin secretion in patients with recent-onset type 1 diabetes, although it did not change the insulin requirement. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00435981.)