Dimensionless Index in Patients With Low-Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis and Preserved Ejection Fraction.

Background Risk stratification of patients with low-gradient (LG) severe aortic stenosis (AS) despite preserved left ventricular ejection fraction remains challenging. We sought to evaluate the relationship between the dimensionless index (DI)-the ratio of the left ventricular outflow tract time-velocity integral to that of the aortic valve jet-and mortality in these patients. Methods Seven hundred fifty-five patients with LG severe AS (defined by aortic valve area ≤1 cm2 or aortic valve area indexed to body surface area ≤0.6 cm2/m2 and mean aortic pressure gradient <40 mm Hg) and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50% were studied. Flow status was defined according to stroke volume index <35 mL/m2 (low flow, LF) or ≥35 mL/m2 (normal flow, NF). Results After adjustment for age, sex, body mass index, Charlson comorbidity index, history of hypertension, history of atrial fibrillation, AS-related symptoms, left ventricular ejection fraction, indexed left ventricular ventricular mass, aortic valve area, and aortic valve replacement as a time-dependent covariate, patients with LG-LF and DI<0.25 exhibited a considerable increased risk of death compared with patients with LG-NF and DI≥0.25 (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.41 [95% CI, 1.61-3.62]; P<0.001), LG-NF and DI<0.25 (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.84 [95% CI, 1.24-2.73]; P=0.003), and LG-LF and D≥0.25 (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.27 [95% CI, 1.42-3.63]; P<0.001). In contrast, patients with LG-LF and DI≥0.25, LG-NF and DI<0.25, and LG-NF and DI≥0.25 had similar outcome. DI<0.25 showed incremental prognostic value in patients with LG-LF severe AS but not in patients with LG-NF severe AS. Conclusions Among patients with LG severe AS and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction, decreased DI<0.25 is a reliable parameter in patients with LF to identify a subgroup of patients at higher risk of death who may derive benefit from aortic valve replacement.

Improvement of the Prognosis Assessment of Severe Tricuspid Regurgitation by the Use of a Five-Grade Classification of Severity.

It is well known that some patients present with "more than severe" tricuspid regurgitation (TR). We aimed to assess the prognosis of these very severe TR patients. We defined very severe TR using 3 simple echocardiographic parameters: a coaptation gap≥10mm, a laminar TR flow and a systolic reversal of the hepatic vein flow. We included 259 consecutive patients (76 ± 13 years; 46% men) with moderate-to-severe TR (n = 114) and severe TR (n = 145). The primary end point was the combination of hospitalisation for right heart failure (RHF) and cardiovascular mortality. Median follow-up was 24(7 to 47) months. In patients with severe TR, 52 (36%) met the definition of very severe TR. These patients were younger, had more history of RHF and were more frequently treated with loop diuretics than those with moderate-to-severe TR (all p < 0.001). Four-year event-free survival rates were 68 ± 5%, for moderate-to-severe TR, 48 ± 6% for severe TR and only 35 ± 7% for very-severe TR (p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, after adjustment for outcome predictors including age, comorbidity, RHF, TR etiology, left and right ventricular dysfunction, and tricuspid valve surgery, patients with very severe TR had a worsened prognosis than those with moderate-to-severe TR (Adjusted Hazard Ratio [95% Confidence Interval] = 2.43 [1.18 to 5.53]; p = 0.002) and than those with severe TR (Adjusted Hazard Ratio [95% Confidence Interval] = 2.23 [1.06 to 5.56]; p = 0.015). In conclusion, very severe TR is frequent in patients with severe TR, corresponds to a more advanced stage of the disease and is associated with poor outcomes. Therefore, the use of a 5-grade classification of TR severity is justified in routine clinical practice. (ID-RCB: 2017-A03233-50).

Progression of Normal Flow Low Gradient "Severe" Aortic Stenosis With Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction.

Normal-flow low-gradient severe aortic stenosis (NF-LG-SAS), defined by an aortic valve area (AVA) <1 cm², mean pressure gradient (MPG) <40 mm Hg and indexed stroke volume ≥35 ml/m², is the most prevalent form of low-gradient aortic stenosis (AS) with preserved ejection fraction (PEF). However, the true severity of AS in these patients is controversial. The aim of this Doppler echocardiographic study was to investigate changes over time in the hemodynamic severity of patients with NF-LG-SAS with PEF. We retrospectively identified 96 patients who had 2 Doppler echocardiographic examinations without an intervening event. After a median follow-up of 25 (interquartile range 15 to 52) months, progression was observed, with increased transaortic MPG (from 28 [25 to 33] to 39 [34 to 50] mm Hg; p<0.001), peak aortic jet velocity (from 3.46 [3.20 to 3.64] to 4.01 [3.70 to 4.39] m/s; p<0.001), and decreased AVA (from 0.87 [0.82 to 0.94] to 0.72 [0.62 to 0.81] cm²; p<0.001). Median annual rates of progression were 4.3 (1.7 to 8.1) mm Hg/year, 0.25 (0.08 to 0.44) m/s/year, and -0.05 (-0.10 to -0.02) cm²/year, respectively. There was no significant change in left ventricular ejection fraction over time (p = 0.74). At follow-up, 46 patients (48%) acquired the features of classical high-gradient severe AS (MPG ≥40 mm Hg). This study shows that most patients with NF-LG-SAS with PEF exhibit significant hemodynamic progression of AS severity without EF impairment. These findings suggest that NF-LG-SAS with PEF is an "intermediate" stage between moderate AS and classical high-gradient severe AS requiring close monitoring.

Effect of training on evidence-based practice to undergraduate dental students: pre and postexperimental study.

BACKGROUND: Evidence-based practice (EBP) training is essential for undergraduate students in making sound clinical decisions during patient care. However, EBP training is not included in the curriculum of undergraduate dental students in India and there is a dearth of research that assessed the effectiveness of EBP training in India. Hence, this study aimed to assess the effectiveness of EBP training to dental undergraduate students. METHODS: Final year undergraduate students and interns of a dental institution participated in this pre and postexperimental study. All the participants received a 2-day workshop (didactic lectures, hands-on and group activities) in a classroom setting. A validated 35 item instrument titled EBP Knowledge, Attitudes, Access and Confidence questionnaire was used for the outcome assessment of EBP training. RESULTS: Fifty undergraduate students (33 interns and 17 final year) participated in the study. Statistically significant improvement was observed in six out of 10 items related to EBP knowledge. All the items related to attitude showed a significant positive change in scores. Only four out of nine items related to accessing evidence showed a statistically significant change. Participants reported moderate confidence gain in critical appraisal skills. CONCLUSION: The current study demonstrated moderate improvement in the effectiveness of EBP training in improving EBP knowledge, accessing evidence and critical appraisal skills.

Prognostic Impact of the Ratio of Acceleration Time to Ejection Time in Patients With Low Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis and Preserved Ejection Fraction.

The clinical management of patients with low gradient severe aortic stenosis (LG-SAS) and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) remains challenging owing to their heterogeneity. The aim to this study was to evaluate the relation between an ejection dynamic parameter linked to AS severity and outcome, the ratio of acceleration time (AT) to ejection time (ET), in a cohort of patients with LG-SAS and preserved LVEF. Three hundred and fifty-six patients with LG-AS (defined by AVA ≤1 cm² and/or AVAi ≤0.6 cm²/m² and mean aortic pressure gradient <40 mm Hg) and preserved LVEF ≥50% were studied. The relation between AT/ET and all-cause and cardiac mortality during follow-up was studied. Median follow-up was 41 months (interquartile range, 35 to 47 months). Median AT/ET was 0.32 (interquartile range, 0.29 to 0.36). The 5-year estimates of all-cause and cardiac mortality were respectively 57 ± 7%, 36 ± 7% for patients with AT/ET >0.36 versus 43 ± 4%, 16 ± 3% for patients with AT/ET ≤0.36 (p = 0.024 and p <0.001, respectively). After adjustment on known predictors of outcome including aortic valve replacement used as a time-dependent covariate, there was a significant increase in all-cause mortality risk for patients with AT/ET >0.36 (adjusted hazard ratio 2.04 [95% confidence interval, 1.32 to 3.13]; p = 0.001) and cardiac mortality risk (adjusted hazard ratio 2.89 [95% confidence interval, 1.54 to 5.43]; p<0.001) compared with patients with AT/ET ≤0.36. The association of AT/ET >0.36 and all-cause or cardiac mortality risk was consistent in subgroups of patients with LG-SAS and preserved EF. In conclusion, an AT/ET ratio of more than 0.36 is an independent predictor of mortality in patients with LG-SAS and preserved EF.

Outcome of Normal-Flow Low-Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis With Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction: A Propensity-Matched Study.

Background Normal-flow, low-gradient severe aortic stenosis (NF-LG-SAS), defined by aortic valve area <1 cm2, mean gradient <40 mm Hg, and indexed stroke volume >35 mL/m2, is the most prevalent form of low-gradient aortic stenosis (AS). However, the true severity of AS and the management of NF-LG-SAS are controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of patients with NF-LG-SAS compared with moderate AS (MAS) and with high-gradient severe-AS (HG-SAS). Methods and Results A total of 154 patients with NF-LG-SAS, 366 with MAS (aortic valve area between 1.0 and 1.3 cm2), and 1055 with HG-SAS were included. On multivariate analysis, after adjustment for covariates of prognostic importance, NF-LG-SAS patients did not exhibit an excess risk of mortality compared with MAS patients under medical management (hazard ratio=1.13 [95% CI, 0.82-1.56]; P=0.45) and under medical and surgical management (hazard ratio 1.06 [95% CI, 0.79-1.43]; P=0.70), even after further adjustment for aortic valve replacement (hazard ratio=1.09 [95% CI, 0.81-1.48]; P=0.56). The 6-year cumulative incidence of aortic valve replacement (performed in accordance with guidelines) was comparable between the 2 groups (39±4% for NF-LG-SAS and 35±3% for MAS, P=0.10). After propensity score matching (n=226), NF-LG-SAS and MAS patients also had comparable outcomes under medical (P=0.41) and under medical and surgical management (P=0.52). NF-LG-SAS had better outcomes than HG-SAS patients (adjusted hazard ratio 1.84 [95% CI, 1.18-2.88]; P<0.001). Conclusions This study shows that patients with NF-LG-SAS have a comparable outcome to those with MAS when aortic valve replacement is performed during follow-up according to guidelines, mostly at the stage of HG-SAS. Rigorous echocardiographic assessment to rule out measurement errors and close follow-up are essential to detect progression to true severe AS in NF-LG-SAS.

Characteristics and prognosis of patients with significant tricuspid regurgitation.

BACKGROUND: Severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) usually remains asymptomatic for a long period, and the diagnosis is often delayed until an advanced stage of right heart failure (RHF). Only a minority of patients are referred for surgery. AIM: To describe the characteristics and prognosis of patients with significant TR, according to aetiology. METHOD: Two-hundred and eight consecutive patients with moderate-to-severe (grade III) or severe (grade IV) TR were included from echocardiography reports between 2013 and 2017. Median follow-up was 18 (6-38) months. RESULTS: Patients (mean age 75 years; 46.6% men) were divided into four groups according to TR aetiology: group 1, primary TR (14.9%); group 2, TR secondary to left heart disease with a history of left heart valve surgery (24.5%); group 3, TR secondary to left heart or pulmonary disease with no history of left valvular surgery (26.5%); and group 4, idiopathic TR (34.1%). During follow-up, 61 patients (29.3%) experienced at least one episode of RHF decompensation requiring hospitalization. Only 11 patients (5.3%) underwent tricuspid valve surgery during follow-up. The 4-year survival was much lower than the expected survival of age- and sex-matched individuals in the general population (56±4% vs. 74%). After adjustment for outcome predictors, patients with idiopathic TR had a higher risk of mortality (adjusted hazard ratio 1.83, 95% confidence interval 1.05-3.21; P=0.034) compared with other groups. CONCLUSIONS: Moderate-to-severe or severe TR is associated with a high risk of hospitalization for RHF and death at 4 years, and a low rate of surgery. Idiopathic TR is associated with worse outcome than other aetiologies.

Correlates of the ratio of acceleration time to ejection time in patients with aortic stenosis: An echocardiographic and computed tomography study.

BACKGROUND: An increased acceleration time to ejection time (AT/ET) ratio is associated with increased mortality in patients with aortic stenosis (AS). AIM: To identify the factors associated with an increased AT/ET ratio. METHODS: The relationships between the AT/ET ratio and clinical and Doppler echocardiographic variables of interest in the setting of AS were analysed retrospectively in 1107 patients with AS and preserved left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (LVEF). The computed tomography aortic valve calcium (CT-AVC) score was studied in a subgroup of 342 patients. RESULTS: In the univariate analysis, the AT/ET ratio was found to correlate with peak aortic jet velocity (r=0.57; P<0.0001), mean pressure gradient (r=0.60; P<0.0001), aortic valve area (r=-0.50; P<0.0001) and CT-AVC score (r=0.24; P<0.0001). The AT/ET ratio had good accuracy in predicting a peak aortic jet velocity≥4 m/s, a mean pressure gradient≥40mmHg and an aortic valve area≤1.0cm2, with an optimal cut-off value of 0.34. Multivariable linear regression analysis showed that presence of AS-related symptoms, decreased LV stroke volume index, LVEF, absence of diabetes mellitus, systolic blood pressure, increased LV mass index, relative wall thickness and peak aortic jet velocity were independently associated with an increased AT/ET ratio (all P<0.05). In the subgroup of patients who underwent CT-AVC scoring, the CT-AVC score was independently associated with an increased AT/ET ratio (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The AT/ET ratio is related to echocardiographic and CT-AVC indices of AS severity. However, multiple intricate factors beyond the haemodynamic and anatomical severity of AS influence the AT/ET ratio, including LV geometry, function and systolic blood pressure. These findings should be considered when assessing the AT/ET ratio in patients with AS and preserved LVEF.

Relationship Between Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction and Mortality in Asymptomatic and Minimally Symptomatic Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine the best left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) cutoff value to predict long-term mortality in patients with asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic severe aortic stenosis (AS) and LVEF ≥50% under conservative management and after surgical correction of AS. BACKGROUND: Aortic valve replacement (AVR) is a Class I indication in asymptomatic patients with severe AS and LVEF <50%. However, this is an uncommon situation in asymptomatic severe AS (<1% of patients), usually occurring late in the course of the disease. No data are available concerning the prognostic value of LVEF in asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic AS patients with preserved LVEF (≥50%) in order to identify a LVEF threshold value associated with increased mortality. METHODS: This analysis included 1,678 patients with preserved LVEF and no or minimal symptoms, with a diagnosis of severe AS. The population was divided into 3 groups: LVEF <55%, LVEF 55% to 59%, and LVEF ≥60%. RESULTS: Five-year survival rate was 72 ± 2% for patients with LVEF ≥60%, 74 ± 2% for patients with LVEF between 55% and 59%, and 59 ± 4% for patients with LVEF <55% (p < 0.001). Under initially conservative or initially surgical management (surgery within 3 months after baseline echocardiography), patients with LVEF <55% displayed significant excess mortality compared to patients with LVEF≥ 60% (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 2.44 [95% confidence interval: 1.51 to 3.94]; p < 0.001 and 2.51 [95% confidence interval: 1.58 to 4.00]; p < 0.001, respectively), whereas patients with LVEF between 55% and 59% had comparable prognosis to those with LVEF ≥60% (p = 0.53 and p = 0.36, respectively). In patients with LVEF <55%, initial conservative management was associated with increased mortality compared to initial surgical management, even after covariate adjustment (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 2.70 [95% confidence interval: 1.98 to 3.67]; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with severe AS, preserved LVEF and no or minimal symptoms at the time of diagnosis, LVEF <55% is a marker of poor outcome, with medical or surgical management suggesting that these patients should be considered for surgery before this stage.

Dental survey of institutionalized children with autistic disorder.

The objective of this study was to assess the oral hygiene practices, dietary pattern, dental caries status and needs of institutionalized autistic children. The sample consisted of 35 children (28 males and 7 females) in the age group of 5 to 10 years from two institutions in Maharashtra, India. The parents of the children were interviewed regarding oral hygiene practices of their respective ward and instructed to maintain a 4-day diet chart for their children. A clinical examination was conducted using WHO dentition status and treatment needs index and a simplified oral hygiene index for ages 4 to 6 years and 7 to 10 years (deciduous and mixed dentition) was used to assess the oral hygiene. The results of diet chart analysis according to Nizel AE and Papas AS score showed the 'at meal' sugar exposure close to nil, while the 'in between' meal sugar exposure was observed to be more than three times per day among maximum children. The oral hygiene status was poor with abundance of soft debris and fair calculus accumulation. The mean caries experience (deft) in these children was 6.4. The present study provided baseline data which has been used for planning a comprehensive oral health care program. How to cite this article: Chadha GM, Kakodkar P, Chaugule V, Nimbalkar V. Dental Survey of Institutionalized Children with Autistic Disorder. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2012;5(1):29-32.