Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol ; 6(1): 6-12, 2021 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33614923

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To find the lowest effective injection dose of abobotulinum toxin A (Dysport) for allergic rhinitis. STUDY DESIGN: Dose-escalation randomized controlled trial. METHODS: We included all patients aged 18 years or older who had persistent allergic rhinitis and positive allergy skin prick test. The patients were randomly allocated to receive 40, 30, or 20 U of abobotulinum toxin A by injection at the inferior turbinate. We followed up on patients for 12 weeks to evaluate nasal symptoms, ocular symptoms, minimum nasal cross-sectional area as measured using acoustic rhinometry, and complications. RESULTS: Seventeen patients were included in this study, with 7 receiving 20 U of abobotulinum toxin A and 5 each receiving 30 U and 40 U. Abobotulinum toxin A significantly improved nasal congestion, rhinorrhea, sneezing, and loss of smell at 40 U (P < .05) and nasal congestion, sneezing, and loss of smell at 30 U (P < .05). However, at a dose of 20 U, only nasal congestion and loss of smell improved (P < .05). Nasal patency had also significantly improved two weeks after treatment at doses of 40 and 30 U (P < .05). Complications included epistaxis (11.8%) and nasal dryness (23.5%). CONCLUSION: Abobotulinum toxin A at a dose of at least 30 U effectively reduced most nasal symptoms. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.in.th/ TCTR20200526014.

2.
Ear Nose Throat J ; 100(3): 167-171, 2021 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31547699

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: As the endoscope has become more common in the otolaryngologist's office, there is a need to reevaluate the value of traditional nasal examination methods. The objective of this study was to determine the sensitivity and specificity of traditional nasal examination tools compared to those of the rigid endoscope. METHODS: A prospective diagnostic study was conducted. Eligible patients with nasal symptoms were recruited and examined using 4 tools: (1) a nasal speculum, (2) an otoscope, (3) a posterior rhinoscopy mirror, and (4) a rigid nasal endoscope. The diagnostic value of each tool was evaluated. RESULTS: There were a total of 53 patients eligible for inclusion in the study. The mean age of all patients was 40.9 years. The most common nasal symptom was nasal obstruction (90.6%). With regard to the tools used in anterior rhinoscopy, the nasal speculum had a sensitivity of 54.69% (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 41.75-67.18) and specificity of 88.10% (95% CI: 74.37-96.02); and the otoscope had a sensitivity of 57.81% (95% CI: 44.82-70.06) and specificity of 85.71% (95% CI: 71.46-94.57). After application of topical anesthesia and decongestant, the nasal speculum had a sensitivity of 67.19% (95% CI: 54.31-78.41) and specificity of 85.71% (95% CI: 71.46-94.57); and the otoscope had a sensitivity of 65.62% (95% CI: 52.70-77.05) and specificity of 83.33% (95% CI: 68.64-93.03). The posterior rhinoscopy mirror had a sensitivity of 12.50% (95% CI: 5.18-24.07) and specificity of 94.00% (95% CI: 83.45-98.75). All adverse events in this study were minor. CONCLUSION: The traditional nasal examination tools exhibited excellent specificity. However, the sensitivity was only average, meaning that they may not be suitable for screening. We do not recommend routine use of topical anesthesia and decongestants when applying these tools, as the application of these agents did not improve the clinical sensitivity or specificity. The posterior rhinoscopy mirror had a lowest sensitivity. We thus do not recommend using a posterior rhinoscopy mirror to rule out pathologies of the posterior nasal cavity.


Subject(s)
Nasal Obstruction/diagnosis , Nose Diseases/diagnosis , Otolaryngology/instrumentation , Symptom Assessment/instrumentation , Adult , Endoscopes , Female , Humans , Male , Nasal Cavity/pathology , Nose/pathology , Otoscopes , Predictive Value of Tests , Prospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity , Surgical Instruments
3.
Iran J Allergy Asthma Immunol ; 14(3): 280-6, 2015 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26546896

ABSTRACT

Allergic rhinitis is a chronic respiratory disease. Sympathetic hypofunction is identified in all of the allergic rhinitis patients. Moreover, allergic rhinitis is associated with decreased peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF) and impaired lung functions. The aim of this study was to investigate effects of six-week of aquatic exercise on the autonomic nervous system function, PNIF and lung functions in allergic rhinitis patients. Twenty-six allergic rhinitis patients, 12 males and 14 females were recruited in this study. Subjects were diagnosed by a physician based on history, physical examination, and positive reaction to a skin prick test. Subjects were randomly assigned to two groups. The control allergic rhinitis group received education and maintained normal life. The aquatic group performed aquatic exercise for 30 minutes a day, three days a week for six weeks. Heart rate variability, PNIF and lung functions were measured at the beginning, after three weeks and six weeks. There were statistically significant increased low frequency normal units (LF n.u.), PNIF and showed decreased high frequency normal units (HF n.u.) at six weeks after aquatic exercise compared with the control group. Six weeks of aquatic exercise could increase sympathetic activity and PNIF in allergic rhinitis patients.


Subject(s)
Autonomic Nervous System/physiopathology , Exercise/physiology , Lung/physiopathology , Rhinitis, Allergic/physiopathology , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Heart Rate , Humans , Inspiratory Capacity , Male , Random Allocation , Young Adult
4.
J Med Assoc Thai ; 98 Suppl 7: S128-31, 2015 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26742380

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare the minimization of the fog condensation during nasal endoscopy between a commercial anti-fogging agent and baby shampoo. MATERIAL AND METHOD: This randomized double-blinded matched pair study was conducted at the Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University during February 4, 2013 to March 14, 2013. The commercial anti-fogging solution (Ultrastop®) and baby shampoo solution (Johnson's® no more tear®) were compared. A computer generated randomization was performed to select the solution applying on the lens for nasal endoscopy of the right nasal cavity. The other solution was then used for the left one. Three passes of endoscopy were performed to examine the floor of the nose, the sphenoethmoidal recess and the middle meatus area which spent about 30 seconds for each time of endoscopy. The time to become foggy on the lens and the preferred solution assessed by the endoscopists were recorded. RESULTS: There were 71 eligible patients recruited in the study, 37 males (52.1%) and 34 females (47.9%). There was no fogging during a 30-second nasal endoscopy either by baby shampoo or commercial anti-fogging solution. However, 9.86% (95% C12.75-16.97) of endoscopists preferred commercial anti-fogging agent, 7.04% (95% CI 0.94-13.14) preferred baby shampoo and 83.10% (95% CI 74.16-92.03) had equal satisfaction. Both agents had no statistically significant difference for preventing foggy on the lens. CONCLUSION: Baby shampoo is an effective agent to prevent fogging during nasal endoscopy and comparable with the commercial anti-fogging agent.


Subject(s)
Endoscopy/methods , Soaps , Solutions , Adolescent , Adult , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nose , Thailand , Young Adult
5.
J Med Assoc Thai ; 98 Suppl 7: S204-16, 2015 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26742392

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To examine: 1) types of bacteria and antimicrobial sensitivity of commonly used antibiotics for acute bacterial rhinosinusitis (ABRS) in Thailand, 2) the effectiveness of using antibiotics according to antimicrobial sensitivity, and 3) the effectiveness of using antibiotics according to the Thai clinical practice guidelines (CPG) of ABRS. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Descriptive & experimental studies were conducted in seven tertiary hospitals in Thailand. The specimens from maxillary sinuses were taken for bacterial cultures either by maxillary sinus tap or endoscopically directed middle meatus swabs in patients with clinically diagnosed ABRS. Antimicrobial sensitivity was performed and antibiotics were prescribed according to the results of antimicrobial sensitivity or the Thai CPG of ABRS. RESULTS: A total of 113 patients were enrolled between August 2006 and April 2007, 104 cases of which were performed for bacteriological study. The incidence of bacterial growth was 60.6% (95% CI 51.0-69.4%). The most common bacteria was H. influenzae (25.0%, 95% CI 16.9-35.3%), followed by S. pneumoniae (14.3%, 95% CI 8.2-23.5%) and S. aureus (9.5%, 95% CI 4.7-17.9%), respectively, whilst M. catarrhalis was found only in 2.4% (95% CI 0.5-7.3%). Eight in 12 S. pneumoniae isolates were tested for the minimal inhibitory concentration of penicillin and found to be penicillin resistant strain in five specimens. Beta-lactamase producing H. influenzae was found in eight out of 20 isolates. H. influenzae had a tendency to be sensitive to amoxicillin/clavulanate, cefuroxime, cefpodoxime, azithromycin, clarithromycin, ofloxacin, levofloxacin and gatifloxacin, whilst S. pneumoniae had a tendency to be sensitive to amoxicillin/clavulanate, cefaclor ampicillin/sulbactam, cefuroxime, ofloxacin, levofloxacin, gatifloxacin, cefpodoxime, cefixime and cefdinir. The effectiveness of antibiotics prescription according to the Thai CPG of ABRS and antimicrobial sensitivity were comparable, 88.5% (95% CI 69.8-97.6%) and 82.2% (95% CI 67.9-92%), respectively. CONCLUSION: H. influenzae is found to be the most common bacteria in Thai ABRS, followed by S. pneumoniae and S. aureus. There is a high incidence of beta-lactamase producing H. influenzae and penicillin non-susceptible S. pneumoniae.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Rhinitis/drug therapy , Sinusitis/drug therapy , Acute Disease , Adult , Bacteriological Techniques , Humans , Incidence , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Rhinitis/epidemiology , Rhinitis/microbiology , Sinusitis/epidemiology , Sinusitis/microbiology , Thailand/epidemiology
6.
Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol ; 31(2): 142-7, 2013 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23859414

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Allergic rhinitis is a chronic respiratory disease. Sympathetic hypofunction has been identified in allergic rhinitis patients. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of six weeks of repeated sauna treatment on the autonomic nervous system, peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF) and lung functions in Thai patients with allergic rhinitis. METHODS: Subjects were diagnosed with allergic rhinitis clinically by an attending physician based on history, physical examination and positive reactions to a skin prick test. Subjects were randomly assigned to two groups. Controlsubjects received education and maintained a normal life. The sauna group received sauna treatment over a six-week period, 3 days per week, with 6 sets of 5 minutes per set per day, totaling 30 minutes. Each 5 minute set alternated with a 5 minute period of rest. Heart rate variability (HRV), peak nasal inspiratory flow and lung function were measured at the beginning and after three and six weeks of sauna treatment. The HRV measurement is composed of three components, including low frequency (indicating sympathetic function in normal units or n.u.), high frequency (indicated parasympathetic function in n.u.), and the ratio of LF/HF (indicating the balance of the autonomic system). RESULTS: Twenty-six allergic rhinitis patients, 12 males and 14 females participated in this study, 13 in the control group and 13 in the sauna treatment group; there were 6 males in each group. Baseline characteristics for the control and sauna treatment groups were comparable. There were significant changes in the HRV after six weeks of sauna treatment. The high frequency component was significantly lower in sauna treatment group (51.8 vs 35.4), while the low frequency component and LF/HF ratio were significantly higher in sauna treatment group than in the control group (48.1 vs 64.5 and 0.9 vs 2.5, respectively). The PNIF and the forced expiratory volume in one second, or FEV1, were also significantly higher in sauna treatment group (103.0 vs 161.9 and 80.1 vs 95.6, respectively). CONCLUSION: The six weeks of repeated sauna treatment can increase sympathetic activity, PNIF, and FEV1 in Thai patients with allergic rhinitis.


Subject(s)
Heart Rate , Respiration , Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial/physiopathology , Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial/therapy , Steam Bath , Sympathetic Nervous System/physiopathology , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Forced Expiratory Flow Rates , Humans , Inspiratory Capacity , Male , Rhinitis, Allergic , Thailand , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL