ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: We examined the feasibility of assessing and referring adults successfully completing TB treatment for comorbidities, risk determinants and disability in health facilities in Kenya, Uganda, Zambia and Zimbabwe. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study within national TB programmes. RESULTS: Health workers assessed 1,063 patients (78% of eligible) in a median of 22 min [IQR 16-35] and found it useful and feasible to accomplish in addition to other responsibilities. For comorbidities, 476 (44%) had HIV co-infection, 172 (16%) had high blood pressure (newly detected in 124), 43 (4%) had mental health disorders (newly detected in 33) and 36 (3%) had diabetes mellitus. The most common risk determinants were 'probable alcohol dependence' (15%) and malnutrition (14%). Disability, defined as walking <400 m in 6 min, was found in 151/882 (17%). Overall, 763 (72%) patients had at least one comorbidity, risk determinant and/or disability. At least two-thirds of eligible patients were referred for care, although 80% of those with disability needed referral outside their original health facility. CONCLUSIONS: Seven in 10 patients completing TB treatment had at least one comorbidity, risk determinant and/or disability. This emphasises the need for offering early patient-centred care, including pulmonary rehabilitation, to improve quality of life, reduce TB recurrence and increase long-term survival.
CONTEXTE: Nous avons examiné la faisabilité d'évaluer et de référer les adultes ayant terminé avec succès le traitement de la TB pour les comorbidités, les déterminants de risque et l'invalidité dans les établissements de santé au Kenya, en Ouganda, en Zambie et au Zimbabwe. MÉTHODES: Il s'agissait d'une étude transversale menée dans le cadre des programmes nationaux de lutte contre la TB. RÉSULTATS: Les agents de santé ont évalué 1 063 patients (78% des personnes éligibles) en médiane de 22 min (IQR 1635) et ont jugé utile et réalisable d'accomplir cette tâche en plus de leurs autres responsabilités. Pour les comorbidités, 476 (44%) étaient co-infectés par le VIH, 172 (16%) souffraient d'hypertension artérielle (dont 124 nouvellement diagnostiqués), 43 (4%) présentaient des troubles de santé mentale (dont 33 nouvellement diagnostiqués) et 36 (3%) étaient diabétiques. Les déterminants de risque les plus courants étaient une « dépendance probable à l'alcool ¼ (15%) et la malnutrition (14%). L'invalidité, définie comme une marche <400 m en 6 min, a été observée chez 151/882 (17%) des patients. Dans l'ensemble, 763 (72%) des patients présentaient au moins une comorbidité, un déterminant de risque et/ou une invalidité. Au moins deux tiers des patients éligibles ont été référés pour des soins, bien que 80% de ceux souffrant d'invalidité aient besoin d'être référés en dehors de leur établissement de santé d'origine. CONCLUSIONS: Sept patients sur 10 ayant terminé le traitement de la TB présentaient au moins une comorbidité, un déterminant de risque et/ou une invalidité. Cela souligne la nécessité d'offrir des soins précoces centrés sur le patient, y compris une réadaptation pulmonaire, pour améliorer la qualité de vie, réduire la récurrence de la TB et augmenter la survie à long terme.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The study assessed whether a "7-1-7" timeliness metric for screening and TB preventive therapy (TPT) could be implemented for household contacts (HHCs) of index patients with bacteriologically confirmed pulmonary TB under routine programmatic settings in Kenya. METHODS: A longitudinal cohort study conducted among index patients and their HHCs in 12 health facilities, Kiambu County, Kenya. RESULTS: Between January and June 2023, 95% of 508 index patients had their HHCs line-listed within 7 days of initiating anti-TB treatment ("First 7"). In 68% of 1,115 HHCs, screening outcomes were ascertained within 1 day of line-listing ("Next 1"). In 65% of 1,105 HHCs eligible for further evaluation, anti-TB treatment, TPT or a decision for no drugs was made within 7 days of screening ("Second 7"). Altogether, 62% of screened HHCs started TPT during the "7-1-7" period compared with 58% in a historical cohort. Main barriers to TPT uptake were HHCs not consulting clinicians, HHCs being unwilling to initiate TPT and drug shortages. Healthcare workers felt that a timeliness metric was valuable for streamlining HHC management and proposed "3-5-7" as a workable alternative. CONCLUSIONS: The national TB programme must generate awareness about TPT, ensure uninterrupted drug supplies and assess whether the "3-5-7" metric can be operationalised.
CONTEXTE: L'étude a évalué si une mesure de rapidité "7-1-7" pour le dépistage et le traitement préventif de la TB (TPT) pouvait être mise en Åuvre pour les contacts familiaux des patients index atteints de TB pulmonaire confirmée bactériologiquement dans le cadre d'un programme de routine au Kenya. MÉTHODES: Étude de cohorte longitudinale menée auprès de patients index et de leurs contacts familiaux dans 12 établissements de santé du comté de Kiambu, au Kenya. RÉSULTATS: Entre janvier et juin 2023, 95% des 508 patients index ont eu leur centre de santé inscrit sur la liste dans les 7 jours suivant le début du traitement antituberculeux (« First 7 ¼ ). Dans 68% des 1 115 centres de santé, les résultats du dépistage ont été vérifiés dans le jour suivant l'inscription sur la liste (« Next 1 ¼). Dans 65% des 1 105 centres de santé éligibles pour une évaluation plus approfondie, le traitement antituberculeux, le TPT ou la décision de ne pas prendre de médicaments a été prise dans les 7 jours suivant le dépistage (« Second 7 ¼). Au total, 62% des patients dépistés ont commencé un traitement antituberculeux au cours de la période « 7-1-7 ¼, contre 58% dans une cohorte historique. Les principaux obstacles à l'adoption du TPT étaient les suivants : les centres de santé ne consultaient pas les cliniciens, les centres de santé n'étaient pas disposés à commencer le TPT et les pénuries de médicaments. Les professionnels de la santé ont estimé qu'une mesure de la rapidité d'exécution était utile pour rationaliser la gestion des centres de santé et ont proposé le « 3-5-7 ¼ comme solution de rechange viable. CONCLUSION: Le programme national de lutte contre la TB doit sensibiliser au TPT, garantir un approvisionnement ininterrompu en médicaments et évaluer si la mesure « 3-5-7 ¼ peut être mise en Åuvre.
ABSTRACT
Carbon monoxide (CO) is a poisonous gas produced by incomplete combustion of carbon-based fuels that is linked to mortality and morbidity. Household air pollution from burning fuels on poorly ventilated stoves can lead to high concentrations of CO in homes. There are few datasets available on household concentrations of CO in urban areas of sub-Saharan African countries. CO was measured every minute over 24 h in a sample of homes in Nairobi, Kenya. Data on household characteristics were gathered by questionnaire. Metrics of exposure were summarised and analysis of temporal changes in concentration was performed. Continuous 24-h data were available from 138 homes. The mean (SD), median (IQR) and maximum 24-h CO concentration was 4.9 (6.4), 2.8 (1.0-6.3) and 44 ppm, respectively. 50% of homes had detectable CO concentrations for 847 min (14h07m) or longer during the 24-h period, and 9% of homes would have activated a CO-alarm operating to European specifications. An association between a metric of total CO exposure and self-reported exposure to vapours >15 h per week was identified, however this were not statistically significant after adjustment for the multiple comparisons performed. Mean concentrations were broadly similar in homes from a more affluent area and an informal settlement. A model of typical exposure suggests that cooking is likely to be responsible for approximately 60% of the CO exposure of Nairobi schoolchildren. Household CO concentrations are substantial in Nairobi, Kenya, despite most homes using gas or liquid fuels. Concentrations tend to be highest during the evening, probably associated with periods of cooking. Household air pollution from cooking is the main source of CO exposure of Nairobi schoolchildren. The public health impacts of long-term CO exposure in cities in sub-Saharan Africa may be considerable and should be studied further.
Subject(s)
Air Pollutants , Air Pollution, Indoor , Carbon Monoxide , Carbon Monoxide/analysis , Air Pollution, Indoor/analysis , Air Pollution, Indoor/statistics & numerical data , Kenya , Humans , Air Pollutants/analysis , Environmental Monitoring , Cities , Housing , Public Health , Cooking , Family Characteristics , Environmental Exposure/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The aim of these clinical standards is to provide guidance on 'best practice' care for the diagnosis, treatment and prevention of post-COVID-19 lung disease.METHODS: A panel of international experts representing scientific societies, associations and groups active in post-COVID-19 lung disease was identified; 45 completed a Delphi process. A 5-point Likert scale indicated level of agreement with the draft standards. The final version was approved by consensus (with 100% agreement).RESULTS: Four clinical standards were agreed for patients with a previous history of COVID-19: Standard 1, Patients with sequelae not explained by an alternative diagnosis should be evaluated for possible post-COVID-19 lung disease; Standard 2, Patients with lung function impairment, reduced exercise tolerance, reduced quality of life (QoL) or other relevant signs or ongoing symptoms ≥4 weeks after the onset of first symptoms should be evaluated for treatment and pulmonary rehabilitation (PR); Standard 3, The PR programme should be based on feasibility, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness criteria, organised according to local health services and tailored to an individual patient's needs; and Standard 4, Each patient undergoing and completing PR should be evaluated to determine its effectiveness and have access to a counselling/health education session.CONCLUSION: This is the first consensus-based set of clinical standards for the diagnosis, treatment and prevention of post-COVID-19 lung disease. Our aim is to improve patient care and QoL by guiding clinicians, programme managers and public health officers in planning and implementing a PR programme to manage post-COVID-19 lung disease.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Quality of Life , Humans , Disease Progression , Educational Status , Exercise , COVID-19 TestingABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: We performed an analysis of the cost and relative merits of different strategies for the diagnosis of multidrug-resistant/extensively drug-resistant TB (MDR/XDR-TB) in different settings.METHODS: We systematically reviewed the published evidence on cost/cost-effectiveness of rapid MDR/pre-XDR-TB and other methods for XDR-TB testing up to September 2022. PRISMA guidelines were followed. Collected data were analysed using Stata v17 software. Cost data were reported in USD ($) and summarised by mean, standard deviation, and range. Country income level was defined according to the World Bank country classification. Three simplified scenarios were also used to explore testing implications, based on low, intermediate and high TB incidence.RESULTS: Of 157 records, 25 studies were included with 24 reporting the cost of Xpert/RIF and two that evaluated the implementation of the MTBDRplus test. The total rapid test cost ranged from $12.41-$218, including $1.13-$74.60 for reagents/consumables and $0.40-$14.34 for equipment.CONCLUSION: The cost of MDR/XDR-TB diagnostics is lower in low resource settings. However, the cost-effective implementation of MDR/XDR-TB diagnostic algorithms requires careful consideration of local resources to avoid missed identification and the use of inappropriate regimen.
Subject(s)
Extensively Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis , Mycobacterium tuberculosis , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant , Humans , Antitubercular Agents/pharmacology , Antitubercular Agents/therapeutic use , Extensively Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis/diagnosis , Extensively Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis/drug therapy , Extensively Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis/epidemiology , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant/diagnosis , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant/drug therapy , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant/epidemiology , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , SoftwareABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Access to affordable inhaled medicines for chronic respiratory diseases (CRDs) is severely limited in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), causing avoidable morbidity and mortality. The International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease convened a stakeholder meeting on this topic in February 2022.METHODS: Focused group discussions were informed by literature and presentations summarising experiences of obtaining inhaled medicines in LMICs. The virtual meeting was moderated using a topic guide around barriers and solutions to improve access. The thematic framework approach was used for analysis.RESULTS: A total of 58 key stakeholders, including patients, healthcare practitioners, members of national and international organisations, industry and WHO representatives attended the meeting. There were 20 pre-meeting material submissions. The main barriers identified were 1) low awareness of CRDs; 2) limited data on CRD burden and treatments in LMICs; 3) ineffective procurement and distribution networks; and 4) poor communication of the needs of people with CRDs. Solutions discussed were 1) generation of data to inform policy and practice; 2) capacity building; 3) improved procurement mechanisms; 4) strengthened advocacy practices; and 5) a World Health Assembly Resolution.CONCLUSION: There are opportunities to achieve improved access to affordable, quality-assured inhaled medicines in LMICs through coordinated, multi-stakeholder, collaborative efforts.
Subject(s)
Developing Countries , Respiration Disorders , Humans , Income , Poverty , Global HealthABSTRACT
Short-acting ß2-agonist (SABA) prescriptions and associated outcomes were assessed in 1440 patients with asthma from the SABA use IN Asthma (SABINA) III study treated in primary care. Data on asthma medications were collected, and multivariable regression models analysed the association of SABA prescriptions with clinical outcomes. Patients (mean age, 47.9 years) were mostly female (68.6%); 58.3% had uncontrolled/partly controlled asthma and 38.8% experienced ≥1 severe exacerbation (reported in 39% of patients with mild asthma). Overall, 44.9% of patients were prescribed ≥3 SABA canisters (over-prescription) and 21.5% purchased SABA over-the-counter. Higher SABA prescriptions (vs 1-2 canisters) were associated with significantly decreased odds of having at least partly controlled asthma (6-9 and 10-12 canisters) and an increased incidence rate of severe exacerbations (10-12 and ≥13 canisters). Findings revealed a high disease burden, even in patients with 'mild' asthma, emphasising the need for local primary care guidelines based on international recommendations.
Subject(s)
Asthma , Prescriptions , Asthma/drug therapy , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Primary Health CareABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The extent of short-acting ß2-agonist (SABA) overuse in Africa remains poorly documented. As part of the SABA use IN Asthma (SABINA) III study, we assessed SABA prescriptions/clinical outcomes in 3 African countries. METHODS: Data on disease characteristics/asthma treatments were collected from patients (≥12 years) using electronic case report forms. Patients were classified by investigator-defined asthma severity (guided by the 2017 Global Initiative for Asthma) and practice type (primary/specialist care). Multivariable regression models analyzed associations between SABA prescriptions and outcomes. RESULTS: Data from 1778 patients (mean age, 43.7 years) were analyzed. Most patients were female (62.4%) and had moderate-to-severe asthma (63.3%), with 57.1 and 42.9% of patients treated in specialist and primary care, respectively. Asthma was partly controlled/uncontrolled in 66.2% of patients, with 57.9% experiencing ≥1 severe exacerbation in the previous 12 months. Overall, 46.5% of patients were prescribed ≥3 SABA canisters in the preceding 12 months (over-prescription); 26.2% were prescribed ≥10 canisters. SABAs were purchased over-the-counter by 32.6% of patients, of whom 79.3% had received SABA prescriptions; 71.9% and 40.1% for ≥3 and ≥10 canisters, respectively. Higher SABA prescriptions (vs. 1-2 canisters) were associated with increased incidence rate of severe exacerbations and lower odds of having at least partly controlled asthma (except 3-5 canisters). CONCLUSIONS: Findings from this African cohort of the SABINA III study indicate that SABA over-prescription and SABA over-the-counter purchase are common and associated with poor asthma-related outcomes. This highlights the need for healthcare providers/policymakers to align clinical practices with the latest treatment recommendations.
Subject(s)
Asthma , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Asthma/drug therapy , Asthma/epidemiology , Cohort Studies , Nonprescription Drugs/therapeutic use , PrescriptionsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Optimal drug dosing is important to ensure adequate response to treatment, prevent development of drug resistance and reduce drug toxicity. The aim of these clinical standards is to provide guidance on 'best practice´ for dosing and management of TB drugs.METHODS: A panel of 57 global experts in the fields of microbiology, pharmacology and TB care were identified; 51 participated in a Delphi process. A 5-point Likert scale was used to score draft standards. The final document represents the broad consensus and was approved by all participants.RESULTS: Six clinical standards were defined: Standard 1, defining the most appropriate initial dose for TB treatment; Standard 2, identifying patients who may be at risk of sub-optimal drug exposure; Standard 3, identifying patients at risk of developing drug-related toxicity and how best to manage this risk; Standard 4, identifying patients who can benefit from therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM); Standard 5, highlighting education and counselling that should be provided to people initiating TB treatment; and Standard 6, providing essential education for healthcare professionals. In addition, consensus research priorities were identified.CONCLUSION: This is the first consensus-based Clinical Standards for the dosing and management of TB drugs to guide clinicians and programme managers in planning and implementation of locally appropriate measures for optimal person-centred treatment to improve patient care.
Subject(s)
Antitubercular Agents , Drug Monitoring , Tuberculosis , Humans , Patient Care , Reference Standards , Tuberculosis/drug therapy , Antitubercular Agents/administration & dosageABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The aim of these clinical standards is to provide guidance on 'best practice´ for diagnosis, treatment and management of drug-susceptible pulmonary TB (PTB).METHODS: A panel of 54 global experts in the field of TB care, public health, microbiology, and pharmacology were identified; 46 participated in a Delphi process. A 5-point Likert scale was used to score draft standards. The final document represents the broad consensus and was approved by all 46 participants.RESULTS: Seven clinical standards were defined: Standard 1, all patients (adult or child) who have symptoms and signs compatible with PTB should undergo investigations to reach a diagnosis; Standard 2, adequate bacteriological tests should be conducted to exclude drug-resistant TB; Standard 3, an appropriate regimen recommended by WHO and national guidelines for the treatment of PTB should be identified; Standard 4, health education and counselling should be provided for each patient starting treatment; Standard 5, treatment monitoring should be conducted to assess adherence, follow patient progress, identify and manage adverse events, and detect development of resistance; Standard 6, a recommended series of patient examinations should be performed at the end of treatment; Standard 7, necessary public health actions should be conducted for each patient. We also identified priorities for future research into PTB.CONCLUSION: These consensus-based clinical standards will help to improve patient care by guiding clinicians and programme managers in planning and implementation of locally appropriate measures for optimal person-centred treatment for PTB.
Subject(s)
Tuberculosis, Pulmonary , Adult , Child , Humans , Tuberculosis, Pulmonary/diagnosis , Tuberculosis, Pulmonary/drug therapy , Tuberculosis, Pulmonary/microbiologyABSTRACT
Despite the acknowledged injustice and widespread existence of parachute research studies conducted in low- or middle-income countries by researchers from institutions in high-income countries, there is currently no pragmatic guidance for how academic journals should evaluate manuscript submissions and challenge this practice. We assembled a multidisciplinary group of editors and researchers with expertise in international health research to develop this consensus statement. We reviewed relevant existing literature and held three workshops to present research data and holistically discuss the concept of equitable authorship and the role of academic journals in the context of international health research partnerships. We subsequently developed statements to guide prospective authors and journal editors as to how they should address this issue. We recommend that for manuscripts that report research conducted in low- or middle-income countries by collaborations including partners from one or more high-income countries, authors should submit accompanying structured reflexivity statements. We provide specific questions that these statements should address and suggest that journals should transparently publish reflexivity statements with accepted manuscripts. We also provide guidance to journal editors about how they should assess the structured statements when making decisions on whether to accept or reject submitted manuscripts. We urge journals across disciplines to adopt these recommendations to accelerate the changes needed to halt the practice of parachute research.
Subject(s)
Authorship/standards , Biomedical Research/standards , Editorial Policies , Global Health/standards , Periodicals as Topic/standards , Africa , Australia , Biomedical Research/trends , Global Health/trends , Humans , Periodicals as Topic/trends , Review Literature as Topic , United KingdomABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Increasing evidence suggests that post-TB lung disease (PTLD) causes significant morbidity and mortality. The aim of these clinical standards is to provide guidance on the assessment and management of PTLD and the implementation of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR).METHODS: A panel of global experts in the field of TB care and PR was identified; 62 participated in a Delphi process. A 5-point Likert scale was used to score the initial ideas for standards and after several rounds of revision the document was approved (with 100% agreement).RESULTS: Five clinical standards were defined: Standard 1, to assess patients at the end of TB treatment for PTLD (with adaptation for children and specific settings/situations); Standard 2, to identify patients with PTLD for PR; Standard 3, tailoring the PR programme to patient needs and the local setting; Standard 4, to evaluate the effectiveness of PR; and Standard 5, to conduct education and counselling. Standard 6 addresses public health aspects of PTLD and outcomes due to PR.CONCLUSION: This is the first consensus-based set of Clinical Standards for PTLD. Our aim is to improve patient care and quality of life by guiding clinicians, programme managers and public health officers in planning and implementing adequate measures to assess and manage PTLD.