A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR): Behavioural Changes in the COVID-19 Era.

Objectives The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has impacted public health systems and individuals' behaviour, with decreasing survival rates among out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients. Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) improves OHCA outcomes, which may have been affected by COVID-19. We sought to understand the impacts of COVID-19 on bystanders' willingness to administer CPR in three Canadian provinces. Methods Participants ≥ 18 years of age were surveyed online about their current and recalled pre-pandemic attitudes toward CPR and perceived transmission risk. We compared mean willingness to perform various CPR actions before and during the pandemic using paired t-tests. Differences in willingness across three provinces were assessed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's Honestly Significant Difference (HSD) test. We also conducted Chi-square tests to assess changes in willingness to perform CPR on children and older adults. Results Five hundred thirty-five participants were surveyed from October 1 to November 15, 2021. The mean age was 42.7 years (SD 14.5), and 60.2% were female. Participants reported less willingness to perform chest compressions on strangers during the pandemic compared to their recollections before the pandemic (mean willingness 86.2% vs. 94.3% prior, p<0.001). With personal protective equipment (PPE) available, particularly masks, willingness recovered to 91.3% (p<0.001). Willingness was higher in Nova Scotia (NS) than in British Columbia (BC) or Ontario (ON). Reluctance to assist older adults increased from 6.6% to 12.0% (p=0.020). Conclusions This study highlights changes in CPR willingness during the COVID-19 pandemic, underscoring the importance of PPE and offering insights into public health strategies pertaining to CPR during a pandemic.

The socio-economic burden of cancer: An observation from the palliative care OPD.

A cross-sectional study was planned to assess the socio-economic burden of cancer among patients referred for palliative care. Patients referred within 6 months of diagnosis were grouped as early while others were late referrals. The socio-economic status, out-of-pocket expenditure (OOPE), and budget adjustments were noted and compared between the two groups using SPSS v 23.0. A total of 96 patients were included among which 57 were referred late. Most patients belonged to middle- and lower-income groups but only 22/96 had some kind of social security. The demographic profiles of the two groups were comparable. Although the patients referred late had more OOPE compared to the early ones, the difference was not statistically significant. Patients receiving chemotherapy had a significantly higher OOPE (P = 0.001). Job interruptions and loss of family income leading to budget adjustments were reported by 50 patients. The study indicates that there is a significant economic impact and OOPE that needs to be addressed in our patient population.

Association of Preoperative Diuretic Use With Early Acute Kidney Injury in Infants With Biventricular Hearts Following Cardiac Surgery.

Background Diuretics are used to manage congestive heart failure in infants with congenital heart disease. Adult data indicate that preoperative diuretic use increases the risk of cardiac surgery associated acute kidney injury (CS-AKI). We have sought to understand if preoperative diuretics in infants increases the risk of CS-AKI. Methods and Results This is a single-center retrospective study of infants (1-12 months) who had CS requiring cardiopulmonary bypass between 2013 and 2018. The diagnosis and severity of CS-AKI was defined according to the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes guidelines. Three hundred patients were included (mean 6 months, SD 2.4, range 1.2-12.9 months). A total of 149 (49.7%) patients were diagnosed with CS-AKI (stage 1: 80 [54%], stage 2: 57 [38%], stage 3: 12 [8%]). Logistic regression analysis showed preoperative diuretics were not associated with CS-AKI (odds ratio [OR], 0.79; 95% CI, 0.43-1.44; P=0.45). A diagnosis of tetralogy of Fallot was an independent risk factor for CS-AKI (OR, 3.49; 95% CI, 1.33-9.1, P=0.01). A diagnosis of tetralogy of Fallot (OR, 3.6; 95% CI, 1.28-10.22; P=0.02) and longer cardiopulmonary bypass (OR, 1.01; 95% CI, 1.0-1.02; P=0.04) time are risk factors for moderate to severe CS-AKI. Conclusions Preoperative diuretic use does not contribute to the risk of CS-AKI in infants early after surgery. A diagnosis of tetralogy of Fallot was the only risk factor for CS-AKI identified using multivariate analysis in our cohort. Furthermore, a diagnosis of tetralogy of Fallot and longer cardiopulmonary bypass time are risk factors for moderate to severe CS-AKI.

Bystanders are less willing to resuscitate out-of-hospital cardiac arrest victims during the COVID-19 pandemic.

AIM: The COVID-19 pandemic may influence the willingness of bystanders to engage in resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. We sought to determine if and how the pandemic has changed willingness to intervene, and the impact of personal protective equipment (PPE). METHODS: We distributed a 12-item survey to the general public through social media channels from June 4 to 23, 2020. We used 100-point scales to inquire about participants' willingness to perform interventions on "strangers or unfamiliar persons" and "family members or familiar persons", and compared mean willingness during time periods prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic using paired t-tests. RESULTS: Survey participants (n = 1360) were from 26 countries; the median age was 38 years (IQR 24-50) and 45% were female. Compared to prior to the pandemic, there were significant decreases in willingness to check for breathing or a pulse (mean difference -10.7% [95%CI -11.8, -9.6] for stranger/unfamiliar persons, -1.2% [95%CI -1.6, -0.8] for family/familiar persons), perform chest compressions (-14.3% [95%CI -15.6, -13.0], -1.6% [95%CI -2.1, -1.1]), provide rescue breaths (-19.5% [95%CI -20.9, -18.1], -5.5% [95%CI -6.4, -4.6]), and apply an automated external defibrillator (-4.8% [95%CI -5.7, -4.0], -0.9% [95%CI -1.3, -0.5]) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Willingness to intervene increased significantly if PPE was available (+8.3% [95%CI 7.2, 9.5] for stranger/unfamiliar, and +1.4% [95%CI 0.8, 1.9] for family/familiar persons). CONCLUSION: Willingness to perform bystander resuscitation during the pandemic decreased, however this was ameliorated if simple PPE were available.