Management of Severe Malnutrition Post-bariatric Surgery Using Artificial Nutrition.

BACKGROUND: Bariatric surgery (BS) results in major and sustained weight loss and improves comorbidities in patients with obesity but can also lead to malnutrition, especially through severe malabsorption and/or surgical complications. Little is known about the efficacy of artificial nutrition (AN) in this setting. METHODS: In this case series, we describe data from consecutive severely malnourished patients after BS (resectional and non-resectional), managed by AN at our hospital unit over a 4-year period. RESULTS: Between January 2018 and June 2022, 18 patients (mean ± SD age 42.2 ± 10.4 years, 94% women) required AN following BS complications. At the time of AN initiation, more than half of the patients (53%) had multiple revisional surgeries (up to four). Mean BMI was 49.7 ± 11.3 kg/m2 before BS and 29.6 ± 9.6 kg/m2 when AN was initiated. Most patients (n=16, 90%) received enteral nutrition. AN management resulted in weight regain (+4.7kg ± 8.0, p=0.034), increased serum albumin (+28%, p=0.02), pre-albumin (+88%, p=0.002), and handgrip strength (+38%, p=0.078). No major AN complication nor death was observed. Median total AN duration was 4.5 months [1-12]. During follow-up, the cumulative duration of hospitalization was 33 days [4-88] with a median of 2.5 hospitalizations [1-8] per patient. CONCLUSION: Malnutrition can occur after any BS procedure, and AN when required in this setting appears safe and effective on nutritional parameters. It is important to recognize the potential risk factors for malnutrition, which include excessive weight loss resulting from surgical complications, eating disorders, multiple revisional BS, and pregnancy.

From Dyspnea to Skin Grafting: The Difficulties of Managing a Patient with Extreme Obesity.

While the prevalence of severe obesity is increasing worldwide, caregivers are often challenged with the management of patients with extreme weight. A 30-year-old woman (weight 245 kg, body mass index 85 kg/m2) presented with dyspnea, for which investigations led to suspect pulmonary embolism. The patient's weight made it impossible to perform adapted imaging; thus, an empirical anticoagulant treatment was initiated. A hematoma of the thigh occurred as a consequence of a transient antivitamin K overdose, leading to a 15-cm necrotic wound worsened by a state of malnutrition. Multidisciplinary and comprehensive care was performed including wound trimming, antibiotics, skin grafting, treatment of malnutrition, and psychological support, but with marked difficulties due to the lack of adapted medical equipment and facilities as well as appropriate medical guidelines. Overall, 7 months of hospitalization including 4 months of physiotherapy and rehabilitation were needed before the patient could return home. This case highlights how difficult managing patients with extreme obesity can be and points to the importance for healthcare systems to adapt to the specific needs of these patients and to design specific guidelines for treatment dosage and malnutrition prevention and treatment in this setting.

The COVID-19 lockdown as an opportunity to change lifestyle and body weight in people with overweight/obesity and diabetes: Results from the national French COVIDIAB cohort.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: To analyze lifestyle habits and weight evolution during the COVID-19 pandemic-associated lockdown, in diabetes and overweight/obesity patients (body mass index (BMI) [25-29.9] and ≥30 kg/m2, respectively). METHODS AND RESULTS: We collected information on participants' characteristics and behavior regarding lifestyle before and during the lockdown, through the CoviDIAB web application, which is available freely for people with diabetes in France. We stratified the cohort according to BMI (≥25 kg/m2vs < 25 kg/m2) and examined the determinants of weight loss (WL), WL > 1 kg vs no-WL) in participants with a BMI ≥25 kg/m2, in both univariate and multivariate analyses. Of the 5280 participants (mean age, 52.5 years; men, 49%; diabetes, 100% by design), 69.5% were overweight or obese (mean BMI, 28.6 kg/m2 (6.1)). During the lockdown, patients often quit or decreased smoking; overweight/obese participants increased alcohol consumption less frequently as compared with normal BMI patients. In addition, overweight/obese patients were more likely to improve other healthy behaviors on a larger scale than patients with normal BMI: increased intake of fruits and vegetables, reduction of snacks intake, and reduction of total dietary intake. WL was observed in 18.9% of people with a BMI ≥25 kg/m2, whereas 28.6% of them gained weight. Lifestyle favorable changes characterized patients with WL. CONCLUSIONS: A significant proportion of overweight/obese patients with diabetes seized the opportunity of lockdown to improve their lifestyle and to lose weight. Identifying those people may help clinicians to personalize practical advice in the case of a recurrent lockdown.

Benefits and risks of bariatric surgery in patients with bipolar disorders.

The prevalence of bipolar disorders in patients requesting bariatric surgery is estimated to be 1.5% to 3.4%. There are currently no specific recommendations regarding the way bariatric surgery should be managed in the context of bipolar disorder. The aim was to document the benefit-risk of bariatric surgery in patients with bipolar disorders. A systematic literature review was carried out. In addition, results were reported from a survey of current clinical practice in French referent centers for obesity care. Finally, 3 clinical cases from the "Severe Obesity Outcome Network" cohort are described. This systematic review shows there are few studies in the literature regarding the outcomes of bariatric surgery in patients with bipolar disorders and no randomized, controlled trials. Weight loss appeared similar in all patients, but psychiatric complications were sometimes reported in those with bipolar disorders. Almost all 11 referent centers for obesity care that responded had carried out bariatric surgery in patients with stable bipolar disorders. Postsurgical psychiatric destabilization occurred and included, at least, a need to reinforce treatment and follow-up. In the 3 case studies, postsurgical manic or hypomanic decompensation occurred. Thus, although effective in terms of weight loss, bariatric surgery could be a destabilizing factor for those with bipolar disorders. Current practice is to contraindicate surgery in patients with unstable disorders. There are insufficient data to conclude on the benefits and safety of bariatric surgery in patients with stable bipolar disease. Further studies are required to fully determine the benefits and risks.