Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 13 de 13
Filter
1.
JAMA Netw Open ; 6(5): e2315064, 2023 05 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37223900

ABSTRACT

Importance: There is a lack of information regarding the impact of implementing a protocol-driven, team-based, multicomponent intervention in public primary care settings on hypertension-related complications and health care burden over the long term. Objective: To compare hypertension-related complications and health service use at 5 years among patients managed with Risk Assessment and Management Program for Hypertension (RAMP-HT) vs usual care. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this population-based prospective matched cohort study, patients were followed up until the date of all-cause mortality, an outcome event, or last follow-up appointment before October 2017, whichever occurred first. Participants included 212 707 adults with uncomplicated hypertension managed at 73 public general outpatient clinics in Hong Kong between 2011 and 2013. RAMP-HT participants were matched to patients receiving usual care using propensity score fine stratification weightings. Statistical analysis was conducted from January 2019 to March 2023. Interventions: Nurse-led risk assessment linked to electronic action reminder system, nurse intervention, and specialist consultation (as necessary), in addition to usual care. Main Outcomes and Measures: Hypertension-related complications (cardiovascular diseases, end-stage kidney disease), all-cause mortality, public health service use (overnight hospitalization, attendances at accident and emergency department, specialist outpatient clinic, and general outpatient clinic). Results: A total of 108 045 RAMP-HT participants (mean [SD] age: 66.3 [12.3] years; 62 277 [57.6%] female) and 104 662 patients receiving usual care (mean [SD] age 66.3 [13.5] years; 60 497 [57.8%] female) were included. After a median (IQR) follow-up of 5.4 (4.5-5.8) years, RAMP-HT participants had 8.0% absolute risk reduction in cardiovascular diseases, 1.6% absolute risk reduction in end-stage kidney disease, and 10.0% absolute risk reduction in all-cause mortality. After adjusting for baseline covariates, the RAMP-HT group was associated with lower risk of cardiovascular diseases (hazard ratio [HR], 0.62; 95% CI, 0.61-0.64), end-stage kidney disease (HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.50-0.59), and all-cause mortality (HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.50-0.54) compared with the usual care group. The number needed to treat to prevent 1 cardiovascular disease event, end-stage kidney disease, and all-cause mortality was 16, 106, and 17, respectively. RAMP-HT participants had lower hospital-based health service use (incidence rate ratios ranging from 0.60 to 0.87) but more general outpatient clinic attendances (IRR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.06-1.06) compared with usual care patients. Conclusions and Relevance: In this prospective matched cohort study involving 212 707 primary care patients with hypertension, participation in RAMP-HT was associated with statistically significant reductions in all-cause mortality, hypertension-related complications, and hospital-based health service use after 5 years.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases , Hypertension , Kidney Failure, Chronic , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Cohort Studies , Hypertension/epidemiology , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Prospective Studies
2.
Diabetes Metab Res Rev ; 34(2)2018 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28925010

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This study examined whether temporal trends exist in treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and quality of diabetes care after implementation of quality improvement initiative in primary care setting. METHODS: We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study of 202,284 patients with T2D who were routinely managed in primary care clinics. We examined the change over time and the variability between clinics in quality of care from Hospital Authority administrative data over a 5-year period (2009-2013) and used multilevel logistic regression to adjust for patient and clinic characteristics. Observational period was partitioned in 5 calendar years. Ten quality-of-care criteria were selected: adherence to 7 process of care criteria (HbA1c test, renal function test, full lipid profile, urine protein analysis, retinal screening, lipid-lowering agent prescriptions among patients with hypercholesterolaemia, and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker prescriptions among patients with microalbuminuria) and 3 outcome of care criteria (HbA1c  ≤ 7%, BP ≤ 130/80 mmHg, and LDL-C ≤ 2.6 mmol/L). Variability of standards between clinics was assessed by using intracluster correlation coefficients. RESULTS: Characteristics of patients with T2D managed in primary care changed substantially during the observational period, with increasing age and usage of insulin and longer duration of diabetes but improved metabolic profiles (all P trend < .001). Performance rates of the 7 process and 3 clinical outcomes of care criteria increased remarkably over time (all P trend < .001). Variations in retinal screening delivery between clinics were considerable, albeit decreasing over time. CONCLUSIONS: Coinciding with implementation of quality improvement initiative, quality of diabetes care improved significantly in the past 5 years, in part attributable to benefits of integrated multidisciplinary diabetes management.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/therapy , Health Plan Implementation , Primary Health Care/standards , Quality Assurance, Health Care , Quality Improvement/trends , Aged , Ambulatory Care Facilities , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/epidemiology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hong Kong/epidemiology , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies
3.
J Hypertens ; 35(3): 627-636, 2017 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27861244

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the effectiveness of a structured multidisciplinary risk assessment and management programme for patients with hypertension (RAMP-HT) who were managed in public primary care clinics but had suboptimal blood pressure (BP) control in improving BP, LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) and predicted 10-year cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk after 12 months of intervention. METHODS: A total of 10 262 hypertension patients with suboptimal BP despite treatment, aged less than 80 years and without existing CVD were enrolled in RAMP-HT between October 2011 and March 2012 from public general out-patient clinics in Hong Kong. Their clinical outcomes and predicted 10-year CVD risk were compared with a matched cohort of hypertension patients who were receiving usual care in general out-patient clinics without any RAMP-HT intervention by propensity score matching. Multivariable linear and logistic regressions were used to determine the independent effectiveness of RAMP-HT after adjusting for potential confounding variables. RESULTS: Compared with the usual care group after 12 months, significantly greater proportions of RAMP-HT participants achieved target BP (i.e. BP < 140/90 mmHg) (OR = 1.18, P < 0.01) and LDL-C levels (i.e. <3.4 mmol/l for patients with CVD risk ≤20% or <2.6 mmol/l for CVD risk >20%) (OR = 1.13, P < 0.01). RAMP-HT participants also had significantly greater reduction in predicted 10-year CVD risk by 0.44% (coefficient = -0.44, P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The structured multidisciplinary RAMP-HT was more effective than usual care in achieving target BP, LDL-C and reducing predicted 10-year CVD risk in public primary care patients with suboptimal hypertension control after 12 months of intervention. A long-term follow-up should be conducted to confirm whether the improvement in clinical outcomes can be translated into actual reductions in CVD complications and mortalities and whether such approach is cost-effective.


Subject(s)
Blood Pressure , Cholesterol, LDL/blood , Hypertension/drug therapy , Hypertension/physiopathology , Primary Health Care , Adult , Aged , Ambulatory Care , Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Case-Control Studies , Cohort Studies , Female , Hong Kong , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Time Factors
4.
J Adv Nurs ; 73(5): 1158-1171, 2017 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27859530

ABSTRACT

AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the 24-month outcomes of a nurse-led continence care service for Chinese primary care patients with lower urinary tract symptoms. BACKGROUND: Most studies evaluating the outcomes of continence care services have had short follow-up durations with limited knowledge on whether benefits are sustained beyond 12 months. DESIGN: Twenty-four month cohort study. METHODS: Two comparison groups were recruited: (1) Patients with lower urinary tract symptoms attending a nurse-led community-based continence care programme; (2) Primary care patients with lower urinary tract symptoms identified by screening, receiving usual medical care. Self-reported symptom severity, health-related quality of life, patient enablement and general health perception were measured at baseline and 24 months. Data collection occurred from March 2013-August 2015. RESULTS: Baseline and 24-month data were available for 170 continence care and 158 usual care subjects. After controlling for baseline characteristics, the continence care group was observed to have greater reductions in symptom severity and larger improvements in disease-specific health-related quality of life, patient enablement and general health perception than the usual care group. Deterioration in the mental components of generic health-related quality of life was observed in the usual care group, but not in the continence care group. CONCLUSION: Over 24 months, when compared with usual medical care, nurse-led continence care services were effective in reducing symptom severity and improving health-related quality of life, patient enablement and general health perception and provided protection against deterioration in the mental components of health-related quality of life in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms.


Subject(s)
Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms/nursing , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , China/ethnology , Female , Hong Kong , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms/ethnology , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life , Surveys and Questionnaires , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
5.
Endocrine ; 54(2): 422-432, 2016 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27623970

ABSTRACT

To examine the effects of a structured group-based education programme, patient empowerment programme (PEP), compared with usual care on 2-year changes in patient-reported outcomes (PRO) in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). A prospective observational study of 715 patients (PEP/non-PEP: 390/325) was conducted to complete the baseline PRO survey and followed up for 2 years. Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) was measured using the short-form 12 at baseline and annually at two follow-up assessments, which yielded physical and mental component summary and SF-6D preference-based scores. Perceived control over diabetes and general health status were measured using the patient enablement instrument (PEI) and global rating scale (GRS) at follow-ups. When compared with non-PEP, PEP participants significantly reported improvement in health condition (GRS score > 0; 24.55 % vs 10.16 %; odds ratio = 2.502; P = 0.018) in 2 years and enabled the self-perceived control over diabetes (PEI score > 0; 72.20 % vs 38.40 %; odds ratio = 3.25; P < 0.001) in 1-year follow-up but no sustained effects in year 2 (52.65 % vs 39.04 %; odds ratio = 1.366; P = 0.265). There were no significant differences between PEP and non-PEP groups in the changes in quality of life scores (all P > 0.05) at 1 year. Although HRQOL scores deteriorated over 2-year period in both groups, PEP participants reported similar changes in HRQOL scores to that of non-PEP. PEP for DM patients preserved self-perceived disease control and health condition, whereas PEP participants perceived their HRQOL similar to that of non-PEP participants. Findings of PRO should be considered alongside clinical outcomes when evaluating the overall benefits of PEP.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/therapy , Patient Education as Topic , Patient Participation , Quality of Life , Self Care , Aged , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/psychology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Health Education , Health Status , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Prospective Studies
6.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract ; 120: 171-81, 2016 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27568647

ABSTRACT

AIMS: To examine the association of patient volume with quality of diabetes care in the primary care setting. METHODS: We analyzed population-based data from Hospital Authority administrative database using a Hong Kong representative sample of 187,031 diabetic patients managed in 74 primary care general outpatient clinics between 04/2011 and 03/2012. We assessed the associations between annual clinic-based patient volume and quality of care in terms of adherence to care criteria of process (HbA1c test, renal function test, full lipid profile, urine protein analysis, diabetic retinopathy screening, and appropriate drug prescription) and clinical outcomes (HbA1c⩽7%, BP⩽130/80mmHg, LDL-C⩽2.6mmol/L) of care criteria, with and without adjustment for patient and clinic characteristics. RESULTS: Patient volume was associated with three of seven process of care criteria; however, when compared to clinics in higher volume quartiles, those in lowest-volume quartile had more odds of HbA1c test (odds ratios (OR): 0.781, 0.655 and 0.646 for quartile from 2 to 4, respectively), renal function test (OR: 0.357, 0.367 and 0.590 for quartile from 2 to 4, respectively), and full lipid profile test (OR: 0.508, 0.612 and 0.793 for quartile from 2 to 4, respectively). There was no significant association between patient volume and the standards of achieving of HbA1c, BP and LDL-C outcome targets. CONCLUSIONS: Disparities in volume and quality of diabetes care were observed in public primary care setting. Lower patient volumes at clinic level were associated with greater adherence to three process criteria but a volume-outcome association was not present.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus/therapy , Primary Health Care/standards , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Ambulatory Care Facilities , Diabetes Mellitus/blood , Female , Glycated Hemoglobin/metabolism , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Outpatients , Quality Assurance, Health Care , Retrospective Studies
7.
BMC Nephrol ; 17(1): 79, 2016 07 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27401348

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Haemodialysis (HD) is one of the life-saving options for patients with end stage renal disease but demand for this treatment exceeds capacity in publicly funded hospitals. One novel approach to addressing this problem is through a shared-care model whereby government hospitals partner with qualified private HD service providers to increase the accessibility of HD for needy patients. The aim of this study is to evaluate and enhance the quality of care (QOC) provided in such a shared-care programme in Hong Kong, the Haemodialysis Public-Private Partnership Programme (HD-PPP). METHODS/DESIGN: This is a longitudinal study based on Action Learning and Audit Spiral methodologies to measure the achievement of pre-set target standards for the HD-PPP programme over three evaluation cycles. The QOC evaluation framework is comprised of structure, process and outcome criteria with target standards in each domain developed from review of the evidence and in close collaboration with the HD-PPP working group. During each evaluation cycle, coordinators of each study site complete a questionnaire to determine adherence with structural criteria of care. Process and clinical outcomes, such as adverse events and dialysis adequacy, are extracted from the patient records of consenting study participants while face-to-face interviews are conducted to ascertain patient-reported outcomes such as self-efficacy and health-related quality of life. DISCUSSION: The study relies on the successful implementation of partnership-based action research to develop an evidence-based and pragmatic framework for evaluation of quality of care in an iterative fashion, and to use it to identify possible areas of quality enhancements in a shared-care programme for HD patients. The approach we take in this study emphasizes partnership and engagement with the clinical and administrative programme team, a robust but flexible evaluation framework, direct observation and the potential to realize positive change. The experience will be useful to inform the process of coordinating research studies involving multiple stakeholders and results will help to guide service planning and policy decision making. TRIAL REGISTRATION: US Clinical Trial Registry NCT02307903.


Subject(s)
Hospitals, Public , Kidney Failure, Chronic/therapy , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care , Program Evaluation , Public-Private Sector Partnerships/standards , Renal Dialysis/standards , Health Services Accessibility , Hong Kong , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Program Evaluation/methods , Quality Indicators, Health Care , Renal Dialysis/adverse effects , Research Design
8.
Qual Life Res ; 25(11): 2957-2965, 2016 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27299744

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This study aimed to identify the predictors of decline in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). METHODS: A prospective longitudinal observational study was conducted on 1826 Chinese T2DM patients managed in public primary care setting. HRQOL was measured at baseline, 1 and 2 years by the Short Form-12 Health Survey version 2 (SF-12v2) and Chinese (HK) Short Form-6 Dimensions (SF-6D). Linear mixed effect models with forward stepwise method were performed to select the factors associated with SF-12v2 physical (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) scores and SF-6D value. RESULTS: Over a 2-year observation period, the HRQOL (PCS: -0.626; MCS: -1.869; and SF-6D: -0.017 per year) scores decreased significantly with time. Female, unmarried, current smoker, no regular exercise, obesity, comorbid hypertension, chronic kidney disease (CKD) or cardiovascular disease (CVD) and insulin use were predictors of one or more poorer HRQOL scores after 12 or 24 months. Older age had a negative impact on PCS score and SF-6D value, but had a positive impact on MCS score. CONCLUSIONS: The HRQOL of Chinese T2DM patients under primary care declined significantly over time. Obesity, smoking and no regular exercise were found to be modifiable risk factors of the decline in HRQOL in T2DM, which strengthened the importance of these lifestyle changes in diabetes care. More attention should be given to T2DM patients who are female, older, unmarried, or on anti-hypertensive drugs or insulin, or have comorbid hypertension, CKD or CVD in minimizing the negative impact of illness on their life.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/psychology , Sickness Impact Profile , Asian People , Female , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies
9.
PLoS One ; 11(5): e0155188, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27148742

ABSTRACT

AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity, reliability and sensitivity of the disease-specific items of the Kidney Disease Quality of Life-36 (KDQOL-36) in Chinese patients undergoing maintenance dialysis. METHODS: The content validity was assessed by content validity index (CVI) in ten subjects. 356 subjects were recruited for pilot psychometric testing. The internal construct validity was assessed by corrected item-subscale total correlation. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to confirm the factor structure. The convergent validity was assessed by Pearson's correlation test between the disease specific subscale scores and SF-12 version 2 Health Survey (SF-12 v2) scores. The reliability was assessed by the internal consistency (Cronbach's Alpha coefficient) and 2-week test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)). The sensitivity was determined by performing known group comparisons by independent t-test. RESULTS: The CVI on clarity and relevance was ≥ 0.9 for all items. Corrected item- total correlation scores were ≥0.4 for all, except an item related to problems with access site. CFA confirmed the 3-factor structure of the disease-specific component of the KDQOL-36. The correlation coefficients between the disease-specific domain scores and the SF-12 v2 physical and mental component summary scores ranged from 0.328 to 0.492. The reliability was good (Cronbach's alpha coefficients ranged from 0.810 to 0.931, ICC ranged from 0.792 to 0.924). Only the effect subscale was sensitive in detecting differences in HRQOL between haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients, with effect size = 0.68. CONCLUSION: The disease-specific items of the KDQOL-36 are a valid, reliable and sensitive measure to assess the health-related quality of life of Chinese patients on maintenance dialysis.


Subject(s)
Asian People/psychology , Kidney Diseases/psychology , Quality of Life/psychology , Renal Dialysis/psychology , Adult , Factor Analysis, Statistical , Female , Health Surveys/methods , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Psychometrics/methods , Reproducibility of Results , Surveys and Questionnaires
10.
Endocrine ; 53(2): 412-22, 2016 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26785847

ABSTRACT

Patient Empowerment Programme (PEP) in primary care was effective in preventing diabetes-related complications in patients with diabetes. Nevertheless, the effect of PEP on glycaemic control, weight control, and complications was unclear in obese type 2 diabetic patients. We aimed to assess whether PEP reduced all-cause mortality, first macrovascular and microvascular disease events. A cohort of 6372 obese type 2 diabetic patients without prior occurrence of macrovascular or microvascular disease events on or before baseline study recruitment date was linked to the administrative database from 2008 to 2013. Non-PEP participants were matched one-to-one with the PEP participants using propensity score method with respect to their baseline covariates. Cox proportional hazard regressions were performed to estimate the associations of the PEP intervention with the occurrence of first macrovascular or microvascular disease events and death from any cause, controlling for demographic and clinical characteristics. During a median 31.5 months of follow-up, 350 (PEP/non-PEP: 151/199) patients suffered from a first macrovascular or microvascular disease event while 95 patients (PEP/non-PEP: 34/61) died from any cause. After adjusting for confounding variables, PEP participants had lower incidence rates of all-cause mortality [hazard ratio (HR): 0.589, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.380-0.915, P = 0.018] and first macrovascular or microvascular disease events (HR: 0.782, 95 % CI 0.632-0.968, P = 0.024) than those with PEP. Enrolment to PEP was an effective approach in reducing all-cause mortality and first macrovascular or microvascular disease events in obese patients with type 2 diabetes.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Diabetic Angiopathies/etiology , Obesity/complications , Patient Education as Topic , Self Care , Aged , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/mortality , Diabetic Angiopathies/mortality , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Obesity/mortality , Patient Participation
12.
Health Qual Life Outcomes ; 13: 108, 2015 Jul 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26215978

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Haemodialysis (HD) is a life-saving but burdensome therapy for patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) which can have a detrimental impact on patients' quality of life and outcomes. There is currently little data on the health related quality of life (HRQOL) of Chinese ESRD patients undergoing HD and this study sought to examine the patterns of HRQOL and its associated factors within this population, as well as in comparison with the general local population. METHODS: A cross-sectional study of 244 ESRD patients receiving HD in the hospital and in the community in Hong Kong was conducted using the Short Form-12 Health Survey version 2 (SF-12v2). All study subjects were one-to-one matched with subjects in a Hong Kong general population database by sex and exact age. Independent t-tests were performed to compare the mean SF-12v2 scores between HD patients and the general population, followed by one-way analysis of variance with post hoc Tukey's HSD tests to compare community-based haemodialysis, hospital-based haemodialysis and the general population. Multiple linear regressions were used to identify the factors (socio-demographic, clinical characteristics and comorbidities) associated with the HRQOL scores of ESRD patients receiving HD. RESULTS: The SF-12v2 Physical Functioning, Role Physical, Bodily Pain, General Health and Physical Component Summary scores of HD patients were significantly lower than the age-sex adjusted general population. However, the SF-12v2 Mental Health and Mental Component Summary scores of HD patients were significantly higher than the corresponding general population. Poorer HRQOL was associated with being female, smoking, unemployment and hospital-based haemodialysis. CONCLUSIONS: HD patients had substantially poorer physical HRQOL but better mental HRQOL than the age-sex adjusted general population. Patients receiving HD in the community setting had better HRQOL. Reasons for these observations will need to be further investigated. Those patients who are female, smokers and unemployed may warrant more attention as their poorer HRQOL may be associated with poorer outcomes.


Subject(s)
Health Status , Kidney Failure, Chronic/psychology , Quality of Life/psychology , Renal Dialysis/psychology , Adult , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Hong Kong/epidemiology , Humans , Kidney Failure, Chronic/therapy , Male , Mental Health/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged
13.
PLoS One ; 10(6): e0129875, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26076486

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether community-based nurse-led continence care interventions are effective in improving outcomes for adult Chinese primary care patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). RESEARCH DESIGN AND SUBJECTS: A case-controlled intervention study was conducted. An intervention group of 360 primary care patients enrolled into a nurse-led continence care programme were recruited by consecutive sampling. A control group of 360 primary care patients with LUTS identified by screening were recruited from the waiting rooms of primary care clinics by consecutive sampling. Both groups were monitored at baseline and at 12 months. MEASURES: Outcome measures included symptom severity, health-related quality of life (HRQOL), self-efficacy, global health and self-reported health service utilization at 12-months. The effect of the continence care programme on symptom severity and HRQOL was assessed by the difference-in-difference estimation, using independent t-test and multiple liner regression. Chi-square test was used to compare the self-efficacy, global health and self-reported health service utilization between the two groups at 12-months. RESULTS: After adjusting for baseline severity and socio-demographics, the intervention group had significant improvements in LUTS severity (P<0.05) and HRQOL (P<0.05). Improvements in the amount of urine leakage were not significantly different between the two groups. A higher proportion of subjects in the intervention group reported increased self-efficacy (43.48% vs. 66.83%), improved global health condition (17.74% vs. 41.5%), having doctor consultation (18.5% vs. 8.06), having medication due to LUTS (26.50% vs.11.29%) and having non-drug therapy due to LUTS (59.5% vs.9.68%). CONCLUSIONS: Community-based nurse-led continence care can effectively alleviate symptoms, improve health-related quality of life, and enhance self-efficacy and the global health condition of Chinese male and female primary care patients with LUTS.


Subject(s)
Nurse's Role , Primary Health Care , Urinary Incontinence/epidemiology , Urinary Incontinence/therapy , Aged , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms , Male , Middle Aged , Primary Health Care/methods , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life , Risk Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , Treatment Outcome , Urinary Incontinence/diagnosis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...