DASH-HF Study: A Pragmatic Quality Improvement Randomized Implementation Trial for Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction.

BACKGROUND: Heart failure is a prevailing diagnosis of hospitalization and readmission within 6 months, and nearly a quarter of these patients die within a year. Guideline-directed medication therapies reduce risk of mortality by 73% over 2 years; however, the implementation of these therapies to their target dose in clinical practice continues to be challenging. In 2020, the Veterans Affairs (VA) Health Care System developed a HF dashboard to monitor and improve outpatient HF management. The DASH-HF (Dashboard Activated Services and Telehealth for Heart Failure) study is a randomized, pragmatic clinical trial to evaluate proactive dashboard-directed telehealth clinics to improve the use and dosing of guideline-directed medication therapy for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction not on optimal guideline-directed medication therapy within the VA. METHODS: Three hundred veterans with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction met inclusion criteria with an optimization potential score (OPS) of 5 or less out of 10, representing nonoptimal guideline-directed medication therapy. The primary outcome was a composite score of guideline-directed medical therapy, the OPS, 6 months after the end of the intervention. Secondary outcomes included active prescriptions for each individual guideline-directed medical therapy class, HF-related hospitalizations, deaths, and clinician time per patient during the intervention clinics. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the intervention arm and usual care group in the primary outcome (OPS, 2.9; SD=2.1 versus OPS, 2.6, SD=2.1); adjusted mean difference 0.3 (95% CI, -0.1 to 0.7) or in the prespecified secondary outcomes for hospitalization and all-cause mortality for the intervention of proactive dashboard-based clinics. CONCLUSIONS: A dashboard-based clinic intervention did not improve the OPS or secondary outcomes of hospitalization and all-cause mortality. There remains a larger opportunity to better target patients and provide more intensive follow-up to further evaluate the utility of proactive dashboard-based clinics for HF management and quality improvement. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov; Unique identifier: NCT05001165.

The design of the Dashboard Activated Services and Telehealth for Heart Failure (DASH-HF) study: A pragmatic quality improvement randomized implementation trial for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.

BACKGROUND: Gaps in the receipt and dosing of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) persist for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) [1]. In 2020, the Veterans Affairs (VA) developed a heart failure (HF) specific population dashboard to monitor care quality and performance on standard HFrEF performance measures [2]. METHODS: The Dashboard Activated Services and Telehealth for HF (DASH-HF) study is a pragmatic randomized quality improvement study designed to evaluate the utility of proactive population management clinics using the VA's HF dashboard to optimize GDMT for patients with HFrEF. Panel management telemedicine clinics incorporated multidisciplinary clinicians to perform chart review and impromptu telephone encounters to evaluate current HFrEF management and opportunities to optimize GDMT. The study will evaluate the efficacy of proactive panel management to usual care at 6 months as quantified by the GDMT optimization potential score. Secondary outcomes include hospitalizations, mortality, and clinician time per intervention. The study completed enrollment and randomization of 300 participants. The intervention was performed from September to December 2021. CONCLUSION: DASH-HF will contribute to the literature by evaluating use of the existing VA dashboard to identify HF patients with the lowest adherence to GDMT and proactively target this group for the intervention. REGISTRATION: https://clinicaltrials.gov/. Unique identifier: NCT05001165.

Improving heart failure care and guideline-directed medical therapy through proactive remote patient monitoring-home telehealth and pharmacy integration.

To address ambulatory care sensitive hospitalisations in heart failure (HF), we implemented a quality improvement initiative to reduce admissions and improve guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) prescription, through proactive integration of remote patient monitoring-home telehealth (RPM-HT) and pharmacist consultations. Each enrolled patient (n=38) was assigned an RPM-HT registered nurse (RN), cardiology licensed independent provider (provider), and, if referred, a clinical pharmacy specialist (pharmacist). The RN called patients weekly and for changes detected by RPM-HT, while the pharmacist worked to optimise GDMT. The RN and pharmacist communicated clinical status changes to the provider for expedited management. Process measures were the percentage of outbound RN weekly calls missed per enrolled patient; the weekly percentage of provider interventions missed; and the number of initiative-driven diuretic changes. Outcome measures included eligible GDMT medications prescribed, optimisation of those medications, and the pre-post difference in emergency department (ED) visits/hospitalisations. After a 4-week run-in period, RN weekly calls missed per enrolled patient decreased from a mean of 21.4% (weeks 5-15) to 10.2% (weeks 16-23). Weekly missed provider interventions decreased from a mean of 15.1% (weeks 1-15) to 3.4% (weeks 16-23), with special cause variation detected. The initiative resulted in 43 diuretic changes in 21 patients. Among 34 active patients, 65 ED visits (0.16 per person-month) occurred in 12 months pre intervention compared with 8 ED visits (0.04 per person-month) for 6 intervention months (p<0.001). Among 16 patients referred to pharmacist, the per cent of eligible GDMT medications prescribed increased by 17.1% (p<0.001); the number of patients receiving all eligible medications increased from 3 to 11 (p=0.008). Similarly, the per cent optimisation of GDMT doses increased by 25.3% (p<0.001), with the number of patients maximally optimised on GDMT increasing from 1 to 6 (p=0.06). We concluded that a cardiology, RPM-HT RN and pharmacist team improved prescription of GDMT and may have reduced HF admissions.

Leveraging telemedicine for management of veterans with heart failure during COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: Telemedicine and telemonitoring have become invaluable tools in managing chronic diseases, such as heart failure (HF). With the recent pandemic, telemedicine has become the preferred method of providing consultative care. LOCAL PROBLEM: This rapid paradigm shift from face-to-face (F2F) consultations to telemedicine required a collaborative approach for successful implementation while maintaining quality of care. The processes for conducting a telemedicine visit for HF patient are not well defined or outlined. METHOD: Using a collaborative practice model and nurse practitioner led program, technology was leveraged to manage the high-risk HF population using virtual care (consultation via phone or video-to-home) with two aims: first to provide ongoing HF care using available telemedicine technologies or F2F care when necessary and, second, to evaluate and direct those needing urgent/emergent level of care to emergency department (ED). INTERVENTION: The process was converted into an intuitive algorithm that describes essential elements and team roles necessary for execution of a successful HF consultation. RESULTS: Following the algorithm, nurse practitioners conducted 132 visits, yielding 100% success in the conversion of F2F appointments to telemedicine, with 3 patients referred to ED for care. The information obtained through telemedicine consultation accurately informed decision for ED evaluation with resultant admission. CONCLUSION: Collaborative team-based approach delineated in the algorithm facilitated successful virtual consultations for HF patients and accurately informed decisions for higher level of care.

Impact of a Multidisciplinary Heart Failure Postdischarge Management Clinic on Medication Adherence.

PURPOSE: Disease management programs have been associated with improved adherence to heart failure (HF) medications. However, there remain limited data on the benefit of a comprehensive multidisciplinary HF postdischarge management (PDM) clinic that promptly follows HF-related hospitalization on evidence-based HF medication adherence. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of an HF-PDM clinic on adherence to evidence-based HF medication therapy. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we identified patients discharged from the Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System between 2009 and 2012 with a primary diagnosis of HF. Data from patients who attended the HF-PDM clinic immediately following HF-related hospitalization between 2010 and 2012 were compared with those from historical controls, who did not attend the HF-PDM clinic, from 2009. The main outcome was adherence to evidence-based HF medications during the 90 days after discharge. Adherence was defined as the proportion of days covered at 90 days after discharge (PDC-90) of ≥0.80. The percentages of patients adherent to each medication were compared between the 2 groups using the χ2 test. A logistic regression model adjusted for potential confounding variables was constructed to evaluate the percentages of patients adherent to evidence-based HF medications. FINDINGS: A total of 277 patients (144 clinic, 133 control) were included in the study. Both univariate and multivariate analyses showed that the clinic was associated with improved medication adherence to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, a twice-daily ß-blocker, and aldosterone antagonists compared with controls. The most significant increases were in adherence to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, with mean PDC-90 values of 0.84 (control) versus 0.93 (clinic) (P = 0.008) and 90-day adherence rates of 69% (control) versus 87% (clinic) (P = 0.005). IMPLICATIONS: Care in the multidisciplinary HF-PDM clinic was associated with significant increases in 90-day adherence to evidence-based HF medications in patients who were recently discharged after an HF-related hospitalization.

Impact of a Multidisciplinary Heart Failure Post-hospitalization Program on Heart Failure Readmission Rates.

BACKGROUND: Specialized chronic heart failure (HF) clinics have demonstrated significant reductions in readmissions. Limited evidence is available regarding HF clinics in the immediate post-discharge period. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of a multidisciplinary HF clinic on 90-day readmission rates and all-cause mortality in those recently discharged from a HF hospitalization. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, patients discharged with a primary HF diagnosis who attended the HF postdischarge clinic in 2010-2012 were compared with controls from 2009. During 6 clinic visits, patients were seen by a physician assistant, clinical pharmacist specialist, and case manager, with care overseen by a cardiologist. The program focused on optimizing therapy, identifying HF etiology/precipitating factors, medication titration, education, and medication adherence. The primary outcome was 90-day HF readmission. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards model was used to compare outcomes. RESULTS: Among the 277 patients (144 clinic, 133 control) in the study, 7.6% of patients in the clinic and 23.3% of patients in the control group were readmitted for HF within 90 days (aHR (adjusted hazard ratio) = 0.17; 95% CI = 0.07-0.41; P < 0.001; ARR (absolute risk reduction) = 15.7%; NNT (number needed to treat) = 7). Clinic patients had lower 90-day time-to-first HF readmission or all-cause mortality (9.0% vs 28.6%; aHR = 0.28; 95% CI = 0.06-0.31; P < 0.001; ARR = 19.6%; NNT = 6). CONCLUSIONS: The multidisciplinary HF posthospitalization outpatient program was associated with a significant reduction in 90-day HF readmissions in patients who were recently discharged from a HF hospitalization.

Stretchable electrochemical impedance sensors for intravascular detection of lipid-rich lesions in New Zealand White rabbits.

Flexible electronics have enabled catheter-based intravascular sensing. However, real-time interrogation of unstable plaque remains an unmet clinical challenge. Here, we demonstrate the feasibility of stretchable electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) sensors for endoluminal investigations in New Zealand White (NZW) rabbits on diet-induced hyperlipidemia. A parylene C (PAC)-based EIS sensor mounted on the surface of an inflatable silicone balloon affixed to the tip of an interrogating catheter was deployed (1) on the explants of NZW rabbit aorta for detection of lipid-rich atherosclerotic lesions, and (2) on live animals for demonstration of balloon inflation and EIS measurements. An input peak-to-peak AC voltage of 10 mV and sweeping-frequency from 300 kHz to 100 Hz were delivered to the endoluminal sites. Balloon inflation allowed EIS sensors to be in contact with endoluminal surface. In the oxidized low-density-lipoprotein (oxLDL)-rich lesions from explants of fat-fed rabbits, impedance magnitude increased significantly by 1.5-fold across the entire frequency band, and phase shifted ~5° at frequencies below 10 kHz. In the lesion-free sites of the normal diet-fed rabbits, impedance magnitude increased by 1.2-fold and phase shifted ~5° at frequencies above 30 kHz. Thus, we demonstrate the feasibility of stretchable intravascular EIS sensors for identification of lipid rich lesions, with a translational implication for detecting unstable lesions.

Use of coronary computed tomography angiography to detect coronary ostial stenosis after Bentall procedure.

Coronary ostial stenosis is a rare complication of the Bentall procedure for aortic root and aortic valve replacement. We report a case of coronary ostial stenosis after a Bentall procedure that was detected by coronary computed tomography angiography and subsequent percutaneous coronary interventions.

Atrial fibrillation: pathogenesis, medical-surgical management and dental implications.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a cardiac rhythm disturbance arising from disorganized electrical activity in the atria, and it is accompanied by an irregular and often rapid ventricular response. It is the most common clinically significant dysrhythmia in the general and older population. TYPES OF STUDIES REVIEWED: The authors conducted a MEDLINE search using the key terms "atrial fibrillation," "epidemiology," "pathophysiology," "treatment" and "dentistry." They selected contemporaneous articles published in peer-reviewed journals and gave preference to articles reporting randomized controlled trials. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The anticoagulant warfarin frequently is prescribed to prevent stroke caused by cardiogenic thromboemboli arising from stagnant blood in poorly contracting atria. Most dental procedures and a limited number of surgical procedures can be performed without altering warfarin dosage if the international normalized ratio value is within the therapeutic range of 2.0 to 3.0. Certain analgesic agents, antibiotic agents, antifungal agents and sedative hypnotics, however, should not be prescribed without consultation with the patient's physician because these medications may alter the patient's risk of hemorrhage and stroke. CONCLUSIONS: AF affects nearly 2.5 million Americans, most of who are older than 60 years. Consultation with the patient's physician to discuss the planned dental treatment often is appropriate, especially for people who frequently have comorbid diseases such as coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, diabetes and thyrotoxicosis, which are treated with multiple drug regimens.

Suboptimal control of atherosclerotic disease risk factors after cardiac and cerebrovascular procedures.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Undergoing a carotid endarterectomy, a coronary artery bypass graft, or a percutaneous coronary intervention provides an opportunity to optimize control of blood pressure and low-density lipoprotein. METHODS: Using Veterans Administration databases, we determined whether patients who underwent a carotid endarterectomy (n=252), coronary artery bypass graft (n=486), or percutaneous coronary intervention (n=720) in 2002 to 2003 at 5 Veterans Administration Healthcare Systems had guideline-recommended control of blood pressure and low-density lipoprotein in 12-month periods before and after a vascular procedure. Postprocedure control of risk factors across procedure groups was compared using chi(2) tests and multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: The proportion of patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy who had optimal control of both blood pressure and low-density lipoprotein increased from 23% before the procedure to 33% after the procedure (P=0.05) compared with increases from 32% to 43% for coronary artery bypass graft (P=0.001) and from 29% to 45% for percutaneous coronary intervention (P=0.002). Compared with the carotid endarterectomy group, the percutaneous coronary intervention group was more likely to achieve optimal control of blood pressure (OR: 1.92, 95% CI: 1.42 to 2.59) or low-density lipoprotein (OR: 1.51, 95% CI: 1.01 to 2.26) and the coronary artery bypass graft group was more likely to achieve optimal control of blood pressure (OR: 1.53, 95% CI: 1.42 to 2.59). Postprocedure cardiology visits, increase in medication intensity, and greater frequency of outpatient visits were also associated with optimal postprocedure risk factor control. CONCLUSIONS: Although modest improvements in risk factor control were detected, a majority of patients in each vascular procedure group did not achieve optimal risk factor control. More effective risk factor control programs are needed among most vascular procedure patients.