ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Hard metal lung disease (HMLD) is a relatively less known occupational interstitial lung disease, and instances of HMLD resulting from para-occupational exposure are rarely reported. CASE PRESENTATION: This paper presents two cases of interstitial lung disease caused by exposure to hard metal. The first case involves a 37-year-old Taiwanese man who had worked at a grinder station for hard metal materials for 12 years without respiratory protective equipment. He experienced a dry cough and exertional dyspnea, and his chest imaging and pathology findings were consistent with the features of usual interstitial pneumonia. Analysis of his lung tissue revealed the presence of tungsten and cobalt. The second case involves a 68-year-old Taiwanese woman, the mother of the first patient, who had hand-washed her son's workwear. She experienced a dry cough and had similar imaging findings to her son. After her son left his job, they both exhibited improved symptoms and lung functions with nintedanib treatment. These findings suggest a diagnosis of HMLD and interstitial lung disease resulting from para-occupational exposure to hard metal dust. CONCLUSIONS: The diagnosis of HMLD relies on obtaining a detailed occupational exposure history. If HMLD is diagnosed, discontinuing exposing to hard metal dusts can lead to improved lung function.
Subject(s)
Lung Diseases, Interstitial , Occupational Diseases , Occupational Exposure , Male , Female , Humans , Adult , Aged , Tungsten/adverse effects , Cough/etiology , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/chemically induced , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/diagnostic imaging , Cobalt , Occupational Diseases/diagnosis , Occupational Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Occupational Exposure/adverse effectsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Precision error in dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is defined as difference in results due to instrumental and technical factors given no biologic change. The aim of this study is to compare precision error in DXA body composition scans in head and neck cancer patients before and 2 months after chemotherapy. METHODOLOGY: A total of 34 male head and neck cancer patients with normal body mass index (BMI) were prospectively enrolled and all patients received 2 consecutive DXA scans both before and after 2 months of chemotherapy for a total of 4 scans. The precision error of 3 DXA body composition values (lean mass, fat mass, and bone mineral content) was calculated for total body and 5 body regions (arms, legs, trunk, android, and gynoid). Precision errors before and after treatment were compared using generalized estimating equation model. RESULTS: There was no significant change in precision error for the DXA total body composition values following chemotherapy; lean mass (0.33%-0.40%, pâ¯=â¯0.179), total fat mass (1.39%-1.70%, pâ¯=â¯0.259) and total bone mineral content (0.42%-0.56%, pâ¯=â¯0.243). However, there were significant changes in regional precision error; trunk lean mass (1.19%-1.77%, pâ¯=â¯0.014) and android fat mass (2.17%-3.72%, pâ¯=â¯0.046). CONCLUSIONS: For head and neck cancer patients, precision error of DXA total body composition values did not change significantly following chemotherapy; however, there were significant changes in fat mass in the android and lean mass in the trunk. Caution should be exercised when interpreting longitudinal DXA body composition data in those body parts.
