Identifying the Risk Factors for Orbital Complications in Isolated Sphenoid Rhinosinusitis.

Background and Objectives: Isolated sphenoid rhinosinusitis may have devastating consequences such as orbital complications due to its anatomical contiguity with vital structures. This study aimed to identify patients with isolated sphenoid inflammatory diseases at high risk for developing orbital complications and requiring aggressive management through investigation of the clinical and computed tomography (CT) characteristics of patients with isolated sphenoid rhinosinusitis. Materials and Methods: The medical records of patients who underwent endoscopic sinus surgery between 2005 and 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with isolated sphenoid rhinosinusitis were identified based on a manual review of the clinical and histopathological findings. Participants' clinical and CT features were reviewed. Results: Among the 118 patients with isolated sphenoid rhinosinusitis, 15 (12.7%) developed orbital complications, including diplopia, extraocular motility limitation, ptosis, and visual impairment. Headaches and facial pain occurred significantly more frequently in patients with orbital complications than in those without orbital complications (p < 0.001). Patients with diabetes mellitus or malignant neoplasms were more likely to develop orbital complications than those without these comorbidities (p < 0.05). Bony dehiscence on CT images was significantly more common in patients with orbital complications than in those without. In the regression analysis, diabetes mellitus (OR, 4.62), malignant neoplasm (OR, 4.32), and bony dehiscence (OR, 4.87) were significant predictors of orbital complications (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Headaches and facial pain are the most common symptoms of isolated sphenoid rhinosinusitis. Orbital complications of isolated sphenoid rhinosinusitis are more common in patients with comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus or malignancy or in those with bony dehiscence on CT images.

A new technique for perioral muscle reconstruction and lip lengthening in complete unilateral cleft lip.

BACKGROUND: Adequate skin lengthening and symmetry may not be consistently obtained in unilateral cleft lip repair, especially in patients with complete cleft. The purpose of this study was to present the model of muscle dissection and approximation to facilitate lip lengthening and symmetry. METHODS: The design followed the rotation-advancement (RA) method without skin measurement. A curvilinear skin incision was made from subnasale to the Cupid's bow peak (CBP). Muscle dissection was continued to the contralateral nostril floor beneath the columellar base to facilitate downward rotation in the medial lip. Wide muscle dissection was performed in the lateral lip segment from the nasal mucosa passing the alar base. The lateral lip muscle was advanced and sutured to the medial lip muscle in a Z-plasty fashion. A small skin backcut was made above the CBP. Primary nasal correction was performed. A series of 138 patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate were included in this study. Standard photographs were collected for measurement in the nasolabial region. RESULTS: Adequate lengthening and symmetry of the lip was obtained. The ratio of vertical philtral height was 0.99±0.05 between the cleft and noncleft sides. The C flap was used for supplementary skin lengthening in 58% of cases. Postoperative lip retraction requiring massage occurred in 13%. Overall nasolabial appearance was satisfactory. CONCLUSION: The new technique of perioral muscle reconstruction facilitated to obtain lip lengthening and symmetry in the repair of complete unilateral cleft lip.

Primary Repair in Patients With Unilateral Complete Cleft of Lip and Primary Palate: Assessment of Outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: Asymmetry of median facial structures is a major concern for patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate, and the principal goal of its treatment is to restore symmetry. Unilateral complete cleft of lip and primary palate (UCCLPP) is an uncommon subgroup and rarely reported. Patients with UCCLPP have protruding and deviating premaxilla, rendering a primary repair difficult. This study evaluated consecutive patients with UCCLPP and presented their treatment outcome. METHODS: We assessed 36 patients with UCCLPP and collected clinical information. Surgical repair was performed at 3 months of age by using a modified rotation-advancement method and primary nasal reconstruction. A single surgeon performed all surgical procedures. A postoperative nasal stent was used for 6 months. Follow-up standardized photographs were collected. Landmarks were identified, and nose and lip dimensions measured. The ratios of the corresponding parameters (cleft vs noncleft side) were obtained for evaluating nose and lip symmetry. RESULTS: No surgical complication was noted in any patient. The overall lip and nose outcome after the primary repair were adequate, and all ratios were close to 1. The nostril width was slightly wider on the cleft side, but the alar width and height were acceptable. The lip heights were balanced between the 2 sides. Patients who received presurgical nasoalveolar molding did not show more favorable lip and nose dimensions, except for the medial philtral height. CONCLUSION: Even in the presence of protruding and deviating premaxilla, our patients with UCCLPP obtained adequate lip and nose outcome after undergoing primary lip repair and nasal reconstruction.