Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Acad Radiol ; 2024 Apr 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38658210

ABSTRACT

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Targeting fibroblast-activation protein is a newer diagnostic approach for the visualization of tumor stroma, and a novel aluminum-[18F] fluoride (Al18F)-labeled fibroblast-activation protein inhibitor-4 (FAPI-04), hereafter [18F] AlF-NOTA-FAPI-04, presents a promising alternative to gallium 68 (68Ga)-labeled FAPI owing to its relatively longer half-life. This study sought to evaluate the clinical usefulness of [18F] AlF-NOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT for the diagnosis of various types of cancer, compared to [18F] FDG PET/CT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective study conducted from October 2021 to January 2024, a total of 148 patients with 16 different tumor entities underwent contemporaneous 18F-FDG and 18F-FAPI-04 PET/CT either for an initial assessment or for recurrence detection. Uptake of 18F-FDG and 18F-FAPI-04 was quantified by the maximum standard uptake value (SUV max). Diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were compared by using the McNemar test between these two imaging agents. RESULTS: 18F-FAPI-04 PET/CT could clearly depict 16 different types of cancer with excellent image contrast, thereby leading to a higher detection rate of primary tumors than did 18F-FDG PET/CT (98.06% vs. 81.55%, P<0.001). In per-lymph node analysis, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy in the diagnosis of metastatic lymph nodes were 92.44%, 90.44%, and 91.56%, respectively, which was much higher than that 18F-FDG PET/CT (80.23%, 79.41%, and 79.87%, respectively). Meanwhile, 18F-FAPI-04 PET/CT outperformed 18F-FDG PET/CT in identifying more suspected distant metastases (86.57% vs. 74.13%, P<0.001). Furthermore, 18F-FAPI-04 PET/CT upgraded tumor staging in 36/101 patients (35.6%), and detected tumor recurrence or metastases in 43/47 patients (91.49%). CONCLUSION: Our findings demonstrated that primary and metastatic lesions in patients with various types of malignant tumors are well-visualized on 18F-FAPI-04 PET/CT, which exhibited a superior diagnostic performance than 18F-FDG PET/CT. Moreover, 18F-FAPI-04 PET/CT is a promising tool for tumor staging and follow-up of various malignancies.

2.
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging ; 50(13): 4051-4063, 2023 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37542659

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The radiopharmaceutical [18F]AlF-NOTA-FAPI-04 presents a promising alternative to 68 Ga-FAPI owing to its relatively longer half-life. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical usefulness of [18F]AlF-NOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT for the diagnosis of primary and metastatic lesions in various types of gastrointestinal system cancers, compared with 18F-FDG PET/CT. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with gastrointestinal system malignancies were prospectively enrolled. All patients underwent both 18F-FDG and 18F-FAPI-04 PET/CT scans within one week, with 44 (73.3%) for cancer staging and 16 (26.7%) for tumor restaging. Diagnostic efficacy of the primary tumor, as well as the presence and number of lymph nodes and distant metastases, were assessed. Tumor uptake was quantified by the maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax). RESULTS: For detection of primary tumor, the diagnostic sensitivity of 18F-FDG PET/CT was 72.7%, while it was 97.7% for 18F-FAPI-04 PET/CT. Based on per-lymph node analysis, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 18F-FAPI-04 PET/CT in diagnosing metastatic lymph nodes were 91.89%, 92.00%, and 91.96%, respectively. These values were notably higher than those 18F-FDG PET/CT (79.72%, 81.33% and 80.80%, respectively). The 18F-FAPI-04 PET/CT surpassed 18F-FDG PET/CT in detecting suspected metastases in the brain (7 vs. 3), liver (39 vs. 20), bone (79 vs. 51), lung (11 vs. 4), and peritoneal carcinoma (48 vs. 22). Based on per-patient analysis, differential diagnostic accuracies (18F-FAPI-04 vs. 18F-FDG PET/CT) were observed in all patients (91.7% vs. 76.7%), the initial staging group (90.9% vs. 79.5%), and the re-staging group (93.8% vs. 68.7%). Additionally, 18F-FAPI-04 PET/CT revised final diagnosis in 31.7% of patients, contrasting with 18F-FDG PET/CT, and prompted changes in clinical management for 21.7% of the patients. CONCLUSION: 18F-FAPI-04 PET/CT outperforms 18F-FDG PET/CT in delineating the primary gastrointestinal tumors and detecting suspected metastatic lesions due to a higher target-to-background ratio (TBR). Moreover, 18F-FAPI-04 PET/CT could provide valuable guidance for tumor staging, thereby having a potential impact on patient management.


Subject(s)
Gastrointestinal Neoplasms , Quinolines , Humans , Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 , Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography , Prospective Studies , Gastrointestinal Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Positron-Emission Tomography , Fibroblasts , Gallium Radioisotopes
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...