The Effect of Surgical Weight Loss on Cognition in Individuals with Class II/III Obesity.

BACKGROUND: Obesity is a global epidemic and is associated with cognitive impairment and dementia. It remains unknown whether weight loss interventions, such as bariatric surgery, can mitigate cognitive impairment. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to determine the effect of surgical weight loss on cognition in individuals with class II/III obesity. DESIGN: We performed a prospective cohort study of participants who underwent bariatric surgery. At baseline and two years following surgery, participants completed metabolic risk factor and neuropsychological assessments. SETTING: Participants were enrolled from an academic suburban bariatric surgery clinic. PARTICIPANTS: There were 113 participants who completed baseline assessments and 87 completed two-year follow-up assessments (66 in-person and 21 virtual) after bariatric surgery. The mean (SD) age was 46.8 (12.5) years and 64 (73.6%) were female. INTERVENTION: Bariatric surgery. There were 77 (88.5%) participants that underwent sleeve gastrectomy and 10 (11.5%) that underwent gastric bypass surgery. MEASUREMENTS: Cognition was assessed using the NIH toolbox cognitive battery (NIHTB-CB) and the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (AVLT). The primary outcome was the change in NIHTB-CB fluid composite score before and after surgery. RESULTS: The primary outcome, NIHTB-CB composite score, was stable following bariatric surgery (-0.4 (13.9), p=0.81,n=66). Among secondary outcomes, the NIHTB-CB dimensional card sorting test (executive function assessment), improved (+6.5 (19.9),p=0.01,n=66) while the Rey AVLT delayed recall test (memory assessment) declined (-0.24 (0.83),p=0.01,n=87) following surgery. Improvements to metabolic risk factors and diabetes complications were not associated with improvements to NIHTB-CB composite score. The other 4 NIHTB-CB subtests and Rey AVLT assessments of auditory learning and recognition were stable at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Following bariatric surgery, the age-adjusted composite cognitive outcome did not change, but an executive subtest score improved. These results suggest that bariatric surgery may mitigate the natural history of cognitive decline in individuals with obesity, which is expected to be faster than normal aging, but confirmatory randomized controlled trials are needed. The decline in delayed recall also warrants further studies to determine potential differential effects on cognitive subtests.

The effect of surgical weight loss on diabetes complications in individuals with class II/III obesity.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: The aim of this study was to determine the effect of bariatric surgery on diabetes complications in individuals with class II/III obesity (BMI > 35 kg/m2). METHODS: We performed a prospective cohort study of participants with obesity who underwent bariatric surgery. At baseline and 2 years following surgery, participants underwent metabolic phenotyping and diabetes complication assessments. The primary outcomes for peripheral neuropathy (PN) were a change in intra-epidermal nerve fibre density (IENFD, units = fibres/mm) at the distal leg and proximal thigh, the primary outcome for cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy (CAN) was a change in the expiration/inspiration (E/I) ratio, and the primary outcome for retinopathy was a change in the mean deviation on frequency doubling technology testing. RESULTS: Among 127 baseline participants, 79 completed in-person follow-up (age 46.0 ± 11.3 years [mean ± SD], 73.4% female). Participants lost a mean of 31.0 kg (SD 18.4), and all metabolic risk factors improved except for BP and total cholesterol. Following bariatric surgery, one of the primary PN outcomes improved (IENFD proximal thigh, +3.4 ± 7.8, p<0.01), and CAN (E/I ratio -0.01 ± 0.1, p=0.89) and retinopathy (deviation -0.2 ± 3.0, p=0.52) were stable. Linear regression revealed that a greater reduction in fasting glucose was associated with improvements in retinopathy (mean deviation point estimate -0.7, 95% CI -1.3, -0.1). CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: Bariatric surgery may be an effective approach to reverse PN in individuals with obesity. The observed stability of CAN and retinopathy may be an improvement compared with the natural progression of these conditions; however, controlled trials are needed.

Dietary weight loss in people with severe obesity stabilizes neuropathy and improves symptomatology.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the effect of dietary weight loss on neuropathy outcomes in people with severe obesity. METHODS: A prospective cohort study of participants attending a medical weight-management program was followed. Weight loss was achieved with meal replacement of 800 kcal/d for 12 weeks and then transitioning to 1,200 to 1,500 kcal/d. The coprimary outcomes were changes in intraepidermal nerve fiber density (IENFD) at the distal leg and proximal thigh. Secondary outcomes included nerve conduction studies, Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument questionnaire and exam, Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders, and quantitative sensory testing. RESULTS: Among 131 baseline participants, 72 (mean [SD] age: 50.1 [10.5] years, 51.4% female) completed 2 years of follow-up. Participants lost 12.4 (11.8) kg. All metabolic syndrome components improved with the exception of blood pressure. IENFD in the distal leg (0.4 [3.3], p = 0.29), and proximal thigh (0.3 [6.3], p = 0.74) did not significantly change. Improvements were observed on the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument questionnaire, two Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders subdomains, and quantitative sensory testing cold threshold. CONCLUSIONS: Dietary weight loss was associated with improvements in all metabolic parameters except blood pressure, and both IENFD outcomes remained stable after 2 years. Given that natural history studies reveal decreases in IENFD over time, dietary weight loss may halt this progression, but randomized controlled trials are needed.

Central Obesity is Associated With Neuropathy in the Severely Obese.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of neuropathy stratified by glycemic status and the association between extensive anthropometric measurements and neuropathy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional, observational study in obese individuals, before surgery, with body mass index (BMI) greater than 35 kg/m2. Lean controls were recruited from a research website. Neuropathy was defined by the Toronto consensus definition of probable neuropathy. We compared nine anthropometric measurements between obese participants with and without neuropathy. We used multivariable logistic regression to explore associations between these measures, and other metabolic risk factors, and neuropathy. RESULTS: We recruited 138 obese individuals and 46 lean controls. The mean age (SD) was 45.1 (11.3) years in the obese population (76.1% female, n=105) and 43.8 (12.1) years in the lean controls (82.2% female, n=37). The prevalence of neuropathy was 2.2% (n=1) in lean controls, 12.1% (n=4) in obese participants with normoglycemia, 7.1% (n=4) in obese participants with pre-diabetes, and 40.8% (n=20) in obese participants with diabetes (p≤.01). Waist circumference was the only anthropometric measure that was larger in those with neuropathy (139.3 cm vs 129.1 cm, p=.01). Hip-thigh (71.1 cm vs 76.6 cm, p<.01) and mid-thigh (62.2 cm vs 66.3 cm, p=.03) circumferences were smaller in those with neuropathy. The body mass index was comparable between patients who were obese with and without neuropathy (p=.86). Waist circumference (odds ratio [OR], 1.39; 95% CI, 1.10 to 1.75), systolic blood pressure (OR, 2.89; 95% CI, 1.49 to 5.61), and triglycerides (OR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.70) were significantly associated with neuropathy. CONCLUSION: Normoglycemic obese patients have a high prevalence of neuropathy indicating that obesity alone may be sufficient to cause neuropathy. Waist circumference, but not general obesity, is significantly associated with neuropathy.

The Prevalence and Determinants of Cognitive Deficits and Traditional Diabetic Complications in the Severely Obese.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of cognitive deficits and traditional diabetic complications and the association between metabolic factors and these outcomes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study in severely obese individuals before bariatric surgery. Lean control subjects were recruited from a research website. Cognitive deficits were defined by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Toolbox (<5th percentile for lean control subjects). Cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy (CAN) was defined by an expiration-to-inspiration (E-to-I) ratio of <5th percentile for lean control subjects. Retinopathy was based on retinal photographs and nephropathy on the estimated glomerular filtration rate (<60 mg/dL) and/or the albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR) (≥30 mg/g). NIH Toolbox, E-to-I ratio, mean deviation on frequency doubling technology testing, and ACR were used as sensitive measures of these outcomes. We used multivariable linear regression to explore associations between metabolic factors and these outcomes. RESULTS: We recruited 138 severely obese individuals and 46 lean control subjects. The prevalence of cognitive deficits, CAN, retinopathy, and nephropathy were 6.5%, 4.4%, 0%, and 6.5% in lean control subjects; 22.2%, 18.2%, 0%, and 6.1% in obese participants with normoglycemia; 17.7%, 21.4%, 1.9%, and 17.9% in obese participants with prediabetes; and 25.6%, 31.9%, 6.1%, and 16.3% in obese participants with diabetes. Waist circumference was significantly associated with cognitive function (-1.48; 95% CI -2.38, -0.57) and E-to-I ratio (-0.007; 95% CI -0.012, -0.002). Prediabetes was significantly associated with retinal function (-1.78; 95% CI -3.56, -0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Obesity alone is likely sufficient to cause cognitive deficits but not retinopathy or nephropathy. Central obesity is the key metabolic risk factor.

Examination of office visit patient preferences for the after-visit summary (AVS).

The federal government advocates the practice of routinely providing an after-visit summary (AVS) to patients after each office-based visit as an element of stage 1 meaningful use. A significant potential benefit of the AVS is improved patient engagement achieved by enabling patients and family members to better understand and retain key health information. The methodology for this study was a mixed-methods pilot study to examine, through the perspectives of adult primary care patients, how relevant and actionable data can be better formatted in the AVS. Results of this study suggest that the goal of the AVS to serve as a communication tool to engage and support patients is frequently not being met. Further study is needed to understand, from the viewpoints of patients and providers, what barriers are keeping them from optimally providing and using the information on the AVS.