Effects of individualized antiplatelet therapy, based on CYP2C19 genotyping, on platelet function in patients underwent percutaneous coronary intervention.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of individualized antiplatelet therapy, based on CYP2C19 genotyping, on platelet function in patients underwent PCI and to compare this treatment with conventional antiplatelet therapy. METHODS: All patients were treated with 100 mg aspirin once a day. Additionally, the CA group received 75 mg clopidogrel once a day. The IA group was divided into extensive metabolizers (EMs, no loss-of-function, i.e. LOF allele, 75 mg clopidogrel once a day), intermediate metabolizers (IMs, carrying one LOF alleles, 75 mg clopidogrel twice daily), and poor metabolizers group (PMs, carrying two LOF alleles, 90 mg ticagrelor twice daily). After taking these antiplatelet medications for ⩾5 days, we assessed platelet function by thromboelastography, and recorded the MAADP (maximum amplitude produced by adenosine diphosphate) value. MAADP > 47 mm was defined as residual HPR, indicating a high risk of thrombosis. MAADP ≤ 31 mm indicated a high risk of bleeding. RESULTS: The proportion of patients with MAADP > 47 mm was significantly lower in the IA group (29.6%) than the CA group (38.1%). The proportion of patients with MAADP ≤ 31 mm was significantly higher in the IA group (31.0%) than the CA group (21.3%). No significant differences were found in the proportions of patients with MAADP > 47 mm or MAADP ≤31 mm when compared between the EMs and IMs group. CONCLUSION: Individualized antiplatelet therapy, based on CYP2C19 genotyping, can reduce the incidence of HPR in ACS patients after PCI compared to conventional therapy. By taking a double dose of clopidogrel, patients with a CYP2C19 LOF allele can therefore overcome the reduced efficacy of clopidogrel associated with LOF alleles without increasing the risk of bleeding, which is of guiding significance for the management of antiplatelet therapy on ACS patients after PCI especially considering the CYP2C19 LOF alleles that carry an important predictor for the ischemic events. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: chiCTR-INC-17011550.

Aortic Valve Replacement with Bovine Pericardium in Patients with Aortic Valve Regurgitation.

This study aimed to analyze the early and mid-term outcomes of aortic valve replacement with bovine pericardium in the treatment of aortic valve regurgitation.From January 2015 to March 2018, 36 patients (19 men; mean ± standard deviation [SD] age, 46.70 ± 16.60 years) underwent aortic valve replacement with bovine pericardium. The bovine pericardium was intraoperatively measured and shaped using an Ozaki template, according to the shape and size of the individual patient's aortic valve leaflets. Additional procedures were performed, including ventricular septal defect repair in 5 cases, mitral valve reconstruction in 6 cases, tricuspid valve reconstruction in 6 cases, and coronary artery bypass grafting in 3 cases.There were no perioperative deaths. One elderly patient with postoperative respiratory failure recovered after symptomatic treatment. One patient with frequent ventricular tachycardia after intraoperative cardiac re-jump underwent intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation (IABP), and the IABP device was successfully removed on the second postoperative day. Within the first 6 months of follow-up, there were no death events, no reoperation events, and no additional thromboembolic events. Follow-up echocardiography was performed for 6 months, with average left ventricular ejection fraction of 62.01 ± 3.21%, mean transvalvular pressure gradient of 11.17 ± 4.90 mmHg, and mean aortic valve velocity of 1.60 ± 0.58 m/s. Compared with the preoperative transthoracic echocardiography findings, the results at the six-month follow-up were statistically significant (P < 0.05). Mild aortic valve regurgitation occurred in 2 patients (5.56%), whereas other patients had no or only minimal aortic valve regurgitation (n = 34, 94.44%). Moderate aortic valve regurgitation occurred in one patient at 9 months after the initial operation. This was found to be due to infective endocarditis, and a biological valve was finally implanted.Aortic valve replacement with bovine pericardium in the treatment of aortic valve regurgitation is feasible, and good early and mid-term results are achieved. Long-term results need to be followed up in the future.