Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Assist Reprod Genet ; 38(9): 2481-2490, 2021 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34050447

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Mammalian spermatogenesis is responsible for male fertility and is supported by the self-renewal and differentiation of spermatogonial stem cells (SSCs). Sertoli cells provide a supportive microenvironment for SSCs, in part by the production of stem cell factor (SCF), which is a potent regulator of spermatogonia proliferation and survival. METHODS: We investigated the novel role of ß-estradiol in modulating the proliferation and apoptosis of fetal SSCs via the regulation of SCF secretion in Sertoli cells isolated from human fetal testes. The proliferation of SSCs in the co-culture system was determined by colony formation and BrdU incorporation assays. TUNEL assay was used to measure SSC apoptosis in co-culture in response to treatment with control, ß-estradiol, or the combination of ß-estradiol and the estrogen receptor inhibitor ICI 182780. RESULTS: In the system with purified human fetal Sertoli cells (MIS+/c-Kit-/AP-), ß-estradiol upregulated the production of SCF in a dose- and time-dependent manner. In the co-culture system of primary human fetal SSCs (c-Kit+/SSEA-4+/Oct-4+/AP+) and Sertoli cells (MIS+), ß-estradiol markedly increased the proliferation of SSCs. Moreover, SSC apoptosis was significantly inhibited by ß-estradiol and was completely reversed by the combination of ß-estradiol and ICI 182780. CONCLUSION: Here we report, for the first time, that ß-estradiol can induce the increase of SCF expression in human fetal Sertoli cells and regulates the growth and survival of human fetal SSCs. These novel findings provide new perspectives on the current understanding of the role of estrogen in human spermatogenesis.


Subject(s)
Cell Differentiation , Estradiol/pharmacology , Fetus/cytology , Sertoli Cells/cytology , Spermatogonia/cytology , Stem Cell Factor/metabolism , Stem Cells/cytology , Coculture Techniques , Estrogens/pharmacology , Fetus/drug effects , Fetus/metabolism , Gestational Age , Humans , Male , Sertoli Cells/drug effects , Sertoli Cells/metabolism , Spermatogenesis , Spermatogonia/drug effects , Spermatogonia/metabolism , Stem Cells/drug effects , Stem Cells/metabolism
2.
Asian J Androl ; 23(1): 91-96, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32567578

ABSTRACT

Slow freezing is the most commonly used technique for the cryopreservation of spermatozoa in clinical practice. However, it has been shown to have a negative impact on sperm function and structure. Vitrification as a successful alternative method has been proved to have better protective effects on human embryos, but vitrification of spermatozoa is still subject to low recovery rates. In this study, a modified vitrification method for native spermatozoa was developed. A total of 28 semen samples were included; each sample was divided into three equal parts and assigned to fresh, slow freezing, and vitrification groups. Sperm vitality, motility, morphology, DNA integrity, and acrosome reaction were assessed for each of the groups. The results showed that vitrification achieves better results for several sperm protection parameters than slow freezing; vitrification achieves a higher recovery rate (P < 0.05), motility (P <0.05), morphology (P <0.05), and curve line velocity (P <0.05) than slow freezing. Furthermore, DNA fragmentation was decreased (P <0.05) and better acrosome protection (P <0.05) was exhibited in the spermatozoa after vitrification. Principal component analysis of all sperm parameters revealed that the vitrification cluster was closer to the fresh cluster, indicating that spermatozoa are better preserved through vitrification. In conclusion, while both slow freezing and vitrification have negative effects on sperm function and structure, the vitrification protocol described here had a relatively better recovery rate (65.8%) and showed improved preservation of several sperm quality parameters compared with slow freezing.


Subject(s)
Cryopreservation/methods , Spermatozoa , Vitrification , Acrosome Reaction , Adult , Humans , Male , Specimen Handling/methods , Sperm Motility , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...