Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Endocr Rev ; 36(6): E1-E150, 2015 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26544531

ABSTRACT

The Endocrine Society's first Scientific Statement in 2009 provided a wake-up call to the scientific community about how environmental endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) affect health and disease. Five years later, a substantially larger body of literature has solidified our understanding of plausible mechanisms underlying EDC actions and how exposures in animals and humans-especially during development-may lay the foundations for disease later in life. At this point in history, we have much stronger knowledge about how EDCs alter gene-environment interactions via physiological, cellular, molecular, and epigenetic changes, thereby producing effects in exposed individuals as well as their descendants. Causal links between exposure and manifestation of disease are substantiated by experimental animal models and are consistent with correlative epidemiological data in humans. There are several caveats because differences in how experimental animal work is conducted can lead to difficulties in drawing broad conclusions, and we must continue to be cautious about inferring causality in humans. In this second Scientific Statement, we reviewed the literature on a subset of topics for which the translational evidence is strongest: 1) obesity and diabetes; 2) female reproduction; 3) male reproduction; 4) hormone-sensitive cancers in females; 5) prostate; 6) thyroid; and 7) neurodevelopment and neuroendocrine systems. Our inclusion criteria for studies were those conducted predominantly in the past 5 years deemed to be of high quality based on appropriate negative and positive control groups or populations, adequate sample size and experimental design, and mammalian animal studies with exposure levels in a range that was relevant to humans. We also focused on studies using the developmental origins of health and disease model. No report was excluded based on a positive or negative effect of the EDC exposure. The bulk of the results across the board strengthen the evidence for endocrine health-related actions of EDCs. Based on this much more complete understanding of the endocrine principles by which EDCs act, including nonmonotonic dose-responses, low-dose effects, and developmental vulnerability, these findings can be much better translated to human health. Armed with this information, researchers, physicians, and other healthcare providers can guide regulators and policymakers as they make responsible decisions.


Subject(s)
Endocrine Disruptors/toxicity , Animals , Benzhydryl Compounds , Cardiovascular Diseases/chemically induced , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus/chemically induced , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Endocrinology , Environmental Exposure , Female , Herbicides , Humans , Male , Neoplasms, Hormone-Dependent/epidemiology , Neurodevelopmental Disorders/chemically induced , Neurodevelopmental Disorders/epidemiology , Neurosecretory Systems/drug effects , Obesity/chemically induced , Obesity/epidemiology , Pesticides , Phenols , Phthalic Acids/toxicity , Prostatic Neoplasms/chemically induced , Prostatic Neoplasms/epidemiology , Reproduction/drug effects , Societies, Medical , Thyroid Gland/drug effects
2.
Endocr Rev ; 36(6): 593-602, 2015 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26414233

ABSTRACT

This Executive Summary to the Endocrine Society's second Scientific Statement on environmental endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) provides a synthesis of the key points of the complete statement. The full Scientific Statement represents a comprehensive review of the literature on seven topics for which there is strong mechanistic, experimental, animal, and epidemiological evidence for endocrine disruption, namely: obesity and diabetes, female reproduction, male reproduction, hormone-sensitive cancers in females, prostate cancer, thyroid, and neurodevelopment and neuroendocrine systems. EDCs such as bisphenol A, phthalates, pesticides, persistent organic pollutants such as polychlorinated biphenyls, polybrominated diethyl ethers, and dioxins were emphasized because these chemicals had the greatest depth and breadth of available information. The Statement also included thorough coverage of studies of developmental exposures to EDCs, especially in the fetus and infant, because these are critical life stages during which perturbations of hormones can increase the probability of a disease or dysfunction later in life. A conclusion of the Statement is that publications over the past 5 years have led to a much fuller understanding of the endocrine principles by which EDCs act, including nonmonotonic dose-responses, low-dose effects, and developmental vulnerability. These findings will prove useful to researchers, physicians, and other healthcare providers in translating the science of endocrine disruption to improved public health.


Subject(s)
Endocrine Disruptors/toxicity , Animals , Benzhydryl Compounds/toxicity , Diabetes Mellitus/chemically induced , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Endocrinology , Environmental Exposure , Epigenesis, Genetic , Female , Gene-Environment Interaction , Herbicides/toxicity , Humans , Male , Neoplasms, Hormone-Dependent/chemically induced , Neoplasms, Hormone-Dependent/epidemiology , Neurodevelopmental Disorders/chemically induced , Neurodevelopmental Disorders/epidemiology , Neurosecretory Systems/drug effects , Obesity/chemically induced , Obesity/epidemiology , Pesticides/toxicity , Phenols/toxicity , Phthalic Acids/toxicity , Polychlorinated Biphenyls/toxicity , Prostatic Neoplasms/chemically induced , Prostatic Neoplasms/epidemiology , Reproduction/drug effects , Societies, Medical , Thyroid Gland/drug effects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL