Diaphragmatic electromyography during a spontaneous breathing trial to predict extubation failure in preterm infants.

BACKGROUND: Premature attempts at extubation and prolonged episodes of ventilatory support in preterm infants have adverse outcomes. The aim of this study was to determine whether measuring the electrical activity of the diaphragm during a spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) could predict extubation failure in preterm infants. METHODS: When infants were ready for extubation, the electrical activity of the diaphragm was measured by transcutaneous electromyography (EMG) before and during a SBT when the infants were on endotracheal continuous positive airway pressure. RESULTS: Forty-eight infants were recruited (median (IQR) gestational age of 27.2 (25.6-30.4) weeks). Three infants did not pass the SBT and 13 failed extubation. The amplitude of the EMG increased during the SBT [2.3 (1.5-4.2) versus 3.5 (2.1-5.3) µV; p < 0.001]. In the whole cohort, postmenstrual age (PMA) was the strongest predictor for extubation failure (area under the curve (AUC) 0.77). In infants of gestational age <29 weeks, the percentage change of the EMG predicted extubation failure with an AUC of 0.74 while PMA was not associated with the outcome of extubation. CONCLUSIONS: In all preterm infants, PMA was the strongest predictor of extubation failure; in those born <29 weeks of gestation, diaphragmatic electromyography during an SBT was the best predictor of extubation failure. IMPACT: Composite assessments of readiness for extubation may be beneficial in the preterm population. Diaphragmatic electromyography measured by surface electrodes is a non-invasive technique to assess the electrical activity of the diaphragm. Postmenstrual age was the strongest predictor of extubation outcome in preterm infants. The change in diaphragmatic activity during a spontaneous breathing trial in extremely prematurely born infants can predict subsequent extubation failure with moderate sensitivity and specificity.

Kidney transplantation outcomes for adult recipients of pediatric donor kidneys.

Despite a paucity of data assessing transplantation of deceased-donor pediatric donor kidneys into adult recipients, utilization of pediatric organs is declining in the UK, likely due to concerns that such organs may have inferior outcomes. However, we hypothesized that these concerns may be unfounded. As such, the aim of the study was to compare kidney transplant outcomes between adult recipients of pediatric and adult deceased-donor organs. Data were collected from the UK Transplant Registry for all adult (18+ years) deceased-donor single-kidney transplant recipients between January 2000 and January 2016. Univariable and multivariable analyses were undertaken, to compare a range of outcomes between recipients of kidneys from pediatric and adult donors. Transplants were stratified by the donor age (years) as follows: 0-16 (n = 666), 17-18 (n = 465), and 19-44 (n = 7378). Recipients of pediatric donor kidneys were observed to have improved long-term graft function, with a median creatinine at 1 year of 109 vs. 117 µmol/L for recipients of donors aged 0-16 vs. 19-44 years (P < .001). However, on multivariable analysis, this was not found to correspond to a significant difference in patient (P = .914) or graft survival (P = .190) between the donor age groups. Subgroup analysis within the younger donors found no significant differences in recipient outcomes between donors aged 0-6, 7-12, and 13-16 years. In this population cohort study, we identified excellent outcomes among adult recipients of pediatric donor kidneys. Pediatric donors are a valuable source of organs for adult recipients in an era where organ demand is rising.

The Influence of Donor to Recipient Size Matching on Kidney Transplant Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Nephron endowment in renal transplantation is infrequently considered, but may have important implications for post kidney transplantation outcomes. In this population-cohort study, we analyzed the deceased-donor kidney transplant outcomes stratified by donor-to-recipient size ratios. METHODS: Data for all deceased-donor adult kidney transplantation recipients between 2003 and 2015 were extracted from the UK Transplant Registry. We used weight as a surrogate marker for kidney size and defined the following mismatch categories (donor weight/recipient weight × 100): less than 75% (small donor kidney), 75% to 125% (weight matched kidney), and greater than 125% (large donor kidney). Univariable and multivariable analyses were undertaken to assess the relationship between this marker and patient outcomes. RESULTS: Outcomes for 11 720 transplants were analyzed with weight mismatch stratified as follows; small donor kidney (n = 1608, 13.7%), weight matched kidney (n = 7247, 61.8%) and large donor kidney (n = 2865, 24.4%). On multivariable analysis, no significant differences were detected in overall (P = 0.876) or death-censored (P = 0.173) graft survival, or in rates of delayed graft function (P = 0.396) between these 3 groups. However, 12-month creatinine levels were found to decline progressively across the groups (P < 0.001), with adjusted averages of 144.2 µmol/L for recipients of small donor kidneys, 134.7 µmol/L in weight matched kidneys, and 124.9 µmol/L in recipients of large donor kidneys. In addition, patient survival was found to be significantly shorter in recipients of larger kidneys than those with weight matched kidneys (hazard ratio, 1.21; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-1.40; P = 0.009), which is inconsistent with the existing literature. CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate that 12-month creatinine is influenced by donor-to-recipient difference in body weight, but that no such difference is observed for either delayed graft function or death-censored graft survival. However, we observed increased mortality in recipients receiving larger kidneys; an observation which conflicts with the existing literature and warrants further investigation.

Ethnicity matching and outcomes after kidney transplantation in the United Kingdom.

BACKGROUND: Kidneys from non-white donors have inferior outcomes, but it is unclear if ethnicity matching between donors and recipients achieves better post kidney transplant outcomes. METHODS: We undertook a retrospective, population cohort study utilising UK Transplant Registry data. The cohort comprised adult, kidney-alone, transplant recipients receiving their first kidney transplant between 2003-2015, with data censored at 1st October 2016. We included 27,970 recipients stratified into white (n = 23,215), black (n = 1,679) and south Asian (n = 3,076) ethnicity, with median post-transplant follow-up of 1,676 days (IQR 716-2,869 days). Unadjusted and adjusted Cox regression survival analyses were performed to investigate ethnicity effect on risk for graft loss and mortality. RESULTS: In unadjusted analyses, matched ethnicity between donors-recipients resulted in better outcomes for delayed graft function, one-year creatinine, graft and patient survival but these differed by ethnicity matches. Compared to white-to-white transplants, risk for death-censored graft loss was higher in black-to-black and similar among Asian-to-Asian transplants, but mortality risk was lower for both black-to-black and Asian-to-Asian transplants. In Cox regression models, compared to white donors, we observed higher risk for graft loss with both south Asian (HR 1.38, 95%CI 1.12-1.70, p = 0.003) and black (HR 1.66, 95%CI 1.30-2.11, p<0.001) donated kidneys independent of recipient ethnicity. We observed no mortality difference with south Asian donated kidneys but increased mortality with black donated kidneys (HR 1.68, 95%CI 1.21-2.35, p = 0.002). Matching ethnicities made no significant difference in any Cox regression model. Similar results were observed after stratifying our analysis by living and deceased-donor kidney transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: Our data confirm inferior outcomes associated with non-white kidney donors for kidney transplant recipients of any ethnicity in a risk-adjusted model for the United Kingdom population. However, contrary to non-renal transplant literature, we did not identify any survival benefits associated with donor-recipient ethnicity matching.

The impact of donor body mass index on outcomes after deceased kidney transplantation - a national population-cohort study.

The aim of this study was to determine the effect of donor body mass index (BMI) on deceased donor kidney transplant outcomes. Data were collected from the UK Transplant Registry for all deceased donor kidney transplant recipients between January 2003 and January 2015. Univariable and multivariable analyses were undertaken to assess the impact of donor BMI on a range of outcomes. Donor BMI (kg/m2 ) was stratified as <18.5 (n = 380), 18.5-25.0 (n = 6890), 25.1-30.0 (n = 6669), 30.1-35.0 (n = 2503) and >35.0 (n = 1148). The prevalence of delayed graft function increased significantly with donor BMI (P < 0.001), with an adjusted odds ratio of 1.38 (95% CI: 1.16-1.63) for the >35.0 vs. 18.5-25.0 groups. However, there was no significant association between donor BMI and 12-month creatinine (P = 0.550), or patient (P = 0.109) or graft (P = 0.590) survival. In overweight patients, increasing donor BMI was associated with a significant increase in warm ischaemia time and functional warm ischaemia time, by an average of 4.6% (P = 0.043) and 5.2% (P = 0.013) per 10.0 kg/m2 . However, rising warm ischaemic time and functional warm ischaemic time was not significantly associated with delayed graft function, 12-month creatinine levels, graft loss or patient death. In this population cohort study, we identified no significant association between donor BMI and long-term clinical outcomes in deceased donor kidney transplantation.