Treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis in adults: An expert consensus statement using a Delphi method to produce a decision-making algorithm.

BACKGROUND: New highly effective drugs for moderate-to-severe cutaneous psoriasis are regularly marketed, and the hierarchy of treatments thus requires frequent review. OBJECTIVES: A Delphi method was used to enable a structured expert consensus on the use of systemic treatments and phototherapy among adults with moderate-to-severe psoriasis. METHODS: The Delphi method consists in achieving a convergence of opinions among a panel of experts using several rounds of questionnaires with controlled feedback between rounds. A two-part Delphi questionnaire was administered online to French psoriasis experts. In the first part, 180 items related to the prescription of systemic treatments and phototherapy for adult patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis were grouped into 21 sections covering different lines of treatment and different forms of cutaneous psoriasis. The experts voted on each proposal using an ordinal 7-point Likert scale. The second part comprised 11 open-ended questions about special indications for each therapeutic class. These were converted into 101 questions for subsequent rounds. Consensus was deemed to have been reached if more than 80% of the experts agreed with a given proposal. RESULTS: Three rounds of questionnaires were sequentially sent to 35 participants between November 2021 and March 2022. Thirty-three (94%) completed all three rounds. For plaque psoriasis, only methotrexate was recommended by the experts as first-line systemic treatment (89% of votes). Cyclosporin was advocated in pustular and erythrodermic psoriasis, and acitretin was suggested for hyperkeratotic and palmoplantar psoriasis. In the event of failure of or intolerance to non-biological systemic treatments, guselkumab, risankizumab, ixekizumab or secukinumab were recommended by more than 80% of the experts. Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) inhibitors remain useful for patients with cardiovascular risk factors. Special indications were provided for each therapeutic class (methotrexate/narrowband ultraviolet B phototherapy, psoralen/ultraviolet A phototherapy, cyclosporin, acitretin, apremilast, TNF inhibitors, interleukin (IL)-12/23 inhibitors, IL-17(R)A inhibitors, and IL-23 inhibitors). CONCLUSIONS: This expert consensus statement indicate that newly available IL-17 and IL-23 inhibitors may be favored over TNF and IL-12/23 inhibitors as first-line biologics. The Centre of Evidence of the French Society of Dermatology has drawn up a decision-making algorithm to guide clinicians in the therapeutic management of moderate-to-severe psoriasis.

Treatment of Eosinophilic Annular Erythema: Retrospective multicenter study and literature review.

BACKGROUND: Eosinophilic annular erythema (EAE) is a rare eosinophil-related skin disease which typically manifests with annular erythematous plaques and severe pruritus. Besides the diagnosis, the treatment of EAE is challenging since relevant published data are sparse. METHODS: The aim of this study was to assess the underlying diseases, treatments and outcomes of patients with EAE. To this end, we conducted a retrospective multicenter study and a systematic review of the MEDLINE database. RESULTS: We included 18 patients with EAE followed in 8 centers. The MEDLINE database search yielded 37 relevant publications reporting 55 cases of EAE with 106 treatment sequences. The most common and efficient treatments included topical or systemic corticosteroids, hydroxychloroquine and dapsone. In refractory patients, a combination of systemic corticosteroids with hydroxychloroquine was associated with 88% of complete clinical response. DISCUSSION: To improve the management of EAE patients, we discuss the following treatment strategy: in topical steroid-resistant patients, hydroxychloroquine can be given as first-line systemic treatment. Dapsone, hydroxychloroquine or systemic corticosteroids are second-line options to consider. Last, monoclonal antibodies or JAK inhibitors targeting type 2 inflammation could represent promising last-resort options in refractory patients.

[A long-term follow-up quality evaluation of patients taking oral anticoagulant therapy]. / Qualité du suivi sur le long terme des traitements anticoagu ants oraux.

OBJECTIVES: the aim of this study was to estimate the population under Vitamin-K antagonists (VKA) in the region of Limousin (France), and to assess the treatment quality and the level of knowledge of the patients. METHODS: a transversal study permitted to identify all the patients under VKA under the French general health care coverage. During 6 months, a cohort of 370 patients had been followed. Major data measured were: the number of INR, the duration within the therapeutic range, the duration in the hazardous zone (INR >4.5), the level of patients' education and the knowledge on the treatment's indication by biologists. Data were collected through the French general health care database as well as questionnaires sent to general practitioners, biologists and patients. RESULTS: one percent of the entire population was under VKA. The mean number of INR performed during 6 months was 6.6, and 36.5% of patients had less than one biological control monthly. The mean duration passed within the therapeutic range was at 54%. The hazardous zone was reached by 22% of the patients. The level of education of the patients was poor in one half of the patients. The indication of the treatment was known in 6% of patients' biologists. CONCLUSION: these results reflect the limits of application of recommendations. Facing to this evidence, it is necessary to optimize the management and follow-up of these treatments, especially through the development of public health charters with biologists, education with patients, or even anticoagulant clinics.