Normal morphometry of the biliary tree in pediatric and adult populations: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to characterise the normal morphometry of the biliary tree in pediatric and adult populations, through a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: This study, conducted using the PRISMA guidelines and registered with PROSPERO, searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS and Web of Science databases up to October 2022, and updated to August 2023. Studies that reported extractable data on diameter and length of the right, left and common hepatic ducts (LHD, RHD and CHD), and common bile duct (CBD) were included. Quality of the included studies were assessed using the Anatomical Quality Assessment (AQUA) tool. Statistical analysis included subgroup analyses according to sex, age, geographical location, and imaging modality. RESULTS: In total, 60 studies were included, of which 44 studies reported adequate data for meta-analysis on 23,796 subjects. Overall, the pooled mean diameter of the CBD was 4.69 mm (95 % CI: 4.28-5.11). Significant differences were found between pediatric (1.32 mm, 95 % CI: 1.03-1.61) and adult (4.97 mm, 95 % CI: 4.67-5.27) subjects, as well as US (3.82 mm, 95 % CI: 3.15-4.49) and other imaging modalities, including MRI (6.21 mm, 95 % CI: 4.85-7.57) and ERCP (7.24 mm, 95 % CI: 6.08-8.40). The CBD diameter measured significantly larger distally (5.20 mm, 95 % CI: 4.60-5.80) than proximally (4.01 mm, 95 % CI: 3.51-4.51). CONCLUSIONS: The results obtained from this evidence-based study may guide the establishment of standardised reference values and ranges of the normal biliary tree in pediatric and adult populations and aid clinical understanding.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of portal vein morphometry in pediatric and adult populations: Drawing the line between normal and abnormal findings.

PURPOSE: The morphometry of the hepatic portal vein is of clinical importance, particularly in pre-operative assessments, surgical management, and diagnoses of liver conditions. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to characterize the morphometry of the normal portal vein in both pediatric and adult patients. METHODS: The study, conducted using the PRISMA guidelines and registered with PROSPERO, utilized the MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS and Web of Science databases up to May 2020, and updated to May 2023. All studies reporting extractable data on diameter, length, and cross-sectional area (CSA) of the main, left, and right portal veins (PV, LPV, RPV, respectively) were included. The AQUA Tool was used to assess the quality of the included studies. Data analysis included subgroup analyses based on geographical location, sex, age, and imaging modality. RESULTS: A total of 122 studies with 11,637 subjects were eligible for inclusion. Overall, the pooled mean diameter of the PV (PVD) was 10.09 mm (95% CI: 9.56-10.62). Significant differences in diameter were found between pediatric (6.60 mm; 95% CI: 5.38-7.82) and adult (10.72 mm; 95% CI: 10.25-11.19) subjects. Additionally, there was a significantly larger PVD measurement from computed tomography (CT) than other imaging modalities: CT, 13.28 mm (95% CI: 11.71-14.84); magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), 10.50 mm (95% CI: 9.35-11.66) and ultrasound (US), 9.81 mm (95% CI: 9.47-10.16). The mean diameters of the LPV and RPV were 8.27 mm (95% CI: 6.78-9.77) and 8.33 mm (95% CI: 6.70-9.95), respectively. Mean PV length in adults is 48.63 mm (95% CI: 35.63-61.64). Mean CSA of the PV was 1.09 cm2. CONCLUSIONS: The study obtained aim to improve the understanding of portal vein anatomy, especially with relevance to surgical interventions of the liver in both pediatric and adult patients. Measurements from ultrasound imaging closely approximates the generated pooled PVD mean for pediatric and adult patients. CT imaging, however, significantly exceeded the established 13 mm threshold for adults. For pediatric patients, a threshold of 8 mm is proposed as a diagnostic upper limit for a normal PVD. Although not significant, the PVD decreased from the portal confluence towards its bifurcation.

Deduced Respiratory Scores on COVID-19 Patients Learning from Exertion-Induced Dyspnea.

Dyspnea is one of the most common symptoms of many respiratory diseases, including COVID-19. Clinical assessment of dyspnea relies mainly on self-reporting, which contains subjective biases and is problematic for frequent inquiries. This study aims to determine if a respiratory score in COVID-19 patients can be assessed using a wearable sensor and if this score can be deduced from a learning model based on physiologically induced dyspnea in healthy subjects. Noninvasive wearable respiratory sensors were employed to retrieve continuous respiratory characteristics with user comfort and convenience. Overnight respiratory waveforms were collected on 12 COVID-19 patients, and a benchmark on 13 healthy subjects with exertion-induced dyspnea was also performed for blind comparison. The learning model was built from the self-reported respiratory features of 32 healthy subjects under exertion and airway blockage. A high similarity between respiratory features in COVID-19 patients and physiologically induced dyspnea in healthy subjects was observed. Learning from our previous dyspnea model of healthy subjects, we deduced that COVID-19 patients have consistently highly correlated respiratory scores in comparison with normal breathing of healthy subjects. We also performed a continuous assessment of the patient's respiratory scores for 12-16 h. This study offers a useful system for the symptomatic evaluation of patients with active or chronic respiratory disorders, especially the patient population that refuses to cooperate or cannot communicate due to deterioration or loss of cognitive functions. The proposed system can help identify dyspneic exacerbation, leading to early intervention and possible outcome improvement. Our approach can be potentially applied to other pulmonary disorders, such as asthma, emphysema, and other types of pneumonia.