Divergent Cellular Expression Patterns of PD-L1 and PD-L2 Proteins in Breast Cancer.

PD-L1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) has become an established method for predicting cancer response to targeted anti-PD1 immunotherapies, including breast cancer (BC). The alternative PD-1 ligand, PD-L2, remains understudied but may be a complementary predictive marker. Prospective analysis of 32 breast cancers revealed divergent expression patterns of PD-L1 and PD-L2. PD-L1-positivity was higher in immune cells than in cancer cells (median = 5.0% vs. 0.0%; p = 0.001), whereas PD-L2-positivity was higher in cancer cells than immune cells (median = 30% vs. 5.0%; p = 0.001). Percent positivity of PD-L1 and PD-L2 were not correlated, neither in cancer cells nor immune cells. Based on a cut-point of ≥1% positivity, ER+ tumors (n = 23) were frequently PD-L2-positive (73.9%), whereas only 40.9% were PD-L1-positive. These data suggest differential control of cellular PD-L1 and PD-L2 expression in BC and a potential role for PD-L2 IHC as a complementary marker to PD-L1 to improve selection of aggressive ER+ BC that may benefit from anti-PD-1 therapy.

National trends in neoadjuvant chemotherapy utilization in patients with early-stage node-negative triple-negative breast cancer: the impact of the CREATE-X trial.

PURPOSE: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) allows for assessment of tumor pathological response and has survival implications. In 2017, the CREATE-X trial demonstrated survival benefit with adjuvant capecitabine in patients TNBC and residual disease after NAC. We aimed to assess national rates of NAC for cT1-2N0M0 TNBC before and after CREATE-X and examine factors associated with receiving NAC vs adjuvant chemotherapy (AC). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of women with cT1-2N0M0 TNBC diagnosed from 2014 to 2019 in the National Cancer Database (NCDB) was performed. Variables were analyzed via ANOVA, Chi-squared, Fisher Exact tests, and a multivariate linear regression model was created. RESULTS: 55,633 women were included: 26.9% received NAC, 52.4% AC, and 20.7% received no chemotherapy (median ages 53, 59, and 71 years, p < 0.01). NAC utilization significantly increased over time: 19.5% in 2014-15 (n = 3,465 of 17,777), 27.1% in 2016-17 (n = 5,140 of 18,985), and 33.6% in 2018-19 (n = 6,337 of 18,871, p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, increased NAC was associated with younger age (< 50), non-Hispanic white race/ethnicity, lack of comorbidities, cT2 tumors, care at an academic or integrated-network cancer program, and diagnosis post-2017 (p < 0.05 for all). Patients with government-provided insurance were less likely to receive NAC (p < 0.01). Women who traveled > 60 miles for treatment were more likely to receive NAC (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: From 2014 to 2019, NAC utilization increased for patients with cT1-2N0M0 TNBC. Racial, socioeconomic, and access disparities were observed in who received NAC vs AC and warrants interventions to ensure equitable care.

Methylation signatures as biomarkers for non-invasive early detection of breast cancer: A systematic review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Early detection of breast cancer would help alleviate the burden of treatment for early-stage breast cancer and help patient prognosis. There is currently no established gene panel that utilizes the potential of DNA methylation as a molecular signature for the early detection of breast cancer. This systematic review aims to identify the optimal methylation biomarkers for a non-invasive liquid biopsy assay and the gaps in knowledge regarding biomarkers for early detection of breast cancer. METHODS: Following the PRISMA-ScR method, Pubmed and Google Scholar was searched for publications related to methylation biomarkers in breast cancer over a five-year period. Eligible publications were mined for key data fields such as study aims, cohort demographics, types of breast cancer studied, technologies used, and outcomes. Data was analyzed to address the objectives of the review. RESULTS: Literature search identified 112 studies of which based on eligibility criteria, 13 studies were included. 28 potential methylation gene targets were identified, of which 23 were methylated at the promoter region, 1 was methylated in the body of the gene and 4 were methylated at yet to be identified locations. CONCLUSIONS: Our evaluation shows that at minimum APC, RASSFI, and FOXA1 genes would be a promising set of genes to start with for the early detection of breast cancer, based on the sensitivity and specificity outlined in the studies. Prospective studies are needed to optimize biomarkers for broader impact in early detection of breast cancer.

Frequent upregulation of HER2 protein in hormone-receptor-positive HER2-negative breast cancer after short-term neoadjuvant endocrine therapy.

BACKGROUND: Endocrine resistant metastatic disease develops in ~ 20-25% of hormone-receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer (BC) patients despite endocrine therapy (ET) use. Upregulation of HER family receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) represent escape mechanisms in response to ET in some HR+ tumors. Short-term neoadjuvant ET (NET) offers the opportunity to identify early endocrine escape mechanisms initiated in individual tumors. METHODS: This was a single arm, interventional phase II clinical trial evaluating 4 weeks (± 1 week) of NET in patients with early-stage HR+/HER2-negative (HER2-) BC. The primary objective was to assess NET-induced changes in HER1-4 proteins by immunohistochemistry (IHC) score. Protein upregulation was defined as an increase of ≥ 1 in IHC score following NET. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients with cT1-T3, cN0, HR+/HER2- BC were enrolled. In 35 patients with evaluable tumor HER protein after NET, HER2 was upregulated in 48.6% (17/35; p = 0.025), with HER2-positive status (IHC 3+ or FISH-amplified) detected in three patients at surgery, who were recommended adjuvant trastuzumab-based therapy. Downregulation of HER3 and/or HER4 protein was detected in 54.2% of tumors, whereas HER1 protein remained low and unchanged in all cases. While no significant volumetric reduction was detected radiographically after short-term NET, significant reduction in tumor proliferation rates were observed. No significant associations were identified between any clinicopathologic covariates and changes in HER1-4 protein expression on multivariable analysis. CONCLUSION: Short-term NET frequently and preferentially upregulates HER2 over other HER family RTKs in early-stage HR+/HER2- BC and may be a promising strategy to identify tumors that utilize HER2 as an early endocrine escape pathway. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY: Trial registration number: NCT03219476.

Worsening Rash in a Patient With Metastatic Breast Cancer.

A 56-year-old woman with metastatic hormone receptor­positive, ERBB2-negative breast cancer presents with pruritic, erythematous, scaly macules and papules on her forearms, faces, chest, and upper back. What is your diagnosis?

High PD-L2 Predicts Early Recurrence of ER-Positive Breast Cancer.

PURPOSE: T-cell-mediated cytotoxicity is suppressed when programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) is bound by PD-1 ligand-1 (PD-L1) or PD-L2. Although PD-1 inhibitors have been approved for triple-negative breast cancer, the lower response rates of 25%-30% in estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer will require markers to identify likely responders. The focus of this study was to evaluate whether PD-L2, which has higher affinity than PD-L1 for PD-1, is a predictor of early recurrence in ER+ breast cancer. METHODS: PD-L2 protein levels in cancer cells and stromal cells of therapy-naive, localized or locoregional ER+ breast cancers were measured retrospectively by quantitative immunofluorescence histocytometry and correlated with progression-free survival (PFS) in the main study cohort (n = 684) and in an independent validation cohort (n = 273). All patients subsequently received standard-of-care adjuvant therapy without immune checkpoint inhibitors. RESULTS: Univariate analysis of the main cohort revealed that high PD-L2 expression in cancer cells was associated with shorter PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.8; 95% CI, 1.3 to 2.6; P = .001), which was validated in an independent cohort (HR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.1 to 4.8; P = .026) and remained independently predictive after multivariable adjustment for common clinicopathological variables (HR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.4 to 2.9; P < .001). Subanalysis of the ER+ breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy (n = 197) revealed that high PD-L2 levels in cancer cells associated with short PFS in univariate (HR, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.4 to 4.4; P = .003) and multivariable analyses (HR, 3.4; 95% CI, 1.9 to 6.2; P < .001). CONCLUSION: Up to one third of treatment-naive ER+ breast tumors expressed high PD-L2 levels, which independently predicted poor clinical outcome, with evidence of further elevated risk of progression in patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy. Collectively, these data warrant studies to gain a deeper understanding of PD-L2 in the progression of ER+ breast cancer and may provide rationale for immune checkpoint blockade for this patient group.

Facing the conundrum: which first-line therapy should be used for patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer carrying germline BRCA mutation?

Pembrolizumab combined with chemotherapy has been established as the preferred first-line therapy for treating metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) with programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1)-positive disease since its approval for that indication. However, the optimal sequencing of therapy remains an unanswered question for a subset of mTNBC patients who harbor germline breast cancer gene 1/2 (BRCA1/2; gBRCA1/2) mutation. This article aims to offer insights into the optimal therapy sequencing for mTNBC patients with gBRCA1/2 mutations and its impact on clinical decision-making. The perspective offered is based on the best currently available data and propose a practical algorithm to guide the management of this subgroup in the frontline setting.

Matched Case Control Analysis of Breast Cancer- Specific Factors Affecting Risk of Developing SARS-CoV-2 Infection.

INTRODUCTION: In this retrospective matched case control study, we aim to identify breast cancer-related risk factors associated with developing COVID-19 and describe outcomes of patients with breast cancer diagnosed with COVID-19. METHODS: Women with breast cancer treated at the Medical College of Wisconsin and diagnosed with COVID-19 from March through December 2020 served as cases, and those without COVID-19 within the same timeframe served as controls. Univariate and multivariate comparisons were performed. RESULTS: Twenty-five cases and 77 controls were identified. All cases were fully matched by age, obesity, county, and race. Mean age was 54.6 versus 54.9, body mass index 31.0 versus 31.6, 48% lived in Milwaukee County, and 68% were White. Regarding COVID-19 outcomes, 24.0% (n = 6) of cases were hospitalized, median length of stay was 2 days, 8% (n=2) needed oxygen, 4% (n = 6) were intubated, and 4% (n = 6) died. COVID-19 led to treatment delays in 40% of cases. On univariate analysis, there was no statistically significant difference in hormone receptor status or breast cancer stage. Being on active chemotherapy (OR 5.8, P = 0.043) significantly increased the likelihood of developing COVID-19. CONCLUSIONS: In this matched case control study of patients with breast cancer, active chemotherapy was significantly associated with an increased likelihood of developing COVID-19, with a trend seen for triple negative disease. These findings support continued strict precautions for those on active chemotherapy and warrant further analysis in those with triple negative disease.

Androgen receptor expression in patients with triple negative breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a single institution study.

Background: Androgen receptor (AR) expression has emerged as a potential prognostic and predictive marker in patients with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). We conducted a retrospective analysis to evaluate pathologic complete response (pCR) rates, disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with AR positive and AR negative TNBC treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Methods: 107 patients with TNBC subtype, treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy between June 2006 and March 2016 were evaluated for AR expression. Androgen receptors were evaluated by immunohistochemical staining (clone AR441, Dilution 1:50, Dako-Agilent, Santa Clara, CA) using whole tissue sections from archived paraffin-embedded formalin-fixed (FFPE) blocks. AR positive was defined as ≥10% nuclear stained cells. Correlation of AR expression was examined with age, BMI, race, menopausal status, tumor grade, tumor size, and lymph node involvement, and response and outcomes. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine an association with AR expression and pathologic response and survival outcomes. Results: Fifty-eight patients with available tumor specimens were stained, with twenty (34.5%) being AR-positive and thirty-eight (65.5%) being AR negative. Median age was 49 years and median follow up was 5.7 years. All patients received anthracycline based neoadjuvant chemotherapy with 13 patients (23%) receiving an additional platinum chemotherapy. BRCA mutation positivity was 7% for the entire group. No differences in age, menopausal status, BMI, race, tumor size and lymph node involvement were observed between the two groups. However, there was a statistically significant difference in tumor grade between the two groups (p=0.008). Overall pCR rate was 28% with no difference between the two groups (30% vs 26%, p=0.56). There was no statistically significant difference in median DFS (5.9 years vs 5.2 years (p=0.94) and median OS (6.2 years vs 5.4 years, p=0.98) between the AR positive and AR negative groups. Conclusions: Our study did not find an association of AR status and the pathologic responses or survival outcomes in patients with TNBC treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Further studies exploring the prognostic and predictive role of AR in patients with TNBC are warranted.

Leveraging Antiprogestins in the Treatment of Metastatic Breast Cancer.

Although incurable, the prognosis for patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) has considerably improved with the approvals of multiple targeted and cytotoxic therapies. For hormone receptor-positive (HR+), ie, estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor positive (ER+/PgR+) and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 negative (ie, ERBB2 gene nonamplified or HER2-) MBC, current approved treatment options include palliative endocrine therapy (ET), cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK 4/6) inhibitors, mTOR inhibitors, and PI3 kinase inhibitors. Most treatments target ER+ disease regardless of PgR status. Although the presence of PgR is crucial for ER+ cell proliferation in both normal and malignant mammary tissue, currently, there are no approved treatments that specifically target PgR. Recent literature has demonstrated the potential of antiprogestins in the treatment of MBC both in preclinical and clinical studies. Antiprogestins, including selective PgR modulators (SPRMs) that act as PgR antagonists, are a promising class of therapeutics for overcoming endocrine resistance in patients who develop activating estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1) and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) gene mutations after prior endocrine therapy. Herein, we summarize the role of PgR and antiprogestins in the treatment of MBC. Other aspects on the use of functional imaging, clinical trials incorporating novel antiprogestins, and potential treatment combinations to overcome endocrine resistance will be briefly discussed.

Early stage triple negative breast cancer: Management and future directions.

Triple negative breast cancer is the most aggressive kind of breast cancer with high risk of recurrences and poor outcomes. Systemic chemotherapy has significantly improved long term outcomes in early stage patients; however, metastatic recurrences still develop in a significant number of patients. Anthracycline and taxane based chemotherapy regimens are standard of care for early stage patients. Neoadjuvant treatment is preferred due to the ability to assess pathologic responses providing important prognostic information and guidance in adjuvant therapy decisions. Carboplatin addition to the anthracycline and taxane backbone is associated with a significant improvement in pathologic complete response but is associated with more toxicity. Understanding the immune microenvironment of triple negative disease is an exciting field and immune checkpoint inhibitors have shown great promise in further improving response rates in early stage patients. Patients with residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy have a significantly higher risk of recurrence compared to those with complete responses. Adjuvant capecitabine for these high-risk patients have shown significant improvement in long term outcomes and is routinely used in this setting. Given the heterogeneity within triple negative tumors, molecular subtypes with variable genomic makeup and chemo sensitivities have been identified and will likely aid in further clinical developmental therapeutics.

Does Progesterone Receptor Matter in the Risk of Recurrence for Patients With Ductal Carcinoma in Situ?

BACKGROUND: Local recurrence is a major concern in patients diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). In invasive breast cancers, estrogen receptor (ER) (+)/progesterone receptor (PR) (-) subtype is considered more aggressive with poorer prognosis as compared to ER+/PR+ tumors. It is unclear whether this holds true in DCIS. METHODS: Six hundred ninety-three patients diagnosed and treated for DCIS at Froedtert and Medical College of Wisconsin Cancer Center (February 2002 to March 2015) were studied to determine if the recurrence rates were significantly different between ER+/PR- and ER+/PR+ tumors. Recurrence was defined as either noninvasive or invasive ipsilateral, contralateral, or distant disease. Probabilities of recurrences were calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimator. Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate the effect of prognostic factors on DCIS recurrence. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 5.2 years. The 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) was 91% (95% CI, 88.2-93.3) while estimated 7-year RFS was 86% (95% CI, 81.9-89.2). Seventy-five patients had a recurrence during their follow-up. Patients with ER-/PR- tumors (n = 118) had a significantly higher risk of recurrence (Hazard Ratio 3.7, 95% CI, 1.9-7.2, P = 0.0001) whereas those with ER+/PR- subtype (n = 77) did not have a significant difference in recurrence risk (HR 1.75, 95% CI, 0.92-3.32, P = 0.085) when compared to ER+/PR+ tumors (n = 482). No endocrine therapy for ER+ DCIS and lumpectomy alone were also significant predictors of recurrence (P = 0.0073 and P = 0.005, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: ER+/PR- subtype was not a significant predictor of recurrence in DCIS patients. This finding is in contrast to the recurrence risk seen in invasive breast cancers. Mastectomy and postlumpectomy radiation were associated with improved outcomes as was adjuvant endocrine therapy.

Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Who Should Receive Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy?

Progress in the treatment of triple-negative breast cancer remains an important challenge. Given the aggressive biology and high risk of distant recurrence, systemic chemotherapy is warranted in most patients. Neaodjuvant chemotherapy benefits patients with locally advanced disease by downsizing the tumor and increasing the probability of breast-conserving surgery. Clinical and pathologic responses provide important prognostic information, which makes neoadjuvant therapy an attractive approach for all patients with triple-negative breast cancer. Clinical research in the neoadjuvant setting is focused on improvement in pathologic complete response rates and outcomes of patients with residual disease.

Relevance of progesterone receptor immunohistochemical staining to Oncotype DX recurrence score.

OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND: Progesterone-receptor negativity (PR-) is predictive of adverse outcomes in estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer. The Oncotype DX assay provides risk stratification for hormone receptor-positive (HR+) invasive breast cancer; however, the association of PR status and Oncotype DX recurrence scores (RSs) is less clear. METHODS: We designed an analysis to determine whether a significant difference exists in the RS for ER+/PR- tumors when compared with ER+/PR+ breast cancer. Three hundred and fifty patients with HR+ invasive breast cancer who underwent Oncotype DX testing at our institution from December 2006 to October 2013 were included. We also examined the concordance in the HR status reported by immunohistochemical (IHC) and reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analyses. The data were analyzed by analysis of variance, F test, t test, and chi-square tests. Multivariate linear regression was used to determine significant predictors of Oncotype DX RS. RESULTS: A total of 301 patients had ER+/PR+ tumors and 47 patients had ER+/PR- tumors by IHC. PR- tumors had a significantly higher RS than PR+ tumors (24.7±8.53 vs. 17.3±7.38; p<.001), predicting a greater 10-year risk of distant recurrence. Multivariate linear regression showed PR status and tumor grade to be significant predictors of Oncotype DX RS (p<.0001). A total of 284 patients had HR status reported by Oncotype DX assay. Concordance between IHC and RT-PCR was 99.3% for ER and 88.7% for PR. CONCLUSION: Our study shows that ER+/PR- breast cancer tumors are associated with a significantly higher Oncotype DX scores; this interprets into a higher risk of recurrence. Our data also show that the concordance between IHC and RT-PCR was 99.3% for ER and lower at 88.7% for PR.

Radiation exposure from diagnostic procedures in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer.

Radiation exposure is associated with an increased risk of secondary cancers. Knowing the approximate radiation exposure from diagnostic procedures in the œrst year after a breast cancer diagnosis could help educate patients and allow physicians to monitor them more closely for potential risks.

Weight change associated with third-generation adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Studies have shown that breast cancer treatment can cause an increase in weight. Weight gain during chemotherapy is usually significant and may be associated with poor survival. However, the role of third- generation chemotherapy regimens and weight gain is not well reviewed. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the mean percentage weight change during the first year after breast cancer diagnosis in 246 patients at West Virginia University during September 2007 and October 2010. Kruskal-Wallis test and post hoc pairwise comparisons were used to assess the influence of age, histology, stage, ER/PR/HER2/neu status, menopausal status, and types of therapeutic modalities received on the percentage weight change. Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank test was used to evaluate recurrence-free survival (RFS). Local or distant recurrence and disease progression were events for RFS analysis and disease-free patients were censored at last follow-up. RESULTS: Mean weight gain was 0.39% (SD, 0.40) of baseline body weight, 1 year after diagnosis of breast cancer. Premenopausal status was the only factor associated with significant weight gain (+1.67% vs -0.10% for postmenopausal patients; P = .02). Stages ≥ III was associated with significant weight loss (-1.64% for stages III, IV vs +0.85% for stages 0, I, II; P = .02) and a lower RFS at 3 years and 5 years (P < .0001). Higher baseline weight (> 90th percentile) did not have any significant impact on RFS (0.84 vs 0.91; P = .19). There was no significant change in weight relative to other factors. CONCLUSIONS: Our study in patients receiving third-generation adjuvant chemotherapy regimens did not show any significant change in percentage weight with chemotherapy. Premenopausal status was the only significant factor associated with weight gain. As expected, stage III or higher disease was associated with significant weight loss and lower RFS.

Unique association of myeloid neoplasm with eosinophilia and abnormalities of PDGFRA with TTP.

Myeloid neoplasm with eosinophilia and abnormalities of Alpha type platelet derived growth factor receptor (PDGFRA) is a type of hypereosinophilic syndrome characterized by multiorgan damage due to eosinophilia. Its association with thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) has rarely been reported. We describe here a case report of a female in whom TTP presented as one of the earlier manifestations of myeloproliferative HES with rearrangement of PDGFRA. Our patient was found to have a normal ADAMTS-13 level which is not commonly seen with TTP. This case illustrates the importance of recognizing the atypical presentations of HES which may be difficult to recognize.