Does Baseline Severity of Arm Pain Influence Outcomes Following Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion?

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. PURPOSE: To assess preoperative arm pain severity influence on postoperative patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) and minimal clinically important difference (MCID) achievement following single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: There is evidence that preoperative symptom severity can affect postoperative outcomes. Few have evaluated this association between preoperative arm pain severity and postoperative PROMs and MCID achievement following ACDF. METHODS: Individuals undergoing single-level ACDF were identified. Patients were grouped by preoperative Visual Analog Scale (VAS) arm ≤8 vs. >8. PROMs collected preoperatively and postoperatively included VAS-arm/VAS-neck/Neck Disability Index (NDI)/12-item Short Form (SF-12) Physical Composite Score (PCS)/SF-12 mental composite score (MCS)/Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System physical function (PROMIS-PF). Demographics, PROMs, and MCID rates were compared between cohorts. RESULTS: A total of 128 patients were included. The VAS arm ≤8 cohort significantly improved for all PROMs excepting VAS arm at 1-year/2-years, SF-12 MCS at 12-weeks/1-year/2-years, and SF-12 PCS/PROMIS-PF at 6-weeks, only (p ≤0.021, all). The VAS arm >8 cohort significantly improved for VAS neck at all timepoints, VAS arm from 6-weeks to 1-year, NDI from 6-weeks to 6-months, and SF-12 MCS/PROMIS-PF at 6-months (p ≤0.038, all). Postoperatively, the VAS arm >8 cohort had higher VAS-neck (6 weeks/6 months), VAS-arm (12 weeks/6 months), NDI (6 weeks/6 months), lower SF-12 MCS (6 weeks/6 months), SF-12 PCS (6 months), and PROMISPF (12 weeks/6 months) (p ≤0.038, all). MCID achievement rates were higher among the VAS arm >8 cohort for the VAS-arm at 6-weeks/12-weeks/1-year/overall and NDI at 2 years (p ≤0.038, all). CONCLUSIONS: Significance in PROM score differences between VAS arm ≤8 vs. >8 generally dissipated at the 1-year and 2-year timepoint, although higher preoperative arm pain patients suffered from worse pain, disability, and mental/physical function scores. Furthermore, clinically meaningful rates of improvement were similar throughout the vast majority of timepoints for all PROMs studied.

Impact of Postoperative Length of Stay on Patient-Reported and Clinical Outcomes After Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

BACKGROUND: Existing literature has not yet evaluated the impact of postoperative length of stay (LOS) on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and minimum clinically important difference (MCID) in patients undergoing anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF). The authors investigates the influence of postoperative LOS following ALIF on PROMs and MCID achievement rates. METHODS: A single-surgeon database was retrospectively reviewed for patients undergoing single-level ALIF. The following 2 cohorts were studied: patients with LOS <45 hours and patients with LOS ≥45 hours. The following PROMs were recorded at preoperative and 6-week, 12-week, 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year postoperative timepoints: visual analog scale (VAS) back and leg, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), 12-item short form (SF-12) physical composite score (PCS), and patient-reported outcome measurement information system physical function. MCID achievement was compared by LOS grouping using χ 2 analysis. The rates of complications by LOS grouping and the relative risk among demographic and perioperative characteristics for a longer hospital stay of ≥45 hours were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 52 subjects were included in each cohort. LOS ≥45 hours demonstrated worse ODI at 6 weeks and SF-12 PCS preoperative and at 12 weeks (P ≤ 0.026, all). LOS <45 hours demonstrated greater MCID rates for all PROMs except VAS back (P ≤ 0.004, all). Postoperative urinary retention (POUR), fever, and total complications (P ≤ 0.003, all) were associated with increased LOS. Diabetes (P = 0.037), preoperative VAS neck ≥7 (P = 0.012), and American Society of Anesthesiologists classification ≥2 (P = 0.003) served as preoperative risk factors for postoperative stay ≥45 hours. CONCLUSION: Following single-level ALIF, patients with shorter LOS demonstrated significantly greater overall MCID achievement for most PROMs. POUR, fever, and total complications were associated with longer LOS and greater blood loss. Diabetes and higher preoperative leg pain were identified as risk factors for longer LOS. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Patients undergoing ALIF with shorter LOS had greater MCID achievement for disability, physical function, and leg pain outcomes. Patients with greater preoperative leg pain and diabetes may be at risk for longer LOS.

Impact of Body Mass Index on Postsurgical Outcomes for Workers' Compensation Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

BACKGROUND: Increased morbidity associated with obesity imposes a greater financial burden on companies that provide insurance to their employees. Few studies have investigated the relationship between body mass index (BMI) and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF) in the workers' compensation (WC) population. METHODS: WC patients who underwent a primary, single-level MIS TLIF were included/grouped according to BMI: nonobese (<30 kg/m2); obese I (≥30, <35 kg/m2); severe + morbid (≥35). PROMs were collected pre- and postoperatively: visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), 12-Item Short Form (SF-12) physical composite score (PCS), and Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System physical function (PROMIS-PF). BMI predictive power grouping on PROMs was evaluated using simple linear regression. Established minimum clinically important difference values were used to compute achievement rates across PROMs using logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 116 nonobese, 70 obese I, and 61 severe + morbid patients were included. Demographics among BMI grouping significantly differed in gender, hypertensive status, and American Society of Anesthesiologists score (P ≤ 0.037, all). Operative time was significantly different in perioperative values among BMI grouping (P ≤ 0.001). Increased BMI was significantly associated with greater VAS back at 12 weeks and 2 years (P ≤ 0.026, all), greater ODI preoperatively at 12 weeks and 6 months (P ≤ 0.015, all), and decreased PROMIS-PF at 12 weeks (P ≤ 0.011, all). Mean PROMs between obese I and severe + morbid cohorts differed in SF-12 PCS at 12 weeks, only (P = 0.050). ODI overall was the only parameter for which minimum clinically important difference was achieved among BMI cohorts (P ≤ 0.023). CONCLUSION: WC patients with increased BMI were more likely to develop significant back pain and disability at numerous postoperative timepoints compared with nonobese individuals. Our findings highlight the weight management importance within WC population to minimize back pain and disability following MIS TLIF, but provide a sense of reassurance with comparable clinical improvement regardless of BMI. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: When considering the effect of weight, surgeons may incorporate these findings in managing patient expectations in the WC population undergoing lumbar spine surgery.

Patient Satisfaction Following Lumbar Decompression: What is the Role of Mental Health?

OBJECTIVE: To determine the association between patient-reported depressive symptoms and patient satisfaction following minimally invasive lumbar decompression. METHODS: Primary, single-level/multilevel minimally invasive lumbar decompression was identified. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) collected preoperatively/postoperatively included visual analog scale back/leg, Oswestry Disability Index, 9-Item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), and 12-Item Short Form Mental Composite Score (SF-12 MCS). Patients rated current satisfaction level (0-10) with back/leg pain and disability. A paired Student's t-test compared each postoperative PROM score to its preoperative baseline. At each timepoint, patients were categorized by PHQ-9 and SF-12 MCS scores. One-way analysis of variance compared patient satisfaction with back/leg pain and disability among PHQ-9 subgroups. The Student's t-test for independent samples compared patient satisfaction between SF-12 MCS subgroups. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) assessed differences in satisfaction between depression subgroups while controlling for preoperative/postoperative values in corresponding PROMs. RESULTS: 193 patients were included. All PROMs demonstrated significant postoperative improvement from 6-weeks through 2-years (P < 0.001, all), except PHQ at 9 2-years (P = 0.874). Mean satisfaction scores ranged from 6.9-7.9 (back pain), 7.3-8.0 (leg pain), and 7.6-8.0 (disability). Satisfaction with back/leg pain and disability significantly differed among PHQ-9 subgroups at all postoperative timepoints (P < 0.001, all). Accounting for baseline and current pain/disability values, ANCOVA revealed differences between PHQ-9 subgroups only in satisfaction with back pain at 2 years (P < 0.001), leg pain at 12 weeks/1 year/2 years (P ≤ 0.047, all), and disability at 6 months/2 years (P ≤ 0.049, both). Satisfaction differed between SF-12 MCS subgroups at all timepoints (P ≤ 0.047), except back pain 6 months (P = 0.263). Accounting for baseline and postoperative pain/disability, ANCOVA revealed differences in satisfaction between SF-12 MCS groups only for back/leg pain at 2 years (P ≤ 0.001, both). CONCLUSIONS: Independent effect of depression at long-term follow-up was significant. This highlights the importance of understanding the interaction between physical and mental health outcomes to optimize patients' perceptions of surgical outcomes.

Systematic Review: Applications of Intraoperative Ultrasonography in Spinal Surgery.

BACKGROUND: As a result of increased practicality and decreased costs and radiation, interest has increased in intraoperative ultrasonography (iUS) in spinal surgery applications; however, few studies have provided a robust overview of its use in spinal surgery. We synthesize findings of existing literature on use of iUS in navigation, pedicle screw placement, and identification of anatomy during spinal interventions. METHODS: PRISMA guidelines were used in this systematic review. Studies were identified through PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases using the search string. Abstracts mentioning iUS in spine applications were included. On full-text review, exclusion criteria were implemented, including outdated studies or those with weak topic relevance or statistical power. On elimination of duplicates, multireviewer screening for eligibility, and citation search, 44 articles were analyzed. RESULTS: Navigation using iUS is safe, effective, and economical. iUS registration accuracy and success are within clinically acceptable limits for image-guided navigation. Pedicle screw instrumentation with iUS is precise, with a favorable safety profile. Anatomic landmarks are reliably identified with iUS, and surgeons are overwhelmingly successful in neural or vascular tissue identification with iUS modalities, including standard B mode, Doppler, and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography. iUS use in traumatic reduction of fractures properly identifies anatomic structures, intervertebral disc space, and vasculature. CONCLUSIONS: iUS eliminates radiation, decreases costs, and provides sufficient accuracy and reliability in identification of anatomic and neurovascular structures in various spinal surgery settings.