ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery (OBCS) improves satisfaction in patients who would fare otherwise sub-optimal cosmetic outcome, while brings challenge in tumor-bed identification during adjuvant radiotherapy. The ultra-hypofractionated breast radiotherapy further shortens treatment sessions from moderately hypofractionated regimens. To circumscribe the difficulty in tumor-bed contouring and the additional toxicity from larger boost volumes, we propose to move forward the boost session preoperatively from the adjuvant radiation part. Thus, the present study aims to evaluate the feasibility of a new treatment paradigm of preoperative primary-tumor boost before breast-conserving surgery (BCS) or OBCS followed by adjuvant ultra-hypofractionated whole-breast irradiation (u-WBRT) for patients with early-stage breast cancer. METHODS: There was a phase II study. Patients younger than 55 years old, with a biopsy confirmed mono-centric breast cancer, without lymph node involvement were enrolled. Preoperative primary-tumor boost was given by a single 10 Gy in 1 fraction, and BCS or OBCS was conducted within two weeks afterwards. Adjuvant u-WBRT (26 Gy/5.2 Gy/5 f) was given in 6 weeks postoperatively without any boost, after the full recovery from surgery. Surgical complications and patient-reported outcomes, as assessed via Breast-Q questionnaires, were documented. A propensity score matching approach was employed to identify a control group at a 1:1 ratio for BREAST-Q outcomes comparison. RESULTS: From May 2022 to September 2023, 36 patients were prospectively enrolled. Surgical complications were observed in 7 cases (19.4%), including 3 cases with Clavien-Dindo (CD) grade 1-2 and 4 cases with CD grade 3 complications. All but four patients (11.1%) started the planned u-WBRT within one week after the pre-defined due dates postoperatively (≤49 d). Four patients (11.1%) developed grade 2 radiodermatitis after chemotherapy initiation. Compared to the study group, the control patients reported higher scores in chest physical well-being (P=0.045) and in their attitudes towards arm swelling (P=0.01). No significant difference was detected in the other of domains (Satisfaction with Breasts, Sexual and Psychosocial Well-Being, and Adverse Effects of Radiation). With a median follow-up period of 9.8 months (2.4-18.9 mo), none had any sign of relapse. CONCLUSION: This Phase II clinical trial confirmed the technical and safety feasibility of novel radiation schedule in patients undergoing BCS or OBCS. According to the BREAST-Q questionnaire, patients who underwent novel radiation schedules reported lower satisfaction in chest physical well-being. A randomized controlled trial is necessary to further investigate these findings. Additionally, long-term follow-up is required to assess oncological outcomes.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Although primary thyroid lymphoma (PTL) and anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (ATC) both account for a rare portion of the morbidity of all thyroid malignancies, the therapeutic methods and prognosis for these two diseases are different. The purpose of this study was to investigate the sonographic characteristics of PTL and ATC and to compare the sonographic findings of PTL and ATC. METHODS: The study included 42 patients with histopathologically proven PTL (n=27) and ATC (n=15). The Clinical characteristics and sonographic findings were retrospectively reviewed and compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The mean age of patients with ATC was not significantly different from that in patients with PTL (P=0.601). The female-to-male ratio of patients with ATC was significantly lower than that of patients with PTL (P=0.029). Both PTL and ATC commonly present as a relatively large, solid mass on sonography with compressive symptoms, in which hoarseness was seen more frequently in ATC group (66.7%) than in PTL group (14.8%) (P=0.001). There is no significant difference in thyroid size, nodular size, margin, shape, echo texture, echogenicity, cystic change, vascularity and local invasion on sonography between ATC and PTL groups. Echogenic strands, markedly hypoechoic and enhanced posterior echo were seen more frequently in PTL group (92.6%, 92.6%, and 85.2%, respectively) than those in ATC group (6.7%, 60.0%, and 33.3%, respectively) (P<0.05), and calcification was seen more frequently in ATC group (80.0%) than in PTL group (0%) (P<0.001). Three ultrasound patterns were observed for PTL including diffuse type (25.9%), nodular type (48.2%) and mixed type (25.9%), while all ATC cases presented with nodular type (100.0%). Associated Hashimoto's thyroiditis occurred more frequently in PTL group (59.3%) than in ATC group (20.0%) (P=0.023). CONCLUSIONS: Certain sonographic features as a markedly hypoechogenicity, the presence of an enhanced posterior echo and linear echogenic strands, lack of calcification and associated Hashimoto's thyroiditis were valuable for distinguishing PTL from ATC. In contrast, heterogeneous echogenicity, uncircumscribed margin, irregular shape, and vascular pattern were not specific features for differential diagnosis.